🟢SugarPea🟢 🏴‍☠️

I'm making this my hollywood trial acct, but its also still kind of for Depp support. So, if you want to follow me for a shared interest in other hollywood cases but hate seeing so much about JD, lmk what keywords you muted & try to use them in posts & rts.

@LethalLauren904 I like my tomatoes refigerated because that mutes the raw tomato taste. Might be the same thing. People keep saying "don't keep them in the refrigerator, they'll lose their taste" yep, just enough to make them taste better lol.

That’s me

VANZAN…VANSHAM OF @blakelively (BL) & @manatt FYI: Watch LGA & then NGA 😉😉 WF ask Judge Liman to let them present evidence that BL (through Vanzan Inc.) filed a short-lived New York state “Doe” lawsuit for the purpose of obtaining subpoena power over a former publicist, then used the resulting material in a CRD complaint and to support press coverage (NYT), which WF characterise as misconduct relevant to the case. 1️⃣ BACKGROUND WF offer a linear “scheme” story: — Vanzan Inc. filed a New York state “Doe” action ➜ the suit was “promptly dismissed” without service, and WF claim its “sole purpose” was to issue a pre-answer subpoena to Stephanie Jones (ex-WF’s 🧙🏻‍♀️publicist); WF claim the subpoena created “legal cover” for Jones to turn over communications taken from Jennifer Abel’s phone (ex-Jones’ employee handling WF’s account) ➜ WF claim BL then used excerpts in her CRD 💩complaint and provided the complaint to the NYT before filing it, contributing to a “highly damaging” story about Baldoni. 2️⃣ WHAT THEORIES WF OFFER (A) Context / rebuttal to retaliation narrative: If BL argues WF’s litigation actions (e.g., counterclaims and other shit) were retaliation, WF want to show their actions were reasonable defensive measures in response to perceived wrongdoing. (B) Alternative causation of reputational harm: If BL claims reputational damages stemming from litigation conduct, WF argue BL’s own litigation tactics contributed to reputational decline. (C) Credibility impeachment: WF argue the alleged “sham” lawsuit is an “act of deceit” probative of credibility and therefore fair game on cross under FRE 608(b). 3️⃣ REBUTTING “RETALIATION BY LITIGATION” WITH “DEFENSIVE MEASURES” CONTEXT WF’s cleanest relevance hook is conditional: if BL is allowed to argue that WF’s litigation conduct (including counterclaims) was retaliation for protected activity, WF want to show they acted defensively because they believed BL had “wrongfully obtained” confidential work product. This is essentially a motive/state-of-mind argument for why WF did what they did in litigation—aimed at negating an inference of retaliatory intent. 4️⃣ ALTERNATIVE CAUSATION FOR REPUTATIONAL DAMAGES WF separately argue that if BL is claiming reputational harm from how WF litigated (including counterclaims), WF should be able to present evidence that BL’s own “aggressive litigation tactics” (including the alleged “sham” Doe suit) contributed to reputational decline. This is a damages defense: even if there’s harm, was it caused by something else? 5️⃣ IMPEACHMENT UNDER FRE 608(B) WF also assert the filing was “outright deceit against the court system,” and thus relevant to credibility and subject to inquiry on cross-examination under FRE 608(b). They add that “other litigation” can be used for that purpose, citing Second Circuit authority. #blakelively #justinbaldoni #livelyvsbaldoni #vanzan #vansham

@TVMovieAddict But like, you said, even then, it's not the end of the world if someone doesn't like your music. Sheesh.

@TVMovieAddict It's even ok to not like someone's music emphatically. Oh no! He said "**definitely** not?" How dare he be sure! He could have said like "no, she's overrated" and that would still be not that bad. Because she's the biggest musician, she can both be overrated &still be fairly good

It’s because the majority of swifties are kids who still don’t understand that it’s ok to not like someone’s music. Some of them are also unhinged 😫 #taylorswift variety.com/2026/tv/news/j…

@bruijn_mde It's not often I check off every box when saying a community note was helpful, but this time I did. It is an important addition. Thanks for bringing it to my attention. 🥰

Blake Lively: I’m suing you because you cost me money!!! Justin: Okay, so let’s talk about your money. Blake: What? …. (Pls click on TMZ post, request community note)

It has been 121 days since this administration was legally required to release the full Epstein files. Still waiting on those 3 million files. NO ONE IS MOVING ON. RELEASE THE FILES.

Not saying LGBTQ can't be abusive, but we have a much longer tradition of overlooking "respectable businessmen" abusers, than people w weird hair colors. Not to mention, Punks in particular have a particularly safe reputation. Looks, personal choices, have nothing to do w safety.

To reiterate: the worst abusers work hard to look normal. I'm more afraid of a guy in a suit in my bathroom than any LGBTQ person. Being obviously different draws attention &suspicion. So predators become pros at avoiding standing out & distract by loudly accusing those who do.

@Supernatural979 He was the best partner she had & that's why she's obsessed w him. That's also part of why he's moved on, she's so shallow, he could do better by closing his eyes and picking a random fan from the crowd. Even if he gets a crazy fan (no shade, it happens) still better than AH.

