Never51

@kr8tvty @Adamc851 @QuestionInfinit @forallcurious It's one of the outcomes of the universe from our observations - if it's eternally expanding then heat death is inevitable. Other possibilities are the big rip, the big crunch, big slurp, big bounce, big freeze, big snap, of the return of the big bopper.

@Adamc851 @QuestionInfinit @forallcurious How do you know that?

James Webb telescope confirms the universe is expanding faster than physics can explain

@JackSarfatti @Yale Is SO(24) actually accepted? My understanding is it is not really testable and introduces endless gravito-dilatonic theories upon reduction. Doesn't it use an invented/theoretical workaround for stability to inject fermionic matter? Could be wrong but it looks like just math?

These people are stupid dark energy and dark matter are both quantum mechanical vacuum effects easily explained by the correct theory of gravity, which is SO24 everyone is using Einstein‘s SO13 which is a sub group of SO24 Einstein didn’t know about modern gauge theory. He died right as it was coming into understanding by the rest of the Physics community.

For decades, the standard model of dark matter has explained how the universe is structured at large scales. A new Yale study suggests that inside galaxy clusters, the model may be missing something entirely, possibly a second type of particle, or one that behaves in ways physicists have never observed. Astrophysicist Priyamvada Natarajan and two Ph.D. students explain their findings: bit.ly/3PIXd1d

@Vinreskb @konstructivizm The big bang and the inflationary period afterwards are still the best explanation we have for why these exist. Nothing found from JWT has changed this. The theory is much more than a bang, it's the math that works backwards from what we've observed, and is still the best theory.

@konstructivizm By continuing to see all this new information, I think we all should go back to the drawing board and seriously question if there was ever a big bang 13+ odd billion years ago. I now seriously think that the big bang theory is no longer true.

The James Webb Space Telescope has discovered a new type of cosmic object. The James Webb Space Telescope has been in operation for several years, and during this time, it has made many important discoveries. Astronomers have also observed several entirely new types of cosmic objects. One of these is the "little red dots" or LRDs—faint and very distant objects from the early Universe. Spectral analysis shows that they resemble the nuclei of small galaxies, yet they also have significant differences. LRDs are currently believed to be primordial supermassive holes, destined to become the centers of spiral galaxies. Their light is emitted by giant accretion disks. One of the first celestial bodies of this type discovered was Abell 2744 QSO1. It is located 13 billion light years from us, and we see it in its current state just 773 million years after the hypothetical Big Bang. The light generated by this LRD was amplified several times by gravitational lenses, allowing astronomers to track the motion of hydrogen clouds around its center and precisely measure their rotation speed. This allowed them to calculate the mass of the supermassive black hole, which turned out to be 50 million times that of the Sun. This value is very large, amounting to approximately 60% of the total mass of Abell 2744 QSO1. According to scientists, this cosmic object is an "embryo" of a galaxy formed near a primordial black hole, which formed not from a supernova, but through the direct collapse of a supergiant gas cloud.

@HUBBABUBBADOOP1 @amazing_physics You can use NTR for when you need thrust (NEPs/ion engines have low trust). But you're going to require a big power source (and you have several conversion losses along the way in this design) with what you have drawn up.

@HUBBABUBBADOOP1 @amazing_physics If you're planning on using water as your fuel, the energy required to break chemical bonds is high, so you will need a giant solar array or a nuclear power plant. If you have a nuclear power plant on board, might as well do NEP.

"Gravity only affects things with mass." Light has no mass, it still obeys gravity how?

@HUBBABUBBADOOP1 @amazing_physics Arithmetic is the foundational branch of mathematics dealing with numbers and basic operations. Mathematics is the broader overarching discipline encompassing arithmetic, algebra, geometry, calculus, and logic. Ask any mathematics prof the difference.

@Never51eh @amazing_physics "Don't confuse math with arithmetic." (it's in the root name) 🤦🏻‍♂️ "Appliance of Math".

@HUBBABUBBADOOP1 @amazing_physics Unitless (and dimensionless) math is real and used all the time, and is very useful. Think of the Pythagorean theorem - it's unit-less and is used all the time. You use it with units, but the math itself doesn't. Don't confuse math with arithmetic.

