JTT

@paraschopra But how ser

I don’t get the OpenClaw hype Connecting Claude with Telegram / WhatsApp is trivially easy, you can literally ask it to help you do this and it’ll guide you. Same story with recurring jobs. I just did this - now Claude send me local bangalore news summary at 12pm IST daily on Telegram. Took me 15 mins to build. If the argument is that Claw lets nontech users do this, imagine the security implications when users let an LLM take over their system while having no idea what’s happening under the hood. Making custom scripts and workflows with Claude lets you at least know what you’re configuring on your system.

Claude Cowork complete crash course from zero to expert in 12 minutes. Installation, automations, connectors, plugins..all of it: 00:00 Intro 01:00 Installation & setup 02:08 Your first task 03:01 Global instructions (most skip this) 04:00 What Cowork can actually access 05:15 Skills feature 06:08 Connectors explained 07:04 Real workflow (Drive + Gmail) 07:46 Claude in Chrome 08:43 Scheduled tasks 09:52 Plugins (why $285B was wiped out) 11:41 Big picture

The concept of asymmetry in the US-Iran War. #PredictiveHistory | @xueqinjiang

The best way to teach people critical thinking is to teach them to write

@Realdealmate @grok give me the book/document name

By the age of 35 you should be smart enough to know these Dark Pschology tricks -Thread-

@cloudz Nope. JUP is dead. Stop shilling JUP

are we about to witness the $JUP bounce?

@dinhthang97 Chơi crypto đến giờ này còn bàn để sau 4h

Đã từng có một người chị tha thiết kêu mình gom #ZEC Câu chuyện người chị của mình đã gom $ZEC từ giữa năm 2023 và cũng đã khuyên mình all in ZEC luôn, chị cầm 90% tài sản là ZEC, và thời điểm ZEC về dưới 20$ chị đã mạnh dạng múc và vùng giá trung bình ôm $ZEC của chị khoảng 25$. Mình cũng đã múc khá nhiều thời điểm về ~20$ nhưng mình lại không giữ ZEC. Anh em nhìn số lượng từ ZEC trong hình lên đến hơn 100 lần, cho thấy đã rất nhiều lần bàn luận về ZEC. Cho đến lần ở trong hình, chị bảo về dưới 20 thì all in r đi làm! Và kết quả thì mọi người biết đó, mình đã không đủ niềm tin để hold #ZEC . Kèo trên thị trường không thiếu, quan trọng phải là kèo mọi người tin và hold được đến lúc hái ra thành quả. Nhiều con hàng mới đi về lòng đất, nhưng nhiều coin cũ vẫn giữ được giá trị! Một buổi sáng tốt lành nha bà con!

