nkl

T A C O USA, are you guys ok?!

Death has Chuck Norris`d After a sudden medical emergency, death has Chuck Norris´d RIP

@Terror_Alarm there is a full intel platform available and has Iran in focus! synnq.io/intelligence

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 Not yet confirmed, but some people are working on a virtual situation room (with live views of Tehran) that the entire world can join to follow the U.S.-Iran conflict - hopefully by the weekend.

@samuelrdt @capacityso This is the easy part! The hard part is the forecasting or conditional forecasting.... @SYNNQ_Networks

Claude Opus 4.6 works so well. I asked for for a Palantir alternative to view conflicts around the world using Claude Opus 4.6 on @capacityso Took 15 minutes and 3 prompts.

@sarahraviani No, we call it profit maximization... This has nothing to do with diplomacy...

So let me get this straight. Tens of thousands of Iranians are murdered and that’s what gets the regime back to the table? Why do we keep engaging them on a moral level? The “Supreme Leader” sees himself as a spokesperson of God. He doesn’t negotiate. He sends disposable mullahs in suits to stall, lie, and buy time while innocent people are slaughtered. And we still call this “diplomacy.” 🤯

Mongol Empire British Empire Russian Empire Qing Dynasty All bigger... If you take only the Achaemenid Empire - yes at their time... If you look at the Parthian, Sassanian - Rome, Ottoman, and Umayyad have been bigger So yes, but absolutely irrelevant what happened 2500 years ago.

never forget that the persian empire was the biggest in the world

@BrennpunktUA That’s what I said weeks ago! That’s was very much predictable

Persians 🇮🇷 now learn what Ukrainians 🇺🇦 already know for month.

@ZoroastersChild The enemy of Iranians is Iranians, with a delusion fed to them by their parents over decades!

I am Iranian. You are not. Our enemy is NOT the same. The enemy of Iranian people, Iranian history, Iranian heritage, Iranian life, Iranian nation are ARABS

@arsalannaamdar Does Belgium go through a transition and you guys are short on politicians? 🤣

Sign the petition to recognise Reza Pahlavi as the transitional leader of the Lion and the Sun revolution. c.org/cd847MzSTh

@arsalannaamdar @Erfanmusic As long you guys spew hate against Islam no Islamic country, Organisation, sympathizer will help you with your cause. Inclusion is much more powerful than excluding the majority of the people in the region.

This will only make Iranians stronger, harder, and colder in their approach. We must acknowledge that there are plenty of people who genuinely wish for the Islamic Republic to kill every last one of us, so they can continue financing Palestine and other proxies for a war they believe serves their interests. We may have allies in Israel and the US, but that will only be proven when the moment comes and they act accordingly. Until then, we have only one another. We must operate on that assumption and set our mindset accordingly.

We thought our fight was on one front: the murderous Islamic Republic. Instead, we’re now fighting on two. Alongside the regime, we’re facing constant attacks from a loud segment of so‑called ‘pro‑Palestinian’ activists, physically at our protests and relentlessly online, who function as the Islamic Republic’s arms outside Iran. Either you’re brainwashed, or you’re choosing ignorance over the reality of what this regime is and what the Iranian people demand. We’re counting the days until victory, until these monsters are driven out of our country. And when that day comes, soon, the Iranian people will remember where everyone stood. #IranMassacre

@AmirAminiMD Every single one who read Khomainis book wanted that including your nana… The revolution did not happen in a vacuum!

1979 wasn’t a coup-It was a revolution. Nobody wanted this outcome. But the fact that the Mullahs hijacked the revolution doesn’t change the fact that the Iranian people overwhelmingly rejected the Idea of a Pahlavi Monarchy. You don’t fix a mistake by returning to the problem.

@sharghzadeh 👆👆👆

It will be a tragic comedy if Trump, once heralded by Iranian Americans as the last hope to dislodge the mullas, is the one who makes a deal and prolongs their lifespan by a few more decades, and then continues to deport Iranians.

@AmirAminiMD Hahahaahha... I feel you brother!

My life until 2026: I’m Iranian but I hate the Iranian regime. My life since 2026: I’m Iranian but I hate the Iranian regime and the Iranian diaspora.

Sorry was traveling... I just ask you one thing... If he wants to be a uniter and is the right person for the job: Why couldn't he unite the opposition groups outside of Iran and keep this coalition in place? In my businesses, I give people 1 chance to prove to me that what they say they can do, they really are capable of doing. Based on my own standards, I am against giving someone more chances (btw. this would be his 47th chance) atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/iransour…

The decision does belong to the people of Iran. But the reality is that, in today’s climate, they cannot build a coalition or a structured plan around it from inside Iran. The IPP is said to have been drafted with support from elements within Iran. They cannot name who, for obvious reasons. But those names were intended to be revealed post regime collapse.

