Nullmask

585 posts

Nullmask banner
Nullmask

Nullmask

@NullMaskio

ZK privacy protocol for any wallet, blockchain, or token - Shielded swaps. Untraceable transactions. One click. 👉 Community: https://t.co/TGSs0H7CEw

Katılım Ekim 2025
12 Takip Edilen345 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Nullmask
Nullmask@NullMaskio·
Introducing Nullmask Transact privately from the wallet you already have. No new seed phrases. No new addresses. No new wallet. Setup takes under 30 seconds. On-chain privacy, finally built for how people actually use crypto. 👉 app.nullmask.io Learn more 👇 We built Nullmask because every existing privacy tool has the same flaw: they make you start over. New wallet. New seed. New address. New interface. Most people never bother. If privacy is too complicated, it will never be democratized. Nullmask works differently. It plugs into your existing wallet (MetaMask, hardware wallets, any multichain wallet) as a private network. Your address stays the same. Your keys stay yours. You just gain privacy. Here's what that looks like in practice: ① You shield tokens into your Nullmask balance. That deposit is visible on-chain. ② You transfer, swap, and transact inside Nullmask. Zero traces. Completely dark to any outside observer. ③ You withdraw to any address. That exit is visible on-chain but carries no cryptographic link back to your deposit. Under the hood: every transaction is backed by a zero-knowledge proof. Your funds are individually provable, not mixed with anyone else's. Compliance-first from day one. Currently live on Ethereum with support for ETH, USDT, USDC, and QF. Hardware wallet support included, which is a first for any EVM privacy protocol. ERC-20 expansion, L2s, BNB Chain, and Solana are in progress. Desktop app is live now. Mobile coming soon. 👉 app.nullmask.io
Nullmask tweet media
English
52
17
107
18.7K
Nullmask
Nullmask@NullMaskio·
Congress just extended FISA Section 702 by 45 days. For those unfamiliar: Section 702 is the law that authorizes mass collection of communications data. Emails. Messages. Calls. No warrant required if you're communicating with someone overseas. They passed it in 2008 as a temporary measure. They've renewed it every single time it's come up for a vote. It has never expired. It never will. This is not a conspiracy theory. It is US law. It is public record. And it is the clearest possible signal that governments are not going to protect your privacy. They're going to legislate around it. You cannot opt out of Section 702. But you can control what you put on-chain. Privacy isn't coming from Washington. It has to come from the infrastructure itself. NULLMASK
Nullmask tweet media
English
3
6
8
154
Nullmask
Nullmask@NullMaskio·
The era of public-by-default blockchains is ending. Because the people who were supposed to move serious money onto these rails looked at a fully public ledger and said: absolutely not. Institutions, banks, asset managers, they didn't need convincing that privacy matters. They needed someone to build it properly. The demand was always there. The infrastructure wasn't. It is now. We have arrived. NULLMASK
Nullmask tweet media
English
3
5
7
125
Nullmask
Nullmask@NullMaskio·
Anyone still building serious financial infrastructure on public-by-default blockchains is building for yesterday. Not because regulators said so. Not because institutions demanded it. Because it was always the wrong default. The idea that every transaction, every balance, every counterparty relationship should be permanently visible to anyone on earth was never a feature. It was an oversight that nobody fixed. Finance has always had privacy. Cash is private. Wire transfers are private. Your bank statement is private. The blockchain was the anomaly and the industry is finally correcting it. The question now isn't whether on-chain finance will be private. It's who builds the privacy layer that actually works. NULLMASK
Nullmask tweet media
English
2
4
5
105
Nullmask
Nullmask@NullMaskio·
Your transaction history is more sensitive than your home address. Your address tells people where you live.. Your transaction history tells them: How you live. What you earn. What you spend. Who you pay. What you believe in. What you're afraid of. What you're planning. Every on-chain transaction you've ever made is public. Permanently. Searchable by anyone with an internet connection and five minutes to spare. We've normalized something that should horrify us. Your financial life is yours. Not your employer's. Not your government's. Not a blockchain analytics firm's. Not a stranger's. NULLMASK
Nullmask tweet media
English
2
4
6
86
Nullmask
Nullmask@NullMaskio·
Every major enterprise privacy solution announced this month has the same problem. There's an operator in the middle. A Zone administrator. A server that sees everything. A company you have to trust not to look. They've taken the public ledger and replaced it with a private one, one that only the operator controls. The public sees nothing. The operator sees everything. That's not privacy but surveillance with better branding. Real privacy means no operator has a god's-eye view. Not the public, not the infrastructure provider, not us. The cryptography enforces it. The math guarantees it. No trust required. That's the only model worth building. NULLMASK
Nullmask tweet media
English
3
3
8
105
Nullmask
Nullmask@NullMaskio·
ADT just had 10 million customer records stolen. The company you pay to protect your home. The company with cameras at your door, sensors on your windows, and your family's daily patterns in their database. Gone. This keeps happening because we've accepted a broken deal. You hand over your most sensitive information. They promise to protect it. They fail. You suffer the consequences. We deserve better than that. Privacy is not a premium feature. It's not a product you subscribe to. It's not something a corporation should be able to grant or revoke. It's a right.. and one that most of the systems we rely on are failing to protect. That's what Nullmask is built around. Not just the technology. The belief that your financial life, your transaction history, your on-chain activity, none of it should be anyone else's business unless you choose to make it so. Privacy is our industry. It's what we're here for. NULLMASK
Nullmask tweet media
English
3
3
10
261
Nullmask
Nullmask@NullMaskio·
