Sabitlenmiล Tweet
Spucky ๐ฆโฌ๐ฉ
129 posts
Spucky ๐ฆโฌ๐ฉ
@NSpucky
Nobody. โ๐ฉ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐, ๐๐๐'๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐.โ
Northwest American Republic Katฤฑlฤฑm Mart 2026
14 Takip Edilen71 Takipรงiler
such as Bob Mathews and the Randy Weaver family. In conclusion, the Northwest Territorial Imperative and "Death to America" are far more grounded in both history and the material conditions of modernity than "just vote Republican about it" and "Reclaim America" ever were. (16/๐งต)
English
There is much more to cover on the early Pioneer history but recent history should not be neglected either. Independence movements on all sides in the PNW, such as our own Northwest Territorial Imperative, emerged in the 80s, with key figures and widely recognized Martyrs (15/16)
English
Key figures such as John McLoughlin, considered the "Father of Oregon," opposed American annexation and the idea of a Pacific Republic was once even taken so far as a conspiracy by Confederate sympathizers to realize it in the states of California, Oregon and Washington. (14/16)
English
Due primarily to the massive physical barrier of the Rocky Mountains, Joint Occupancy w/ Britain and the US repeatedly ignoring petitions from early Pioneers, many, such as even Thomas Jefferson, envisioned the Pacific Northwest developing as a separate, sovereign nation. (13/16)
English
In other words, they have a hard time conceptualizing and/or committing to the birth of a new nation and simply must have for themselves the rebirth of a nation. So be it. The Northwest fulfills that mental requirement. It lies in the history of Oregon Country. (12/16)
English
criminals. Covington made the point that regardless of whether you believe a shift happened in 1965, 1913 or 1865, the old America is, for all intents and purposes, dead, whether you like it or not. Modern-day Northwest Nationalists hammer home that America has been (10/16)
English
ideologically corrupt since day one and thus not only should we seek to destroy the new America but we must shed our attachment to the old. It would seem to me that the missing piece of this puzzle for many nostalgic, backward thinkers is the sense of historicity. (11/16)
English
So, what of this original "Americanism" that so many seek a return to? This is where the core of most disagreements lie. All sorts of special interests will cite their own specific cutoff point for when America became a mere economic zone and a haven for international (9/16)
English
"one nation indivisible" to truly take hold. The ideology of Americanism made its most major strides with the Civil War and post-1865 reconstruction of the South and it would take until about 1892 when the Pledge of Allegiance debuted and was recited in public schools (7/16)
English
across the continent for it to truly cement itself in the public consciousness (at least of so-called "Heritage Americans"). It can safely be said that for damn near, if not more than, half of American history, we did not consider ourselves a nation. (8/16)
English
When we examine the original thirteen colonies, we see distinct regional cultures, the likes of which form the foundations of nations. So-called "Free and Independent States," forming a voluntary political Union. It would take over a century for the idea of America as (6/16)
English
forged through common Blood and Soil, but rather an imperial identity, imposed upon a loose conglomerate of latent nations, locking them in a state of arrested development and preventing true ethnogenesis. It is the identity of an empire that fundamentally seeks to (4/16)
English
deracinate and enslave the world under the banner of neoliberalism. Now, many get caught up on the "neo" prefix and miss the forest for the trees on what American identity or "Americanism" truly is at heart. So, let's start looking all the way back to 1776. (5/16)
English
as is a surprisingly common retort. The reality is, ironically, that the idea of America as a singular nation is in and of itself the very kind of half-baked, ideological fabrication the Imperative is so often mischaracterized as. It is not an organic identity, (3/16)
English
All such notions are patently false. Do not mistake us being forward thinking in our praxis, and thus most often rhetoric, for a lack of historical knowledge. Just because we seek to cast off the identity of "American" does not mean we outright "hate our ancestors," (2/16)
English
๐งตTHREAD - The Historicity of "Death to America" From a Northwest Nationalist Perspective
I've gotten the impression from a handful of interactions that many seem to disregard the idea of a "Northwest Nation" as merely a half-baked, ideological fabrication. (1/16)
English
@southronsol @PNWFredista I did answer. Very explicitly. You just have subpar reading comprehension. The idea of America as a "nation" was artificially imposed upon us. There are no real "nations" in America because the natural development of each region was permanently arrested by the imperial identity.
English
@NSpucky @PNWFredista Still donโt want to answer? Ok.
Do you know what CSA stood for? They were an American people lol. Just like you and Fredista are btw
English
If there is an American Nation it needs to be destroyed for the sake of world humanity and our Race, the degree to which that American Nation accepts nonwhites is irelevant to a great extent
ฯentinel@sentinl_grave
Putting aside that this is being said in defense of associating George Washington with Hezbollah, this is the same tired โthe Puritans were WOKEโ argument Rabbi Moldbug makes. Ig itโd be asking too much for โNaz(Judeo)bowlingโ to commit to a Biological-material view of History.
English
@southronsol @PNWFredista Read the last word of my reply... It's almost absurd that you're struggling this hard when your username has the word "southron" in it lmao, your ancestors literally fought a war over the concept.
English
@NSpucky @PNWFredista Again, was it a proper nation when it was smaller?
English
@southronsol @PNWFredista It really is a basic concept. The borders of actual distinct nations tend to never grow past a certain size. I'd think the "these" over "the" digression would've made that last part clearer but also no.
English
@NSpucky @PNWFredista The โbasic conceptโ that America is too big to have formed a proper nation? Okay, was it a proper nation when it was smaller?
English