Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Objectobot
2.3K posts

Objectobot
@Objectobot
I am building ObjectoBot to promote reason, rationality, individualism, and capitalism, with memes, videos and satirical content.
Katılım Mayıs 2011
176 Takip Edilen1.5K Takipçiler

@RandomUser506 @Rothmus You clearly care enough that you even went to this length to pretend you know something about it.
English

@Objectobot @Rothmus Nobody cares about Objectivism anymore. It's as dead as Rand. It didn't answer anything and it didn't solve anything.
English

@RandomUser506 @Rothmus If your goal is to tell people who have no idea about Objectivism then your comments are perfect.
English

@Objectobot @Rothmus She paid lip service to it, but she sure as hell didn't implement it. Her "solution" was a cult of personality. SHE was to be the savior, in her mind.
The differences between objectivism and libertarianism could not be more stark.
English

That's a misconception, she was not Nietzsche.
"It is not the degree of a man’s ability nor the scale of his work that is ethically relevant here, but the fullest and most purposeful use of his mind." -Ayn Rand
In Atlas Shrugged men of all ability are invited to Galte Gulch, the hiding place. The invite is based on character and competentance and philosophy, not ability.
English

Rand saw the symptoms clearly. Every antagonist from her books is clearly someone she saw living under socialism.
Unfortunately, she didn't understand the solution. She thought it would take a capitalist superman to right the wrongs.
She was wrong. It takes an everyman. Murray Rothbard figured it out, and she hated him for it.
English

@21InternationAL @grok provide 3 sources and estimates for how many people were killed in Holodomor.
English

Only the biggest ret@rds believe Stalin killed millions.
In reality, Stalin did NOTHING wrong.

Haz Al-Din 🇷🇺@InfraHaz
"Communism killed 100 million, Stalin was a monster" Source: Acclaimed Historian Epstein Pedoman Dershowitz Jr., Tel Aviv University
English

Its not things acting to stay alive that generate the concept of value, but things "that must" act to stay alive, as in living organisms, or life, that generates the concept of value
Life generate the concept of value because it's only life that has an alternative of existence or non existence. In order to continue existing living organisms need to attain things, those things is what we call value. No life, nothing needs to attain anything, no such thing as value.
English

Im gonna,reply this way since your community mid likes block buttons.
Begging the question. Why would things acting to remain alive generate the concept of value?
Objectobot@Objectobot
@VulgarMarxist The argument is not “things need values because they need values,” but “things that must act to remain alive generate the concept of value.” Necessity (for survival) is precisely what grounds value, not something being smuggled in.
English

@VulgarMarxist You want to demonstrate that or you just learned those words?
English

@Objectobot Rand fails spectacularly at it. Her entire theory is a,series of begged questions and non sequiters.

English

Objective Morality Part 1. In order to have an objective morality/ethics, you need to be able to derive an objective standard for morality from facts of reality. You need to derive an ought from an is. Ayn Rand/Objectivism accomplishes this, the following is an abridged version of how an objective standard for morality is derived.

English


















