Duchess of Dirt

@carlbernstein @gtconway3d 🇺🇸They lack courage. 🇺🇸History will be unkind. "History will have to record that the greatest tragedy of this period of social transition was not the strident clamor of the bad people, but the appalling silence of the good people." --Martin Luther King, Jr.

@DNetolitzky TY

Multiple Canadian news outlets are reporting that the criminal proceedings against HRM Queen of Canada Romana Didulo were stayed (dropped). So, what does that mean? We don’t know. And we’re unlikely to know unless the Crown volunteers an explanation. Or HRM Didulo sues for wrongful prosecution or such. There are multiple possibilities. But first there is one I can eliminate with some confidence: the Crown lost interest, or was shuffling this high attention media case into a corner. The reason I say that is a few weeks ago the Crown Prosecutor carrying the Didulo prosecution was switched to Pamela Larmondin. I’ve never dealt with Ms. Larmondin before, but when I searched for cases that reported her activities, what became obvious is she is a veteran, and a “heavy hitter”. Ms. Larmondin is extremely experienced, over 20 years in crown prosecutions, having worked with the federal Public Prosecution Service of Canada, the Ontario Crown, then now Saskatchewan. I located her acting as a lecturer in legal criminal law training sessions on constitutional law and criminal proceedings. She’s a subject expert. Scanning through the matters she's been involved with, there are very large and complex matters in Ontario, serious crimes involving drugs, and most interesting of all, back in the 2000s, Ms. Larmondin was part of the historic Ernst Zundel hate speech/antisemitism proceedings. This is a “higher status” criminal prosecutor, not someone whose been slinking along in the background. You don’t assign someone like that to a jaywalking prosecution. You reserve lawyers like her for serious matters, or instances where evidence and constitutional principles are involved and complex. If you are dismayed to see HRM Didulo going free, I very much doubt that is because the RCMP and/or Saskatchewan Crown “didn’t care”. A lot of resources were committed, and the length of the scheduled preliminary inquiry, nearly a week, tells me the Crown had a lot lined up. This was a substantial effort. Been around the Crown/police side enough to be confident this choice wasn’t easy. Bringing in Ms. Larmondin suggests there was a problem. So that leaves a number of alternatives, alone or in combination. (1) This was a Resource Versus Benefit Call. The Crown’s resources are stretched, and they can only fully prosecute a fraction of the criminal activity that comes before them. This situation is a reality in Canada. Some crimes get prioritized, like violence and sexual offenses. Others don’t, like regulatory offences, economic offences, “victimless crimes”. It’s possible that the Saskatchewan Crown Prosecutors looked at this matter, said HRM Didulo isn’t likely to get more than a slap on the wrist as a sentence. A fact - Canada’s criminal sanctions fall to the low end, and for a first-time offender, HRM Didulo would likely face no more than a kind of house arrest. If that. Against that is a possibly multi-week jury trial “with antics”. Being pragmatic, putting HRM Didulo before a jury of Canadians, and her being self-represented ... well, the odds wouldn’t be good for the Arcturian Queen. But that’s a lot of public resources for a comparatively limited result. Didulo faced a “breach of undertaking” charge, which is minor, and an “intimidation of a justice system participant” charge, which is potentially quite serious. But the latter charge is also a big unknown. So was this a costs versus benefit call? Possibly, but there’s a negative public relations consequence. Staying the charges was reported in almost every major Canadian news outlet in hours. There are multiple documentaries, podcasts, political attention, all directed at HRM Didulo. To be succinct, the Queen is not popular with the public. I’m pretty confident that staying the charges was stewed upon. This was going to be a landmark precedent case in Canada, if it had proceeded. So my very strong suspicion is the choice to end the proceeding wasn’t made casually. There’s a possibility HRM Didulo agreed to some non-court settlement, too. No data on that one way or another at this point. (2) There was an Evidence Problem. Something went wrong with the searches so that one of the many, many and ever expanding “gotcha rights” in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is implicated so that some or much evidence is very likely to be excluded. This happens all the time in Canada. Our rules on searches and evidence are baroque, and getting weirder all the time. We’ll very likely never know what glitch, if any, came into play. Maybe it was the basis for a search warrant. Maybe it was taking a witness statement. Maybe HRM Didulo was not given her rights. Did she demand a “Natural Law” lawyer, and the RCMP said oh we don’t have any of those, could you give us a name? Did something like that possibly deny the Queen her right to legal information and representation? Were there nasty confrontations when the RMCP raided the not-a-school? Did someone say