NASCAR Shill

2.8K posts

NASCAR Shill banner
NASCAR Shill

NASCAR Shill

@NASCAR_Shill

NASCAR is an American small family business that has succeeded thanks to the great leadership of the France Family. #PrayForJimFrance

Katılım Kasım 2022
156 Takip Edilen500 Takipçiler
Caiden
Caiden@CaidenC64976991·
ranking nascar twitter users on a tier list (reply to be ranked)
English
106
3
77
7.9K
NASCAR Shill
NASCAR Shill@NASCAR_Shill·
@bobpockrass @NASCARONFOX Jim France was a fantastic CEO of this sport, and his legacy will remain for generations. Thank you for all you have done Jim France.
English
0
0
3
224
NASCAR Shill
NASCAR Shill@NASCAR_Shill·
@Jordan_Bianchi Wow, what a change. I for one will be very sad to see the titan of NASCAR, Jim France go. The sport is in good hands with Steve O'Donnell at the helm however.
English
1
0
8
1.3K
Jordan Bianchi
Jordan Bianchi@Jordan_Bianchi·
NEWS: NASCAR CEO and chairman Jim France is relinquishing his role as CEO and being replaced by current NASCAR president Steve O’Donnell, according to multiple industry sources. NASCAR is also promoting Ben Kennedy to COO. nytimes.com/athletic/72260…
English
51
89
431
125.8K
NASCAR Shill
NASCAR Shill@NASCAR_Shill·
@BenKennedy33 I agree with you too Ben Kennedy. This is a fantastic compromise that brings this sport into the future! Thank you for your amazing leadership.
English
0
0
0
205
Ben Kennedy
Ben Kennedy@BenKennedy33·
There were many stakeholders in these conversations, all with different preferences. The same is true across our fans. Some favored a 36-race champ, while others asked for little to no change. Many specifically mentioned the Chase. I believe the format is a good compromise.
ElitePrecision29@lmm2996

That's....very concerning. Tells how out of touch majority of the NASCAR industry is. What is so hard to having your ear to the ground....? They claim they got all this data to know what fans want yet a retired NASCAR driver in his 60s is more in tuned with the fans. Lord help us

English
77
4
198
31.5K
Ben Kennedy
Ben Kennedy@BenKennedy33·
Two new positions have been posted to join our Venues & Racing Innovation team where they will begin working directly with me. One will be overseeing facility operations for our national venues, while the other will be focused on driving new business. Links are in the thread.
English
25
13
203
24.7K
NASCAR Shill
NASCAR Shill@NASCAR_Shill·
@jeff_gluck NASCAR's executive leadership is perfect and needs no modifications
English
2
0
10
297
NASCAR Shill
NASCAR Shill@NASCAR_Shill·
@CouchRacerShop Bass Pro Shops needs to tread carefully. They have an incredible opportunity for promotion via NASCAR. Attacking the great Steve Phelps is very dangerous to their business prospects.
English
2
0
4
592
Couch Racer
Couch Racer@CouchRacerShop·
Bass Pro Shops sponsors everything in and around this sport - Teams, drivers, tracks, NASCAR….. Unprecedented times we are seeing and linked in profiles being updated most likely. Wow.
Bob Pockrass@bobpockrass

Bass Pro Shops founder Johnny Morris: “… the commissioner’s recently revealed contempt for Richard Childress makes it abundantly clear that he and his lieutenants are not capable of being fair and objective when it comes to impartially enforcing the rules and regulations…”

