David Neumark

4.2K posts

David Neumark

David Neumark

@NeumarkEcon

Katılım Ağustos 2022
346 Takip Edilen924 Takipçiler
David Neumark
David Neumark@NeumarkEcon·
@sndurlauf But there are so many other problems that also need fixing, like editors serving for years and years and years. Some journals have moved away from this, to their credit. Others have not.
English
1
0
10
1.2K
Steven N. Durlauf
Steven N. Durlauf@sndurlauf·
The emergence of "reject and resubmit" as a decision option for editors has been harmful to Economics, in my opinion, in particular for junior scholars. Why? The receipt of a "reject and resubmit" has, in my observation, all too frequently caused untenured faculty to spending enormous amounts of time and energy revising papers where eventual success was very unlikely. I am comfortable saying the creation of this option has not been research quality maximizing for individuals and by implication for the discipline. At best, these decisions reflect the intense pressure on junior scholars to publish in a "top 5" and so my claim is that this inefficiency is another indictment of the way top 5 publication affect Economics. Beyond this, I am unconvinced that the subjective expected value calculations of junior scholars have accurately reflected success likelihoods. (I certainly would have done poorly at them had I faced such choices before tenure.) Christopher Severan @ChrisSeveren raises an additional issue: by increasing the length of the revision process, changes in editor become more likely, a possibility whose probability is not known and I think not assessed in a decision to revise. Further, I believe that the option created an "out" for editors to avoid rejecting papers. It is no pleasure to reject an article, especially junior scholars, and my observation is that the option has allowed editors to avoid having to be decisive after a first round of decisions. As an editor, I tried to clearly distinguish between "warm" revise and resubmit decisions versus "tough minded" revise and resubmit decisions in order to make clear differences in likelihoods of success, but this was always predicated on a clearly feasible path to publication.
Christopher Severen@ChrisSeveren

This is applied micro now: Editor gives you path to publication (Rej & Resub). You spend 9mo revising paper. 2 refs say accept, 1 says R&R. But, there's a new editor. They find a new ref that says reject. So, paper rejected. Everyone's time wasted.

English
18
30
235
96.5K
David Neumark
David Neumark@NeumarkEcon·
@sndurlauf I agree Steve. Why can't journals just allow authors to submit a revised paper as a new submission if authors would like to, but it's unambiguously a new submission, no expectation of the same editor, etc.? If I really advance a paper and want to try a journal again, why not?
English
1
0
3
1.1K
David Neumark retweetledi
NBER
NBER@nberpubs·
Adverse local labor market shocks that reduce employment hasten cognitive decline, from Noah Arman Kouchekinia, @NeumarkEcon, and Tim A. Bruckner nber.org/papers/w35117
NBER tweet media
English
2
35
116
57.7K
David Neumark
David Neumark@NeumarkEcon·
Can you point to more reporting on the results?
Samer Sinijlawiسامر السنجلاوي@SSinijlawi

The early results of the Palestinian local elections are beginning to tell a deeper story. A young generation of change has now firmly placed itself on the Palestinian political map. Meanwhile, President Mahmoud Abbas and the current leadership are increasingly failing to win the trust of Fatah’s own base—let alone the broader independent public—even in elections where Hamas largely stayed out. Despite the full weight of administrative, financial, and institutional support behind official Fatah lists, the results show that challengers have made significant and meaningful gains. In small and mid-sized municipalities—where tribal dynamics are less dominant—such as al-Obeidiya, al-Karmel, Khillet al-Mai, and Jericho, independent lists representing a clear demand for change have won decisively. These lists are often led by credible, moderate figures—many emerging from within Fatah itself—who chose to challenge the official structures and succeeded. In Hebron, the picture is more complex. Tribal dynamics played the major role. While Fatah list officially “won,” the reality is that the election became an internal contest between the Jaabari and Qawasmi families over control on on the Mayor position. Despite Hamas’s boycott, many of its supporters within these families participated, influencing the outcome in favor of their tribal candidates like Yousef al-Jaabari and Khaled al-Qawasmi. Jenin delivered another surprise. A list representing the camp-based reality and local grassroots leadership won by a large margin against the official Fatah list—signaling a deep disconnect between the traditional leadership and the street. The conclusion is becoming clearer: This was not just a municipal election. It was a political signal. A new current is rising—pragmatic, independent, and rooted in credibility. The question now is no longer whether change is coming. It is whether the current leadership is ready to face it.

English
0
0
0
149
yannispappas
yannispappas@yannispappas·
I just read that 1 in 4 doctors in Israel is Arab. Doctors: 25% Nurses: 27% Dentists: 27% Pharmacists: 49% Did not expect that at all. Tripped me out. They must segregate the hospitals or have separate Jewish & Arab hospitals.
English
280
43
616
141.6K