A

52.8K posts

A banner
A

A

@OneThr35ive

United States Katılım Ekim 2017
176 Takip Edilen8 Takipçiler
A retweetledi
A retweetledi
🌲🌸🏛️Mr. Remote🇺🇸🌸🌲
If the Supreme Court strike's down Trump's birthright citizenship EO, then he needs to immediately pivot the party in the direction of implementing an immigration moratorium for at least 10 years. An amendment to the constitution isn't happening anytime soon so this would be the best way to mitigate the long-term damage and ramifications of such a disgraceful ruling.
English
64
157
1.7K
23.4K
A retweetledi
tantum
tantum@QuasLacrimas·
We need a supreme court ruling that anything that can be imposed by executive order, can be undone by executive order. Otherwise it’s not an EO, it’s a form of legislation and that’s not within the president’s powers
Mike Lee@BasedMikeLee

Biden badly misused immigration parole, using it unlawfully to bring millions of migrants into the U.S. A federal judge has now told Trump he can’t reverse Biden’s unlawful use of this narrow authority. It’s all so upside down.

English
12
154
1.1K
45.8K
A retweetledi
Shipwreckedcrew
Shipwreckedcrew@shipwreckedcrew·
Nightmare: Eventually 10 million Chinese nationals become U.S. citizens via birthright citizenship. Vote by mail adopted nearly nationwide. Vote by mail ballots forwarded en masse to US citizens who are actually Chinese nationals. CCP directs mass mail-in of ballots all in favor of the same candidate. CCP controls outcome of U.S. POTUS elections.
English
219
1.5K
5.3K
84.5K
A retweetledi
Chris
Chris@chriswithans·
You know they do that because SCOTUS said Obamacare was not a tax but also a tax and that DACA was legal by EO but not rescindable and they saw Obergefell and Bostock and also how little Masterpiece Cake Shop did to stop Colorado's tyranny? And then they lived through 4 years of Biden creating de facto permanent legal status for millions of migrants while also letting anyone else in anywhere for the sheer lols? You understand this, right? SCOTUS said you can't discriminate on the basis of race against Whites and Asians and all the Democrats immediately said we are most definitely going to keep doing that, and no legal conservative said that was wrong. And SCOTUS said Biden could not forgive student loans and Biden immediately held a press conference saying here are some more ways we will illegally "forgive" student loans. And oh, by the way, the people very clearly voted in favor of Prop 187 and Prop 8 and yet the courts were like, Haha Elections Don't Matter. And the people very clearly voted for Trump and yet the Star Wars judges said you still need unanimous permission from the judiciary to do anything unless it's creating mass entropy. Rule of law keeps going one way and one way only. So that is why they are the way they are.
Legal Phil@Legal_Fil

A significant proportion of the people who poo-poo the rule of law are under the delusion that they would fare well in its absence.

English
28
490
2.6K
80.5K
A retweetledi
FischerKing
FischerKing@FischerKing64·
This is true. If SCOTUS decides the 14th Amendment requires birthright citizenship, travel agents all over the world have more say over American citizenship than American voters. Because all constitutional amendments are impossible today. We’re too divided. x.com/ninovantweeto/…
English
10
68
1.2K
47.5K
A retweetledi
Retro Coast
Retro Coast@RetroCoast·
Birthright Citizenship is the death knell for America. When you have open borders, and anyone can just walk in and breed "citizens"- forget it. Your country won't exist in 100 years.
English
64
132
765
7K
A retweetledi
Christian Collins
Christian Collins@CollinsforTX·
Democrat Congresswoman Delia Ramirez: "I'm a proud Guatemalan before I'm an American." I'd say this is a perfect example of why we must end birthright citizenship.
English
2.8K
16.6K
46.8K
770.1K
A retweetledi
Senator Eric Schmitt
Senator Eric Schmitt@SenEricSchmitt·
We must upend the New Deal Era perversion of American sovereignty that is unlimited Birthright Citizenship. In a generation, if 9% of our population is born to illegal aliens and tourists, we will no longer have a nation—we will be a hotel, not a homeland. We will have a permanent underclass of "citizens" that are foreign nationals who owe no loyalty to America while having the voting power to determine our national elections. As I’ve said many times before: America isn’t an economic zone. It isn’t an airport with a shopping mall attached. It’s our country. It’s our people. It’s our home. It's time we start fighting for it. x.com/RWMaloneMD/sta…
English
144
622
2K
20K
A retweetledi
Adam Johnston
Adam Johnston@adamkjohnston·
The existence of Delia Ramirez in Congress is why Birthright Citizenship must be ended. Delia Ramirez was born on American soil after her mother illegally crossed the U.S. border. She’s also married to a DACA recipient. Now she wants to end ICE and immigration enforcement.
Adam Johnston tweet media
English
765
5.8K
14.7K
142.3K
A retweetledi
Big Money
Big Money@MoneyMan·
Cold ass verse Judges 10:14 “Go and cry out to the gods you have chosen. Let them save you when you are in trouble
English
59
2.3K
14.4K
276.6K
A retweetledi
C3
C3@C_3C_3·
Birthright citizenship steals the Birthright of actual Americans. Facts.
English
334
2.2K
16.4K
88.6K
A retweetledi
Liz Wheeler
Liz Wheeler@Liz_Wheeler·
In the next decade, over 1M Chinese communists will be able to vote in American elections. You heard me. Thanks to birth tourism, Chinese billionaires are paying surrogates to birth their children on U.S. soil so the babies are American citizens. The children are taken back to China after birth, raised as communists, then when they’re 18, they’re allowed to vote in U.S. elections. THAT is why birthright citizenship must end. 1M votes swings any election. Soon the Chinese communists will “legally” control our elections. Unless we end birthright citizenship.
English
1.2K
9.3K
22.8K
384K
A retweetledi
Blood Memory
Blood Memory@AnemoiaAmerica·
“It’s a new world, but it’s the same Constitution.” Is the most ignorant argument in favor of birthright citizenship. You could use that same phrase as an argument against every amendment since the founding. I don’t think they want to set that precedent.
English
3
4
127
1.9K
A retweetledi
🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸
Likely Supreme Court holding: We fought a Civil War so we can mail U.S. election ballots and Social Security checks to 1.5 million Chinese nationals with birthright citizenship living in Beijing. If you don’t like it, amend the Constitution. We’re just following the law here.
English
223
1.7K
7.1K
129.4K
A retweetledi
Jack Posobiec
Jack Posobiec@JackPosobiec·
The Indian Wars were still ongoing in the Western Territories and Great Plains when the 14th Amendment was passed. This wasn’t an academic argument it had serious nations security implications for the nation
English
11
71
566
26.9K