#getup. standup.standupforyourright

Most of these cruise ships have medallion 5G technology. This is why you see huge outbreaks of flu like infections and chest infections I know of a case where over 900 were removed from one ship, samples were taken from the air-conditioning. 5G technology is not for you to download your movies. Why do you think it was all laid during lockdown. Why do you think no one ever mentions it and if they do they are removed? Dr Barrie Trower , Dr. Katherine Horton and so many more including Miltary papers. I’ve covered it and I don’t give a rats behind behind what anyone says about me pointing this out here.

Rolling Stone moved Eric Clapton down from the top 10 of greatest guitar players of all time to 35 because he admitted to being Covid "vaccine" injured & refused to discriminate on entry to his concerts based on "vaccine" status. They even admit the reasoning in the explanation!

🚨This is pretty MAJOR 🚨 Grok confirms exactly what I suspected! Had a hunch about this for a while and have spoken of the probability of satellites being used to direct beams of sunlight to specific locations and have on occasion caught them in pics during edits 👀🤓🥸 This explains a lot of what we’re seeing up there!!! 😳😳

@IonisedSkyWatch @p_maguire10 @UniverseMan Thats horrible. Get your girls self defence lessons asap the missus deep heat spray for her erhm bad hip 🥰

@NinaSimone2021 @p_maguire10 @UniverseMan Thanks 🙏 There are 24 there and another 26 half a mile along the Main Street in Industry street! My eyes are wide open!!!🫡✊🤝

NOT GREAT FOOTAGE 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 This is the old smiths hotel in Kirkintilloch now called The Broadcroft Hotel ..... if anyone is thinking of booking their wedding or a party here I would really reconsider your safety first 💯🤬🙏 This is one of hundreds of hotels that are housing illegals🤬

Met a woman I know in the supermarket. Her husband has early onset dementia, she's been told care home fees would be £1300 a week, however she'd need to sign an agreement that ScoGov gets her house, savings etc, when he passes, they leave a paltry £23k. 1/ 1/

@No_Bikers Get house into joint/co tenants names then they cant take it while she alive. Dont have the link but please look into it for her

@LovelyGeezer65 Do you remember this 🤣🤣🤣 𝐂𝐚𝐬𝐮𝐚𝐥 𝐔𝐥𝐭𝐫𝐚 𝐎𝐟𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥 on X: "West Ham fans banned from the London Stadium after sniffing cocaine from a bald man’s head during a match 😂🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 " / X

A CCJ is public record that says, "This person didn't pay a debt. The court had to step in." Whether the debt was fair or not—or whether you even knew about it—doesn't matter. #Debt #CCJ

The year is 1950. Your doctor lights a cigarette and tells you smoking is fine. He read it in a study. He is telling the truth about having read it. He does not know, or is not saying, that the study was funded by the tobacco industry. The year is 1958. Your doctor tells you to eat less fat. The evidence is contested. The contestation is not in the public messaging. The food industry has been helpful in clarifying which findings deserve attention. Some researchers who published contradictory data have been quietly defunded. Ancel Keys is on the cover of Time magazine. The year is 1962. Your doctor prescribes thalidomide to your pregnant wife for morning sickness. It has been approved. The FDA gave it the green light in Europe. Twelve thousand children will be born with severe limb malformations before anyone in an official capacity acknowledges the problem. The families are told the drug was safe. The drug was approved. Both of these things remain true. The year is 1972. Your doctor prescribes Valium. Britain is in the grip of a benzodiazepine wave that will last two decades. The dependency risk is known internally. It is not shared. Your doctor is not lying to you. He was not told either. The year is 1999. Your doctor prescribes Vioxx for your arthritis. It is newer than ibuprofen, well-tolerated, and Merck has a study showing it works. Merck also has internal data suggesting it roughly doubles the risk of heart attack. This data will not reach your doctor for four more years. Fifty thousand people are estimated to have died in the interim. Merck eventually settles for 4.85 billion dollars. No criminal charges are brought. The year is 2002. Your doctor prescribes OxyContin. Purdue Pharma trained its sales representatives to tell doctors the addiction risk was less than one percent. That figure came from a letter, not a study. The letter was about patients with terminal cancer on short-term doses in hospital settings. Your doctor is a GP with a patient who has a bad back. Nobody draws a distinction. Nobody is required to. The year is 2008. Your doctor checks your cholesterol. Your LDL is elevated. You are prescribed a statin. Nobody mentions that the number needed to treat for primary prevention is approximately 250. Nobody mentions that the muscle deterioration you'll notice over the next two years is listed as a rare side effect rather than a documented pattern affecting a meaningful percentage of patients. The trial that informed the prescription was funded by the manufacturer. Now it is today. Your doctor has new guidelines. New studies. New consensus. He is confident. He has always been confident. The confidence has never been the problem. The confidence is, in fact, precisely the problem. Source: COVID19 VACCINE VICTIMS AND FAMILIES