something rude? Was there anti-Arcturian racism? Or someone lost relevant records, or they were deleted? So many possibilities. In Canada, the scales are tilted wildly in favour of the accused when it comes to anything procedural, any right. There's a jab that we don't care about reaching the truth, than the procedural protection and process must be perfect. Eh. Thems the rules. Maybe that’s what happened. Calling in an expert Crown Prosecutor like Ms. Larmondin to do a salvage assessment makes sense. And the conclusion then was there isn’t a viable case, because of something rights or evidence related. The case against HRM Didulo goes poof. (3) Running a Pretend Vigilante Court isn’t Illegal. In Canada, things are illegal when the law says so. Specifically. I got in an interesting discussion with a non-Canadian academic/lawyer about this exact point a few weeks ago. I don’t see anything in the Canadian Criminal Code or common law that says operating a pretend court is illegal. In the US there’s an offense called “simulating legal process” which covers exactly these kind of antics. Canada doesn't have an equivalent. Let me illustrate how stupid this gets. There’s an offence in the Criminal Code called “personating a peace officer” (section 130). Here’s what’s illegal: 130 (1) Everyone commits an offence who (a) falsely represents himself to be a peace officer or a public officer; or (b) not being a peace officer or public officer, uses a badge or article of uniform or equipment in a manner that is likely to cause persons to believe that he is a peace officer or a public officer, as the case may be. Peace officer is defined in the Criminal Code very broadly to include the cops you’d expect, mayors, bailiffs, customs and border officials, fishery officers, even aircraft pilots. What it doesn’t include is people who are pretending to be members of a non-existent police force. So, there are cases in Canada where a fake pseudolaw cop who belongs to the “Territorial Marshalls” (there are no real Territorial Marshalls) was charged with personation, and acquitted. It’s illegal to pretend to be a real cop. It’s not illegal to pretend to be a fake cop. Yes, it’s stupid, and I expect the rules will change the first time some fake vigilante pseudolaw cops in Canada kill someone or something like that. It likely is in contempt of court to claim to be a duplicate of a real court in Canada. I cannot set up shop and call myself the Federal Court of Canada. But to say you are operating a wholly fictitious court, and issuing orders, arrests, sentences? I don’t think it’s illegal. There’s no offence for that. Nothing is written down that says that’s illegal. If that’s what was the basis for HRM Didulo’s intimidation of a justice system participant charges? Then that would be a new legal question. One I find very interesting, obviously. But if someone concluded that there isn't a illegal act here, I’d not argue. And now it gets worse. The section 423.1 intimidation of a justice system participant prohibited activity is: “No person shall, without lawful authority, engage in any conduct with the intent to provoke a state of fear”. Does HRM Didulo have the lawful authority to issue court decisions in a court of make-believe? It might not be illegal. In fact, this is probably protected freedom of expression. In Canada, rights to protest, to yell, publish things, that’s all very broad. Can I write the police to demand they arrest someone? Sure. And how do you differentiate between a politically sympathetic example, versus a pseudolaw one. On a conceptual basis, what’s the difference between a First Nations group claiming to set up a Court of Turtle Island and sanction a public official for “treason to Mother Earth” or whatever. Or is what HRM Didulo has been doing a religious activity? That too is a basis why Canadian government officials have to back off. Is it “intimidation” to excommunicate someone, casting them into the eternal lake of fire? “YAAAAAAAHHH!” (Bonus Jack T. Chick Reference!) No, it’s not. Then there’s the second part of the offence: “with the intent to provoke a state of fear”. Is that what HRM Didulo does? Or is she engaged in political or religious activities? Would it be reasonable to expect someone who receives a decree or order to experience “a state of fear”? I don’t have answers for these questions. In fact, I was very excited to hear a judge comment and explain their analysis and conclusions. What I can tell you is if I were sitting across a table from a Crown Prosecutor whose professional obligation is to only pursue prosecutions they believe can succeed, and that prosecutor says “I’m not sure I’ve got a hook.” I wouldn’t second guess them. They’re the dude on the line. Others like Dr. Sarteschi have commented on the probably effect of this result on HRM Didulo and her actions. They’re way better positioned than I am to make that call. So, I’ll just end with what I so often say when I speak about these people. Nothing much is going to change in Canada until there is a mass casualty scenario with pseudolaw aspects and adherents. And I very much hope I’m incorrect. Here’s some of the related reporting: theglobeandmail.com/canada/article… cbc.ca/news/canada/sa… globalnews.ca/news/11736333/…

