The old M can’t come to the phone right now

Plot twist … we’re NOT the problem. 👯‍♀️

‼️👩🏼‍⚖️NEW MARIE CARVALHO MOTION TO SEAL ‼️⚖️ Today, via certified mail, I received a motion from Marie Carvalho to seal last week’s court hearing. In it, she claims I shared her “medical diagnosis and history” on social media after the hearing. See her motion below. Every single detail she testified to regarding her medical history she had already publicly disclosed herself, multiple times, on her own shows. This is just a sample. She was explicitly told at the start of the hearing that it was being recorded and part of the public record. None of us were “discussing her medical history.” I simply mentioned what she said under oath, including her claim that I made fun of her do-rag. She tried spinning that into mockery of a disability. False. I had zero idea why she was wearing it, and contrary to popular belief, I don’t watch all her shitty shows. This is yet another example of Marie wasting the court’s time. I’ll be filing an opposition next week, loaded with case law. In New Hampshire, there is a strong constitutional presumption that court proceedings and records are public. The burden is on the moving party to prove that a specific and substantial interest in confidentiality outweighs that presumption. That’s a high bar. Motions to seal are for truly sensitive matters, i.e. domestic violence, minors, etc. They are not information you yourself already put out on your shows. There is no irreparable harm when the information was already public by your own hand. The judge is going to love this. Especially after you said “it’s back on” right after your petition was denied.