RCKT GRL 🏳️‍⚧️🇵🇸🇺🇦 (antifa era)

Time to update this and give some people whiplash lmao, also visit nele.pet for more info

@AlFletcher23384 @daniellismore Then why are you forcing men to go there?

The UK Is Now a “Country of Concern” for Trans People. That Should Alarm Everyone. Something extraordinary has happened, and it has barely been absorbed by the public. The United Kingdom has been formally criticised by the Council of Europe for an “appalling rise in transphobia and toxic anti-trans discourse” and placed alongside countries such as Poland, Hungary, Turkey and Russia as a country of concern for LGBTQIA+ people. This is not the assessment of activists on social media. It is the conclusion of Europe’s leading human rights body. The Council of Europe’s resolution, debated and adopted in January, did not emerge from nowhere. It followed years of escalating hostile rhetoric in UK politics, media and public life, particularly aimed at trans people. British delegates attempted to dilute the findings during the debate and failed. The rebuke stood. Adam Long of the National LGBT Federation described the situation plainly. The rise in anti-trans discourse in the UK is no longer marginal. It is visible, sustained and harmful. The Council’s decision reflects a recognition that this rhetoric is producing real-world consequences. Ireland’s Transgender Equality Network chair, Sara Phillips, was equally clear. The narratives being pushed do not merely debate policy. They deny the existence of trans people, undermine their rights and dehumanise them. These campaigns do not stop at trans communities. They bleed into attacks on wider LGBTQIA+ equality, reproductive rights and the rights of women and children. This is how human rights erosion works. It never announces itself as oppression. It frames itself as “common sense”, “concern” or “balance”. But the outcomes are measurable. Increased hate speech. Increased harassment. Increased violence. Increased fear. That is why the Lemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention issued a red-flag alert for the UK in relation to anti-trans and anti-intersex rights. A red flag is not an accusation of genocide. It is an early warning system. It identifies patterns that historically precede mass rights violations: scapegoating, dehumanisation, moral panic, institutional hostility and the narrowing of legal protections. The Lemkin Institute’s analysis highlights how trans people in the UK are increasingly framed as threats rather than citizens. Language matters. When pronouns are stripped in reporting, when identity is treated as ideology, when existence is debated rather than protected, the groundwork for exclusion is laid. What makes this particularly disturbing is the comparison the Council of Europe itself draws. Poland’s so-called “LGBT-free zones”. Hungary’s ban on LGBTQ+ representation to minors. Turkey’s systematic rollbacks of queer rights. These are not fringe regimes. They are cautionary examples of how quickly a democracy can slide when minorities are treated as disposable. The UK now appears in that conversation. This is not about silencing disagreement. It is about recognising when disagreement turns into organised hostility backed by institutions. Human rights law exists precisely to protect minorities when they become politically inconvenient. The Council of Europe was explicit. States have a duty to counter misleading narratives, increase public understanding and actively promote equality. Neutrality in the face of dehumanisation is not neutrality. It is complicity. What happens next matters. Countries can change course. They can correct. They can choose dignity over panic. But pretending this condemnation does not exist will not make it go away. When international human rights bodies raise alarms, history shows it is wise to listen early rather than explain later. Shame on @UKLabour @Keir_Starmer @wesstreeting — Sources Council of Europe Resolution on rising anti-trans hostility GCN reporting on the UK as a “country of concern” gcn.ie/uk-council-eur… Lemkin Institute Red Flag Alert on anti-trans and intersex rights in the UK lemkininstitute.com/red-flag-alert…

@EliteDangerous Meanwhile me:

📰 Conflict continues across the 49-system enclave surrounding HIP 87621, with military forces from all major powers showing no signs of a ceasefire after two weeks of heavy fighting. 🔗 fron.dev/ef6b

@maxescu One more reason to pirate

The streaming wars are officially over. Netflix just won. While purists cry, AI Filmmakers are entering their GOLDEN AGE. We're talking VFX and production speeds 10x faster than traditional studios. As Sarandos said, "AI won't take your job, the person using it will". Infinite, data-driven content tailored perfectly to the audience. That red monster in the pic? That’s the Future eating the Past. Adapt or get left behind.

@MAGAVoice Rest in Piss looser

If Charlie Kirk had an impact on your life in any way, drop a “❤️” down below. We love you Charlie Kirk

@LitmusConf19810 @secretoddities @AGallagherAlly You can’t possibly be this dumb

@Nele_the_egg @secretoddities @AGallagherAlly The first one is legislating for people not to use words which is different to compelling them to use words. Your other example is physical assault and is a criminal offence. It’s in no way comparable.

Isn't it strange how TERFs are happy for men like Glinner to "support women's rights" and even to speak at women's events, but when a trans woman speaks out about women's rights they get told to shut up because they're "not a woman". Somebody make this make sense....

@LitmusConf19810 @secretoddities @AGallagherAlly Sorry I thought you were so big on implied meaning. I ment reputable biologist of course

@Nele_the_egg @secretoddities @AGallagherAlly So when you said no biologist would agree with what I said, you just meant only your ‘biologists’ agree with you.

@LitmusConf19810 @secretoddities @AGallagherAlly People are also „forced“ not to use the N word or punch pregnant people. What is your point?

@secretoddities @Nele_the_egg @AGallagherAlly I’m sure they do and are happy to use your preferred pronouns. Are you happy that people are forced to do this or face a penalty?

@LitmusConf19810 @secretoddities @AGallagherAlly Thats a lie

@secretoddities @Nele_the_egg @AGallagherAlly It’s not fake from a legalistic and societal point of view where you live. That doesn’t mean everyone in your town believes it either. They’re just being compelled to adhere to your beliefs. It’s fake from a scientific point of view.

@LitmusConf19810 @secretoddities @AGallagherAlly You can never have closed biological categories because they don’t have necessary conditions

@Nele_the_egg @secretoddities @AGallagherAlly So we can never categorise anything because there will always be exceptions to the rule?

@LitmusConf19810 @secretoddities @AGallagherAlly No you are lying

@Nele_the_egg @secretoddities @AGallagherAlly It’s well documented.

@LitmusConf19810 @secretoddities @AGallagherAlly Dawkins doesn’t know the difference between gender and race thepinknews.com/2021/04/12/ric… He is most certainly not a reliable source. Winston is not even remotely qualified on the subject wtf

@Nele_the_egg @secretoddities @AGallagherAlly Richard Dawkins and Robert Winston would beg to disagree.

@LitmusConf19810 @secretoddities @AGallagherAlly No. You will not find one biologist who agrees with you

@Nele_the_egg @secretoddities @AGallagherAlly It’s not what you claim biologists claim. I suppose it depends which ones you listen to.

@LitmusConf19810 @secretoddities @AGallagherAlly Stop lying about random women that’s weird.

@LitmusConf19810 @secretoddities @AGallagherAlly That is incorrect

@LitmusConf19810 @secretoddities @AGallagherAlly The problem is that you are trying to claim these are necessary conditions but biologists don’t do that. There are no necessary conditions for the categories of man and woman

@LitmusConf19810 @secretoddities @AGallagherAlly That’s not what biologists claim.

@LitmusConf19810 @secretoddities @AGallagherAlly The above can not be true if exceptions exist. Or these exceptions can not be man or women

@LitmusConf19810 @secretoddities @AGallagherAlly That is incorrect

@LitmusConf19810 @secretoddities @AGallagherAlly Thats the problem your argument is inconsistent it doesn’t hold up to scrutiny. And it isn’t supported by established science.

@Nele_the_egg @secretoddities @AGallagherAlly Frustration would be the key word at your inability to understand basic arguments and established science.