@DNetolitzky @DrSarteschi There were two letters

If there has been a misunderstanding? I'd imagine so. Plus, it's kind of embarrassing that the media outlets didn't pick up that there still is a remaining charge - and the more serious one. It's pretty usual that the Crown cuts down a case to the serious stuff. Less evidence and argument you'd need to present. So it's not unexpected that occurred just prior to a preliminary inquiry. Clearing the deck, so to speak.

Dr. Sarteschi published this letter which stays proceedings against HRM Didulo. From my reading of the letter, this does not terminate the more serious Criminal Code s 423.1 Intimidation of Justice System Participant charge. Media reporting on this proceeding may be inaccurate.

@CarolineMa1592 Everyone knows she a grifter, a fraud and a weirdo.

For those of you at the back of the bus or had any doubt 👇 The World will know who the real Commander in Chief is.

@HRMQR @globalnews copyrighted story violating Canadian copyright laws. Copyright infringement Legal Consequences: Paying damages to the copyright owner, paying profits made from the infringing work, and court-ordered injunctions to stop the activity. Criminal penalties are possible

Divina Communitas 15, 0035 [March 17, 2026] | QRTRV World News Daily @ 5:00 P.M. CST x.com/i/broadcasts/1…

@I_AmGinaLee Have the courage to reach out to your kids. They miss you. You can’t find what you’re missing from the cult qween. Have courage to leave.

HRM Queen Romana Didulo The First has empowered The People with truth and wisdom. HRMs Royal Decrees are the tools to live in a World of Peace, Prosperity, and Love. Have the courage to research and discern what it means thekingdomofcanada.cloud We are one and Rise Together!

@HRMQR @CBCNews @CBCNews ☝️

@HRMQR @cbcnews.ca has another report of your use of unauthorized video and story. Do you really need more legal problems? You have so many… ✅ tax evasion ✅ breaking copyright laws ✅ counseling not filing taxes ✅ counseling not paying property taxes, mortgages/rent, utilities.

Divina Communitas 8, 0035 [March 10, 2026] | QRTRV World News Daily @ 5:00 P.M. CST x.com/i/broadcasts/1…

@I_AmGinaLee Gina Didulo is a fraud. She’s awaiting a criminal trial. She begs for money everyday. She lives in 1/3 condo complex. She doesn’t have planes or power. Find your kids. Be with them. Hug them. They miss you. Be a mom, your most important priority. ❤️

HRM Queen Romana Didulo The First issues Royal Decree #0000000501 Humanitarian Operation Only - Immediate Extraction of Canadian and American Nationals/Citizens from Conflict Zones - Middle East x.com/i/broadcasts/1… timestamp 43:04 It's HRM that loves and protects The People

@HRMQR Stealing @CBCNews stories without PERMISSION is infringement of copyright. You’re in enough trouble and have enough bad press Didulo. You’ve been reported to CBC.

