Realmadrid314

@Rach4Patriarchy My suggestion is to try quizbowl archives! Tons of archives of questions (questions are hard at first then get easier until the giveaway). It is interactive and connects geography with all types of other fields. collegiate.quizbowlpackets.com/2687/ Geography was my field of study.

My 17 yr old doesn’t have as much in depth knowledge on world geography as she would like to, so she just wrote me a text outlining how she wants to go about learning it and asked my opinion. Holy crap. I’m so glad I homeschooled them when literally everyone told me not to.

@AmericanGadfly2 @Rach4Patriarchy She looks like Betty Spaghetty

@Oh_Chapelli @Rach4Patriarchy They tend to like that js

I can’t believe how many people this triggered 😂 I didn’t even hear a single word she said. I had the sound off. But I’m telling you the hair never lies.

@Mnoble35237 @Rach4Patriarchy Yikes. What a weirdo

@Rach4Patriarchy @Rach4Patriarchy You're a bigg time Trump dick sucker, was he one of the men you fucked before Andrew?

@chrispykin69337 @Kathy4Truth @Rach4Patriarchy You are correct, she is Orthodox and would not want Integralism. Interestingly, in the Whatever debate I mentioned in another thread, she says that she would LIKE a monarchy, but clearly knows it isn't realistic (hence the "If I could"): youtu.be/R3JiwMzTA94?t=…

@Kathy4Truth @Oh_Chapelli @Rach4Patriarchy She's Orthodox, but something like that, yeah.

Do your rights come from God... or from men with guns? @Rach4Patriarchy says women only have rights because men allow us to have them. That doesn’t sound like the Declaration of Independence. That sounds like brute force politics. Once you accept that worldview, it won’t stop with women. Next it will be men who don’t own land, retirees, the disabled, and anyone the powerful... or whoever is holding the Autopen... decide has no “skin in the game.” That’s not America. That’s Somalia with better paperwork. Rachel thinks power creates rights. America says God gives rights... and government exists to protect them, not rescind them.

@chrispykin69337 @Kathy4Truth @Rach4Patriarchy "btw, I don't care one way or the other. Im happy enough to entertain ideas that disagree with mine." Of course! Having seen a lot of Wilson's content, the context can include many debates. The idea in this is what I have been basing my thoughts off: youtu.be/R3JiwMzTA94?t=…

@Oh_Chapelli @Kathy4Truth @Rach4Patriarchy btw, I don't care one way or the other. Im happy enough to entertain ideas that disagree with mine. Im not saying 'bad Rachel' for wanting take womens vote away. But thats clearly what she is arguing. There's no question about that.

@Kathy4Truth @chrispykin69337 @Rach4Patriarchy A mother as the head of household is different than a single woman. Another thing: she was arguing the negative side of a debate prompt, which means it doesn't have to be exactly her opinion. If you want her opinion: 26:41 she tells you what she thinks youtu.be/R3JiwMzTA94?t=…

@Oh_Chapelli @chrispykin69337 @Rach4Patriarchy Your statement is false. Watch our conversation. I asked her specifically about women who are not married. She said they would NOT vote. Don't take my word. Watch the debate. ✌🏾

@TheRealJamieKay There is no contradiction or hypocrisy. Illegal aliens are treated as fair as they allow the authorities to treat them. They can literally CLAIM MONEY to leave the country. They were bad guests and we are telling them to leave.

Funny how these ‘patriotic Christians’ never seem to follow this part of the Bible. Leviticus 19:33–34.

These Indian men just defaced a sacred Native American site known as Cathedral Rock in Sedona, Arizona. Deport them.

@Kathy4Truth @chrispykin69337 @Rach4Patriarchy be on standby for war while women are not. If women don't have an equal responsibility in civic life, why do they have equal say? She isn't saying "disenfranchise women," she is saying "put some skin in the game or you don't get a say in the game."

@Kathy4Truth @chrispykin69337 @Rach4Patriarchy She has specifically stated that a "one vote per household" system would apply to a single mother leading a household. Her proposals aren't based on disenfranchising women even if she thinks it was a mistake to let them vote. The draft shows that men are compelled by law to

@chrispykin69337 @Kathy4Truth @Rach4Patriarchy first, then the disabled, then the poor and unemployed. The idea is that an alternative metric for suffrage would be established and ALL categories of people would be affected.

@chrispykin69337 @Kathy4Truth @Rach4Patriarchy I remember Wilson specifically allowing for women's suffrage in her scenarios. For instance, one vote per household would still apply to single mothers, meaning that women can still vote. I think the framing from Barnette is inaccurate. It's not that women would lose suffrage

@chrispykin69337 @Kathy4Truth @Rach4Patriarchy 19th=can't deny vote based on sex, man or woman. Wilson's desire for the 19th=gone Wilson's 19th replacement=some sort of stakeholder vote, which can include men and women, just like the 19th. Nothing about sex changes Also, Monarchy is biblical, but is, like she said, a dream

@Oh_Chapelli @Kathy4Truth @Rach4Patriarchy I think you're the person who doesn't understand Wilson, mate. She wants to repeal the 19th, limit suffrage generally, and supports monrachy. Barnette could not be more accurate. She is explicit about it:

@chrispykin69337 @Kathy4Truth @Rach4Patriarchy "Once you accept that worldview, it won’t stop with women. Next it will be men who don’t own land, retirees, the disabled, and anyone the powerful...." She shows in this tweet that she thinks stakeholder suffrage is a rouse to remove women's suffrage, which Wilson doesn't want.

@Oh_Chapelli @Kathy4Truth @Rach4Patriarchy It pertains to your claim that Barnette has misunderstood Wilson. She has not. Would Wilson limit suffrage in precisely the way Barnette claims if she could? Yes. She is a critic of universal suffrage generally. She favors stakeholder democracy just as Barnette claims.

@chrispykin69337 @Kathy4Truth @Rach4Patriarchy Nothing you said pertained to force doctrine, which is the descriptive theory in question. Rachel made prescriptive claims, like limited suffrage, but force doctrine is simply descriptive. You can't lump everything Rachel said in the debate as "force doctrine."

@Oh_Chapelli @Kathy4Truth @Rach4Patriarchy Like when she says she is not saying that 'abortion is right or wrong' that is somewhat dishonest. Rachel is unquestionably pro-life. She goes so far as to depict it as a satanic aspect of feminism that began as a sacrificial ritual.

@Kathy4Truth @Rach4Patriarchy That's the part you missed. The freedoms that you are pointing toward are only guaranteed because you have strong men standing between you and the horrors of evil men. Men are the only ones who can protect the rights granted by God.

@Kathy4Truth @Rach4Patriarchy Society does not end at our borders. If our defenses are weak, the men from other countries will take our resources. Force doctrine doesn't just apply to your own country; you have to defend against ALL men.

BREAKING: Minneapolis daycare owner featured in Nick Shirley’s video Fahima Egeh Mahamud, CHARGED with wire fraud and conspiracy for allegedly stealing over $4.6 million through false claims to federal and state programs