Nathan
309 posts
@NathanCDev
Building the largest structured UAP dataset.
@MickWest, I am publicly challenging you to do what you repeatedly avoid doing: present the data. You claim there is no video of the Wiggins incident, no corroborating data, and that the objects are “probably military planes.” Fine. Then prove it here. Post a complete technical analysis of the USS Jackson / Corbell / WEAPONIZED video in direct reply to this post: frame by frame, timestamps, coordinates, platform data, sensor source, range, bearing, azimuth/elevation, object count, track continuity, thermal behavior, aircraft identification, flight-track correlation, chain of custody, assumptions, uncertainties, and all relevant statements from Wiggins, Corbell/WEAPONIZED, and the congressional record. If the clip is unrelated to Wiggins’ incident, show the metadata separation. If the objects are planes, identify the planes. If there is no corroborating data, explain why the Star SAFIRE EO/IR footage, radar context, CIC observation, crew recording, time/location/platform readouts, and witness statements do not count as part of the evidentiary record. I am restricting replies so only you can answer. No distractions. No crowd noise. No semantics. Just data. If you answer technically, great. If you cannot, then your position is not analysis. It is speculation protected by reputation. Any missing element from the requested technical analysis must be explicitly justified, technically grounded, and reproducible. No more “probably,” “possibly,” “maybe,” or “it looks like.” If you cannot provide a timestamp, coordinate, platform datum, sensor source, range, bearing, aircraft ID, track correlation, thermal explanation, or chain-of-custody basis, then say so clearly and explain how that missing data limits your conclusion. Do not hide behind rhetorical tricks like “what exactly is the lie?” The question is not whether you can dodge the wording. The question is whether your claim survives a full technical reconstruction. If you want the title of analyst, earn it with data. Otherwise this is not analysis — it is speculation with confidence. @JeremyCorbell #ufotwitter #ufo
Introducing Composer 2.5, our most powerful model yet. It's more intelligent, better at sustained work on long-running tasks, and more reliable at following complex instructions. For the next week, we’re doubling the included usage of the model.
4 alien species were pulled from crashed UFOs, former government researcher claims.
