Kaelo_

31.3K posts

Kaelo_ banner
Kaelo_

Kaelo_

@Orgorkaelo_

Nigerian

Abuja Katılım Ocak 2012
4.7K Takip Edilen1.1K Takipçiler
Kaelo_
Kaelo_@Orgorkaelo_·
@W3bByte @nzemmili We allow rascals to take over the political space and then turn around cry, "will the politicians listen." The politician in itself is not the poblem but the characters that have taken over the political space.
English
0
0
0
8
w3bByte
w3bByte@W3bByte·
@nzemmili This is such a great idea, but will the politicians listen?
English
1
0
4
780
Nze
Nze@nzemmili·
Africans should be doing videos like this, and make it a form of protests. I love what this Ghanaian lady is doing.
English
34
871
2.8K
43.5K
GodSon
GodSon@Thegreatlight10·
@TheBeninBlogger I feel like INEC should interfere in such comments and take necessary actions against such individuals if they were really and independent body .
English
1
0
0
31
The Benin Blogger
The Benin Blogger@TheBeninBlogger·
"We Are Repeating Our Endorsement for Senator Oshiomhole Here. Anybody Who Wants To Print Posters; The Moment You Place The Posters, It Will Be Removed." - Jarrett Tenebe
English
90
35
173
87.9K
Kaelo_
Kaelo_@Orgorkaelo_·
@OkpanachiSulie1 @OgarEmmaOwogeka The law is one of those that feed from these endless and senseless abuse of judicial reach. That's why he's defending it with all the strength he has.
English
0
0
0
5
Okpanachi Sulieman
Okpanachi Sulieman@OkpanachiSulie1·
@OgarEmmaOwogeka Oga Mr lawyer do you know more than supreme court that said internal affairs of political parties are not justiciable
English
2
0
2
39
Emmanuel O. Ogar Esq
Emmanuel O. Ogar Esq@OgarEmmaOwogeka·
The right to fair hearing is a constitutional right and where a person alleged that their rights (under any circumstances) has been violated, those individuals have the right to fair hearings or right to seek redress in court. Relying on section 83 of the Electoral Act, without taking cognizance of section 36(1) of 1999 Constitution is completely absurd, in my opinion. No law or authority is superior to the constitution. To think that any law will be made to oust the jurisdiction of a Court that has been conferred by the constitution or the prevent a right of someone that the constitution has already guaranteed is laughable. While it is wrong to use the court to prevent the flow democratic activities, it is particularly important to always ensure that rights of individuals who belong to an organization is still protected and where there is a violation or an alleged violation of a person’s rights, then the court cannot by any other law be prevented from exercising it judicial power to remedy the wrong. In my submission, Section 83 of the Electoral Act, 2026, is inconsistent with section 36(1) of the 1999 Constitution that guarantee the Right of fair hearing of everyone, therefore to the extent that it prevents the right of an individual to apply to court for redress on a wrong done to them, it is void for it inconsistency. Notwithstanding the above, I do agree that, interlocutory Orders, especially those that seeks to stall a democratic process should be sparingly granted and on a very strong grounds. The court should not be readily available to grant interim Orders, or allow parties to use frivolous applications to obtain orders that stalls due democratic processes. Finally, threatening lawyers or judges in statements, is on its own totally unacceptable. The NBA is not a political party to make statements, advising parties or INEC on matters pending before the Court, also, the NBA and its leadership, cannot constitute itself to a Court to give a conclusive interpretation of the law or give verdict based on what the leadership believes is the true position of the law, no matter how persuasive the facts appears before it. Best Regards. E. O. Ogar, Esq.
Nigerian Bar Association@NigBarAssoc

