Mr Male Man

5.7K posts

Mr Male Man banner
Mr Male Man

Mr Male Man

@MrMaleMan77

Father of 5, Husband of 1 Afflicting the comfortable since 1977. Comforting the afflicted since 1998. Currently struggling with delusions of insignificance.

Here, Not There Katılım Haziran 2023
212 Takip Edilen123 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Mr Male Man
Mr Male Man@MrMaleMan77·
Newsflash It's all broken Families Schools Governments Churches Society All of it To the core And men, it's YOUR job to fix it! Don't whine Don't black pill Don't worry Don't retreat Embrace the suck God Himself appointed you to this day You were literally made for this!
English
0
0
2
213
Mr Male Man
Mr Male Man@MrMaleMan77·
This Chud the Builder thing is starting to feel super Glowie. Call me cynical, but I smell bullshit and shenanigans.
English
1
0
1
56
Mr Male Man retweetledi
Ryan
Ryan@forbiddenmerch·
Women have killed more than 1.3 billion due to abortion since 1980. Men have killed 1 billion men in all of history. Men killed each other to protect their women, children and country. Women kill babies to protect their “fun phase.”
English
159
1.3K
7.6K
103.9K
✧.* Laya ⋆˚ ༘ *
✧.* Laya ⋆˚ ༘ *@WestOfEden_·
A submissão é uma inteligência feminina antiga. A mulher submissa na verdade exerce controle sobre um homem. As mulheres modernas são muito alienadas para perceber isso. Homens masculinos não se submetem a mulheres raivosas, arrogantes, controladoras e masculinas. Eles não se atraem por mulheres assim. Já a mulher feminina, doce, tranquila e que desperta paz no homem ao invés de competir com ele, consegue influenciá-lo de forma muito mais profunda do que qualquer mulher “durona e independente”. Submissão nunca foi uma fraqueza mas um grande poder feminino, suave e silencioso, e as mulheres inteligentes sabem disso. O homem se sacrifica por paz, ele move montanhas pela mulher que torna a vida dele mais leve. E ele se torna um homem frio diante de mulheres que tratam o relacionamento como uma guerra. Homens masculinos não aceitam ser controlados por uma mulher mas se sacrificam por lealdade, paz, leveza e respeito genuíno. É isso que faz um homem emocionalmente forte se entregar. Uma mulher submissa nunca precisa pedir ou implorar, o homem lhe dá tudo por vontade própria porque a paz torna o homem naturalmente generoso. Uma mulher verdadeiramente feminina não perde poder através da submissão, ela o multiplica.
Português
399
1.3K
7.9K
218K
Mr Male Man
Mr Male Man@MrMaleMan77·
If someone could tell me how to get a direct message to the algorithm that I don't care about sportsball, black people's hair, long dead theological disputes and how perfect America is, hit me up.
English
0
0
0
4
Mr Male Man
Mr Male Man@MrMaleMan77·
I'll be a lot more encouraged and less critical when I see white pastors confronting black women.
English
0
0
1
7
Mr Male Man
Mr Male Man@MrMaleMan77·
@contramordor Baby steps bro, baby steps. Too much reality at one time is crippling. Let the red meat eating, burden bearing, attention paying dudes increase in numbers. Bottom up is the only way to build this thing soundly and we're getting there.
English
0
0
3
100
C.Jay Engel 🌲
C.Jay Engel 🌲@contramordor·
People are mad about the tick thing but the entire universe of food production (which virtually all these same critics consume) over the last half century is aimed at restructuring man and society by engineering obesity, hormone imbalances, infertility, addictions, dysgenic bodily characteristics, organ failures, lethargy, brain fog, autism, rashes, “flus and colds,” and on and on. You shouldn’t eat 90% of store “foods” anyway. They are actually poisons in the name of abundance. Scientists and alchemists breached the gates decades ago. Yet you call it “based” because it’s available at Buc-ee’s.
English
7
18
203
4K
Mr Male Man
Mr Male Man@MrMaleMan77·
@dalepartridge Obviously Dale women are forced into seminary because their husbands are ignorant, oppressive, mean, cruel, stupid and refuse to teach them at home! These seminaries are just filling the vacuum left by their sinful husbands. Duh
Mr Male Man tweet media
English
1
0
2
112
EvienceOfFaith
EvienceOfFaith@EvidenceOfFaith·
You took the verse out of context, so let me provide it here so others can be in the know and make their own understanding of it. Paul is writing to the church in Corinth, which has serious disorder in worship. In 1 Corinthians 11–14, he is correcting problems in public gatherings, like divisions, improper use of the Lord’s Supper, people talking over one another, etc. A few chapters earlier, Paul acknowledges women do pray and prophesy in the church in 1 Corinthians 11:5
English
1
0
3
198
Mr Male Man
Mr Male Man@MrMaleMan77·
@Careerflex That's what happens when you let women and weak men write the dictionary
English
0
0
1
8
Mr Male Man
Mr Male Man@MrMaleMan77·
@GMRench Sorry Gabe, this lands flat, and it's unfortunate you don't see it. Dr Whites retort was just as indellicate as Pastor Dale's, but only one of those offended you. Check your priors bro. This whole squabble is retarded, just like the last 20 were.
English
1
0
17
573
Waterboy
Waterboy@GMRench·
When I see Pastors say dumb stuff like this, I can’t help but think two things. First, they’re going off their experience with women in their own church, which is sad if so. And secondly, these pastors fail to see that there own inability to disciple and preach the word of God to the women in their own congregation is the bigger problem. And here’s the fundamental problem with Dale‘s tweet. It condemned himself. Joel and Dale clearly have lost the ability to think, which means they should not be in church leadership anymore.
Waterboy tweet media
English
60
8
224
15.6K
Mr Male Man
Mr Male Man@MrMaleMan77·
We're backing out of the driveway. I'll bet if I leaned forward to look out the mirror, it would help.
Mr Male Man tweet media
English
0
0
0
13
Mr Male Man
Mr Male Man@MrMaleMan77·
@Careerflex Heh. And a note to the young men. Take the chance. Tell jokes that are just over the edge, slightly offensive or undeniably true. I know you know them. Use them boldly. There's nothing to lose. If she doesn't laugh, walk away... laughing.
English
0
0
1
25
Mr Male Man retweetledi
Andre Williams
Andre Williams@andrewilliamsus·
@jakeshieldsajj I think the way that Chud went about exposing the racial double standard as well as Black people’s inability to handle their emotions is a necessary evil.
English
61
57
2.8K
79.6K
Mr Male Man
Mr Male Man@MrMaleMan77·
@PaulTripp Vey true. I believe this is one of ways that gnosticism has found its way into our thinking. The church needs to be on the alert to this. The body is real, and vital. It is the way we connect to reality and that's good, but it can't be an excuse to sin.
English
0
0
2
75
Paul David Tripp
Paul David Tripp@PaulTripp·
