MuPay

People ask why did MuPay choose $XNO? 👀 Because MuPay is built on a simple idea: online payments should be usage-based, privacy-conscious, and controlled by the user. Most payment rails break that model. MuPay lets users define who can charge them, what they can charge for, how much, and for how long. That only works if the payment rail can handle small, frequent internet payments without adding fees, delays, or checkout friction. That’s why MuPay uses $XNO ⚡️ The result? Better UX for users, faster settlement for merchants, and business models that traditional card rails make too expensive or awkward to support.

Subscriptions make people overpay. Checkout adds friction. Prepaid credits lock money in. MuPay is exploring a better model for digital services: • 🔐 non-custodial • ✅ approve a merchant once with clear limits • 🔁 recurring / ongoing payments only within those rules • 💸 funds go directly from user to merchant • 🕵️ better privacy For users: more control, less subscription bloat, more privacy. For merchants: less checkout friction, more flexible pricing, direct settlement. Learn more at mupay.io

NanoStandard is now MuPay 🚀 We just put up the MuPay landing page: 👉 mupay.io The idea is simple, approve a service once, set the rules, then let payments happen inside those boundaries. MuPay is for usage-based payments that stay understandable, bounded, under control, and private 🔒 For merchants, it means less friction, lower fees, and no long waits to get paid. If that sounds like the internet should’ve worked already, you’re not alone. Stay tuned 👀

Hi folks, creator of NanoStandard here. Some of you may have noticed that NanoStandard has been inactive for a while. For the time being the project is being shelved. NanoStandard began with a question I was curious about: How much is Nano actually being used around the world? I was able to answer that partly, but doing it properly required building and maintaining a data pipeline for ingesting and processing Nano network data which turned out to be much harder and more time-consuming than I expected. Moreover, I felt that while interesting, this kind of project does not by itself do much to move Nano forward. So NanoStandard is paused indefinitely. That said, I still believe in Nano, and I still want to contribute to the ecosystem. AI tools have made it possible for me to take on more ambitious projects solo, and I’ll be sharing that new project soon. It starts with one question: If Nano is different, why do its wallets look like every other crypto wallet? More coming soon. Stay tuned.

This is a very good questions. It can be used to further study how good is this analysis. On the other hand, 1.65M over 6.24M accounts is very little Nano lost per account. It's almost certain that little amounts of NANO are slowly being burned for one reason or another. Also >1M NANO has sit untouched for 5+ years. Who are these diamond hands people?

@Nano_Standard It's basically impossible to really know. How much looked like this a year ago that became active since? And each year?

🔥 Ever wondered how much $XNO is actually burned, meaning irrecoverable or lost forever? The only provably burned $XNO is what sits in the canonical burn address (~207M NANO). Everything else is speculation. Let's try anyway. 👇

🧮 Conclusion: Roughly ~1.65M NANO sits in ~6.24M inactive, single-use accounts. 🤔 Thoughts? Is this a reasonable way to approximate burned $XNO? Stay tuned for more! 🔥

This almost certainly overstates the actual burned amount, since long-term $XNO holders often store their assets in untouched cold wallets they still control. On the other hand, how many people would leave their $XNO untouched for 5+ years, through all the market swings? 📉📈

@oops4041555 The complex layering of memes in this tweet is sublime.

I would like to see an intelligent wallet that does transactions for me. At least for the micropayments use-case. A micropayment is not worth the time to take out my cellphone or pop my wallet, view a QR code or copy an address. I just want it to happen. Whatever I want to have access to, it should be seamless a yes/no button and that's it. This boils down to the question, if $XNO is different, why does it wallets look like any other crypto wallet? I've been thinking about a concept for a new wallet, still need to flesh it out more. Unfortunately, I don't have time to implement it at the moment, so will share it so hopefully someone else takes the torch if it turns out to be a worthwhile concept.

Yeah guys no one knows about @Nano. That's our issue. It's not the tech it's the fact that even crypto enthusiasts have not heard about it. The amount of effort we are thinking we have to do is atleast two orders of magnitude lesser than what we NEED to do. We need to talk more about it. More podcasts, more sharing to friends, more guerilla marketing. If anyone has any interesting marketing ideas write it below 👇🏼

🚀 xno.click launches tomorrow at 8 AM GMT! Earn Nano from verified impressions on your shortlinks - cash out instantly, no minimum required. 💸 $XNO

You: sad because $XNO fell Me: happy because I can offset my capital gains tax with $XNO losses We are not the same 💅

🚀 The nanostandard.info site will be offline for a few days. I’m upgrading the stats server to something much faster. No more waiting for the HDD to wake up before answering queries.

@ForestHorsman Not necessarily. In this graph, they're just central nodes. Nodes that connect different swathes of the network.

@Nano_Standard Are the big clusters exchanges? I wonder where in the graph my addresses are, super interesting to explore 😄

Just refined the $NANO network graph based on a snapshot. 🌐 Some communities are completely isolated, others sit right at the core of everything. 🚀 Can’t wait to see what the full dashboard reveals. This is just a glimpse of what’s coming. See high-res version here 👇 drive.google.com/file/d/1eJ8Wte…

@ForestHorsman Exactly! Each node is an account and each edge represents one or more transactions.

@Nano_Standard Wow this looks super cool! Is each dot an account?