@kashdhanda Hold JUP and be prepared to die

A Fresh Start for $JUP (Major Changes Coming) This one is for the token holders. The ride or dies. The folks who have held through up and down, supporting a project they believe has the ability to change the future of finance. We know it hasn’t been easy lately. But here’s the good news: we hear you. And we’re moving to make changes inspired by your ideas and our deep reflections on what $JUP should be. In classic Jupiter style tho, this is going to be a somewhat long essay. Before we can step into the new future, we must acknowledge the past and clearly articulate how we’re changing our approach going forward. But if you read the whole essay, you’ll find 3 major changes that demonstrate how important your feedback has been over the last few weeks/months. —- Reflections on $JUP The $JUP token was initially aimed to be the lynchpin of the Jupiter DAO. That worked quite well to kick things off. Together, we built the largest and most active DAO ever. We regularly had hundreds of thousands of voting wallets, voted on 20+ proposals, and pioneered concepts like Active Staking Rewards before anyone else. In a time where it’s rare to see DAO proposals get more than 100 voters, we showed it was possible to build governance that massive numbers of people cared about. We likely experimented the most amongst all the major protocols about what it means to be a community, a DAO and a platform - and we most certainly learnt a ton. But there were also problems that only became obvious over time. Specifically: - Mechanics of governance turned some potential holders away from the token - for example, the frequency of voting and the 30 day lockup. - We were spending too much time and energy on public comms around the DAO, reducing the amount of attention on the Jupiter product suite and the overall Jupiter mission - Budgeting votes for Work Groups created a massive divide in the token holder base and drew negative attention to $JUP All these, combined, had one MAJOR disadvantage - attention was consistently drawn away from the great work of the team/community towards things that drew the ire of token holders. Fundamentally, the previous setup was not additive to the $JUP token. To move forward, we need to keep what was good, and change what was not. /// Major Change #1: Scaling Back the DAO After countless conversations with token holders, it’s clear that the Jupiter DAO is an important vehicle. Many $JUP holders believe deeply in the power of community governance, and are excited to be able to share their opinions and shape the future of Jupiter. But these conversations have also made clear that the DAO should be laser-focused on extremely high-leverage actions. The constant flow of votes was a drain on token holder attention, especially when vote subjects felt “small”. The other thing was that the votes, a major major driver of community attention, constantly drawn attention to, and vastly Going forward, the DAO will have a narrower focus on broad tokenomics decisions and major treasury stewardship items. This means no more Work Groups, fewer overall votes, and more focus in our public comms on products and growth. Token Holders can rest assured the conversation about Jupiter will not be dominated by politics, while still being able to effectively drive decision making around key items that affect our collective future. We are also going to be refocusing the community energy away from politics and towards a pro-social core mission - onboarding the world to DeFi - as will be explained in a separate community post by @AlleyCatNY. /// Major Change #2: Reducing the Unstaking Window Initially, we created a 30 day lockup on staked tokens. Given that Active Staking Rewards were high and governance votes were very frequent, this made sense to ensure only those who were longer term aligned with the Jupiter mission would be able to participate. But now, we stand at a critical juncture. The key is not only to find long-term aligned holders, but to create more of them. And, as we’ve heard from many token holders, the unstaking window of 30 days is too long and turns away potential buyers (particularly large-scale institutional buyers). To meet in the middle, we are going to reduce the unstaking period to 7 days without any penalty. This ensures those who are participating in governance are not simply buying/dumping $JUP to cast a vote, while still giving token holders the flexibility they want and need. This change should go live in the coming weeks. /// Major Change #3: Burn the Litterbox (subject to a DAO vote) Finally, to kick off this new chapter of the DAO, we want to start with a critical vote that has been the subject of MANY conversations with token holders: the Litterbox Trust. The Litterbox Trust receives 50% of protocol revenues from Jupiter and uses those revenues to accumulate $JUP from the open market. It currently holds over 121m tokens (~1.7% of the total supply, ~3.8% of circulating supply), and grows every hour. The original plan was to hold a DAO vote after 2 years to decide what to do with the accumulated tokens. But we’ve heard two different critiques. First, some token holders have suggested that holding a large amount of $JUP without clarity on how the tokens will be used is creating uncertainty. By far the most common suggested solution is to “burn” these tokens. Second, some token holders have suggested that the buybacks themselves are not particularly effective. The solutions for this are more varied - some want continuous burns, some want increased investment in product growth, and some want other use cases of the revenue. Deciding what to do with 1) the current $JUP holdings and 2) the ongoing revenues are both massive decisions. They are the perfect example of the types of decisions that the DAO can and should have active input on. Starting today, we’ll hold a period of public discussion on the first question (Burning the Litterbox). This will continue for ~10 days, with a formal vote to Burn the Litterbox’s existing holdings shortly thereafter. After that, we will have a separate conversation about whether the $JUP Accumulation Plan should be continued, or if there are much better uses for the revenue. If you’re a token holder, now is the time to make your opinion known, and to get involved again in meaningful governance! – All three of these changes are concrete and tangible, but I want to also point out a more philosophical change that’s taken place within the team. For a long time, we didn’t give JUP the type of attention we give to our products. Each product has a clear value proposition, a marketing plan, iterative improvement process, etc. And for a long time, JUP didn’t have this. We expected the market to understand the value of JUP based on the strength of our products, community, and vision. That was a mistake. And one that we are already in the process of fixing. Going forward, we’re going to give JUP the attention it deserves. We need to be incredibly vocal about the Jupiter story, about the JUP story, and about the story of DeFi going forward. And we’re going to be having more conversations in public about other long term use cases for JUP that will integrate into the future of Jupiter platforms. So here’s my free advice - if you’re tired of seeing talk of Jupiter, switch to Bluesky 😉

@cloudz $JUP is a shit show

be real do you still hold your first $JUP allocation?

@LeninUGReal Dume mấy thằng trader cháy tài khoản khóc thuê thôi

Làn sóng tẩy chay Binance đang lên cao trên twitter . Khởi xướng từ một người Mỹ ngốc TQ là ceo của HypeLiquid 🥲 đòi tẩy chay Một Người Canada Gốc Tq là Cz :))) Binance một mặt bác bỏ mọi cáo buộc 1 mặt liên tục bơm tiền ra xoa dịu các coin thủ bị thanh lý . Binance sẽ phân phối voucher token trị giá từ 4 USD đến 6.000 USD, với tổng giá trị 300 triệu USD cho những người dùng đủ điều kiện đáp ứng tất cả các tiêu chí sau: • Người dùng bị thanh lý cưỡng bức (forced liquidation) trong giao dịch Futures hoặc Margin trong khoảng thời gian từ 00:00 ngày 10/10/2025 đến 23:59 ngày 11/10/2025 (UTC). • Tổng giá trị khoản lỗ do thanh lý: ít nhất tương đương 50 USD. • Tổng khoản lỗ do thanh lý chiếm ít nhất 30% tổng giá trị tài sản ròng của người dùng (dựa trên ảnh chụp số dư tài sản lúc 23:59 ngày 09/10/2025 (UTC) Cz nói rằng mọi cáo buộc đều là vu khống và Cz ko quan tâm Hypeliquid chỉ thích Aster 🙂

@SchmittNYC @NobelPrize How long are you gonna cry about this

So they claim the Nobel Peace Prize decision is made in January? That means they chose Obama 10 days into his first term 😂. There’s no way for @NobelPrize to escape this with its credibility intact.