Detain. Drill. Deport. Glasgow cannot put up with this. It’s not sustainable. It contains some of the most economically and socially deprived communities in the whole of Europe, and this is what’s happening to it. 3,895 applications for homelessness between April and September 2025, 43% of which were largely male asylum seekers.

@Malcolm_Offord And SSI2022/356 x.com/i/status/20465…

6 years to the day I posted this reply to ⁦@DarrenPlymouth⁩ and the whole Convid illusion instantaneously shattered. Thankful to my community nurse friend who sent me this and made it clear it was all fake & manufactured. Helped many others too, I’m pleased to know.

To think this was just 36 years ago, this is what we want our country back to but the people opposing this wants to ruin it

Britain is a speck. Africa is a continent. Only a suicidal idiot pretends we can swallow it whole. Look again at that map. The blue outline isn’t some random African blob, it’s England, our entire island nation, dropped onto the vastness of Africa for scale. One tiny, rain-soaked, historically English rock placed against the Democratic Republic of Congo alone, a country nearly ten times our size. Africa itself could swallow the British Isles dozens of times over and barely notice. Yet the same people who lecture us about “compassion” and “diversity” insist this postage stamp of a homeland must fling open its doors to endless hordes from that continent and beyond. What utter, manipulative bollocks. Africa spans over 30 million square kilometres with 54 countries and 1.4 billion people and growing faster than anywhere on Earth. Nigeria alone will hit 400 million by 2050. Congo, Sudan, Somalia, Eritrea vast territories, immense resources, yet perpetual chaos, tribal slaughter, corruption, and fertility rates that mock any notion of sustainability. Their young men aren’t “fleeing” because there’s literally nowhere else on their gigantic continent; they’re coming here because Europe’s idiot elites turned welfare magnets into beacons for the world’s surplus population. England is not “nowhere else to go.” It is the only homeland our people have ever known. A finite island forged by the English, for the English. the descendants of those who tamed it, defended it, and built the greatest civilisation this planet has seen. We are already 67 million strong on these crowded shores, with native birth rates suppressed and our cities groaning under the weight of parallel societies, knife crime, grooming gangs, and collapsing services. Every additional boatload whether Pakistani, Nigerian, Somali, or Afghan whatever Tom dick and Harry, isn’t enrichment. It’s dilution. It’s dispossession. The intellectual reality, delivered without the usual cowardly euphemisms: this cannot work. It has never worked. You do not transplant tens of millions from low-trust, low-IQ, high-fertility, clan-based, often cousin-marrying cultures, many steeped in the supremacist ideology of Islam or worse into a high-trust, high-investment, native European society and expect harmony. You get what we already see in Newham, Tower Hamlets, Bradford, and Birmingham: electoral capture by foreign blocs, no-go areas, skyrocketing welfare dependency, and native English families priced out or driven out. Europe’s strange death, accelerated by a pathological altruism that mistakes weakness for virtue. We owe these people nothing. The natives of these isles built this country. We paid for it. We died for it. It belongs to us. Remigration on a serious, unapologetic scale is not “far-right extremism.” It is basic arithmetic and national survival. Prioritise the English people in their own homeland. Africa has space. The Middle East has space. Pakistan has space. Let them fix their own failures instead of exporting them to the one place that still works, for now. England is our only home. Tiny, precious, irreplaceable. We’ve had enough of pretending otherwise. The hordes keep coming only because traitorous elites allow it. Time to reclaim our birthright, and ensure that this sceptred isle remains English. Anything less is national suicide sold as kindness. The map doesn’t lie. Neither should we.

“We’re taking Shabana Mahmood & the entire Home Office to the High Court" Harry Miller @WeAreFairCop Scrap Digital ID Together Rally We must have the right to speak freely without being tracked or recorded for a crime protect free speech #together

RIP dude. Very sad news about Ed. One of the good guys.

