Nicolas

171 posts

Nicolas

Nicolas

@Nicolas141985

✝️✝️✝️

Katılım Temmuz 2023
50 Takip Edilen42 Takipçiler
Arfan Nadhimi
Arfan Nadhimi@Arfannadhimi619·
@BRICSinfo Why the fuck is some pedophile president deciding who gets to play the World cup. Iran has been and will always be a better footballing nation than hand-egg warmongers
English
1
0
0
735
BRICS News
BRICS News@BRICSinfo·
JUST IN: 🇮🇹 Italy rejects proposal from President Trump's envoy to replace Iran at the World Cup.
English
900
5.6K
47.2K
2.1M
Nicolas retweetledi
Dolly van den Berg
Dolly van den Berg@dendolly1·
WEET U WAT WE HADDEN ? Een sterke gulden, Het ziekenfonds, Dichte grenzen, Top onderwijs, Top zorg, Blauw op straat, Aardgas uit eigen bodem, Veilige binnensteden, Geen asielzoekers, Eigen moestuinen Authentieke Nederlanders etc. etc. WEET U WAT WE NOG HEBBEN ? NIETS.!
Dolly van den Berg tweet media
Nederlands
232
1K
3K
40.4K
Nicolas retweetledi
Strijder124
Strijder124@Strijder124·
Demonstranten worden door de politie en romeo's ingesloten in een straat in een woonwijk in Loosdrecht, ver buiten de locatie van de demonstratie. De romeo's slaan in op mensen die geen enkele bedreiging vormen. De politie gaat hiermee duidelijk ver buiten haar boekje.
Nederlands
540
1.2K
3K
179.4K
Nicolas retweetledi
RadioGenoa
RadioGenoa@RadioGenoa·
Schools in Norway 1970 - 2025. What corrupt EU politicians have done to Europe will never be forgiven.
RadioGenoa tweet media
English
587
9.5K
27.1K
278.8K
Nicolas retweetledi
Tibo91
Tibo91@Tibortibor15·
🇨🇵🇺🇦French journalists came to Ukraine to film a documentary about escaping mobilization. While filming in the field,they got the chance to see firsthand what mobilization in Ukraine looks like. The Ukrainian translator was arrested and the driver mobilized.
English
127
2.9K
8.2K
194.8K
Nicolas
Nicolas@Nicolas141985·
@RealCandaceO Erica made you look like a dirty spot on the wall on your own wedding day.
Nicolas tweet media
English
1
0
0
36
Candace Owens
Candace Owens@RealCandaceO·
Do not lecture me. You intentionally misrepresented the report and got community-noted. Sort of like you intentionally misrepresented the contents of the Epstein binder back when you were playing the part of a Bondi-girl. There is not a shred of proof that Tyler Robinson’s weapon was even fired on that day. The ATF did NOT hand over any analysis or data to the defense, despite your claim to the contrary, and yet despite this—you wrongly convict Tyler when you describe it as the “gun used to kill Charlie Kirk”. Try “a gun found on the day that Charlie Kirk was killed which not even the bomb dogs could detect and which had a total of six sets of fingerprints on it. Worth noting the FBI will not allow the defense to examine those alternative fingerprints for some reason”. What proof do you have that that was the gun used to kill Charlie Kirk? Or that the weapon was fired at all?
Liz Wheeler@Liz_Wheeler

It’s very important to note what tactic @RealCandaceO is using here, and why. She is deliberately misrepresenting my words, and for a reason. This is exactly what I posted: “The bullet jacket fragment recovered from Charlie Kirk’s body during autopsy matches a .30 caliber class bullet. The .30 caliber bullet matches the .30-06 rifle Tyler Robinson used to shoot Charlie Kirk. This per the ATF ballistics analysis. AND before anyone says “the ATF fabricated this”— This ATF report was filed by THE DEFENSE. Tyler Robinson’s lawyers aren’t denying this, they ADMITTED it by filing this report to the court themselves.” Let’s be very clear: the ATF report confirms the .30 caliber class bullet jacket fragment from Charlie’s body is consistent with the type of .30-06 rifle Tyler Robinson used to shoot Charlie. Which is what my original post was about. Candace claims my second sentence is claiming that the ballistics of the bullet jacket fragment retrieved from Charlie’s body during autopsy match the ballistics from the bullet that law enforcement test-fired from Tyler Robinson’s rifle. But that’s obviously NOT how anyone would interpret my words in the context of the entire post. (I also did an entire episode last week breaking down the “inconclusive” report and what it means). Which is why Candace selectively cherry-picked that sentence without the context to trick people into thinking I said something I didn’t. It’s the same tactic Media Matters uses to try to cancel conservatives. You’re familiar with it. The cherry-picked out-of-context quote that they portray to mean something entirely different. The only difference between Candace and Media Matters is Media Matters lies to trick advertisers to pull ad campaigns from their targets, while Candace is willfully twisting my words in order to distract YOU from the reality of the ATF report and how it devastates the entire house of cards Candace built by claiming Charlie couldn’t possibly have been killed by a bullet fired from a .30-06 rifle. But make no mistake, you SHOULD look at exactly what Candace doesn’t want you to see: The ATF report confirms the .30 caliber class bullet jacket fragment from Charlie’s body is consistent with the type of bullet fired by the kind of .30-06 rifle like Tyler Robinson’s rifle. And the DEFENSE filed this ATF report, which means Tyler Robinson’s attorneys aren’t denying this fact. Again, people are smart enough to recognize the nuance of the ATF report that finds that the bullet jacket fragment retrieved from Charlie’s body during autopsy is CONSISTENT with the kind of .30-06 rifle Tyler Robinson used, while the “inconsistent” result refers to the inability of the analysts to positively identity or exclude specific ballistics markings on the damaged fragment with a bullet they test-fired from Tyler Robinson’s rifle.

