Natalie Jean Beisner

87.3K posts

Natalie Jean Beisner banner
Natalie Jean Beisner

Natalie Jean Beisner

@NJBeisner

✝️🇺🇸 Jesus is Lord & Savior • Opinions are my own but they should be yours too

Katılım Ağustos 2021
8K Takip Edilen119.4K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Natalie Jean Beisner
Natalie Jean Beisner@NJBeisner·
Woman: “So you don’t think it’s killing a human being?” Dean Withers: “No, I do.” Woman: “And you’re ok with that?” Dean: “Yes.” 🙄 At least he admits it, I guess? So often they won’t admit that they’re perfectly fine with killing innocent humans.
English
322
361
7.8K
3.7M
Natalie Jean Beisner
Natalie Jean Beisner@NJBeisner·
Tucker says it’s “of course” Israel’s fault that Graham Platner’s campaign imploded. But that’s only possible if you ignore nearly everything else about Graham Platner. He ignores that Platner was already a deeply problematic, poorly vetted candidate. He ignores the other controversies surrounding him. And he ignores that similar last-minute allegations have happened to politicians like Eric Swalwell—a pro-Israel Democrat—completely undercutting his “it’s obviously Israel” narrative. This is what disappoints me most about Tucker’s evolution. I genuinely used to see him as someone who followed evidence wherever it led. Now it feels like he starts with the conclusion and filters out every inconvenient fact. That’s not good-faith criticism of Israel. It is confirmation bias masquerading as analysis. Perhaps most upsetting is the certainty. The curiosity that once made Tucker compelling seems to have been replaced by absolute confidence in conclusions reached before the evidence is even considered.
English
13
10
50
1.8K
Pauline Kelly
Pauline Kelly@paulinekelly666·
@NJBeisner So.....I'm not seeing "Candace Candace Candace ALL OVER MY FEED then?!?! You'd think she killed Charlie instead of actually investigating his death. Such obvious psychological warfare its cartoonish. You won't break her....whomever killed Charlie....have their work cut out.
English
1
0
0
47
Natalie Jean Beisner retweetledi
Natalie Jean Beisner
Natalie Jean Beisner@NJBeisner·
This is a woman who claimed Charlie’s murder and the aftermath was a coordinated campaign to psychologically break her—and that she survived only because she’s “psychologically stronger than all of you.” She’s repeatedly crowned herself “Public Enemy #1.” Every stage of her supposed friend’s death and everything that followed has somehow become a story about her. Not the victim. Not the family. Not the truth. Her. There isn’t a shred of humility, grace, or selflessness in this wretched individual.
Cinema Shogun@CinemaShogun

WOW 😮 Candace Owens is now saying that Charlie Kirk might’ve been killed because he refused to kill her‼️ Instead of dialing things back after the preliminary hearing she’s dialing things up with even more outrageous claims than ever. And she’s psychotically referring to herself in the third person while doing so. Her entire fake “investigation” has been all about making Charlie’s death all about herself. She disrespects and smears everyone else grieving his loss including his wife and tries to establish herself as the only one grieving. Now she’s trying to convince her fans that Charlie’s assassination wasn’t even about him. It was all about her. Going so far as to say that Charlie was killed because he wouldn’t help kill her. This is obviously ridiculous for many reasons. But in the eyes of her devoted cultists Candace Owens is the most important figure on earth and they literally believe that she’s dodging assassins daily like John Wick or some sort of action movie star.