English
26
45
1.1K
84.4K
James Derrike
James Derrike@DerrikeG1990·
@CouchRacerShop So everybody following the trial wants to know......why did teams refuse a cost cap?
English
6
0
4
1.2K
NASCAR Shill
NASCAR Shill@NASCAR_Shill·
@JennaFryer The fans stand firm on our stance to back Jim France no matter what
English
0
0
0
151
NASCAR Shill
NASCAR Shill@NASCAR_Shill·
@bobpockrass The teams should cut costs. It's not up to NASCAR to subsidize their reckless spending
English
3
0
5
417
Bob Pockrass
Bob Pockrass@bobpockrass·
The debate in the NASCAR CFO testimony is over where $ could come from to pay more for teams. NASCAR says no way could they pay teams $720M a year. FRM/23XI said they could adjust. Cup teams got combined $431M in 2025.
English
7
12
132
23.5K
Bob Pockrass
Bob Pockrass@bobpockrass·
NASCAR Chief Financial Officer Greg Motto was on stand for 1 hr, 45 min. Mostly talk on 400M in 2021-24 distributions to France family designed to primarily go to taxes - part of contract France family has with NASCAR as S Corporation. Not legal requirement but set up that way.
English
8
19
218
30.9K
NASCAR Shill
NASCAR Shill@NASCAR_Shill·
@MattWeaverRA Absolutely agree with John Probst. If teams want to save money, they should reduce costs.
English
2
0
3
408
Matt Weaver
Matt Weaver@MattWeaverRA·
John Probst's examination and cross-examination preceded the lunch break. Probst says NASCAR's total investment into the NextGen is $14 million. He points out that Cup Series teams have spent $0 on development cost. In response to Bob Jenkins saying 'we have to buy' seven center-sections, Probst says no team has to buy seven but the maximum is seven. His own council showed the jury an exhibit email in which 15 teams holding 30 charters endorsed the NextGen before its development began. Probst: 'I thought that was a pretty compelling endorsement by the team owner council' Probst testifies that NASCAR knows how often teams buy parts from the approved vendors and they ask for that data once or twice a year. They ask for this data because they want to turn around and show teams that buying more parts doesn't correlate to wins. He cited that Penske routinely wins the most races on the fewest re-purchasing of single source supplied parts. 23XI Racing has spent the most over the past two years. The point Probst is making, as NASCAR has made the past week in a half, is that it believes there is a spending problem more than a charter revenue problem. Probst testified that NASCAR does not make money off single source parts. He testified that single sourcing is cheaper than teams choosing from multiple vendors because the (Request for Proposal) process results in the lowest price 'whereas before,' the vendors would compete and a clear cut best part would emerge from competition, and that best part would cost more. Probst opinions on cost increases: 'I think from a car perception, we get accused of rule changes, but over the last four years, we have had minimal changes and competition drives cost... I would say that it is up to the teams to decide if they need their own jets. Our last place team has their own regional jet. If you want to see a race, watch the race out of the airport after the race, and how clogged the airspace gets above the track. If the teams want to own their own regional jets, fancy war rooms and state of the art shops, that is on them." When asked about the $20m to run a car on average, Probst says 'sounds high.' Back to costs, Probst said when he was at Red Bull 'and I'm going to get a reactive fine for this, we would take a Cup car to an ARCA race nine times a year and call it an ARCA car.' He said they would test various parts and pieces and as ARCA and NASCAR changed rules to take some of those parts out of the cars, they'd take them out, and keep other parts still legal and test them in ARCA races too. Probst explained to the jury that while some teams (like Jenkins in his testimony) that they can't repair parts and that costs more money, NASCAR doesn't allow it because 'repair' to teams means 'modify' and 'improve' so they need the parts to be re-purchased to maintain parity. As for the internet NASCAR supplies and charges for, Probst says there are four bandwidth tiers that have different price points and most teams don't even pay for the highest tier internet. He is asked which internet does 23XI subscribe to? The highest. NASCAR does not require teams to subscribe to their internet at all. He says teams used to have satellites on their haulers and when NASCAR started bringing their own internet, teams asked them if they would use it. Teams can still bring their own Starlinks if they want, Probst says. Under cross-examination by Jeffrey Kessler, Probst is told 'you are aware that my clients aren't challenging the NextGen, right' but instead is challenging the non-compete restrictions. Probst says he doesn't understand legalese Kessler asks Probst if he knows of any studies that would support restraining the NextGen car as evidence of pro-competition, and they go back and forth over legalese and needing the question asked in a clearer way Kessler asks about the Gen6* (pronounced Star) which is a version of the old car NASCAR considered using that would make certain components spec instead of building a new car ... the NextGen. Probst wrote in an email that the Gen6* would 'increase the risk to NASCAR of a copycat series' "We don't fear competition," Probst says. Kessler says if that were true, NASCAR wouldn't put exclusivity clauses in the track sanctioning agreements. NASCAR's legal objected but Judge Bell overruled it. Probst answered and said this isn't his department and he doesn't deal with tracks Probst also says protecting company likenesses is common practices. Probst says Coca-Cola wouldn't develop a new drink formula and then immediately let Pepsi copy it. Kessler says 'so when you told the jury NASCAR is okay with competition, you had no basis to say that?' Probst says NASCAR protected itself and its investment in the NextGen. He says no one asked to use the old car in a competing series and no one asked to use the new car in a competing series. "All they have to do is ask," Probst says Kessler says there is no way NASCAR would allow teams to use the NextGen in a non NASCAR series. "We would discuss it," Probst says Probst was asked about Steve Phelps texting that someone needs to put a knife in SRX "I'd assume Steve would answer that question." There was an internal document in which NASCAR executives including OD, Prime, Phelps and Probst were tasked with determining how much it costs to start a Cup team from scratch. Probst said teams mislead or do not answer cost questions accurately or evenly so they wanted to have a better idea of the real answer. Kessler suggests it was an exercise to help Project Gold Codes. Probst says their reasons to do the exercise were altruistic. Kessler asks if Probst wrote the Gold Codes document. He says he contributed. Using the internal cost to field a car document? Probst said he pulled data from the report to project the costs of going 'vertical' in Project Gold Codes. When 13 of 15 teams signed the charter agreement on Sept. 6 2024, Probst texted his chief of staff Tom Swindell. Swindell said 'RIP Project Gold Codes.' Probst said 'YES.' Swindell said this was 'great news' and asked 'what is the leverage for (23XI, FRM) holding out?' Probst said 'I can't see any.' Probst said he and Tom are personal friends and they text about their friends, hobbies, families and work. "No further questions, your honor," Kessler said ending cross-examination.
Matt Weaver@MattWeaverRA

