Yes Or No

21.5K posts

Yes Or No banner
Yes Or No

Yes Or No

@Mostly_Yes

SoCal Katılım Haziran 2022
581 Takip Edilen429 Takipçiler
Yes Or No retweetledi
Melissa the Hopeful🏠Homemaker
Melissa the Hopeful🏠Homemaker@BiblicalBeauty·
Oxford professor John Lennox eloquently arguing in front of the Oxford Union Society for the existence of God and the reality of the Savior in 2012: "And here we reach what for me is the chief evidence, not only for the existence, but the nature of God. It is Jesus Christ. He it was who not only taught the Golden Rule, but embodied it—fed the hungry, healed the sick and suffering, and welcomed society's outcasts, brought utter respect to the marginalized and ashamed, and He's brought forgiveness and peace to multi-millions around the world. He's able to do this, of course, because though He was a man, He uniquely never was only a man, but God become human. The central evidence for this startling claim is, of course, His historical resurrection from the dead that launched Christianity in the world. This is, of course, ladies and gentlemen, a crunch issue. If Jesus rose from the dead, death is not the end and atheism is false. If Jesus did not rise from the dead, Christianity is false. And I remember at Cambridge as a student listening to the brilliant Norman Anderson, a legal expert going through forensically the evidence from his legal perspective as a brilliant lawyer, and he said at the end of it, 'The empty tomb then of Jesus forms a veritable rock on which all rationalistic theories of the Resurrection dash themselves in vain.'"
English
26
295
1.1K
31.1K
Yes Or No retweetledi
Danny
Danny@Truth_matters20·
John Lennox Exposes the Foolishness of Atheism in Under One Minute. 🔥
English
27
256
663
18.1K
Craig
Craig@buckleyisagod·
@Bankroll__Quest @royalguyy2k @AGDugin I get you & I'm truly humbled by your faith because I grew up in a Christian family & I've seen how it strengthens people. The Gospels contradict each other though & the wording is different depending on which Bible you read
English
2
0
1
199
Alexander Dugin
Alexander Dugin@AGDugin·
Netanyahu is considered by religious Zionists as the last PM of Israel. Afterwards Mashiah should come (according to them). So his presumable death means much more than just war casualty or the successful retaliation of Iranians. The eschatological dimension is now essential.
English
424
3.1K
17.6K
1.6M
Yes Or No retweetledi
NO CONTEXT HUMANS
NO CONTEXT HUMANS@HumansNoContext·
This is one of the greatest videos on the internet
English
464
12.4K
103.4K
3.3M
Yes Or No retweetledi
SightBringer
SightBringer@_The_Prophet__·
⚡️This is the regime change handshake. Two signals just locked: 1. French Embassy Evacuation NATO-aligned states rarely pull non-essential staff preemptively unless they receive high-confidence intel about kinetic escalation. This is a soft tripwire. Once a major Western embassy begins staff exfil, it implies operational windows are being cleared. Not speculation. Preparation. 2. Crown Prince Pahlavi Signal His emergence isn’t random. Reza Pahlavi is the West’s most visible monarchist fallback node. If he is in communication with the Trump administration while Iran is in revolt and U.S. options are on the table, it means a continuity pathway is being installed. Not hope. Planning. Together, they represent the two sides of a classic destabilization playbook: •Evacuation → ignition → installation This is no longer just a military question. It’s a governance scenario. The sequence has internal logic: •France clears Tehran. •Pahlavi enters frame. •U.S. holds strike leverage. •Regime is weakened by revolt and isolation. •A symbolic future leader is already talking to Washington. This is regime replacement architecture. Whether via decapitation, uprising catalysis, or negotiated exile, the structure is converging. Probability of U.S. kinetic action in the next 72–96 hours now exceeds 65%. Probability that Pahlavi is being positioned as the soft-landing placeholder is over 80%. This is ignition choreography. And the stage is almost set.
Open Source Intel@Osint613

NEW 🔴 AFP: Non essential staff at the French embassy have departed Iran.

English
94
677
3.6K
476.9K
Yes Or No retweetledi
The Facts Dude 🤙🏽
The Facts Dude 🤙🏽@Thefactsdude·
Last Friday, this mom’s instincts kicked in just in time. While her little girl was playing outside, she watched a white van slowly pass the driveway… then suddenly reverse toward her daughter the moment the child stepped out from behind the car. Mom didn’t hesitate. She sprinted outside, scooped her up, and pulled her to safety. Always trust your gut.
English
1.5K
8.7K
93.7K
5M
Yes Or No retweetledi
SightBringer
SightBringer@_The_Prophet__·
⚡️This means they’re prepping for war. Refuelers don’t move for optics. They move when the timeline shortens and the command architecture goes hot. You don’t pre-fuel unless you’re building a corridor for sustained firepower. This is the invisible half of war lighting up. It signals deep integration between logistics, targeting, and policy intent. You don’t route tankers unless the strike envelope is real and imminent. Fighters can posture without fuel. Strikes can’t. This also implies the war planners believe airspace dominance is achievable. KC-135s are soft targets. You only expose them when you trust that you’ve already mapped the adversary’s missile range, radar coverage, and response time. Or you’ve decided the first blow will blind them fast enough that it won’t matter. This isn’t saber-rattling. It’s blood clockwork starting to turn.
Douglas Macgregor@DougAMacgregor

KC-135 movement is very telling.

