J Hill
25 posts



Jeffrey Kessler, Brendan Sorsby’s attorney, has also sent a letter to the Big 12. Comes in the wake of Texas AG letter. "A boycott of Texas Tech or of Mr. Sorsby would be a per se violation of antitrust laws and expose the Big 12 and each of its boycotting members to substantial liability. There is no defense to a per se unlawful boycott of this type, and Mr. Sorsby will hold the Big 12 and its members fully accountable for their actions." on3.com/news/big-12-th…

BREAKING: Noted attorney Jeffrey Kessler has sent a letter on behalf of Brendan Sorsby to the Big 12, warning of potential litigation if Texas Tech or Sorsby is sanctioned by the Big 12. "What does it say about the Big 12 if it decides to lawlessly violate a court order?"

Strong words here from Kessler: "What does it say about the Big 12 if it decides to lawlessly violate a court order? What message does it send to its students if its response to a lawful court order is to be contemptuous of its terms? One would expect something more honorable"

Brett Yormark statement after meeting with his executive committee of presidents. Important here: the presidents feel similar to the ADs, who were clear in a meeting earlier this week that Sorsby should not play. Full presidents board meets Monday

@DanIsett Tech agreed to the conference bylaws that allow the majority to sanction them. AG doesn’t even have a case.



Cody Campbell and Texas Tech desperately want a seat at the big boys table. They are doing everything possible this week to get permanently banished. nytimes.com/athletic/73495…


The Texas Attorney General sent a formal letter to the Big 12 today alerting the conference that Texas Tech would take action against any league sanction.

The Texas Attorney General sent a formal letter to the Big 12 today alerting the conference that Texas Tech would take action against any league sanction.



Name one league or conference making money off of gambling. You can’t. Because none are.


#TexasTech Trashed By Critics As Brendan Sorsby Move Changes Odds for Red Raiders by @FishSports roundtable.io/sports/ncaa/te…


Texas Tech AD Kirby Hocutt releases a statement re: Brendan Sorsby lawsuit. "Texas Tech is not a party to Brendan's lawsuit. We did not file it. We did not fund it." on3.com/news/texas-tec…

I understand why people are uncomfortable with the Brendan Sorsby situation. Betting on sports as a college athlete is serious. Betting connected to your own team creates an obvious integrity concern. Nobody has to minimize that. But there is another side to this that college football people should at least be honest enough to acknowledge. When a player becomes part of your program, he becomes part of your football family. That does not mean you excuse everything. It does not mean accountability disappears. It means you do not abandon him the second the situation becomes difficult, public, or uncomfortable. There is a difference between defending the person and defending the mistake. Texas Tech is in an impossible spot. Deep down, they may have hoped the final ruling would remove the decision from their hands. Exhaust every option, support the player, let the process play out, and if he is ruled ineligible, accept it. That is the cleanest outcome for a program trying to balance loyalty, discipline, public pressure, and competitive integrity. But now the court has ruled that he is legally allowed to play. That changes the structure of the decision. If Texas Tech turns its back on him now, what message does that send to every player and family they recruit? That we will fight for you until the pressure gets too loud? That we will call you family when you are producing, but distance ourselves when standing beside you becomes inconvenient? If I were recruiting against Texas Tech and they abandoned him after he was legally cleared to play, I would use that every time. Not because the mistake does not matter, but because trust matters. Families want to know what happens when their son is injured, struggling, accused, embarrassed, or sitting in the middle of a situation nobody wants attached to the program. Accountability and loyalty are not opposites. You can believe justice should be served. You can believe the integrity of the game matters. You can believe gambling violations deserve real consequence. You can also believe that a program should stand by its people through the full process, not just through the easy parts. That is the hard part of family. You do not only fight for your people when the optics are clean. You fight for them through the good and the bad, while still demanding accountability, treatment, discipline, and truth. Texas Tech may not like the position it is in. Most programs would not. But once he is legally allowed to play and remains part of the Red Raider family, abandoning him strictly because of social pressure would send its own message. And that message may be harder to overcome than the controversy itself.



Whenever someone’s argument is “well I’m not as bad as so & so,” all it tells me is YOU KNOW IT’S BAD The true issue is the ripple effects of the ruling & integrity of the game than Sorsby himself. Also… oh yes… people famously had no issues with Penn State……. 🫠




@On3 @PeteNakos I wonder if this has anything to do with Paxton's involvement....

Under Texas law, courts defer to the internal affairs and rules of private associations and will not substitute the court’s judgment for the association's decision (such as membership revocation, rule-making, or expulsion) unless the association failed to follow its own bylaws or acted in bad faith. So how does Texas Tech get around that? ⬇️



Joey McGuire commented on Brendan Sorsby for the first time Wednesday afternoon while speaking at a Touchdown Club of Houston luncheon.