John Probst, senior vice president of innovation and racing development for NASCAR has been on the witness stand for the past hour. This is NASCAR's first witness and it is also the defenses hope to complete their case by Friday evening. Probst gave his history starting at Ford, which led him to competing in CART with Ford, with stops at Red Bull NASCAR and Ganassi before moving to the Sanctioning Body in 2016. Probst gets asked what happened to CART and what happened to revenue in CART, but Jeffrey Kessler objects to each is sustained by Judge Bell and dropped. "We're getting a little bit out in left field," Bell tells the defense Probst was able to give a short summary of the open wheel split "(IRL) started racing at the Indianapolis 500, created their own racing series, started their own teams to fill the grid, worked with the OEMs to start more teams and split the series apart." Probst is then asked about windtunnels, and the Ganassi wind tunnel in the mountain, and it goes on a bit and Kessler objects on relevance. "This is all very interesting and we understand your point but lets move on," said Judge Bell (The point was the spending in racing prior to spec racing in North America) Why did Ganassi get out of NASCAR? "From my understanding, with the interest in owners because of the NextGen, he got an offer he couldn't refuse. I would also add Chip was a big advocate for the NextGen." Probst was asked why the RTA wanted to build a Stock Car in 2016 "If they could build a Stock Car, that would be considered a threat,that would give them leverage to get charters." Probst said there was nothing back then to prevent the RTA from building the car or starting their own series. Probst was asked twice if he felt 11 of the original charter teams shutting down was due to the competitive ecosystem but Kessler objected on Probst's authority and Judge Bell sustained it so the question wasnt answered either way it was asked. Probst said the genesis of what became the NextGen started with meetings when he joined NASCAR, meeting that led to bolt on clips and single source parts The jury was shown the NextGen for the first time -- a graphic of it being constructed piece by piece Probst said NASCAR did market studies that show fans care about the OEM engine and bodies but want the teams to race on the track beyond that The same study also told NASCAR that a race could be compelling in terms of lead changes but not well received if an unpopular driver won but a race with minimal lead changes would be well received if a popular driver like Dale Jr dominated Probst said NASCAR determined that fans cant see the competition in the wind tunnel so if they cant see it, minimize teams ability to compete in those areas to reduce costs

English
14
5
57
34.2K
NASCAR Shill
NASCAR Shill@NASCAR_Shill·
@jeff_gluck Steve Phelps and Jim France did an amazing job today on the stand.
English
5
0
7
1.2K
Bob Pockrass
Bob Pockrass@bobpockrass·
The Hendrick letter to Jim France in 2024 said that the team had lost $20M in the last five years while winning two Cup titles.
English
13
26
375
41.7K
Bob Pockrass
Bob Pockrass@bobpockrass·
Jim France direct examination is over and the cross examination will be tomorrow. He did say that he was not in favor of permanent charters.
English
14
22
329
51.3K
Jeff Gluck
Jeff Gluck@jeff_gluck·
Court is done for the day. I don’t think I’m underselling it to say Jim France’s testimony was shockingly bad so far. Just not good at all for NASCAR IMO.
English
147
129
3.3K
203.2K
NASCAR Shill
NASCAR Shill@NASCAR_Shill·
@bobpockrass Jim France is a benevolent leader who ensures that all his LOYAL subjects are taken care of. That trust is built off the past 75 years of success in NASCAR.
English
1
0
5
575
Bob Pockrass
Bob Pockrass@bobpockrass·
The Phelps testimony ended a tense exchange with Kessler where Kessler asked about teams and Jim France: "They should trust him to be a benevolent dictator?" ... NASCAR attorneys objected and it was sustained. Kessler: "No further questions."
English
8
24
249
29.4K
NASCAR Shill
NASCAR Shill@NASCAR_Shill·
@JennaFryer Jim France and NASCAR absolutely will win. They cannot bow down to these communist unionizers who want to grant more and more power to the incompetent teams who will bankrupt the sport.
English
0
0
1
70
Jenna Fryer
Jenna Fryer@JennaFryer·
Evidence was also introduced that showed France was determined to thwart the teams from the start of negotiations. Notes from the first strategic session on how to approach teams show O’D wrote “Jim’s overarching comment - we are in a competition. We are going to win.”
English
3
0
13
2.3K
Jenna Fryer
Jenna Fryer@JennaFryer·
Jim France testifies he remains opposed to permanent charters
English
5
7
103
11.9K
NASCAR Shill
NASCAR Shill@NASCAR_Shill·
@bobpockrass NASCAR's new charter agreement solves all these problems. Didn't the teams get a larger percentage of the pie in the new agreement?
English
2
0
2
462
Bob Pockrass
Bob Pockrass@bobpockrass·
Childress said his other businesses are keeping his Cup racing operations alive -- "Iwould be broke if I was just doing the Cup teams." And on those other businesses' profits: "That money should be going into my bank account."
English
9
10
130
20.7K
Bob Pockrass
Bob Pockrass@bobpockrass·
Both Phelps and Childress testimony are complete. Childress got the most animated when being asked about a potential sale of at least part of RCR to Bobby Hillin Jr., a potential deal that has fallen apart. Childress owns 60% of the team and said Chartwell Investments wants out.
English
14
28
444
72K