lawpanda

The fiercest battle mounts must first be broken

Haven't read it, but making sure to share it first.

By eliminating gains Man's a genius

your honor, what big dawg at the other table said was not true

The future is now

"You cannot make people become the users you wish you had, you have to build products the users wish they had." For some reason, the crypto industry seems to struggle with this simple principle.

The partners who would say "I know there's a case out there that says X, I just cited it recently" were the OG hallucinators.

@AirdropGlideApp *sigh*

Damn, Map of Zones used to be something of wonder. Now it's like the who's who of dead chains 💀 How did we get here?

The biggest game of the first round is on Friday, when Long Island battles Arizona for iced tea supremacy

“Gonna be home late tonight babe, I’m out monitoring the Iran situation with a couple of guys. We might even stay and monitor the Cuba situation if something comes up”

Now make Mike Novogratz wear a suit that makes him look like a gay matador

If you build or advise in crypto, this is the legal update worth reading this week: ⚡️CFTC just issued manipulation guidance targeting prediction market exchanges, with specific flags around sports, elections, and concentrated-outcome contracts ⚡️Market structure odds have slipped from 82% to 61% as the stablecoin yield debate stalls around a handful of key Senate votes ⚡️The SEC quietly gave broker-dealers a path to hold stablecoins without punitive capital treatment Full breakdown in the article:

I can’t wait to read all the rushed AI-summarized and semi-incorrect hot takes!

some of you be like

me: stewing about the impacts of AI on the legal profession, thinking about how clients may never need lawyers client: "can you please send this docusign"

I became a lawyer for intellectual stimulation and now I argue about commas.

Show idea: Love Is Blind except the reveal is whether you've been talking to an AI companion the whole time.

@RobertFreundLaw fuckin’ Raoul

Here again is the popular mistaken idea that lawyers charge a lot because they know the laws and the cases that you don't know. Like we have the textbooks and you don't, and if you just had the right library card, you'd be Neal Katyal or David Boies or whomever. No, you're mostly paying for experience, strategy, creativity, responsiveness, practicality, and many other things. The knowledge itself is far, far down on the list.

@jenfassino @EthereumDenver please and thanks!

Who needs to be added to the @EthereumDenver side events chat?