English
1K
2K
15.5K
699.7K
Nicolas retweetledi
Liliana Franco
Liliana Franco@lilianaf523·
🚨CONMOVEDOR MOMENTO‼️ Fila de soldados arrodillados en oración en la pista antes del despegue, con sus mochilas a sus pies y la misión por delante.... un momento que la mayoría de las personas nunca ve. Que Dios proteja a estas tropas.
Español
5.1K
8.2K
35.5K
714.5K
Nicolas
Nicolas@Nicolas141985·
@RealCandaceO There will never be peace as long as islam exists.
English
0
0
1
34
Nicolas retweetledi
Maurits Vande Reyde
Maurits Vande Reyde@Mauritsvdr·
Waarschijnlijk de grootste nederlaag uit mijn politiek bestaan. De Vlaamse partijen Groen, N-VA, CD&V en Vooruit hebben zonet een nieuwe belasting op verwarming, energie en autorijden van 650 euro (!) per huishouden, per jaar goedgekeurd. Dat is het ETS2-systeem. We hadden een keuze vandaag deze Europese klimaatwaanzin NIET om te zetten in Vlaanderen. Dat werd ook beloofd door oa. @valerievanpeel en @MDiependaele. Toch kozen zij en de klassieke partijen er weer maar eens voor het toch WEL te doen. Niet te vatten. Aardgas plus 16 procent. Stookolie plus 21 procent. Diesel en benzine plus 10 procent. De TV-camera's waren natuurlijk al lang weg voor het debat en de stemming. Je gaat hier bijna niets over lezen. Wel zal de komende weken weer vrolijk verteld worden in de media dat de hoge energieprijzen "de schuld zijn van Trump". Mensen zijn niet dom. Mensen worden hier vooral heel kwaad van. Geef hen eens ongelijk.
Nederlands
183
1.1K
2.8K
96.1K
Cieltje Van Achter
Cieltje Van Achter@CieltjeVAchter·
Dit was een bijzonder pijnlijk fragment. Als minister ga ik niet op de stoel van de VRT zitten: de omroep heeft redactionele autonomie. Maar autonomie ontslaat niemand van verantwoordelijkheid of respect. Goed dat op het einde ook wordt erkend dat men hier beter had moeten nadenken. Bezint eer ge begint. En ja, met alle religies moet kunnen gelachen worden.
Nederlands
351
29
262
92.5K
Nicolas
Nicolas@Nicolas141985·
@DVanLangenhove So we can burn the lgbt flag because not a lot of people are gay… Good to know.
English
0
0
0
16
Dries Van Langenhove
Dries Van Langenhove@DVanLangenhove·
Belgian journalists smash statues of Mary and Jesus. A real, non-Belgian journalist asks them: “Would you smash a statue of Muhammad or the Star of David?” “No no no no that would be inappropriate” Brussels is the capital of self-hate. x.com/colmflynnire/s…
English
1.2K
4.8K
28.3K
681.7K
SNEAKO
SNEAKO@sneako·
Seethe you demons
English
266
138
3.1K
99.5K
Zeteo
Zeteo@zeteo_news·
In today’s ‘First Draft’, @mehdirhasan on the Republican religious nutjobs pining for Armageddon in the Middle East.
Zeteo tweet media
English
22
101
270
28.5K
Cenk Uygur
Cenk Uygur@cenkuygur·
1. So, yes, we were pushed into the war because Israel was going to attack and endanger our troops. And basically used it as a threat against us. 2. Of course, Trump can be pushed or pulled into anything, with enough cash (or threats). 3. Tom Cotton also works for Israel.
Aaron Rupar@atrupar

Cotton: "Israel faced an existential risk and they were prepared to strike Iran alone. If that happened, Iran was very likely to target our troops. That may address the question of 'why now.'"

English
193
259
1.3K
109.7K
Nicolas retweetledi
Phantom Shadow
Phantom Shadow@Fuknutz·
Epic Fury: In Full Effect
English
233
2.8K
12.8K
277K