OUR LAWS AND DEMOCRACY MUST BE PROTECTED AT ALL TIMES The Nigerian Bar Association has closely monitored recent political and legal developments as the nation gradually approaches the 2027 General Elections. These developments, particularly those arising from the interpretation and potential application of provisions of the Electoral Act 2026, raise serious constitutional, democratic, and rule-of-law concerns that require immediate intervention. We particularly deprecate the disturbing involvement by lawyers and courts in the internal affairs of political parties despite the clear provisions of the Electoral Act, 2026, which stipulates in Section 83 of the Act that “No court in Nigeria shall entertain jurisdiction over any suit or matter pertaining to the internal affairs of a political party.” Not only are courts denied jurisdiction to entertain any matter pertaining to the internal affairs of a political party, but they are also precluded from granting any interim or interlocutory injunction even where any action has been brought in violation of the Act. The section further provides that “Where such an action is brought in negation of this provision, no interim or interlocutory injunction shall be entertained by the Court, but the Court shall suspend its ruling and deliver it at the stage of final judgment and shall give accelerated hearing to the matter”. What we now see are situations where actions are not only instituted in Courts by lawyers in clear violation of the Act, but Courts purportedly grant interim and/or interlocutory injunctions in clear contempt of statutory provisions of the law. This does not augur well for our democracy. Democracy will not thrive in a situation where lawyers and courts take actions and decisions that not only negate our laws but also do violence to them. This emerging trend of subverting the clear letters of the Electoral Act and dragging courts into the internal affairs of political parties through disingenuous litigation, forum shopping, and malafide applications designed to secure undemocratic political advantage, bodes no good for our democracy. Such practices, if not immediately curbed, would directly contradict the clear intendment of the Electoral Act and risk transforming the judicial processes into avenues for political score-settling or electoral manipulation. We must reiterate that these provisions were clearly designed to curb abuse of court processes and discourage forum shopping in political disputes. This is therefore why the NBA is concerned that the abuse, misapplication, or selective deployment of these provisions may create opportunities for manipulation capable of undermining democratic competition and shrinking the political space. Members of the Bar are reminded that they are Ministers in the Temple of Justice and not political agents seeking judicial endorsement of partisan objectives. The filing of actions intended to draw courts into internal political party disputes, particularly where jurisdiction is expressly excluded, constitutes an abuse of court process and a violation of professional responsibility. The NBA will take firm steps to deter such conduct. Lawyers who deliberately file actions aimed at procuring judicial interference in intra-party affairs, or who seek ex parte or interlocutory orders in clear violation of statutory provisions, risk facing disciplinary proceedings. We will not hesitate to present petitions before the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Committee (LPDC) against any Legal Practitioner found to be engaging in such conduct. This will be pursued decisively to serve as a deterrent and to preserve the sanctity of the judicial process. The Nigerian judiciary must stay vigilant and resist being drawn into political theatrics. Courts should firmly decline invitations, no matter how artfully crafted, to intervene in matters the law explicitly bars them from.

English
108
137
292
48.6K
CreamShaw
CreamShaw@DukeDaviddeedee·
@BeckzUmoh The Senate president is from your state. If your dream becomes a reality, he will want to become the president of this your dream Ask yourself this question, is that the type of president you want for everyone? All the states you mentioned are capable of being different countries
English
2
0
2
132
🤎BECCA UMOH™
🤎BECCA UMOH™@BeckzUmoh·
Akwa Ibom state Rivers state Edo state Bayelsa state Cross river state Delta state These state should have their own country if at all Nigeria want to divide with Akwa Ibom State being the capital.
English
20
9
37
2.4K
Taiwo_Ajakaye
Taiwo_Ajakaye@dmightyangel·
"That same David Mark when OBJ was pitching GSM phones said mobile phone is not for the poor!" Aisha Yesufu Sept 2018.... "In Davi Mark Leadership we stand" Aisha Yesufu April 2026..... Welcome to the world of CONSISTENCY🤣🤣🤣
Taiwo_Ajakaye tweet media
Aisha Yesufu@AishaYesufu

Good morning Nigerians I am an ADC registered member and I will put my all in building my party!!!! In David Mark’s leadership We Stand #UnitedForADC #ThisTooShallPass adcregistration.ng

English
21
279
416
16.7K
Kaelo_ retweetledi
Arewa Daddy
Arewa Daddy@ishakaa·
📌📌📌📌📌📌📌 Dear @afamosigwe Since you’ve identified this dangerous trend and you have the list of these lawyers why is the @NigBarAssoc that you lead still lamenting instead of taking action? Time is of essence The CJN Kudirat Kekere Ekun and her @njcNig are responsible for the mess Joash Amupitan is also said to be a lawyer why won’t @NigBarAssoc take serious action against him or is he enjoying immunity? This @inecnigeria like epistle is unnecessary and showboating Act Now or you will be remembered in history as being complicit
AFAM OSIGWE@afamosigwe

