Nemo lele

@EnderSp1k3 @caiquedeexu @validships @RajahRontwit thanks for proving my point :)

@NemoWoop @caiquedeexu @validships @RajahRontwit Also by the way this question is framed, I'll assume you're Canadian, aka a Brazil Zero counterpart.

there’s a 3rd option here called “not bitching about fiction period unless a real person is being directly exploited”

@EnderSp1k3 @caiquedeexu @validships @RajahRontwit they literally dont , prove it to me in canadian law context since you made the claim :) i'm waiting

@NemoWoop @caiquedeexu @validships @RajahRontwit Yes they do. Otherwise other incidents slip through. Why would they describe laws by your logic then?

@EnderSp1k3 @caiquedeexu @validships @RajahRontwit bruh they don't have to explain why every different form of murder and rape is illegal under the law. its the same thing for this topic nigga

@NemoWoop @caiquedeexu @validships @RajahRontwit "all" until what, it's the nichest thing no law firm, judge or law officer ever would've think?

@EnderSp1k3 @caiquedeexu @validships @RajahRontwit gonna send the canadian sexual abuser squad take care of your children fr

@NemoWoop @caiquedeexu @validships @RajahRontwit Are you gonna come here and do that yourself or no?

@EnderSp1k3 @caiquedeexu @validships @RajahRontwit nah it applies to ALL

@NemoWoop @caiquedeexu @validships @RajahRontwit "all" until it's something specific.

@EnderSp1k3 @caiquedeexu @validships @RajahRontwit g2g i have to pickup my girlfriend from elementary school. was fun raping you!

@NemoWoop @caiquedeexu @validships @RajahRontwit That's why overbroad laws are bad, logistically and politically. Not to mention its huge cost on people. We have a law of similar defect here and it's asinine.

@EnderSp1k3 @caiquedeexu @validships @RajahRontwit that wouldn't work since ALL fictional material is illegal.

@NemoWoop @caiquedeexu @validships @RajahRontwit The umbrella term only covers a generality, which malicious people can take advantage of by being maliciously specific like "oh It's not criminal material of kids, it's [insert made-up term here instead!". By pinpointing which drawings you can't do, they need to be specific.

@caiquedeexu @EnderSp1k3 @validships @RajahRontwit gonna cry loser? keep defending violent toddler rape this is all Brazilian including the children deserve.

@NemoWoop @EnderSp1k3 @validships @RajahRontwit You are a disgusting person. You are a danger to any person, specially children, and yourself. I have refuted all your claims, provided evidence and laws. You reject those because you actually want children harmed, you just don't like anime. Seek therapy, that's my final word.

@caiquedeexu @EnderSp1k3 @validships @RajahRontwit thats decided by a jury and The context of the material. kinda crazy how you have no knowledge on this topic.

@NemoWoop @EnderSp1k3 @validships @RajahRontwit And who's that character? Can you prove his age with any legal document? Are their parents or guardians aware of the depiction? Is the lolituber in jail right now?

@EnderSp1k3 @caiquedeexu @validships @RajahRontwit literally the opposite. they use the umbrella term fictional character that covers everything fictional. explain the loophole?

@NemoWoop @caiquedeexu @validships @RajahRontwit The fact it isn't mentioned anywhere is the definition of a loophole.

@caiquedeexu @EnderSp1k3 @validships @RajahRontwit yea it would prevent the world from having more of them like you. actual subhuman lmao

@NemoWoop @EnderSp1k3 @validships @RajahRontwit Posting babies again, and given that you believe this to be a depiction of a brazilian baby, and you wan't to see brazilian babies abused, I can only imagine why you have this saved. Fucking pedophile.

@caiquedeexu @EnderSp1k3 @validships @RajahRontwit that's not part of what is the law dumbass you are actually one of those

@NemoWoop @EnderSp1k3 @validships @RajahRontwit Literally on the law's page. You are coping so hard now that is isn't funny anymore.

@EnderSp1k3 @caiquedeexu @validships @RajahRontwit not how it works. the law doesn't have to mention every new thing otherwise people would work around it... this isn't complicated to understand either.

@NemoWoop @caiquedeexu @validships @RajahRontwit It doesn't. Otherwise it'd be directly mentioned.

@caiquedeexu @EnderSp1k3 @validships @RajahRontwit character under the age of 18 doing sexual act. same way UK is doing a criminal investigation against the lolituber :)

@NemoWoop @EnderSp1k3 @validships @RajahRontwit Who's being depicted? And if you really find that all this "isn't arguable", then kindly go fuck yourself.

@EnderSp1k3 @caiquedeexu @validships @RajahRontwit fictional depiction that a jury would consider under 18 without reasonable doubt. this include taking context into account and things like this.

@NemoWoop @caiquedeexu @validships @RajahRontwit Fictional depictions of what, itself? Because it isn't of kids by definition.

@caiquedeexu @EnderSp1k3 @validships @RajahRontwit not part of the law. try again.

@NemoWoop @EnderSp1k3 @validships @RajahRontwit Right here.

@caiquedeexu @EnderSp1k3 @validships @RajahRontwit loli falls under the umbrella of fictional depiction. this isn't arguable dawg.

@NemoWoop @EnderSp1k3 @validships @RajahRontwit Not how it works. Prove to me where it says loli is CSEM.

@caiquedeexu @EnderSp1k3 @validships @RajahRontwit cope. its not my fault you can't interpret anything yourself. show me where in the criminal code 163.1 it says anything about loli being fine.

@NemoWoop @EnderSp1k3 @validships @RajahRontwit AI again. Pray for what's left of your brain. Half of it is gone, the other can't stop thinking about children.

@EnderSp1k3 @caiquedeexu @validships @RajahRontwit loli are fictional depiction. this isn't arguable dumbass

@NemoWoop @caiquedeexu @validships @RajahRontwit None of which applies to lolis

@caiquedeexu @EnderSp1k3 @validships @RajahRontwit not true. prove me where in the criminal code 161.3 it says that.

@NemoWoop @EnderSp1k3 @validships @RajahRontwit Sounds like he doesn't know what shota is. Unless the work is realistic indistinguishable, depicts a real minor or incites abuse, it isn't illegal. We already went over the laws. But finally you got one that I disagree with, a shame he's wrong, at least he doesn't claim legality.