Divini Majores 27, 0035 [March 1 , 2026] | QRTRV World News Daily @ 5:00 P.M. CST x.com/i/broadcasts/1…

@I_AmGinaLee Gina You need to find your way back to your kids. They need you more than Didulo.

t.me/HRMQRD2024/3713 Peace has already been achieved. October 9, 2023 "It is with the power of love that we have achieved peace on this star-system also known as planet Earth." -HRM Queen Romana Didulo The First Your thoughts, words & actions manifest your reality. Awaken!

@DNetolitzky How does this parallel to Didulo’s decrees and the counseling of not filing or paying of taxes? Can she be held accountable?

Pseudolaw marks and defines certain individuals. Case in point? Russell Anthony Porisky. Porisky between the late 1990s and 2010 operated Canada’s largest pseudolaw scheme, the Paradigm Education Group. PEG was the culmination of the Detaxer period, where pseudolaw was aimed purely at eliminating income tax obligations (sometimes GST as well.) Naturally, that didn’t work, and the Canada Revenue Agency caught up with taxpayers who said they weren’t “persons” for the purpose of income tax. The PEG promoters were picked off by the Public Prosecution Service of Canada, one by one, for counselling fraud. Russ got 5.5 years incarceration back in 2016. One of the fascinating things about Porisky (at least to me) is he gave up on the concepts. In the late 2000s, he instructed his followers that what he had taught was false, or ... it just wasn’t going to work. But it’s funny how attractive narratives tempt even those who know better. Yes, after Russ was released, the CRA came knocking to collect unpaid tax from Porisky and his spouse. They tried to dodge. That led to an appeal in 2024 where the Tax Court of Canada (Porisky v The King, 2024 TCC 84) concluded the duo owed income tax on $1.4 million and additional GST, plus 50% gross negligence penalties. That’s in addition to around $300K fined in the 2016 prosecutions. Porisky argued that PEG wasn’t really a business, it wasn’t a for-profit endeavor. Justice Wong wasn’t impressed: The appellants offer a convoluted and head-spinning interpretation of the tax legislation that relies on semantics to say that the Income Tax Act and Excise Tax Act do not apply to their situation. Russ appealed, of course, advancing pseudolaw anti-tax games. That resulted in a five-paragraph judgment (Porisky v Canada, 2025 FCA 197). It’s more than a simple “No.”, but not by much. ... The appellants appeal, asserting the Tax Court erred. While they raise many issues, all turn on us accepting Mr. Porisky’s views regarding the interpretation of Stewart—that because they claim they had no subjective intention to earn a profit, the appellants’ activities were not a source of income, but a personal endeavour. ... This Court has consistently rejected those views: Meerman v. Canada, 2019 FCA 119, leave to appeal to SCC refused, 38886 (13 February 2020); De Geest v. Canada, 2022 FCA 22; Shull v. Canada, 2025 FCA 25. Simply put, the appellants have not identified any error of law or palpable and overriding error. Therefore, this appeal has no merit and must be dismissed. But a Detaxer is a Detaxer, and so Russ on January 14, 2026 has taken his challenge to the Supreme Court of Canada. Russell Anthony Porisky, et al. v. His Majesty the King (SCC Docket 42178). The answer will be “No.” But I guess if that’s all you know, all you have ... you keep trying to ram that square PEG into a round hole. (I apologize for that awful pun. No, not really. I am a fiend - I just can’t help it.)