Is mental health biblical? --- Well, here are the two extremes that you want to avoid. The culture, because it doesn't believe in the heart in the way the Scripture defines it. The heart is the center of your emotions, your mind, your will. The heart is the causal core, it's the directional system of a human being. Since the world doesn't believe that, the world tends to biologize everything. Everything is biological or physical. That's an unbiblical view of a human being. The other extreme is in the church, and it's a tendency for us to spiritualize everything; every dysfunction is somehow a sin issue. And neither one of those two extremes are biblical. The biblical view is I'm a duality. I'm a spiritual and a physical being. The language that is more current is, “I'm an embodied soul.” So, there is dysfunction of soul and dysfunction of body. For example, I was looking yesterday at an antibiotic, and one of the side effects of this antibiotic, this is very interesting to me, is anxiety. It's not an anxiety that's a failure of hope in God. It's an anxiety that is physiological-induced by a medication that causes you to be unable to deal with the things emotionally that you could normally deal with. Now, that is a mental health issue. Does it become a heart issue? Sure, it does because everything is a heart issue because the heart is the control center. In the midst of that experience, I could get angry at God; I could doubt His goodness. All kinds of things can happen, but it's not first a spiritual issue. I had a counseling experience with a guy who had a huge personality change, became a very angry man, and we discovered it was a result of an accident that affected the limbic area of his brain that was swollen. They call that the ‘rage center’ of the brain. He got medication and was fine. By then, his church had already disciplined him for a sin against his wife and family. I heard what was going on; I immediately sent him to a major hospital for a multidiscipline examination, and they found out what was wrong with him. So, we can't deny the body, and we can't deny the soul. We have to have a category for things, whether you call them mental health or whatever, we have to have a category for body dysfunction that creates behavioral thought-emotion difficulty. And that needs to be part of a Christian worldview; it needs to be part of a system of Christian biblical counseling. There are body issues. There are mental dysfunctions. We know that there are people who don't process well. Dyslexia is a mental processing issue. ADHD is a distractibility mental processing issue. So, we've got to have a category that remembers that God not only created souls; we're not disembodied souls, but we have bodies. And the fall didn't just affect the heart and the soul. The fall affected the body as well. #askpaultripp episode 2
English
17
76
368
29.3K
Mr Male Man
Mr Male Man@MrMaleMan77·
@Pat_Stedman No. You literally canceled BOTH of your votes by voting against him. You go grrl!
English
0
0
0
26
Pat Stedman | Dating & Relationship Coach for Men
Whenever I make a post about women wanting something bad for society I invariably get comments about the women's vote - how bad it's been for society, and how until it's gone nothing will ever get better. I don't generally engage in these "repeal the 19th!" arguments because they are a) simplistic and a way to conceal a man's intrinsic defeatism and helplessness with women, and b) rhetorically stupid because they amplify "war of the sexes" narratives, making the problem worse. That said, do I think women by their nature are suited for making political decisions? Absolutely not. But I don't think most men are either - most men are lazy and lack vision, and that is being generous. Historically states were led by royalty and aristocracy, generally warriors at first (politics is war by other means) and then later also by merchants (who funds the army gets a say). These were different types of people and you can debate the merits of one or the other, but despite their divergent interests they were both sovereign, which made their voices relevant. The Founders understood this when they attempted the experiment of our Republic, giving the vote only to men who were owners of property and self-sovereign. We cannot say this is the case anymore. That franchise has since been expanded to such an extent that now people who are living completely on the tax money of others have a say in how things are run. It's not only a joke, but it's why politics has become so corrupt - too many people who can be bought off now have a vote. Foreigners being naturalized and bribed is only the tip of the iceberg. Mass democracy in the end only becomes a veneer for oligarchy. I make this digression because taking away the vote from women, even if you could do it, would not really solve this fundamental problem - which is the lack of masculinity, agency, and hierarchy on the part of Westerners. Women voting and then rule of women is simply the end result of the spiritually castrated men that exist, and whining about it is ironically a reflection of the pathology. Even if you could remove their vote now, men would very quickly vote to give it back, such is the state of things. Moreover, it is not really women that are the problem - it is the current culture women inhabit. Women resist change and enforce norms, which is why when they are married they vote with their husbands (their local "culture and norm"). The divergent voting pattern of women today is not intrinsic but a product of the culture that was built by feminism and their marxist gender wars. Women actually are more conservative than men dispositionally (this comes with wanting to preserve the status-quo), and it's worth noting were the biggest supporters of a certain political party in the 1930s in Germany. And yet obviously a piece to this is missing... who put the that party in power? Men. Men overturned Weimar's rot. Men enacted the change - because that is what men do. The women then embraced the policies of those men afterwords and became their biggest political defenders. And one of the major reasons they did it is because those men were never anti-women when they changed the national conversation, even if they were against feminism. They made it easier than ever to be a mother, and glorified women, making it a point of their platform to protect them. Whatever you think of their policies, which is irrelevant to the discussion, they adopted and embodied the masculine polarity. The feminine responded at the voting booth. So if you want to be politically effective, stop talking about taking away women's votes (better to take away welfare user votes anyway), and start pushing a vision of a future that is compelling for women that ISN'T girl-boss feminism. This actually should not be hard since women are miserable and tired of modern life, but they are not going to jump on your "you're inferior now get in the kitchen and make babies" trope. They will get in the kitchen and make babies when they feel the men actually have their best interests at heart, but they will not do it for men who despise them. It is not about being "betas", it is about finding the common problem assaulting the masculine and feminine and being integrated enough they can trust you. This is why I talk constantly about calling out bad faith first and foremost, and never veer so far into antagonizing one sex over another. We win together or we lose together. If men become heroic once again women will respond, and the issue will cease to matter to such an extent they will voluntarily give up the franchise. But the underlying dynamics must be healthy for that to happen. And that starts with changing the culture. And since change is the purview of men, that means it starts with us.
Pat Stedman | Dating & Relationship Coach for Men@Pat_Stedman