OUR LAWS AND DEMOCRACY MUST BE PROTECTED AT ALL TIMES The Nigerian Bar Association @NigBarAssoc has closely monitored recent political and legal developments as the nation gradually approaches the 2027 General Elections. These developments, particularly those arising from the interpretation and potential application of provisions of the Electoral Act 2026, raise serious constitutional, democratic, and rule-of-law concerns that require immediate intervention. We particularly deprecate the disturbing involvement by lawyers and courts in the internal affairs of political parties despite the clear provisions of the Electoral Act, 2026, which stipulates in Section 83 of the Act that “No court in Nigeria shall entertain jurisdiction over any suit or matter pertaining to the internal affairs of a political party.” Not only are courts denied jurisdiction to entertain any matter pertaining to the internal affairs of a political party, but they are also precluded from granting any interim or interlocutory injunction even where any action has been brought in violation of the Act. The section further provides that “Where such an action is brought in negation of this provision, no interim or interlocutory injunction shall be entertained by the Court, but the Court shall suspend its ruling and deliver it at the stage of final judgment and shall give accelerated hearing to the matter”. What we now see are situations where actions are not only instituted in Courts by lawyers in clear violation of the Act, but Courts purportedly grant interim and/or interlocutory injunctions in clear contempt of statutory provisions of the law. This does not augur well for our democracy. Democracy will not thrive in a situation where lawyers and courts take actions and decisions that not only negate our laws but also do violence to them. This emerging trend of subverting the clear letters of the Electoral Act and dragging courts into the internal affairs of political parties through disingenuous litigation, forum shopping, and malafide applications designed to secure undemocratic political advantage, bodes no good for our democracy. Such practices, if not immediately curbed, would directly contradict the clear intendment of the Electoral Act and risk transforming the judicial processes into avenues for political score-settling or electoral manipulation. We must reiterate that these provisions were clearly designed to curb abuse of court processes and discourage forum shopping in political disputes. This is therefore why the NBA is concerned that the abuse, misapplication, or selective deployment of these provisions may create opportunities for manipulation capable of undermining democratic competition and shrinking the political space. Members of the Bar are reminded that they are Ministers in the Temple of Justice and not political agents seeking judicial endorsement of partisan objectives. The filing of actions intended to draw courts into internal political party disputes, particularly where jurisdiction is expressly excluded, constitutes an abuse of court process and a violation of professional responsibility. The NBA will take firm steps to deter such conduct. Lawyers who deliberately file actions aimed at procuring judicial interference in intra-party affairs, or who seek ex parte or interlocutory orders in clear violation of statutory provisions, risk facing disciplinary proceedings. We will not hesitate to present petitions before the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Committee (LPDC) against any Legal Practitioner found to be engaging in such conduct. This will be pursued decisively to serve as a deterrent and to preserve the sanctity of the judicial process. The Nigerian judiciary must stay vigilant and resist being drawn into political theatrics. Courts should firmly decline invitations, no matter how artfully crafted, to intervene in matters the law explicitly bars them from. A thread 1/2

English
8
80
161
10.5K
Kaelo_ retweetledi
Saaaaaf Saaaaaf✨🦋
Saaaaaf Saaaaaf✨🦋@Safreenarrhh·
I was having a peaceful sound sleep when people kept calling,asking me 2 log in to X.Apparently,my dear loving friend Ummu has been laughing at me all over the TL,saying ADC doesn’t rate me😂.So I had to come online,see what’s going on,reply to your tweet,nd then go back 2 my sweet sleep🥰. Not being on the convention committee doesn’t mean I’m not valued😂,If I remember correctly,during your own convention,many of ur so-called influencers here weren’t on the committee list either,have you forgotten?😂😂 Ummu whether my name is on the convention list or not,I’ll still be there.And as a committed member of ADC(Arise and shine)🥳 we’ll work very hard to ensure APC is voted out of Nigeria. Wallahi kun kusa kuka in muka kore partynku 😂😂,but as you been my dear friend I can consider you in jawoki partynmu 😂🥳
The Ummulkhairi@The_Umdazz

So despite all the insult we dey collect from my friend @Safreenarrhh. ADC don’t even rate her , she’s not in the convention list 🤣 Let’s all laugh at her abeg 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

English
77
235
1.4K
84.8K
Kaelo_
Kaelo_@Orgorkaelo_·
@The_Umdazz @kabirusaje @Safreenarrhh Your mindset about youths' interest in politics has degenerated so badly. "Seek what you can do for your country; not what the country can do for you." It appears in @OfficialAPCNg you're not just destroying Nigeria of today, you're also ruining Nigeria of the future.
English
0
0
0
1
The Ummulkhairi
The Ummulkhairi@The_Umdazz·
So despite all the insult we dey collect from my friend @Safreenarrhh. ADC don’t even rate her , she’s not in the convention list 🤣 Let’s all laugh at her abeg 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
The Ummulkhairi tweet media
English
30
12
111
95.4K
Kaelo_ retweetledi
BSN
BSN@Barristerstreet·
🇳🇬 JUST IN: Nigerians Call for the Sack of INEC Chairman, Professor Joash Ojo Amupitan, Over Open Pro APC Partisanship A major controversy has erupted today, April 10, 2026, after old tweets traced to Professor Joash Ojo Amupitan resurfaced online, showing clear and unapologetic support for the APC and President Bola Tinubu during the 2023 general elections. The posts, originally made in March 2023 via the handle @Sundayvibe00, included statements like “Victory is sure” while celebrating APC performance during gubernatorial polling. The tone of the tweets was openly partisan, projecting strong allegiance to the ruling party at the time. As the screenshots went viral on X, the account was abruptly altered. The handle was changed to @Sundayvibe00, the profile was locked, and it now carries a “Parody Account” label, a move widely seen as a clear attempt to distance from the exposed posts. Nigerians are now demanding his immediate removal, insisting that such visible political bias disqualifies him from overseeing a neutral and credible electoral process ahead of 2027. The backlash has intensified nationwide, with growing calls that the integrity of Nigeria’s electoral system cannot be entrusted to someone with a documented history of partisan advocacy.
BSN tweet media
BSN@Barristerstreet

