No Consensus World

348 posts

No Consensus World banner
No Consensus World

No Consensus World

@NoConsensusWld

A platform dedicated to exploring innovative solutions inspired by nature’s wisdom. We believe there is much to learn from nature’s “no consensus” model.

Katılım Temmuz 2024
79 Takip Edilen48 Takipçiler
No Consensus World
No Consensus World@NoConsensusWld·
Privacy-focused operating systems. Devices that work for the user instead of constantly extracting value from the user. This is one of the reasons behind the development of PhoneLiberation. An exploration of a different relationship with technology: phoneliberation.com
English
0
0
2
23
No Consensus World
No Consensus World@NoConsensusWld·
@DisrespectedThe Nature evolves through distributed experimentation, not centralized permission systems. AI should be approached carefully - but concentrating control of intelligence into the hands of a few institutions may become its own systemic risk.
English
0
0
0
29
No Consensus World
No Consensus World@NoConsensusWld·
@DigitalEdward_ „Do you want their money? Yeah. That’s how they control you…” Mutual credit currencies combined with distributed architectures like Holochain could enable decentralized and increasingly agentic economic systems.
English
0
0
1
163
No Consensus World
No Consensus World@NoConsensusWld·
The internet is entering an era where humans may increasingly need protection not only from hackers but from intelligent manipulation itself. ColdBoxAI is an early exploration in that direction. AI for digital self-protection and trust navigation. coldboxai.com
No Consensus World tweet media
English
0
0
2
112
No Consensus World
No Consensus World@NoConsensusWld·
Phones, operating systems, digital identity, AI, payments, and online communication are all moving toward one important question: Do we control our tools, or do our tools increasingly control us? #Linux #ZorinOS #Ubuntu #volla #opensource
No Consensus World tweet media
English
0
1
4
130
No Consensus World
No Consensus World@NoConsensusWld·
@lifesmyth @Holochain A Holochain-native version could go beyond cheaper hosting. It could eliminate central custody of contracts entirely. Users hold their own records, share only proofs and still keep a valid audit trail. Thats not just cheaper DocuSign - thats a new model. HoloSign 😎
English
0
0
4
157
Clippy keeps your info private!
I wonder if this code can be modified to run on distributed @Holochain? Then you don’t even need the hosting.
Nav Toor@heynavtoor

DocuSign Personal: $10 to $15 per month. DocuSign Standard: $25 to $45 per user per month. DocuSign Business Pro: $40 to $65 per user per month. A 10-person team on Business Pro pays $4,800 to $7,800 a year. To put signatures on PDFs. A team of 50 pays $24,000 to $39,000 a year. And there is a 100-envelopes-per-year cap on most plans. Send more contracts and you pay extra. Need SMS delivery? $0.40 per send. Need ID verification? $2.50 per attempt. Need premium support? $5,000 to $50,000 per year add-on. You are rationing digital signatures in 2026. DocuSign is a $10 billion company built entirely on this pricing model. Now meet DocuSeal. A free and open source alternative to DocuSign. Created in 2023 by a Ruby developer named Alex who was simply trying to sign one document and realised every solution online was overpriced or required a subscription. Three weeks later he had a working alternative. He pushed it to GitHub under the AGPL-3.0 license. Today it has 11,800+ stars and over 1,000 forks. Bootstrapped. No VCs. No paywalls. Here is what DocuSeal does: - Upload any PDF and turn it into a fillable, signable form - Drag and drop signature fields, dates, checkboxes, file uploads, and 13 field types - Send to multiple signers with custom signing order - Automated email reminders - Mobile signing on any device - PDF signature verification built in - Audit trail for every document - Bulk send and templates - Full API access - Self-host with one Docker command Here is what DocuSeal costs: Zero. Forever. Unlimited documents. Unlimited signers. Unlimited storage. DocuSign limits envelopes. DocuSeal doesn't. DocuSign charges per SMS. DocuSeal doesn't. DocuSign charges for ID checks. DocuSeal doesn't. DocuSign sees your contracts on their servers. DocuSeal doesn't. Here is the wildest part: The median DocuSign contract per Vendr is $17,250 per year. One Reddit thread has people saying "they want me to pay $4.80 per e-signature." Self-host DocuSeal on a $5 cloud server and a 50-person team can sign as many contracts as they want without paying a single dollar. Your contracts never leave your server. Your client lists. Your NDAs. Your employment agreements. None of it touches a third-party company. For individuals who only sign a few contracts a year, you save $180. For small teams of 10, you save up to $7,800 a year. For a 50-person company, you save up to $39,000 a year. Your documents. Your signatures. Your server. 100% Open Source. (Link in the comments)