Don’t forget this is after the TRO and also remember go two years after the divorce she was texting CC trying to get hold of Johnny CC agreed that she could send a letter to his office. No abused woman does that. Especially after having several partners

Aug 2025: “We have absolutely nothing to hide…” — Blake Lively attorney Esra Hudson on the Vanzan subpoena. Apr 2026: “Your honor, please hide the Vanzan subpoena from the trial jury...” — Blake Lively attorney Esra Hudson. deadline.com/2025/04/justin…

I swear it’s like bloody clockwork, Johnny Depp makes an appearance at CinemaCon to rapturous applause to promote his new movie And what’s-her-face crawls out from under her rock for totally not staged ‘look how happy I am’ pap pics with her PR accessories, aka her kids 🙄😒

Tyler Robinson's defense is making a perfectly reasonable request to be granted a continuance because the ATF and FBI will not hand over files they have had since September. Erika's lawyers are fighting this continuance—they want the preliminary hearing to go forward. They claim they have enough circumstantial evidence, and they plan to object to some of the discovery requests anyway. Why would they object to the discovery requests? Why would they want the case to go forward without the FBI and ATF having produced the DNA data and chain of custody pertaining the very videos they plan to present at the probably cause hearing? This is outrageous. This case SHOULD NOT GO FORWARD until the defense is given the discovery that Kash Patel is withholding.

THIS IS HYSTERICAL: THE CLASSIC EXPERT SHOWDOWN In WF’s expert rebuttal to @blakelively's expert report authored by Dr. Dina Mayzlin, Nicole Alexander supports her analysis by arguing that the methodologies used are not only academically sound but also operationally reliable in business settings where accuracy and reproducibility are commercially essential. In doing so, Alexander specifically draws on the work of Dr. Mayzlin—Blake Lively’s own expert. A few pages later, Alexander concludes that Dr. Mayzlin’s report contains significant methodological shortcomings that undermine the reliability and validity of her findings. She points to issues involving transparency, validation, technical rigor, and adherence to established best practices in both machine learning and social science research. So... I am not really surprised that WF want to exclude Dr. Mayzlin’s report because her approach is novel (never previously used by her), created for this case, and lacks the ordinary hallmarks of a reliable causal framework. ☞ Contrast with her AER paper (differences-in-differences + benchmarks + robustness checks): WF draw a pointed contrast between: — Mayzlin’s peer-reviewed academic hotel-review manipulation research, which used a differences-in-differences regression leveraging two platforms with different “costs of cheating,” plus robustness checks, and — Her expert “BL” work, which WF say uses no formal statistical controls, no benchmark platform comparison, and no robustness testing. 😁😁😁😁 More:⬇️ x.com/schatow/status… #blakelively #justinbaldoni #livelyvsbaldoni

@JungleJuice786 @Variety Whenever this has happened in the past, it's usually because some interviewer brought it up, so she says it. And since it's an interview, it's often not as bad as the headlines make it sound because they're just desperate for clicks.

@Variety Why would she feel the need to comment on this after everyone finally moved on? Clout chasing grandma bitter about a more talented actor than her.

Charlize Theron says "in 10 years," AI will be able to do Timothée Chalamet’s job as an actor, but it will never be able to replace live performance like ballet: “Oh, boy, I hope I run into him one day. That was a very reckless comment on an art form, two art forms, that we need to lift up constantly because, yes, they do have a hard time. But in 10 years, AI is going to be able to do Timothée’s job, but it will not be able to replace a person on a stage dancing live.” variety.com/2026/film/news…

#JohnnyDeppWon The media will do anything to save face💀 The Cut December 2018 "I know the op-ed didn't name Johnny Depp but it's definitely about him." The Cut June 2025 "Wait, why would Johnny Depp think it was about him?"

Oh! This is Perfect! Not only is JD Booked & Busy, while AH is blacklisted... But for a journalist to label AH in an article titled, "Infamous Gold Diggers".. 🤣😂 This is going to piss off AH & her Stans!! Infamous gold diggers who married into wealth share.google/cQpAR659mkFnOo…

Why are you so pathetic @TMZ? If you'd stop with lies, maybe your views wouldn't be so low that you had to stoop to clickbait. 1) Justin is no longer a defendant, & 2) net worth is relevant to claims of damages to her brand, dumb dumbs. You don't even try to present facts do you?

@cikumkenya @TMZ They're making too much money whenever blake pays them to publish her spin.

@TMZ TMZ gonna go broke once this case is over! Justin is NO LONGER A DEFENDANT in this case but y'all can't keep it his name off your page just for clicks and propaganda! Shame on you all!!

Justin Baldoni Wants Blake Lively's Net Worth Discussed in Trial tmz.me/57hkWe2

@TMZ Leave Justin’s name out of CLICKBAIT trashy journalism TMZ. Wayfarer is the defendant, not Justin. So instead of using Justin’s face, how about you use the company’s logo. Like Sony, Warner Brothers 🤔. The right way🙄. Blake lively is still the plaintiff. You could use hers 🤷🏼‍♀️