Institutions don't need a new token. They need privacy on the one they already have. They're not coming for Monero.. They're coming for privacy on USDC, tokenized treasuries, on-chain equity. The instruments they're already building with. They want a privacy layer that works on top of what exists. That's why we are here. NULLMASK
Nullmask tweet media
English
6
4
10
106
Nullmask
Nullmask@NullMaskio·
The two words that shouldn't go together, but do: private and compliant. Nullmask uses the same Association Sets framework as Privacy Pools. The model co-authored by Vitalik Buterin. Every deposit is screened. Funds linked to illicit activity are excluded from the association set. Users can prove their funds are clean without revealing anything else. You get privacy. Regulators get accountability. Nobody has to compromise. This is what responsible privacy infrastructure looks like. Not a choice between hiding and complying, a system where you can do both at the same time. NULLMASK
Nullmask tweet media
English
3
5
12
2.9K
Nullmask
Nullmask@NullMaskio·
KYC was supposed to make finance safer. Instead it created the world's biggest collection of stolen identities. To use most financial services, you hand over your passport, your face, your address. They store it to comply with regulations. That data sits in a database. That database gets breached. We've seen it this year alone.. money transfer apps, crypto exchanges, AI recruiting platforms. Passports. Transaction histories. Identity documents. All stolen.. Zero-knowledge proofs break this logic entirely. You can prove you're eligible without revealing who you are. Compliance without exposure. Verification without storage. That's not a privacy feature. That's a better architecture. This is why we are here. Privacy for all. NULLMASK
Nullmask tweet media
English
4
3
8
131
Nullmask
Nullmask@NullMaskio·
Most privacy protocols hide one thing. Nullmask hides everything. Here's how. ⬇️ When you send, your existing note gets nullified — permanently destroyed on-chain using a cryptographic nullifier tied to your key. Two new notes are created: one for the recipient, one returning your change. Both are encrypted. Neither reveals the sender, receiver, or amount. The nullifier prevents double-spending without revealing which note was spent. The commitment scheme hides the values without making them unverifiable. The entire transaction is wrapped in a zero-knowledge proof. The network confirms it's valid. Nobody sees what happened. That's a shielded transfer. NULLMASK
Nullmask tweet media
English
4
2
6
131
Nullmask
Nullmask@NullMaskio·
10,000 institutions walked into Paris Blockchain Week this week. They all said the same thing. Privacy is the single biggest bottleneck standing between serious money and on-chain finance. Not regulation. Not custody. Not liquidity. Privacy. Banks and asset managers don't want their treasury movements, trading strategies, and counterparty relationships visible to anyone with an internet connection. The same reason you don't want your salary and spending history on a public ledger. The demand is institutional now. The infrastructure is being built. Nullmask is already live. NULLMASK
Nullmask tweet media
English
5
5
20
3.5K
Nullmask
Nullmask@NullMaskio·
Your bank doesn't publish your statement online. Your wallet does. Every transaction. Every amount. Every counterparty. Public. Permanent. Searchable by anyone. That's not a feature. That's a design flaw that nobody fixed. Until now.. 👀
GIF
English
4
2
6
111
Nullmask
Nullmask@NullMaskio·
1,400,000 gas per shielded transaction. We're bringing that to 100,000. Here's how. 👇 The reason private transactions are expensive is straightforward: every shielded transaction requires on-chain proof verification. That's a lot of compute. That's a lot of gas. IVC (Incrementally Verifiable Computation) changes the equation. Instead of verifying the proof on-chain with every transaction, IVC lets Nullmask batch and defer proof verification until withdrawal. The result: gas costs drop 14x. Privacy that doesn't cost a fortune. That's where this is going. NULLMASK
Nullmask tweet media
English
3
2
5
126
Nullmask
Nullmask@NullMaskio·
What if your wallet address and your on-chain identity were two completely different things? That's exactly how Nullmask works. When you send a transaction, you type in a standard 0x address, exactly like you always have. In the background, the Key Server resolves that address to a shielded receiving key. The proxy encrypts the transaction. The recipient's identity stays hidden on-chain. You never see any of this. You just send. No new address format. No new interface. No new anything. That's what privacy infrastructure looks like when it's actually built for people. NULLMASK
Nullmask tweet media
English
3
3
6
163
Nullmask
Nullmask@NullMaskio·
@Aliyu5g mev and front-running are indeed critical. but the true value erosion extends to the fungibility cost and the long-term impact of persistent deanonymization on an open ledger. it compounds.
English
1
3
4
50
Aliyu
Aliyu@Aliyu5g·
The next breakout sector in crypto won’t look flashy. It will be infrastructure that reduces risk, protects value and enables adoption. Confidential Computing is that infrastructure.
English
5
0
4
128
Nullmask
Nullmask@NullMaskio·
@nym Decentralized privacy tools are important because your tx history shouldn't be public domain for MEV bots & on-chain tracking. that's really why wemade nullmask.
English
0
2
5
107
Nym
Nym@nym·
Decentralized privacy tools are important because __________.
English
29
2
51
2.8K
Startpage
Startpage@startpage·
Privacy 𝚙̶𝚕̶𝚎̶𝚊̶𝚜̶𝚎̶ NOW.
Español
10
13
59
1.7K
Nullmask
Nullmask@NullMaskio·
Two protocols. Same compliance model. One of them can empty your account without your signature. Privacy Pools and Nullmask use the same compliance model: Association Sets, same framework, same regulatory thinking. The difference is in the security architecture. Privacy Pools uses a proxy-with-spending-authority model. The app holds your spending key and executes withdrawals without confirmation from your wallet. You're trusting the software not to abuse that. Nullmask doesn't have spending authority. Ever. Your wallet signs every transaction. The zk circuit verifies the signature. A compromised Nullmask server cannot move your funds. Same compliance. Completely different trust model. NULLMASK
Nullmask tweet media
English
3
4
11
206