English
4
5
17
657
No Consensus World
No Consensus World@NoConsensusWld·
@lifesmyth Current system including peoples way of thinking is dysfunctional - its broken and it will collaps. Incentives are fuc*ed up which have an impact on what people are following and choosing. Nothing will change until current stystem collaps.
English
0
0
1
24
Clippy keeps your info private!
Why are we so fascinated with loud mouths who repeatedly spout crap? Is it carisma or our need to look up to authority? How about accountability for what we speak into our communities?
🌱 John Ash 🌳@speakerjohnash

obviously I believe people should be able to stake whatever beliefs they want to public record, but I also believe if your predictions about these things don't come to pass we should stop giving you attention when you speak about them

English
1
0
2
78
No Consensus World
No Consensus World@NoConsensusWld·
More in article: “The $37 Trillion Reset: Debt, Power, and the Alternatives Nature Would Choose” @kamil.sedzimir/the-37-trillion-reset-debt-power-and-the-alternatives-nature-would-choose-8a2878c03403" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">medium.com/@kamil.sedzimi… #tokenization #FinancialReset
No Consensus World tweet media
English
0
0
0
40
No Consensus World
No Consensus World@NoConsensusWld·
Centralized systems tend to collapse when complexity exceeds control capacity. The real contest of the 21st century may not be between nations. It may be between centralized architectures and decentralized ecosystems. #decentralization
No Consensus World tweet media
English
0
0
0
34
No Consensus World
No Consensus World@NoConsensusWld·
@QuantHz Everyone is chasing AI. Almost no one is investing in attention, discipline, and people. That’s the real bottleneck. Not intelligence.
English
0
0
0
9
No Consensus World
No Consensus World@NoConsensusWld·
@evaninsky @brutusww3 Heterarchy already exists - nature and markets run on it. Supply chains are distributed, yet flows concentrate around key hubs. Digital systems improve coordination, but they don’t remove dependency or influence.
English
1
0
0
19
PostMonetary.hc ♓️ 🦆🛸
@NoConsensusWld @brutusww3 Biological limitations of the brain make heterachy impossible in the analog realm, but cryptographically secured trust inside a scalable distributed architecture make heterarchy possible in a digital space.
English
1
0
0
23
No Consensus World
No Consensus World@NoConsensusWld·
@evaninsky @brutusww3 The point isn’t the design itself, but how these systems behave at scale in real-world coordination. Agent-centricity and distributed coordination are part of it but coherence still depends on shared patterns, not just structure. That’s the layer I’m pointing to.
English
1
0
0
27
No Consensus World
No Consensus World@NoConsensusWld·
@evaninsky @brutusww3 Agents create connections. Patterns create coherence. Nature uses both. Systems that don’t - fragment. 🫳🎤
English
1
0
0
27
No Consensus World
No Consensus World@NoConsensusWld·
@evaninsky @brutusww3 Lets learn from the best systems so far - the ones developed in nature. Nature doesn’t fork it adapts within interconnected systems.
English
1
0
0
25
No Consensus World
No Consensus World@NoConsensusWld·
@evaninsky @brutusww3 Forking is an option, not a solution. Real systems need coordination, not endless fragmentation. The question isn’t just local rules, it’s how those systems stay interoperable. Otherwise decentralization turns into disconnection.
English
2
0
0
29