Not LiquidZulu

Zulu and I have reached out and mutually apologized for our admittedly immature behavior in the last argument between us. We let tempers flair and things get personal and disrespectful when we didn't need to be. I also want to personally thank Nai for his part facilitating. 1/2

@_Sekrius_ Is Alis Dekay a male?

@Not_LiquidZulu How did you miss the point this badly Yeah my criticism is that you didn't sperg out to Alis directly rather than the fact that you're sperging out at all lmao Totally lol

Yeah, I should probably contain my responses to HIS responses. I should just respond to HIS tweets. I can still do that, right?

@Zafari_Zn I said what I said

@Not_LiquidZulu Nigga, what where you thinking LMFAO. [Insert high time preferance Hoppe image here]

Erm... that's not supposed to happen!

@Darkest_Granite Well it does directly imply that a woman can do whatever she wants to you.

Apparently, saying "real men don't hit women" actually means you shouldn't ever defend yourself btw

It is useful to purge these people.

This is an all-out admission that they intend to use trademark to kill LPNH, btw.

The people who write me off instantly are being noted down. You will not follow me into the libertarian extremes. You are not the remnant. You are not the vanguard. You refused to stand up for me against the most minimal pressure.

Cory enjoys getting fucked up the ass by me because he is a big and large fat man and he scoops out my cum from his ass to eat it. Because he likes eating things.

@KasimirFreeman You must permit a man his extremes.

@Not_LiquidZulu This is what happens when you join a cripple fight. Bad Zulu.

While the pursuit of absolute adherence to the non-aggression principle is of course fundamental to the libertarian movement, what is also necessary and foundational to our success is the ability to be wrong. I disagreed with @liquid2ulu (aka @Not_LiquidZulu) for his take about the LPNH (who have me blocked), and for his take on Nick Fuentes. I've publicly voiced my disagreement with Zulu about this take, and guess what? I wasn't attacked by a cult, we're still allies in the liberty movement and we're still going to host our podcast together. The reason for that is simple: theorists on the cutting edge of the libertarian movement are allowed to get things wrong. Fuck it, they're even allowed to continue believing wrong things so long as they believe they are advocating for liberty. I fundamentally disagree with and abhor @AlisDekay and others' reaction to Zulu's error, because I think if taken to its logical conclusion such a reaction would be the condemnation of freedom of thought within our movement. I want to be free to take controversial stances within the movement, and disagree with my allies, because that's how we make our philosophy better. I also think that the person who, in my estimation, has done more than any other person in existence to combat the infiltration of pragmatism into the liberty movement, deserves - at the barest of minimums - the 'benefit of the doubt'. Zulu deserves better than to be ruthlessly outcast for getting one thing wrong. Heck, he deserves to get multiple things wrong, without being condemned as a hypocritical neoprag. If you want to take myself and Zulu to task, then the next episode of the Remnant will be coming soon. I implore any of our detractors to show up and take their best shot.

@Sekrius @TrashSocrates @realDavidBJr @CeaddaOfMercia I would disagree with that then

I remain convinced of the NAP's validity through argumentation ethics

@rrektcapital @jeremykauffman @jackvlloyd twitter.com/JimJesus/statu…

Now this is a ratio!

@Qoheleth__ @CeaddaOfMercia Group ownership implies a contradiction; self-ownership is incompatible with god-ownership. #on-the-impossibility-of-group-ownership" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">liquidzulu.github.io/homesteading-a…

@Qoheleth__ @CeaddaOfMercia You don't debunk an argument by rejecting its conclusion.

@Qoheleth__ @CeaddaOfMercia AE demonstrates that it is incoherent to attempt to claim any sort of other-ownership, ownership means the right to control.

@TrashSocrates @realDavidBJr @CeaddaOfMercia Also the NAP doesn't *rely on* self-ownership. Self ownership is derived from the NAP, not the other way around

@TrashSocrates @realDavidBJr @CeaddaOfMercia Well, that isn't a metaphysical premise. Ownership is a legal concept, law is a subset of ethics, ethics clearly comes a lot after metaphysics.