Nalis Solus

@seethroughit2 This is more of a general discussion of self sacrificing heroes, incentives for such people 2 rise & the game theory/math & evolutionary psychology behind it. The flip can happen very suddenly as the dynamic depends on the perception people have of other people & their priorities

@seethroughit2 from doing so, as I pointed out it's self-reinforcing and u can bootstrap public opinion by already creating the illusion of what is public opinion. In a perceived selfish& cowardly social environment, most choose 2 be that as well...it's game theory. We need a hero+crowd support

What the fuck happened us as men? If you see a problem, you fight against it, not quit and cry victim about it If Israel is a problem let's rally the troops and do something about it This Christian martrdom syndrome has to stop, getting people to feel bad for you is not power

@TansuYegen Now imagine if it held the broken sharp dishes in its robot hands and "danced" around moving & waving its hands around and slicing people up...

A robot in China just smashed some dishes started dancing instead of working 😂

@Apolitical3678 It's self reinforcing in both directions meaning: Cowardice+selfishness begets Cowardice+Selfishness. Courage+Selflessness begets Courage+Selflessness. The crowd creates the incentives & peoples perception of the crowd influence their decision & behavior➡️positive feedback loops

@Apolitical3678 Kin must get behind him= willing to stick their neck out & support. People will pick up that they r surrounded by selfish cowards. The system will punish men who fight back in isolation, which reduces the number of men willing to do it...It's self reinforcing in both directions.

Any political figure acting from a sense of morality rather than corrupt self-service and blackmail is an existential threat to the jewish controlled system

"dont you know that nothing actually matters because planets are big?"

@PeterA671 @piscesgutt

@piscesgutt Never !!! We are Christian countries. Not fake "Judea Christians" .

How many years remain before our nordic flags must be altered, to get rid of those awful Christian crosses?

@Ehrenkrieg2 @CJBbooks lol, I watched that...he's basically insulting his audience...the video wasn't even insightful, never proved anything...I have a high tolerance for egomania & eccentricity if there's genuine insights & original thoughts. He seems to be very resentful. Davos Seaworth look-alike.

Christopher Jon Bjerknes @CJBbooks informs us that he is part of a higher evolved species that is "vastly more intelligent" than anyone else, and has magical psychic powers which allows him to see into the future.

@more_amalek The Origin of The Species(1859) & Descent of Man, were game changers. Then later improving our understanding further with the discovery of DNA and the genes-eye view of evolution. Before that very intelligent men such as Isaac Newton(1643–1727) could believe in creation myths.

This is another example of why e-Crusader ideology disgusts me. These idiots actually think you can turn the clock back to the 1600s or 1000s. That is a total fairytale. We cannot turn back time. We have to look forward to the future, not obsess over whatever imaginary era when “true Christianity” was supposedly practiced. Those times belonged to the people who lived in them. We have moved on. Those versions of Christianity are never coming back because they existed inside a political and social framework that no longer exists and never will again. For example, the people who idolize medieval Catholicism do not seem to understand that restoring a church like that would also require restoring the entire political order that supported it. That means feudalism, aristocratic power, and the economic structure that went with it. It is not just impossible. It would not even be a good strategy. Anyone shaping the vision for our people's future needs to be forward thinking, not trying to revive their favorite lost cause from centuries ago. People like Joel should not be anywhere near shaping that future because they are obsessed with resurrecting a past that cannot return rather than building the next stage of our civilization.

In this clip, the Free Press debate “Do We Need God?” with Steven Pinker vs Ross Douthat turns into two universalist liberals trying to out-liberal each other while a young man who is clearly some sort of e-Crusader tries to pin the blame for communism on a lack of religiosity. The two universalists then start arguing about whether Hitler was motivated by Christianity or not, both trying to blame the other's worldview. Then the Christian Ross Douthat explains how, according to his theology and that of his “elder brothers in faith, the Jews,” history works. God supposedly allows societies to drift away from faith, collapse into chaos, and then eventually pulls them back in again. This is exactly why the universalist atheist critique of Abrahamic religion fails and why the Christian universal worldview is totally unequipped to deal with the problems of this age. The atheist critique often ends up adopting the same universal framework as the Christians it argues against and never actually gets to the heart of the problem. Meanwhile the Christian view remains trapped in the belief that endless cycles of decay and restoration are simply part of Yahweh’s divine plan. This is exactly the kind of Abrahamic superstition serious people should stop tolerating. Reading modern politics and history through ancient theological stories about divine punishment and restoration keeps people trapped in religious narratives that have distorted political thinking for centuries.

@seethroughit2 Well put! From local organic bottom-up communities, where people solved problems & had their needs met or provided others needs, locally...still-driven by self-interest, but forced to cooperate. Now everything is being vacuumed up into a top-down, centralized, global system.

I'm so sick of people blaming lack of Christianity for the problems of modernity The problem is that survival in the old days was fundamentally a collective, communal endeavor, not an individual pursuit of accumulating fiat currency from distant, impersonal (now international) employers People's lives were tied to the land, seasons, kin, and neighbors in ways that made cooperation not just beneficial, but essential for the group's continued existence. Survival wasn't about earning "money" from outsiders; it was about contributing to the tribe's shared pool of effort and knowledge, with the group as the ultimate safety net. Exclusion or non-cooperation could mean death for the individual, as the tribe's strength lay in unity Contrast this with the modern fiat-driven economy where survival hinges on earning currency from often multinational corporations or global markets that view workers as interchangeable, expendable inputs These entities prioritize shareholder value, efficiency, and profit extraction over the well-being of any particular nation, community, or family Your personal effort now only translates into fiat dollars, which you then use to "subscribe" to necessities (rent, food, utilities) controlled by distant entities. The nation-state may provide some safety nets (welfare, infrastructure), but these are bureaucratic and conditional, not the organic, face-to-face mutual support of one another. This shift erodes the communal fabric: people become atomized competitors in a labor market, moving for jobs and working long hours away from home. Relationships turn more transactional and the sense of collective national or communal purpose weakens when economic power lies with faceless global capital rather than shared local effort. Pre-modern survival was nation-as-people working together- a tribe, village, or peasantry pooling strength against nature, scarcity, or enemies Modern survival is now an individual subscription to a global system where fiat earnings let you "subscribe" to life essentials - rent/mortgage payments, groceries, utilities, transportation, healthcare, internet - but you never fully own the means of survival in the way pre-modern people did with land, tools, or communal resources Your access is also revocable: Lose your job (or the fiat flow stops), and the subscriptions get canceled or downgraded - eviction notices, utility shutoffs, skipped medical care This creates a perpetual renter's existence: you're always paying to participate, never building unencumbered sovereignty over your environment or future The system thrives on your perpetual participation, not your independence. True freedom (owning productive assets outright, building community resilience, escaping the life subscription trap) fades away. The shift from "working together as a nation for survival" to "subscribing individually to a devaluing system" marks a profound loss of sovereignty. Pre-modern life demanded cooperation but offered embedded security and purpose; the fiat model promises convenience but delivers atomization and perpetual erosion of control The deeper bonds of reciprocal dependence are replaced by isolation, anxiety, and dependence on indifferent and often international companies that hate you

It has NEVER been more clear that America, Britain and all the other White Western countries should never have fought Germany and Japan in WWII, they should have joined them.

Brace yourselves, Europe. The Jews will bless you with a new flow of Migrants from the Middle East