Nick Viest

4.9K posts

Nick Viest banner
Nick Viest

Nick Viest

@NickViest

“Stay close to the Americans” WSC “All’s well that ends well.” WS “The people’s will, constitutionally expressed, is the ultimate law for all.” AL

New York, USA Katılım Kasım 2011
1.5K Takip Edilen548 Takipçiler
John Spencer
John Spencer@SpencerGuard·
Happy Easter to all! May today fill your heart with peace and hope. ✝️🌸
John Spencer tweet media
English
40
29
458
9.2K
Nick Viest retweetledi
@·
A moment to be proud of. 🇺🇸 GOD BLESS AMERICA. GOD BLESS OUR TROOPS.
 tweet media
English
8.1K
19.2K
123.1K
2.1M
Nick Viest retweetledi
@·
🚨“WE GOT HIM! My fellow Americans, over the past several hours, the United States Military pulled off one of the most daring Search and Rescue Operations in U.S. History, for one of our incredible Crew Office Members, who also happens to be a highly respected Colonel, and who I
 tweet media
English
11.7K
43.5K
233.4K
13.4M
Nick Viest
Nick Viest@NickViest·
RT @SpencerGuard: IMO, until our downed pilot is officially announced safe, the last thing that should be happening is a bunch of discussio…
English
0
155
0
0
Nick Viest retweetledi
@·
On this Good Friday, the United States joins Christians around the world in reflecting on Christ’s sacrifice, the power of redemption, and the hope of the Resurrection.
 tweet media
English
1.4K
5.2K
24.6K
1.4M
Nick Viest retweetledi
Gummi
Gummi@gummibear737·
Iran was trying to use the North Korean model to get a nuke: create sufficient conventional deterrence so you won’t be challenged in acquiring one (it’s called the Seoul Hostage Problem). This has been explained over and over since day one. Everyone claiming shifting goalposts or no imminent threat has been lying. The reason North Korea was allowed to get nukes is because Seoul (and its 10 million inhabitants) is within artillery and rocket range of North Korea. During the 1994 nuclear crisis, the Clinton administration seriously considered airstrikes on North Korea’s Yongbyon reactor but backed off precisely because of the artillery threat to Seoul. Iran was trying to accomplish the same by stockpiling missiles and drones which would have had the same deterrent effect. The proof is what Iran has been doing in the past month: attacking all its neighbors in order to pressure the US to stop attacking it Beyond this, they were building medium-range ballistic missiles that could reach Paris and London, meaning all of Europe could be held hostage as they built a nuclear bomb. The reason Iran has not built a nuclear weapon until now is not because it couldn’t, but because it knew it would be attacked and denied this capability. So by allowing them to continue developing this conventional deterrence, you would be allowing Iran to get a nuclear weapon. And unlike North Korea, Iran is led by an eschatological death cult Reagan saw nuclear mutually assured destruction (MAD) as both morally bankrupt (because of the innocent-body-count problem) and dangerously fragile because it assumed flawless rationality between adversaries…this means it only takes one irrational actor to destroy the world. Working backwards from the conclusion that Iran’s Islamist regime must never have a nuclear weapon, it was necessary for the US to attack Iran to deny it the conventional capacity to hold the entire eastern hemisphere hostage. Every European leader knows this and behind the scenes praises the US for this action. But they are cowards, held hostage by their own internal Muslim populations, and so adopt these ridiculous public positions. This was never about Israel. And if your argument is that Iran should be allowed to get a nuclear weapon then you are a fool and a traitor to western civilization…you’re a useful idiot
Ryan Saavedra@RyanSaavedra

Secretary of State Marco Rubio gives an excellent explanation on why the U.S. needed to strike Iran It's less than 2 minutes and is worth the watch

