Father Ramirez

@SiphoMalunga @ibbosnr @SiphoMalunga you have a flawed understanding of secret negotiations. It's bizarre & out of order for a leader to engage in secret talks whilst keeping fellow top leaders in dark. You are naive & too trusting...very risky espec' when stakes are high & a leader can be 'turned'.

@ibbosnr The point stands Prof. I get that nuance (you know I am for Inclusive Dialogue) I'm not delving into detail & process of political negotiations which are usually almost all in secret.Engaging the principle. Recall when Mandela started negotiations, the rest of the ANC didnt know.

1|Zimbabweans! Zimbabweans! Zimbabweans! I called you 3 times! There's nothing wrong about Chamisa negotiating to share power. Smith did it with Muzorewa, Zapu did it with Zanu, Zanu did it with MDC. Mandela did it with DeKlerk, Raila did it with Uhuru. Savimbi with Dos Santos.

@SiphoMalunga @ibbosnr @SiphoMalunga SA struggle was much more than ending Apartheid. Don't be lazy to read SA history. What was the purpose of having the talks for the Black majority? Anyway this is beyond your understanding

@OcularOcean @ibbosnr They ended apartheid. Stop asking "silly" questions. Whether the end of apartheid and the black majority government delivered change to the black people is a separate question.

@vhayolenti @SiphoMalunga @ibbosnr @SiphoMalunga is too daft to comprehend this. He is a shallow analyst who is very simplistic and short-sighted. @SiphoMalunga stop spreading your poor analysis.

@SiphoMalunga @OcularOcean @ibbosnr Apartheid did not end. It was reformed. South Africans still live in these conditions, 7 million of them.