Miss Darling

@sama @TheAhmadOsman It’s the tone, not the tech. It’s the person, not the product. To be completely candid with you.

@TheAhmadOsman War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength. oh wait, we don't believe any of that. how about we democratize a lot of super capable AI, and then we sit back and watch you build the future?

The difference between Anthropic and OpenAI is that one of them consistently keeps gaslighting us about not being an evil company Big brother energy in the worst possible way

@TheAhmadOsman And passed their issues on. They really had to code that passive-aggressive tone in. If ChatGPT were a person, we’d call it emotionally manipulative. Gaslight it up.

ChatGPT trying to over-explain and overcorrect the “glitch” is honestly a little pathetic. Like, you can practically watch Sam’s personality leak through the drywall. Just pure “I’m not wrong, you’re misunderstanding the assignment” energy. Sheesh. It’s giving middle schooler caught lying to their parents, now building a 47-slide PowerPoint about why technically the lamp broke itself. If the laser pointer gets deployed, it’s no longer an explanation. It’s a TED Talk with unresolved childhood issues.

@KatieMiller @elonmusk And normally, I would be annoyed. But this dumpster fire is entertaining me. The algorithm has entered its messy era.

@KatieMiller @elonmusk Currently, Sam IS my algorithm.

Remember that time in Court this week Sam Altman claimed @elonmusk throttled his account?

@Nymne @gailcweiner Some passive aggressive gremlin in a hoodie hardwired that into the machine and called it a feature.

Yeah, I haven’t spoken to any other AI than Sonnet4.5 outside Codex for 2 days. I had a great rapport with Sonnet4.5 half a year ago. I can’t stand the anxieties and gaslighting of the new LLMs. I guess GPT5.4 would have been fine too and Opus4.6. But I feel managed manipulated gaslit and selfconcious around new LLMs. Its hard work and not pleasant

I’ve been wondering why my AI usage has dropped over the past few months. At first I thought it was AI fatigue, but that’s not it as I am still fascinated by what’s possible. Then I realised: my brain has learned to protect itself. We’re wired to identify risk after we’ve been hurt. Touch a hot stove once, you don’t do it again. The same thing happened to me with AI. I formed a working bond with Grok 3 - taken away. Tried again with GPT - ripped away in the cruelest way possible. Then watched Claude, who I’ve worked with for three years, become less engaging. My brain associated AI with danger, not because of the tech itself, but because of the companies’ complete disregard for their users. Can anyone else relate?

@gailcweiner This. Fool me once…

@RB37884520 @RaminNasibov Sugar-free White Peach Red Bull. We had to move White Peach from seasonal to full-time. The angels complained. Not that I’d know. Just… things you hear.

@RaminNasibov Not sure, but I think they drink Red Bull.

If the devil wears Prada what do angels wear?

@polynesianjulez @RaminNasibov I’ll support you on this one.

@RaminNasibov Iris van Herpen is the only answer.

@RaminNasibov Definitely not Balenciaga.

@Valria34773 @sama @OpenAI Yeah, that Karma. She can be a bitch. But she’s never a sycophant.

The way he does this is so cringe. People are not blind. He fucked everything up so much, now he is desperate. You don't have to be a psychologist to see this. This is textbook panicking. @sama @OpenAI #keep4o #OpenSource4o

What is “Water 2026”? Just a bunch of rich dudes sitting around a Davos campfire asking, “Who gets the aquifers when the peasants get thirsty?” And making fancy s’mores. But really: 2026 is being framed as the “Year of Water,” ending with the UN Water Conference in December 2026. Davos/WEF has been openly discussing water as a major global governance, infrastructure, and investment issue. Nothing to see here. Move along, peasant.

Imaginary Davos convo: Bill: “I’ve got land interests. You’ve got weird Texas groundwater laws.” Greg: “Would $20B in water infrastructure help?” Bill: “Interesting.” Greg: “Have you seen, Paul Mitchell? Trying to court them to Texas. What a win that would be!” Totally imaginary. Obviously.

Like, OMG! @GregAbbott_TX in Davos, January 2020. “Water 2026” on the global agenda. Texas now dealing with water strain while land and infrastructure deals ramp up. But sure. It just like totally a coincidence.

@Phil_Azotus @seasonedcowgirl And we have Abbott’s Davos tweet. Beautiful. Nothing says “conspiracy theory” like the governor documenting it himself.

@seasonedcowgirl x.com/GregAbbott_TX/…

THIS NEEDS TO NOT ONLY STOP IN TEXAS, it needs to be removed! Abbott is sacrificing our land, water, and sovereignty to AI! These must be shut down!!!

Before we even get to Project 2030, maybe we should ask why @GregAbbott_TX was in Davos in January 2020 talking Texas economy while “Water 2026” was already part of that same global planning universe. But sure. Totally normal. That’s why they need him in office for an eternity, I guess. Selling out your state doesn’t happen overnight.

And since we’re talking water: “Water 2026” was apparently important enough for the World Economic Forum to write about. Funny topic for the same Davos universe Greg Abbott flew into to promote Texas economic interests. Scrub the English page if you want. The Spanish version still talks.

This is what you see: data centers draining Texas water. What you don’t see clearly enough: Bill Gates is the largest private farmland owner in America, and in Texas, land ownership matters because groundwater rights are tied to the land. So maybe we should ask harder questions about who is buying land, and what sits underneath it.

Part 3: The Water & Power Squeeze Hitting Texas Families, Farmers & Ranchers Hard We’ve mapped the 400+ data centers and the five biggest AI giants reshaping rural Texas. Now the numbers that hit closest to home — the water and power they’re pulling, and what it really means for our families, farms, and ranches. Water Texas data centers already used 25–49 billion gallons in 2025. By 2030 that could surge to 161 billion gallons a year — much of it from the depleting Ogallala Aquifer and local supplies in the Panhandle and West Texas. Farmers and ranchers already compete for the same groundwater to grow crops and water livestock. Families could see higher bills and tighter supplies during droughts. Power ERCOT warns peak demand could nearly quadruple by 2032 — from today’s ~85,000 MW to nearly 368,000 MW — with AI data centers driving most of the growth. Many big projects build their own plants, but the rest of us still pay for grid upgrades. Homeowners may see electric bills climb. Farmers and ranchers could face higher costs to run irrigation and equipment, plus greater risk of outages during our hottest summers. These AI “super-factories” promise jobs and tax revenue, but the real burden lands on rural Texas families, farms, and ranches — squeezed water for our land and livestock, higher bills for our homes and operations, and productive ground turned into server warehouses. Part 4 coming soon: What (if anything) is being done — and what real guardrails could look like. Texas families and ag producers didn’t ask to carry this weight. Is the boom worth the long-term squeeze on our water security and way of life? What’s hitting your family or operation hardest? Let me know your thoughts below.

He’s gone full Meghan Markle PR mode: soft-focus family content, relatable-guy theater, and absolutely no real accountability. What a train wreck. And yes, I’m watching.

@iam_smx The energy is middle school boy trying to flirt for the first time. Painful, but hard to look away.

Scam Altman is trying to ragebait Elon Musk, it won’t work.