English
997
7.3K
30.4K
3.8M
Nick Viest
Nick Viest@NickViest·
@BRyvkin Nixon believed it could have been saved.
English
0
0
4
683
Boris Ryvkin
Boris Ryvkin@BRyvkin·
The politicians and generals lost the Vietnam War. Maybe it was just unwinnable and no combination of strategies when the U.S. took over from the French could have saved South Vietnam. But that our vets who came back were so maligned remains a disgrace.
English
4
1
35
2K
Nick Viest
Nick Viest@NickViest·
@TaliGoldsheft @Cornell Excellent letter by President Kotlikoff. Manhattan Community Board 8 overwhelmingly supported this partnership of Cornell, Technion and the City of New York when I chaired the Board. This partnership benefits our community, city, state and indeed our nation.
English
0
0
8
447
Tali Goldsheft
Tali Goldsheft@TaliGoldsheft·
Amazing letter by @Cornell President rejecting the resolution. Should be read by all: Dear Zora, Thank you for conveying SA Resolution 61: Calling for the Termination of Cornell University’s Partnership with the Technion – Israel Institute of Technology While Preserving Cornell Tech. I reject this resolution, which fundamentally conflicts with Cornell’s principles of academic collaboration and our core commitment to academic freedom. Cornell Tech is not a political entity. It is an academic partnership, created through shared investment by Cornell University, the Technion, and the City of New York for the benefit of the city and the state, according to a negotiated set of conditions that govern its development and the terms of its 99-year ground lease on Roosevelt Island. As one of Cornell University’s many international partnerships and collaborations, Cornell Tech deepens, enriches, and strengthens the ability of our students, faculty, and staff to pursue knowledge and advance the university’s academic mission. The Joan and Irwin Jacobs Technion-Cornell Institute, the core international partnership upon which Cornell Tech is based, is an extraordinarily valuable collaboration focusing on education and research in health tech, media tech, and urban tech, and supporting the development of new startup companies. Severing our relationship with the Technion—or with any entity affiliated with governments, institutions, or enterprises with which some of our community members disagree—as a statement of political protest, would not only hinder our research, teaching, and public engagement; it would imperil our academic principles. Our university, like all of our peer institutions, regularly faces pressure—from across the political spectrum, from within and beyond our own community—to make academic decisions according to political priorities. The phenomenon is not a new one: universities have grappled with such pressures from governments and societies for as long as the institution of the university has existed. When we yield to these pressures and proscribe specific collaborations or collaborators on grounds other than merit, we compromise our principles of academic freedom, undermine our own institutional excellence, and damage public trust in our work.   Moreover, this resolution inaccurately asserts that “the continued operation of Cornell Tech as a Cornell University campus does not require an ongoing partnership with the Technion-Israel Institute of Technology.” Cornell Tech, while part of Cornell, is a joint effort of the university, the Technion, and the City of New York. It is no more possible for Cornell to unilaterally terminate that effort and claim full control of the campus than it would be for the Technion or the City of New York to do the same. Finally, I am deeply troubled by the selective manner in which this resolution singles out the Technion, alone of Cornell’s many international partners, for censure. Cornell currently maintains 159 active agreements with institutions in 59 nations and regions; all of these institutions have some government affiliation, and many conduct research with military and security applications. Cornell itself has military research contracts, conducts research with potential military applications, and has relationships with companies whose products are used in military contexts. Cornell also has relationships with institutions in countries whose governments have been accused of human rights violations—as our own has been.  None of these publicly available facts are mentioned in the resolution; only our partnership with an Israeli institution is targeted for erasure. The political bias evident in this selective approach is deeply disturbing, and the resolution is incompatible with both the Student Assembly’s purpose and Cornell University’s core values. I reject it fully and forcefully. Sincerely,   Michael Kotlikoff President and Professor of Molecular Physiology Cornell University
@

Cornell rejects anti-Technion BDS resolution. And tells ⁦@ZohranKMamdani⁩ not even to think about ending the Consortium: “It is no more possible for Cornell to unilaterally terminate…than it would be for…the City of New York to do the same.” assembly.cornell.edu/resolutions/st…

English
141
869
5.6K
942K
Nick Viest retweetledi
@·
Heading to vote, and I will remain the only Democrat that refuses to shut our government down. Pay TSA agents. Reopen DHS.
 tweet media
English
5.8K
7.2K
52.1K
680.1K
Nick Viest
Nick Viest@NickViest·
@ewarren @grahamformaine Why is it that the socialist progressives like Mr Platner go to the fanciest most expensive private schools? The Hotchkiss School is over $77k per year which is quite extraordinary. Sounds like he is fighting for his own elitist leftist agenda.
English
1
0
0
154
Elizabeth Warren
Elizabeth Warren@ewarren·
Graham Platner's got the grit to fight for what’s right on behalf of Maine’s working families—not billionaires and giant corporations. He’s inspired a grassroots movement to flip Maine, and I’m thrilled to endorse @grahamformaine for Senate.
@

🚨Endorsement Alert! 🚨 “People are excited to vote for someone who will actually fight for them. Not just nibble around the edges.” Thank you, Senator Warren. Together I look forward to taking on Wall Street and the billionaires waging a class war against the rest of us.

English
1.1K
290
2.5K
659.5K
Nick Viest
Nick Viest@NickViest·
@WallStreetApes @srk908 Mayor Mamdani is making NYC less affordable for New Yorkers so he can pay for his affordability agenda.
English
0
0
2
27
Wall Street Apes
Wall Street Apes@WallStreetApes·
Mayor Zohran Mamdani announces he would like to lower the speed limit to just 20mph on ALL STREETS in New York City A 20 mph speed limit would make it much easier to ticket everyone who drives a car all the time to pay for his socialist agenda Yes, this is real
English
1.9K
3.2K
9.4K
547.1K
Nick Viest retweetledi
@·
Hours ago, U.S. forces successfully employed multiple 5,000-pound deep penetrator munitions on hardened Iranian missile sites along Iran’s coastline near the Strait of Hormuz. The Iranian anti-ship cruise missiles in these sites posed a risk to international shipping in the
 tweet media
English
2.3K
9.1K
44.9K
4M
Nick Viest retweetledi
@·
“Unprepared for drones,” Meet Admiral Cooper, THE guy running the Iran war Former CO of the Navy’s 1st Drone & AI Task Force. Commander of Red Sea ops where drones attacked 170 soft targets. How do I know? Because I WATCHED HIM SAY IT ON 60 minutes 2y ago you bafoons 👇👇
English
118
1.1K
5.2K
562.9K
Nick Viest retweetledi
@·
I love the optics of a bunch of white, rich American socialists going to Cuba to tell them not to overthrow communism.
English
431
2.2K
13.7K
387.1K