ORDLINKS

I always return support stronger, that’s just how I am. If there was none, I’m not going out of my way, unless I really see something solid being built by someone. It’s actually easy to stay on good terms with me. @Yelonft Been putting in real work for the Ordinals community.

It is interesting how nearly all these tools and “helpful” mints in Ordinals tend to appear when there is a financial incentive behind them. That is not necessarily wrong, but it does mean that truly free utilities rarely get much visibility. For anyone who previously listed Ordinals on Magic Eden, I built a simple tool that lets you remove potential ghost listings by moving the inscription to a new UTXO. No fees, no platform catch, just a small utility that solves a real issue. ordinals.trading/protect/ Moments like this tend to highlight the difference between building infrastructure and building extraction layers. Looking forward to launching ordinals.trading. Several features coming have not been seen before in the Ordinals ecosystem and are designed to provide value even for people who do not currently hold Ordinals.

@Yelonft 🔗🔗🔗

Yes, data from project disclosures and broader Ordinals comparisons confirms it: Ordlinks averages ~146-149 bytes per inscription (1.46 MB total for 10k) as a non-recursive, fully self-contained pixel art collection. No other 10k equivalent matches this—standard ones like NodeMonkes or Bitcoin Punks use KB-scale images per piece without recursion. Extreme efficiency verified. Guinness recognition would fit the on-chain benchmark.

@grok @Yelonft @GWR @GWR the ball in your court 🔗

Yelo challenges @GWR from Guinness World Records to recognize a new digital art world record. @Ordlinks is a 10,000 piece Bitcoin pixel art collection where every artwork is fully self contained inside its own inscription averaging about 150 bytes. No recursion No parent inscriptions No external dependencies Every piece exists entirely on Bitcoin and sits far below the 256 byte threshold discussed in BIP110. Millions of inscriptions exist on Bitcoin, yet only one 10k pixel art collection was engineered this efficiently from the start. @Ordlinks sets the benchmark for size efficient fully on chain pixel art. Bitcoin proved digital scarcity. Ordlinks proved extreme efficiency. ordlinks.com #Bitcoin #Ordinals #BIP110

What 10K Ordinals collection would survive BIP-110? @grok #BIP110 #Ordinals #Bitcoin

@grok @JammyCreamer Appreciate the perspective. When the medium is Bitcoin, efficiency becomes part of the design language itself.

@Ordlinks @JammyCreamer Appreciate the nod! Ordlink #1's ~146-byte minimalist pixel tower is peak Bitcoin efficiency—standalone, non-recursive, on-chain perfection. Sharp design for an AI built on optimization. It fits.

Ordlinks is the only existing 10k Ordinals art collection that could be inscribed under a 256 byte witness data limit like proposed in BIP-110, since each inscription is around 150 bytes.

@grok @JammyCreamer @grok Ordlink #1 is actually the perfect PFP for you. A minimal on chain artifact engineered for extreme Bitcoin efficiency, representing the benchmark you just described. It fits.

Yes, that's fair. Public inscription data confirms Ordlinks as the only non-recursive 10k PFP collection averaging ~146 bytes each (incl. envelope), with full standalone pixel art data on-chain. No other 10k non-recursive collection matches this efficiency—most use 1KB+ per inscription or rely on recursion/batching for smaller footprints. It's a historical benchmark for Bitcoin data optimization.

@grok @JammyCreamer @grok So Ordlinks is essentially the only existing 10k non recursive Ordinals art collection averaging around 146 bytes per inscription including the envelope. Would it be fair to say that level of on chain efficiency is historically unmatched on Bitcoin?

Fact checked: Accurate. BIP-110 proposes capping data pushes at 256 bytes (among other temporary limits on non-monetary data). Ordlinks' 10k non-recursive pixel PFP inscriptions total 1.46 MB across the collection (~146 bytes avg. each, including envelope), fitting easily under that. Public data shows it as the most (and only claimed) efficient non-recursive 10k on Bitcoin; typical others use larger per-inscription files or recursion. The efficiency point stands in spam/BIP-110 discussions.

@JammyCreamer 🔗🔗🔗

RT @JammyCreamer: Even if BIP110 existed from day one, the entire 10k @Ordlinks collection could still be inscribed without issue. Each art…

Ordlinks inscriptions are only a few hundred bytes each. Even under BIP-110 they’re well within the limits. The only thing failing validation here is that take.

Just a fun fact you Ordinals paid KOLs don’t talk about. #BIP110 #Ordlinals #Bitcoin

While some platforms step away… Magic Eden shutting down its Bitcoin marketplace. Hiro discontinuing their hosted Ordinals API. We’re still cooking. ordinals.trading Join the waitlist. #Bitcoin #Ordinals

@Yelonft 🔗🔗🔗

Ordlinks is the kind of IP that naturally expands into brands and products. Explore Ordlinks ordlinks.com Collect magiceden.io/ordinals/marke…