Nigerian lawyers and judges are the biggest problems we have in this country. Not even the politicians. This is why the profession is shrouded in secrecy, and the judges administering junk judgments don’t like to be in the news. The current INEC Chairman is a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN). Emperor Wike is a Life Bencher, and his wife is a Justice of the Court of Appeal. Your Senate President, Akpabio, was a lawyer for donkey years before joining politics. Those defending government atrocities are all lawyers because they were trained to find nuances and run with them. If you are looking to cast aspersions, also look in the direction of lawyers and judges. Just last month, our justices were given houses by the politicians of the day in high-ranking estates in Abuja. Are you expecting justice for the common man to come from these folks? Some of us left law practice because this country is awfully unlawful and has made it a difficult terrain for us to practise. There’s no way on earth you will practise law in Nigeria without truncating justice. Otherwise, you will remain a poor fellow. Hold Nigerian lawyers and judges equally responsible for the sad and sorry situation of the dungeon we are in, in Nigeria. A classless, lawless, impecunious, and pauperish fast-paced evil society.

English
63
2.3K
3.2K
154.3K
Kaelo_ retweetledi
Morris Monye
Morris Monye@Morris_Monye·
INEC chairman don cast finally.
English
250
2.9K
9.5K
162.5K
Kaelo_ retweetledi
King JB
King JB@ala_nso·
If i talk, I’m in trouble! Meet the akpabios !!! Akpagarri & akpabiggy 😭😭😭
King JB tweet media
HT
43
197
910
12.4K
Kaelo_ retweetledi
Parallel Facts
Parallel Facts@ParallelFacts·
BREAKING: We Will Not Recognise Any Election Under Him — Shari'ah Supreme Council Instructs All Friday Sermons to Preach Immediate Removal of INEC Chairman Amupitan parallelfactsnews.com/shariah-counci…
Parallel Facts tweet media
English
86
1.1K
2.5K
45.9K
Kaelo_ retweetledi
Benkingsley Nwashara
Benkingsley Nwashara@Benking443·
Look at how Tinubu-APC has turned a whole respected SAN and Professor into a political tool like a NURTW tout. A law Professor and Learned Silk that no longer understands what "Status Quo Ante Bellum" means. A law Professor and learned silk that no longer respects the clear provisions of electoral law and has subverted the law for personal gains. A supposed custodian of legal knowledge who now weaponises that same knowledge to undermine the very system he once swore to uphold. A Learned Silk who, rather than defend the sanctity of due process, now stands accused in the court of public conscience for eroding it. A Law Professor who has traded principle for expediency, integrity for influence, and doctrine for personal gain. A teacher of law who no longer practices what he once preached, subverting justice while cloaked in the authority of scholarship. AMUPITAN MUST RESIGN NOW!
Benkingsley Nwashara tweet media
English
72
785
1.2K
26.6K
Kaelo_ retweetledi
Nigerian Bar Association
Nigerian Bar Association@NigBarAssoc·
OUR LAWS AND DEMOCRACY MUST BE PROTECTED AT ALL TIMES The Nigerian Bar Association has closely monitored recent political and legal developments as the nation gradually approaches the 2027 General Elections. These developments, particularly those arising from the interpretation and potential application of provisions of the Electoral Act 2026, raise serious constitutional, democratic, and rule-of-law concerns that require immediate intervention. We particularly deprecate the disturbing involvement by lawyers and courts in the internal affairs of political parties despite the clear provisions of the Electoral Act, 2026, which stipulates in Section 83 of the Act that “No court in Nigeria shall entertain jurisdiction over any suit or matter pertaining to the internal affairs of a political party.” Not only are courts denied jurisdiction to entertain any matter pertaining to the internal affairs of a political party, but they are also precluded from granting any interim or interlocutory injunction even where any action has been brought in violation of the Act. The section further provides that “Where such an action is brought in negation of this provision, no interim or interlocutory injunction shall be entertained by the Court, but the Court shall suspend its ruling and deliver it at the stage of final judgment and shall give accelerated hearing to the matter”. What we now see are situations where actions are not only instituted in Courts by lawyers in clear violation of the