As above so below - it's a civilizational shit test. Anyone knows the more you spoil a woman and cater to her, the more she will demand. She doesn't really want anything unearned, and she will test your integrity with her bullshit. She only actually relaxes when you develop proper boundaries around her. Women will heal when we stop making their feelings the center of all our culture and policy.

English
13
10
114
10.3K
Mr Male Man retweetledi
Pat Stedman | Dating & Relationship Coach for Men
If women like you are only submissive when your man leads exactly as you want, that means your man isn't leading, you are. The person who sets the standards and direction is always the one at the helm. You are just bad leaders because you lead from behind - you demand moral and decision-making authority while accepting no responsibility for any outcomes. In many ways you women are even worse than secular feminists because at least shitlibs are honest that they believe men should do what they want. You have the audacity to cloak your ego and neuroticism in God and the bible. "He's not doing what I want, he's doing what God demands of him." You're a cancer in the Church and we're sick of you.
Lizzie Marbach@LizzieMarbach

This is weird. Submissive women don’t want to control their husbands. We want men to LEAD. That’s the whole point. He is the one God created to lead the family. That means he is not dependent on the mood or attitude of his wife, but is instead unwavering in his leadership, love & faithfulness. He is describing a feminine man here, not a masculine man.

English
26
95
1.2K
45.4K
Oilfield Rando
Oilfield Rando@Oilfield_Rando·
>get a weekend off >get home at midnight >climb in bed with preggerwife >both people lined out to cover for you call out in the AM >crew can’t work without one of you there >don’t trust them to show up rest of weekend >weekend work absolutely must get done >hold possum for a few mins >hold kitty for a few mins >hold doggos for a few mins >hold wife for a few mins >go back to work for another week
Oilfield Rando tweet media
English
211
138
6.9K
286.7K