@I_AmGinaLee ❤️ Gina find your way back to your kids. Please

You're watching central casting, that includes DJT...The Real Boss is known, but the movie plays to wake The People. We're in Natural Law following HRM Queen Romana Didulo The First Royal Decrees. The choice to know is yours-have courage! thekingdomofcanada.cloud Rising Together

@DrSarteschi Everyone needs a hobby. 🤪

Sovereign citizen files 66 motions, all denied

@Charmai12430700 @Sandyyo77817708 @DavidXRPLion 🤡🤡🤡🤡

I Am a Sovereign lady living in the continent of Australis. I recognise Her Royal Majesty Queen Romana Didulo 1 The First, Queen of the Kingdom of Canada and Queen of The World, Commander-in-Chief of the United Armies of Earth, Living Crown, Guardian of Earth and Humanity Under Natural Law. The amazing Natural Law Royal Decrees are the laws for Earth2.0 @HRMQR TheKingdomofCanada.cloud t.me/hrmqrdonline t.me/HRMQRD2024 Research for self. The whole world is under soft martial law and Her Royal Majesty is leading around 270 countries on this Herstoric Timeline

WELCOME TO the NEW AMERICA - KINGDOM # 1 @DavidXRPLion

@LisaCam34121646 @QrdTransparency Homie skoole 🤪

@QrdTransparency Home school?

“inasent”

@I_AmGinaLee Your kids miss you. Find your way to them.

t.me/HRMQRD2024/3468 3D systems are collapsing, have you noticed? or are you watching the actors at D@v0s? #CentralCasting Do your research & awaken to the truth thekingdomofcanada.cloud We are in Natural Law following HRM Queen Romana Didulo The First Royal Decrees WWG1WGA!

Happy birthday to the woman who lights up every room she walks into. I love you, Miche.

@RonFilipkowski Shameful. She’s not a leader! She’s an opportunist.

Grinning like a 5-year old getting his participation trophy at the post-season T-ball pizza party.

@DNetolitzky @Nonnie44522641 Passcode is 123456. You’re welcome 😁

@Nonnie44522641 Also possible they just sent an officer to ask if HRM Didulo would share (HA!) before pulling out the heavy artillery. After all, she has nothing to hide, right? Might also be safer to ask first in a search warrant context - because there definitely is a warrant for the phone.