@Never51eh @amazing_physics Math is meaningless without measurements. ✌️+✌️=✌️✌️or☝️-🖐️+✌️✌️=👍+👎

@HUBBABUBBADOOP1 @amazing_physics Sure, bud. You make AI images that look nice but don't do anything. What have you invented? You must have changed the world, I'm probably using one of your inventions right now. So what have you created?

@Never51eh @amazing_physics You seem to only know what you're told. You seem to be book learned, but outside of regurgitating spoonfed theoretical BS you insult what you can't understand. I don't need someone to tell me fire is hot. I design machines you can't dream of. I am from your future- you're in past

@HUBBABUBBADOOP1 @amazing_physics Faraday's work we're the building blocks of Tesla work. Tesla even credited Faraday with the invention of alternating current. Faraday's and Maxwell's work is literally what Tesla read and built off of. So even the AC power used to generate those AI images comes from Faraday.

@Never51eh @amazing_physics Do Californians worship Lewis and Clark? They "discovered" stuff? Christopher Columbus "discovered" America? Amerigo Vespucci? Nah, guess not. Whoever has backing gets the fame. Do you see Mr. Faraday in here?

@HUBBABUBBADOOP1 @amazing_physics Those are units, not math.

@Never51eh @amazing_physics A "Ruler" used to be whomever was in charge. Same for a "Foot". How many Hands a horse was mattered. Cubit worked for Pharaoh.

@HUBBABUBBADOOP1 @amazing_physics Yes, he discovered the principal. You don't invent principals. Not understood =/= hidden. You should read about Faraday. He did apply his discovery, and did infact create light with it. Then the electric motor and dynamo. You seem to not know both physics and history.

@Never51eh @amazing_physics Listen to yourself- "though induction flashlight would have been figured out by Faraday, it's exactly the principals he discovered". He "discovered" it? It was hidden before? Why didn't he apply his "discovery"? He "would have" made a light? Then you call me crackpot?

@HUBBABUBBADOOP1 @amazing_physics As far as ten digits to count, humans have used several numerical systems in the past. Scientific theories (not quack-pottery) require predictions and falsifiablity, and math is the language we use to describe these. If you have a theory, do the math and prove it (or disprove it)

@Never51eh @amazing_physics Wow. Typical Human, full of itself. You quote "Laws", "discoveries" as if nobody lived before them. You live on 1 Planet and think that's it? YOUR "mathematics" is NOT universal. You think everyone has 10 digits to count? An Induction flashlight would've been MAGIC 300 yrs ago.

@astrodustX @Airaasayss This is correct, and there are two formulas to do it for any sized square grid. 1^2+2^2+3^2+...+n^2 In this case its a 4x4 grid, n=4, 1^2+2^2+3^2+4^2 = 1+4+9+16=30 Or (n(n+1)(2n+1))/6 So n=4, (4(4+1)(2*4+1))/6 =(4(5*9))/6 =180/6 =30

@Airaasayss 30

Only 1% can count all the squares correctly Prove me wrong!!!

@HUBBABUBBADOOP1 @amazing_physics If you mean researched, proven physics, I'm good. Why would I tell Tesla he was wrong? He was right about many things. AC was superior for transmission. His work gave us plenty ofstuff we use today, like remote controls. He did have some crazy ideas but so do most geniuses.

@Never51eh @amazing_physics You need a decent start in the real world, not the one you think you know. You're the kind that would tell Tesla he was wrong.

@HUBBABUBBADOOP1 @amazing_physics I wouldn't recommend researching Faraday or Maxwell's work to a two year old. But from your comments you have some incorrect assumptions about electricity, electrons, positrons and photons. There's lots of places to start reading, I just gave a couple suggestions.

@Never51eh @amazing_physics What am I 2 now?

@HUBBABUBBADOOP1 @amazing_physics And electrons are not electricity, which was your original claim. If you wish to know more, look up Faraday's work and Maxwell's work. It will give you a decent start.

@HUBBABUBBADOOP1 @amazing_physics Yes, it is a phenomenon caused by the presence and motion of electrons. Electricity is not electrons.

@HUBBABUBBADOOP1 @amazing_physics This wind is not visible, just the effects of it are. But if you zoom in, wind is also matter, it is the motion of our planet's gas molecules like nitrogen and oxygen caused by differences in pressure. Those gas particles have mass. Without them, there is no wind.

@Never51eh @amazing_physics The wind is visible with debris in it. Electrons are electricity. Electricity moves at c. Electricity has mass, pressure, potential. Plasma is "pressurized electricity".