For those who haven’t read the IPP and want clarity on how the transition is designed to work, what Reza Pahlavi’s role is within it, and where that role ends: IPP Transition Timeline (post Islamic Republic) Immediately after collapse: Transitional system formed Temporary leadership (RP) + Council + Transitional Government + Judiciary Within 4 months: National referendum on the system of government (democratic monarchy vs democratic republic) referendum on the fate of regime leadership Within 2 months after referendum: Elected Constituent Assembly (not appointed) Next 6–12 months: Constitution drafted Within 1 month of draft completion: Constitutional referendum If rejected: Draft revised and resubmitted If rejected twice → Constituent Assembly dissolved → new elected Assembly formed Within 2 months after approval: Parliamentary elections (Mahestan) If a republic is chosen: Presidential election held at the same time Elected institutions take office → transitional government dissolves → transitional bodies end → transitional leadership roles end If a monarchy is chosen: Constitutional monarchy installed → coronation under the new constitution → constitutional government formed → transitional government dissolves → transitional bodies end On the importance of the immediate phase: The primary danger after regime collapse is not “too much authority,” but a power vacuum. Vacuums do not produce democracy. They produce fragmentation, factional competition, and internal conflict. Iran’s political space is already deeply fragmented. In a collapse scenario, dozens of self-declared leaders and factions would try to fill the vacuum. This would create instability. Democratic transitions require order first, legitimacy second. Stabilisation is the prerequisite for elections, not the enemy of them. The sequencing model: stabilization → referendums → elections → constitutional order. Not permanent rule. Not minority control. Not power consolidation. fund.nufdiran.org/wp-content/upl… youtube.com/watch?v=Q3h8jK…

@no_itsmyturn They found the missing Epstein files…

👀 Something happened near the Strait of Hormuz that both the US 🇺🇸 Navy and Iran 🇮🇷 were interested in

@andfogle Wild theories: - We are watching you... Protests might erupt again. If you kill, we will intervene - Attack us - we get you where you hide. - Israel will attack you - if you dare to retaliate... FAFO

That logic only works with foreign force backing it. Germany, Japan, Iraq, Afghanistan, unelected authority held because overwhelming external military power enforced order. Iran won’t have that. No occupation. No external referee. No force everyone accepts. And the other examples don’t help your case: • Iran 1979 (Khomeini): one faction seized power and crushed rivals, not a neutral transition. • Syria: armed factions + “interim” authorities led to fragmentation and authoritarian consolidation. • Kosovo: worked only because of UN administration backed by NATO troops (I was there) • Ukraine: No regime collapse. State institutions remained intact; interim leadership operated under the existing constitution and was replaced through early elections. (I was there) So if you start with an unelected authority that already represents one side of the monarchy/republic divide, you don’t get neutral stabilization, you get immediate contestation. And one more thing: I don’t need to propose an alternative model. I’m a citizen of another country, voting where I live, like most of the diaspora. We won’t be the ones living with the consequences because the majority will stay where they are, and once in a while, go for vacation. This decision belongs to the people inside Iran. Our role is to support them, not to project our preferences or symbols first. We’re not the ones getting shot. Let’s focus on Iran and the people who deserve to be remembered, not on a petty king.

The referendum after 4 months does not elect 'leaders, parliament, or a government.' It only determines the form of the state (constitutional monarchy or republic), so the Constituent Assembly knows which constitutional model it is drafting toward. People already know where they stand on monarchy vs republic. You do, I do, 90% of Iranians do. There is no structural reason to prolong it. On the “unelected leader” argument: every post-collapse transition begins with non-elected authority. There is no such thing as an elected government the day after regime collapse. The real question is not whether authority exists, but whether it is time-bound, procedurally limited, and structurally transferred. The IPP is explicitly built around forced transfer mechanisms: referendums, elections, and constitutional sequencing. On power vacuum: the alternative is not “neutral interim authority.” The alternative is fragmentation: armed networks, factions, external proxies, militias, self-declared councils, and competing “representatives.” “Stabilization” is not automatic. It requires central command over borders, prisons, security, infrastructure, and broadcasting. Without that, no referendum, no election, and no assembly has legitimacy or credibility. As for the Constituent Assembly, it is not appointed. It is elected. The constitution is not imposed. It is drafted, voted on, and can be rejected — twice — with reset mechanisms built in. It is a sequencing model: stability → framework choice → elected assembly → constitution → referendum → elections → dissolution of transitional power Critique the design if you want. That is 100% your right. But framing it as “crowning someone first and voting later” is simply not what the structure does. If you believe there is a better transition model, put it forward. Share the structure, the sequencing, the safeguards, and the power-transfer mechanisms. You’re a smart guy, so give it a shot. Not in an X comment, but as an actual plan people can evaluate. Because without a viable alternative that addresses power vacuum, fragmentation, security, legitimacy, and institutional transfer, critique alone doesn’t build a future framework, it just leaves a void.

If you insult everyone who disagrees, smear entire groups, and push rigid narratives, don’t be surprised when people distance themselves. In a world that has shifted left, even just not following the loudest slogans is treated as heresy. That doesn’t make your cause stronger — it isolates it. Look at Ukraine: humility, focus on victims, and moral clarity earned broad empathy. Endless infighting, personality cults, and echo chambers do the opposite. If the goal is to make the tragedy in Iran visible, then talk about Iran — the people, the crimes, the evidence — not internal power struggles or cheering each other on in closed circles.

After watching the world ignore, mock, and laugh at the atrocities in Iran, while our people are being slaughtered and we are doing everything possible to make the truth visible, I support Israel a million times more than before. It is the same crowd that denied October 7. Now they're denying what Iranians have seen with their own eyes and documented on video. Pro-Palestine crowd is pure evil. Their cause is sick. They want all of us dead.

@andfogle Hahahahahahaha