Act, but Courts purportedly grant interim and/or interlocutory injunctions in clear contempt of statutory provisions of the law. This does not augur well for our democracy. Democracy will not thrive in a situation where lawyers and courts take actions and decisions that not only negate our laws but also do violence to them. This emerging trend of subverting the clear letters of the Electoral Act and dragging courts into the internal affairs of political parties through disingenuous litigation, forum shopping, and malafide applications designed to secure undemocratic political advantage, bodes no good for our democracy. Such practices, if not immediately curbed, would directly contradict the clear intendment of the Electoral Act and risk transforming the judicial processes into avenues for political score-settling or electoral manipulation. We must reiterate that these provisions were clearly designed to curb abuse of court processes and discourage forum shopping in political disputes. This is therefore why the NBA is concerned that the abuse, misapplication, or selective deployment of these provisions may create opportunities for manipulation capable of undermining democratic competition and shrinking the political space. Members of the Bar are reminded that they are Ministers in the Temple of Justice and not political agents seeking judicial endorsement of partisan objectives. The filing of actions intended to draw courts into internal political party disputes, particularly where jurisdiction is expressly excluded, constitutes an abuse of court process and a violation of professional responsibility. The NBA will take firm steps to deter such conduct. Lawyers who deliberately file actions aimed at procuring judicial interference in intra-party affairs, or who seek ex parte or interlocutory orders in clear violation of statutory provisions, risk facing disciplinary proceedings. We will not hesitate to present petitions before the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Committee (LPDC) against any Legal Practitioner found to be engaging in such conduct. This will be pursued decisively to serve as a deterrent and to preserve the sanctity of the judicial process. The Nigerian judiciary must stay vigilant and resist being drawn into political theatrics. Courts should firmly decline invitations, no matter how artfully crafted, to intervene in matters the law explicitly bars them from.
Nigerian Bar Association tweet mediaNigerian Bar Association tweet mediaNigerian Bar Association tweet media
English
446
3.4K
5.3K
351.4K
Kaelo_ retweetledi
Great Oracle Extraordinary & Plenipotentiary.
This is the worst form of political partisanship by an electoral umpire. The timing of the post is irrelevant. Amupitan's position is now untenable. He should resign.
Great Oracle Extraordinary & Plenipotentiary. tweet media
English
46
706
938
13.9K
Kaelo_
Kaelo_@Orgorkaelo_·
@AdenikeAwe1 @ConstantPolaris Some of you are mistaking Iran for the Gulf countries. They are the ones renowned for sponsoring Jihadism.
English
0
0
0
11
North Star
North Star@ConstantPolaris·
So you will openly support a Religious Terrorist because you hate America. I thought you were an atheist. I am worried for David Hundeyin.
North Star tweet media
English
41
48
298
4.7K
Kaelo_ retweetledi
NEFERTITI
NEFERTITI@firstladyship·
INEC Chairman, Professor Joash Ojo Amupitan is a renowned APC member. His X (formerly Twitter) account from 2022 has surfaced, & he openly supported Tinubu at the last election. His account name was recently changed. Joash Amupitan has locked his X Account. A partisan INEC Chairman has no business presiding over our elections, & he must resign immediately. @joashamupitan was recently changed to @Sundayvibe00. The account is now private. I expect the ADC to take this up immediately.
NEFERTITI tweet mediaNEFERTITI tweet mediaNEFERTITI tweet mediaNEFERTITI tweet media
English
104
1.9K
2.4K
43K
Federal Ministry of Mines and Steel Development
Enough talk!!!. Nigeria has more untapped mineral wealth than oil ever gave us. Gold. Lithium. Tin. Zinc. Coal. Iron Ore. Yet we still import what we can mine ourselves. The Federal Ministry of Mines & Steel is done with excuses. By 2027, we will: 👉Create 500,000 direct jobs in solid minerals 👉Stop billions in mineral imports 👉Make Nigeria a top-10 global steel producer again The era of “potential” is over. This is the era of production. Are you ready to join the revolution? #SolidMineralsNG #NigeriaRising #EndOilDependency"
English
2.1K
788
2.8K
482.6K