@CryptoCurb How do you know? Are you a fortune teller

the next 3-6 months will be the most bullish months of your lives.

@GIVEMEY0URSOL Price /2 and then airdrop 1 cent

$JUP airdrop is coming Jan 2026

@libsoftiktok You know Peacemaker is a comedy series right?

President Trump has now ended conflicts between: - Thailand & Cambodia - Israel & Iran - Rwanda & the Democratic Republic of the Congo - India & Pakistan - Serbia & Kosovo - Egypt & Ethiopia - Armenia and Azerbaijan - Israel & Hamas Trump is the Peacemaker President 🫡

@gnarleyjs JUP is gay

It's good to see $JUP back above 40c, but that's also kind of a sad reality.

@LeviRietveld Why. Because you played with margin?

@CryptoCurb You salty

“hahahah sorry for nuking your altcoins 99% and then liquidating everyone's entire portfolio during the flash crash that we orchestrated….. here’s a $4 airdrop.”

@TommyEgan357 JUP will be 0.1

I still believe $SOL will hit $500 and $JUP will reach $5

@dinhthai1807 Thiệt 10 tỷ ko

Tôi đã mất 10 tỷ đổi lấy 1 bài học đắt giá. chẳng còn lại gì sau cú dum 11.10.2025 nữa. 2021 tôi bước vào crypto với vụ thế nhà nhà đang fomo trend gamefi và tôi cũng lao cả người vào ôm theo giấc mộng giàu sang. hồi đó công việc truyền thống tôi rất tốt tháng 200tr là bình thường. nhưng rồi lao vào gamefi cụ thể là #elemon và #stepn khiến tôi mất 100k$. nhưng hồi đó 100k$ nó chỉ chiếm 30% vốn của tôi thôi. tôi đã tìm hiểu và áp dụ phương pháp DCA BTC và ETH, BNB theo anh @ThuanCapital theo tuần. 2022, 2023: vì áp dụng PP này mà tôi thu hồi được 100k lỗ 2021 và còn lãi thêm 80k$ tính thời điểm BTC 68K. cuối 2023: quyết định sai lầm nhất của cuộc đời tôi tôi bắt đầu tìm hiểu về altcoin và lướt X đọc mấy bài post kol trên X mà nảy lòng tham nên đã swap hết số BTC ETH đang hold sang alt cụ thể là #ALT, #STRK, #RDNT mong quý 1 2025 là chốt vì ai cũng hô hào quý 1 2025 là altss tôi nhớ lúc tôi swap thì tổng tài sản là 500k$ nhưng đời không như mơ. alt thì cứ giảm dần còn 400k gì đó. tôi lại tìm hiểu tới #Margin ( đây chính là con dao đâm tôi chí mạng) lúc đó chỉ nghĩ vay 20k 50k chơi thì với số vốn 400k lúc đó như muỗi tổng tk có tụt 50% thì cũng k thể bị thanh lý. và rồi tôi vay và ăn được 4k 5k 10k thấy sao dễ thế và vay vay vay.. cứ vay mãi nhưng càng vay càng đánh lại càng thua. 2025: thất bại! sau cú sập cuối 2024 thì tk của tôi giảm vê 100k. không tin vào mắt mình.tôi đập thêm tiền bên ngoài vào vay margin nhằm gỡ lại tài khoản lúc này chỉ mong về gốc thôi nhưng không. mm mất dạy không cho tôi đường về tiếp tục margin tiếp tục thua lỗ. tới hôm qua 11.10.2025 thì tài khoản tôi chính thức chỉ còn 100$. khi margin x5 và cháy. mấy hôm nay tìm hiểu tới món yap vì thấy nó free, con đầu tiên là @zama_fhe và kiếm ra tiền tôi thử sức nhưng bị cú vả hôm qua nản quá trời nản. tôi phải làm sao đây con số thua lỗ có khi nhiều hơn số tiền 10 tỷ. cuộc đời tôi chính thức thất bại rồi các bạn. giờ mất phương hướng quá.

You’re choice. Don’t be late. #BNB.