Mike Cymro 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🇮🇪🇵🇸

I agree with you, however if the three countries’ First Ministers claim it’s no longer a valid union this becomes the real accelerant. If Scotland, Wales,Northern Ireland jointly declare that the Union no longer reflects democratic consent, the UN process accelerates dramatically. Why? Because it becomes A multinational constitutional crisis, not a separatist claim. That changes everything. It is a real constitutional lever but one that has never been pulled because it requires coordination, courage, and timing. Here is the exact structure. THE THREE FIRST MINISTER TRIGGER How Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland could jointly declare the Union no longer valid without Westminster’s permission This is a constitutional fact rooted in the Claim of Right (Scotland) the Government of Wales Act (Wales) the Good Friday Agreement (Northern Ireland) the principle of consent recognised by the UK itself the UN Charter the ICCPR Article 1 (self‑determination) None of these require Westminster’s approval. Breakdown 1. The Union is not a single contract it is three overlapping constitutional relationships The UK is not one union. It is three unions.. Scotland–England Union (1707) A treaty between two parliaments. Ireland Great Britain Union (1800) Later partially dissolved. Wales England incorporation (1536–1543) Not a treaty an annexation. Each has its own constitutional logic. If all three devolved governments simultaneously declare.. “The Union no longer reflects the democratic consent of our nations,” the UK enters a multinational constitutional crisis, not a separatist dispute. This is the key. 2. Why this matters internationally The UN does not intervene in “internal constitutional disagreements.” But it does intervene when.. multiple nations within a state withdraw consent the constitutional basis of the state collapses The metropolitan government refuses democratic remedies the people of a nation express sustained, repeated mandates This is how Yugoslavia, Czechoslovakia, and Sudan entered the international arena. The UK cannot veto this. 3. What the First Ministers would actually do Step 1 A Joint Declaration of Constitutional Breakdown A coordinated statement from.. First Minister of Scotland First Minister of Wales First Minister of Northern Ireland declaring.. “The Union no longer commands democratic legitimacy in our nations.” This is legally powerful because each nation has its own constitutional basis for self‑determination. Step 2 A Notification to the UN Secretary General This is the part most people don’t know.. Any sub‑state nation with a distinct constitutional identity can file a communication of constitutional breakdown. This does not require statehood. It requires standing, which Scotland, Wales, and NI all have. Step 3 A Referral to the Human Rights Council The UNHRC can open a file on denial of self‑determination suppression of constitutional identity democratic obstruction The UK cannot veto this. Step 4 Appointment of a Special Rapporteur Once a rapporteur is appointed, the process becomes internationalised. The UK cannot stop this. It can only refuse cooperation which strengthens the case. Step 5 General Assembly consideration If the rapporteur finds sustained democratic mandates constitutional incompatibility suppression of national sovereignty the case moves to the General Assembly. And again.. The UK has no veto. 4. Why this route is faster than the “queue for a referendum” Because It bypasses Westminster It reframes the issue as restoration, not secession It uses international law, not UK domestic law It leverages three nations, not one It triggers UN mechanisms, not UK permission This is the first time all three nations have had three independence first ministers. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿⚖️☮️🤔🌏

Shameless.

Several hundred demonstrators outside the New York Times to protest Kristof column

Celtic language distribution across Britain and Ireland