A young couple in England, the day before they were due to exchange contracts on what was to be their first home, received two phone calls in quick succession. The first was from their estate agent. The second was from their solicitor. The information was the same in both. The local council had outbid them for their house, by £20,000. The seller had accepted. The couple had been bidding for the house since the asking price was £150,000. The bidding had taken the price up to £190,000, already, by their own account, the upper edge of what they could afford. The council had come in at £210,000, a level they could not match. Their offer was abandoned. Their survey, costing £900, was wasted. They still owe legal fees of £2,200 plus VAT regardless. The fixed-rate mortgage offer they had secured, in a market where rates have been rising again, will now expire before they find another property. Their landlord has new tenants moving in to their current rental in the second week of June. They are looking, on the calendar in front of them, at potential homelessness inside two months. The reason the council bought the house was disclosed to them, after some pushing, by a councillor they happened to know personally. The council needed urgent additional accommodation for asylum seekers. The property they had been buying was already previously registered as a House in Multiple Occupation, which made the conversion straightforward. The taxpayer money the council used to outbid them comes from a £500 million national pilot scheme, established under the present government, in which local authorities are funded to buy properties on the open market in order to house asylum seekers and reduce the cost of asylum hotels. In other words, local government is, on the order of central government, using your own money to give housing that you should It's a representative case. 134,760 British households were in temporary accommodation as of September 2025, which is a record. 4,793 people were sleeping rough on a single night in autumn 2025, also a record, and 171% higher than in 2010. 28% of all new social housing lettings in England in 2024/25, approximately 75,000 households, went to people deemed statutorily homeless. The number of new social housing lettings that included a member of the Armed Forces community was, in the same year, approximately 2,600. The number of new lettings that went to non-UK nationals, on the basis of the nationality data published by central government, was substantially in excess of that veteran figure, by, depending on how the data is cut, about 10x. This is the British state, in 2026, using the working tax contributions of two young people in the first weeks of trying to buy a home, to outbid those same two young people for that same home, in order to provide free accommodation for foreign nationals whose claims to be in this country have not yet been assessed and may well be completely worthless. The young people will, on the present trajectory, be made homeless in the same June in which the asylum seekers move into the property they were trying to buy. The young people will be paying, through their council tax for the rest of their working lives, for the accommodation in which the asylum seekers will live. It is likely, given the number of migrants to Britain whose lifetime tax contribution is net negative, that they will be paying tax to offset these new arrivals for the rest of their lives. It goes without saying that we need the most fundamental imaginable reconstruction of our asylum, housing, planning, and immigration laws to prevent such travesties of justice from happening again. We all know what is required by way of change in those areas. Progress has written a more extensively policy testament on this subject than any other political organisation in Britain. Beyond that there is one last thing worth saying. The young couple, on the available account, are not in a position to fight any of this through the courts. They cannot afford to. Their solicitor, on their telling, was pressing them for the legal fees on a debit card before the rest of the conversation was over. They will, in all likelihood, lose the home, the deposit, the survey, the rate deal, and the remainder of their tenancy in a single short summer. They will then watch the property they were trying to buy be filled, at the public's expense, by the people the British state has decided to prioritise over them. If that does not make you furious enough to do something about what is happening in Britain, nothing will.

Most people do not understand that GMO crops are designed, in a lab, to tolerate being sprayed with Glyphosate. If you have ever used Glyphosate (Roundup) in your garden, you know how toxic it is. It kills every organic thing it touches. So, GMO companies take a crop like organic sweetcorn and they spray the crop with glyphosate and the entire crop dies....and all the bugs, insects and vermin die also...and the micro-bacterium & organisms in the soil also dies......so, how do they design a seed variety of corn that they can spray with glyphosate and it kills the bugs and vermin, but leaves a nice bright shining yellow sweetcorn? Answer: Genetically Modify the seed. GMO Is Glyphosate causing cancer in humans? Well, of course the 'regulators' (who are captured) say no....but I am sure someone like @AaronSiriSG could provide more detail on it. Contentious subject, akin to tobacco and health. The company that produces the most GMO seeds? Bayer AG (through its Crop Science division, formerly Monsanto) is the main provider and largest player in GMO seeds and crops globally. Yes, Bayer - the major pharmaceutical company. It almost seems like they are poisoning the food supply with this toxin and then offering the medications to treat cancers and other illnesses. Then again, some people will say 'oh glyphosate is fine for human consumption'. We all know the sort of people who would say such things (cough cough), employees of the megacorp and affiliates in the profit train ....Bayer has over 88, 000 staff.