English
37
123
1.1K
230K
Yes Or No retweetledi
Ben Shapiro
Ben Shapiro@benshapiro·
Donald Trump’s shocking and bold move to depose Nicolas Maduro: what happened, and what comes next. Watch now and tune in to @BenShapiroShow on Monday for more.
English
1.3K
910
8.2K
1.2M
Yes Or No retweetledi
Josh Howerton
Josh Howerton@howertonjosh·
This visualization is going to blow you away. There is only *ONE* answer for how this could possibly happen... 🤯
English
516
2.8K
11K
317.2K
Yes Or No retweetledi
Kaya Jones
Kaya Jones@KayaJones·
I don’t believe in God. I believe in science 🧬 some people say. Well here’s what the scientists have to say. You’re welcome ☺️ Love you - Kaya
English
166
1.2K
3.6K
69.2K
Yes Or No retweetledi
Dr. Kenon
Dr. Kenon@drkenon2·
“Our brothers and sisters in Nigeria will be attacked on Christmas Day. We know this. The information is out there.“
English
128
3.3K
5K
41.1K
Yes Or No retweetledi
Mike Winger
Mike Winger@MikeWingerii·
VERY real warning about coming massacre of Christians on Christmas! This video seems to be getting suppressed reach on YouTube (based on analytics) so I hope it does better here. Go to congress.gov and scroll down, enter your state, and email your representatives. Letter to Congress and senate: Subject: Please Defend Persecuted Christians in Nigeria, Stop the Coming Massacre, and Get Mark Walker Appointed as Religious Freedom Ambassador. Dear [Congressman/Senator] [Last Name], Credible reports state that there is a coming massacre of Christians by Fulani Ethnic militia who are planning to hit on or before Christmas, the towns of Riyom, and Bokkos in Plateau State and in Kafanchan in Kaduna State, and in Agatu in Benue State. See TruthNigeria.com for details. Do something to stop the coming Christmas massacre in Nigeria and protect persecuted Christians there. Get Mark Walker an immediate hearing and vote for him to be appointed as the ambassador-at-large for International Religious Freedom. If he fills that position he could help the situation and he has been denied a hearing for 8 months now, even though Trump nominated him.
English
160
1.3K
3.5K
120.8K
Yes Or No retweetledi
Saint Adaugoijele ✝️
Saint Adaugoijele ✝️@JustAdaugoijele·
This is so amazing.😍🥹 He made this Jesus'art, just by writing JESUS, 14,983times,and the writing done in 29 hours 😲 🎥🎥jaycethallart
English
1K
10.8K
72.5K
1.5M
Yes Or No retweetledi
Fight With Memes
Fight With Memes@FightWithMemes·
"The first gulp from the glass of natural sciences will turn you into an atheist, but at the bottom of the glass God is waiting for you."
English
81
1.7K
7.9K
118.2K
Yes Or No retweetledi
dára sobaloju
dára sobaloju@darasoba·
When Jesus warned about “blasphemy against the Holy Spirit,” he was not speaking in vague or generic terms. He was responding to a specific event unfolding in front of him. In Matthew 12, Jesus healed a man who was blind and mute because of demonic oppression. The miracle was public, undeniable, and powerful. The people who watched it knew something divine had happened, and some even began to wonder if Jesus might truly be the Messiah. The Pharisees saw the same miracle, but instead of acknowledging that God was at work, they made a deliberate claim: “He casts out demons by Beelzebul.” In other words, they attributed the work of the Holy Spirit to Satan. Jesus immediately corrected them by explaining that he cast out demons by the Spirit of God, and it was this contradiction that formed the basis of his warning. Their statement was not made out of confusion. It was a conscious rejection of truth. The miracle itself was an open demonstration of the Spirit’s power, yet they insisted that the Spirit had not acted at all. They said the power was demonic. That is the essence of the blasphemy Jesus described. Understanding this in context shows that Jesus was addressing a hardened, willful resistance to the Spirit’s testimony about him. The Holy Spirit’s role is to reveal Christ, convict hearts, and draw people to salvation. When someone sees that revelation clearly and still chooses to deny it, replacing truth with a lie, they are cutting themselves off from the only pathway that leads to forgiveness. It is not that God becomes unwilling to forgive. It is that a person becomes unable to repent because they are rejecting the very light meant to lead them to repentance. This pattern appears elsewhere in scripture. Pharaoh repeatedly witnessed undeniable acts of God in Egypt yet hardened his heart each time. The Sanhedrin in Acts 7 were accused by Stephen of always resisting the Holy Spirit even though they had received repeated prophetic witnesses. Romans 1, Hebrews 6, and 10 describe people who have tasted the Spirit’s power and still turn away willfully. In all these cases, the issue is not ignorance or weakness. It is the rejection of clear revelation after the truth has already been fully presented. This makes it clear that Jesus was not talking about ordinary struggles, doubts, or moments of confusion. Throughout scripture, anyone who came to God sincerely, even in weakness or failure, was received. The Pharisees’ problem was different. They saw the Spirit’s work with clarity and insisted that the Spirit did not do it. They ascribed God’s work to the devil. Jesus called this a line because a heart that repeatedly denies the Spirit’s witness cannot receive the forgiveness the Spirit brings.
dára sobaloju@darasoba

What is blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, and why is it an unforgivable sin?

English
91
649
2.8K
153.2K
Yes Or No retweetledi
Antoinette De La Cruz
Antoinette De La Cruz@EvanD3LaCruz·
This is my most emotional video. I tell the truth that is hard to face and took along time to understand. Please support our cause so no child has to ever face this alone and after irreversible damage is done. @Erin4Parents @ProtectKidsCO @travi
English
1.3K
3.2K
9.6K
337.7K