HRM Didulo appeared in Court on January 14. I’ve been providing ongoing commentary from an (ex)lawyer’s perspective. This time the issue was "disclosure" complaints initiated by HRM. In Canada prosecutors and police have an obligation to provide their case to the accused in advance of trial. This is “disclosure”. Unlike movies, surprise is not generally permitted in a criminal prosecution. In fact, if disclosure misses relevant information, that’s a basis to end criminal proceedings against the accused. A literal “get out of jail free” defect. So the Crown and police tend to “over-disclose” to avoid that possibility. Disclosure is sometimes described as “the case against the accused”, but it’s broader. If the police have information about an alternative suspect, that must be disclosed. If police learn something that indicates a gap in their theories, or that supports the accused’s claims, or that there’s “a bad cop” on the team? All that must be disclosed. Didulo at the last hearing made a huge list of disclosure demands. That obviously surprised the Crown. The Wednesday hearing was the Crown’s response to those demands. I predicted we’d get a look at HRM’s plans to argue her case from the disclosure demands. Sure enough, we got that. What Didulo wanted is a mixed bag. She demands bodycam footage from RCMP searches. The judge agreed and ordered that disclosure. That makes sense, and I’m a little surprised that material wasn’t already disclosed to HRM. But more on that later. A sensible defence strategy is to try to establish some defect in the searches that produced the evidence that the Crown will use at trial. (If the prosecution gets to trial.) So, that disclosure request is legitimate. There’s some possibility that search video could provide a basis to make Charter-based challenges. But other aspects of Didulo’s planned defence are just not likely to work. At all. First, is a classic pseudolaw strategy - you demand the Crown provide disclosure of law, and legal things. Didulo demanded disclosure of statutes and “proof of their jurisdiction”. The first request deserved a “fuck off idiot” response. There was a time back in the 2000s and earlier where there were no public sources for up-to-date legislation. Back then it was a sound and even sneaky argument to say “I can’t look up the Income Tax Act in its exact current form. How am I supposed to know the law?” Clever. But now legislation in Canada is available for free, in up-to-date forms from sources like CanLII. So that’s a bullshit strategy. Didulo probably trolled that up from old pseudolaw templates. The second half, the demand for proof of jurisdiction, that tells us that one of Didulo’s defences/arguments is going to be that she is Her Royal Majesty, Arcturian Goddess of Space, Queen of Canada. How dare you filthy peons, you Chinese Communist Agents, you pedo fiends, how dare you intrude on her? The Crown won’t and can’t disclose a basis for jurisdiction - she’ll be looking for a contract, explicit or “invisible”. Don’t have that? No jurisdiction. HRM will probably apply as a preliminary step that she’s released and charges dropped because she is outside Canadian jurisdiction. This is also an ancient and standard pseudolaw scheme. Won’t work. Canadian jurisdiction is established by location. HRM Didulo’s alleged misconduct occurred in Richmound Saskatchewan. Saskatchewan courts have authority. I recently ran across an interesting set of cases that went further, and said you can’t even argue jurisdiction in a Canadian court. The question is “nonjusticiable.” Canadian courts cannot reject Canada exists, or has authority. I’m not sure if that entirely makes sense, but the long and short is this defence strategy won’t go anywhere. Other information the Didulo is seeking in disclosure involves the the lengthy interactions between her cult and the Richmoundians, and probably broader. The obvious objective is HRM wants to establish that there’s hostility, persecution, so that should somehow counter the criminal proceedings. Maybe I did do something illegal, but look at all the bastardly stuff I faced? The problem with this strategic direction is that for the purposes of a criminal proceeding, that’s irrelevant. What matters is whether the Crown can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that: (1) Didulo engaged in the illegal activity, intimidation of a justice system participant. (2) Didulo knew that was illegal, or was willfully blind to that. That’s it. The rest doesn’t matter. That’s irrelevant to the investigation, search, and prosecution. Some people in the media said nasty things? Irrelevant. The Richmoundians were hostile? Irrelevant. Note, none of this is part of the Crown’s case against Didulo. So there’s no basis for disclosure, and it appears the Crown Prosecutor said exactly that. The Crown promised to send Didulo another disclosure package (usually an electronic data source like a harddrive or ramstick these days). This time that delivery would be personally handed off by an RCMP officer. That tells me, indirectly, that Didulo has complained she didn’t get disclosure, like nothing was delivered. Which is highly unlikely, and a weak knee-jerk defence strategy I saw all the time from self-represented litigants. All that does is creates a record that Didulo is not a good faith litigant, by making such highly implausible claims. Now the Crown is going to give her even less leeway. Sloppy. Didulo also proposed that she might need more time to review disclosure. That suggests a delay strategy, that Didulo is hoping to push back her criminal proceedings one way or another. With enough delay that can entirely end a prosecution. In Canada, a trial like Didulo’s must start within 30 months of charges (with some wiggling), otherwise Didulo is presumed to have had her timely trial rights breached, and she “gets out of jail free”. That’s a viable, permitted way to game the system, though HRM has to be careful to avoid causing delay - that doesn't count for the 30 month drop dead deadline. So, the combination of “I didn’t get disclosure!” and “I need time to review that late disclosure!” is probably going to count as Crown delay, not Didulo gaming the system. Though she almost certainly is. The other tidbit I noticed was there’s evidence the RCMP have not managed to access HRM’s cell phone. Now, I can’t really comment on the implications of that, but it’s interesting. I’m not a tech guy, but that does suggest HRM is data security conscious. More evidence she’s more calculating than some have suggested. The next hearing is in a couple weeks to update the judge on the progress of disclosure issues. Realistically, I think Didulo has exhausted her quiver for reasonable requests. More demands will probably lead to unfavourable findings. But in the larger picture there’s little harm to trying. In Canada a criminal accused gets all the advantages and indulgences. The deck is stacked against the Crown in a procedural and proof sense. Here's the media report I used as the basis for this analysis: swiftcurrentonline.com/articles/didul… Nice clear reporting - I appreciate that.

@DNetolitzky Thank you. 🙂