English
25
28
170
4.8K
Natalie Jean Beisner
Natalie Jean Beisner@NJBeisner·
If this psychotic theory were even remotely true (it’s not, it’s psychotic and so is she), why wouldn’t Charlie call up Candace and warn her? This creature doesn’t think about anything for even two minutes before she says it. She just word vomits insanity and doesn’t even consider the ramifications of what she’s saying.
English
3
2
27
675
Natalie Jean Beisner
Natalie Jean Beisner@NJBeisner·
@Girlpatriot1974 Candace doesn’t understand that a civil case is different from a criminal case. Figures. She takes EVERYTHING and twists it to be a mark of suspicion. So manipulative and dark.
English
0
0
0
61
Natalie Jean Beisner
Natalie Jean Beisner@NJBeisner·
@robotoverlordz2 It’s not exhausting! You just say “Israel!” all day long and never have to reason or think or explain yourself or contend with facts that don’t confirm your own bias. 🙏🙂
English
0
0
4
46
robotoverlordz
robotoverlordz@robotoverlordz2·
@NJBeisner Groypin' seems so exhausting...how in the world do they have so much energy for this?
English
1
0
4
21
Natalie Jean Beisner retweetledi
Natalie Jean Beisner
Natalie Jean Beisner@NJBeisner·
What bothers me isn’t that Tucker has a theory. It’s that he presents it as if no other explanation could possibly exist. Graham Platner wasn’t just “the anti-Israel candidate.” He was a candidate with a Nazi tattoo, obvious vetting failures, and multiple misconduct allegations. We’ve also seen last-minute allegations derail politicians who are openly pro-Israel and funded by AIPAC, like Eric Swalwell. Leaving all of that out and saying “of course he was attacked for not being pro-Israel” isn’t following the evidence. It’s constructing a narrative from a predetermined conclusion.
English
4
6
31
1.3K
Natalie Jean Beisner retweetledi
0HOUR1
0HOUR1@__0HOUR1_·
July 27th, Candace Owens appears before the judge to ask for a motion to dismiss. If not given, she will go to trial with the Macrons.
English
117
291
4.4K
47.5K
JDub
JDub@jaredbird100·
@NJBeisner When do you think your multiple daily posts about her will start making a difference?
English
2
0
0
70
Natalie Jean Beisner retweetledi
What Does the Planda Say
What Does the Planda Say@SuitedPlanda·
@NJBeisner It grows more and more apparent each day that she hates Jesus and the Scriptures.
English
0
2
6
413
DonnaS
DonnaS@urdonnaU·
@NJBeisner 'A' for Effort; 'F' for EPIC Fail to garner any support or confirmation.
English
1
0
5
1.1K
Natalie Jean Beisner
Natalie Jean Beisner@NJBeisner·
Another Candace lie DEBUNKED! Candace lied once again today and claimed Erika betrayed Charlie by allowing Ben to open AmFest last year even though she knows Charlie hated him. On the right, you’ll see Ben opening AmFest in 2024, while Charlie was still with us. It’s a longer clip because it’s a slower transition between speeches, but Charlie opens the show and welcomes everyone to AmFest, and then Ben Shapiro takes the stage. That’s exactly what happened last year except of course it was Erika doing the opening welcome. You can see clearly on the screen and the video title that this was day one, so again, opening AmFest 2024. So how exactly is it a betrayal of Charlie to do what he himself did the year before? Candace claims the supposed bad blood between Charlie and Ben goes back years, well before 2024, when Charlie was still with us, Ben opened AmFest, and Candace wasn’t even invited.
English
94
181
1.4K
264.2K
Natalie Jean Beisner retweetledi
Vegasjanelle
Vegasjanelle@vegasjanelle·
@NJBeisner I've never in my lifetime, watched someone filled with pure evil and hatred, as CO. She's literally the definition of a PSYCHOPATH.
English
1
2
10
381
Natalie Jean Beisner
Natalie Jean Beisner@NJBeisner·
For ten months, we’ve been told the next “bombshell” would change everything. Instead, the story keeps getting bigger, not clearer. More villains. More shadowy plots. More people accused. More loose threads. Still no coherent theory of what actually happened. That’s the opposite of how real investigations work. Evidence narrows the field. It eliminates possibilities. It forces you to abandon bad theories when the facts don’t support them. Conspiracy content does the opposite. Every failed prediction becomes proof that the conspiracy is even bigger. Every contradiction demands another layer. Every deadend requires a new suspect. At some point, you have to ask whether the goal is finding the truth—or making sure the story never ends.
English
75
68
451
7.1K
Natalie Jean Beisner retweetledi
Viva Frei
Viva Frei@thevivafrei·
Look at the top three comments. Pure ignorance.
Viva Frei tweet media
English
453
32
725
100.8K
Natalie Jean Beisner retweetledi
Andrew Kolvet
Andrew Kolvet@AndrewKolvet·
Let’s clear this up. Charlie personally invited Ben to both AmFest 2024 and AmFest 2025. Charlie reached out to Ben directly on both occasions.
Natalie Jean Beisner@NJBeisner

Another Candace lie DEBUNKED! Candace lied once again today and claimed Erika betrayed Charlie by allowing Ben to open AmFest last year even though she knows Charlie hated him. On the right, you’ll see Ben opening AmFest in 2024, while Charlie was still with us. It’s a longer clip because it’s a slower transition between speeches, but Charlie opens the show and welcomes everyone to AmFest, and then Ben Shapiro takes the stage. That’s exactly what happened last year except of course it was Erika doing the opening welcome. You can see clearly on the screen and the video title that this was day one, so again, opening AmFest 2024. So how exactly is it a betrayal of Charlie to do what he himself did the year before? Candace claims the supposed bad blood between Charlie and Ben goes back years, well before 2024, when Charlie was still with us, Ben opened AmFest, and Candace wasn’t even invited.

English
961
861
6.6K
695.1K
Natalie Jean Beisner
Natalie Jean Beisner@NJBeisner·
The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy; I have come that they may have life, and have it to the full. John 10:10
English
3
6
73
1.9K
Stephen Cline Sr
Stephen Cline Sr@TexasIronCowboy·
@NJBeisner Why on gods green earth would I want to watch Candace. I stopped long ago. But seems people are still giving her a platform spout her anti-christian lunacy.
English
1
0
0
189
Natalie Jean Beisner
Natalie Jean Beisner@NJBeisner·
WATCH Candace intentionally lie to her audience and tell her producer to cut the clip before it debunks the narrative she’s trying to sell. On the left is Candace right before she tells her producer, “I don’t think we need this.” Watch her eyes flicker back and forth for about 10 seconds before as she’s becoming more and more panicked, wondering if she has to say something. Then she tells her producer to cut it. The part she wanted cut (on the right) is the ATF analyst testifying to just how likely it is that this DNA by and large belongs to Tyler Robinson. After the clip is cut, Candace tells her audience that the analyst couldn’t say whether his DNA was found on the trigger or the trigger guard, it that’s not true. She testifies how DNA is found on a number of places on the gun—including the trigger and trigger guard. At no point does she say trigger OR trigger guard. The clip on the right is a lot longer, but it’s necessary for the context. Candace is intentionally not giving her fans the full picture.
English
105
325
1.9K
77.3K

Keşfet

@paulinekelly666 @Girlpatriot1974 @robotoverlordz2 @jaredbird100 @urdonnaU @nicky071l @elonmusk @BarackObama