PAVELKUS

@NSecondarius @KronosTrigger @Failed_Kings because they are attracted to children, specifically to children, not to their character or weakness, their looks Fuck im tired of it, cannot fucking persuade stupid

@PAVELKUS1 @KronosTrigger @Failed_Kings Theres a reason why pedophiles immediately stop going after those who turn 18 (or in some creepier situations, WAIT for them to turn 18).

This is the most perfect way of explaining this situation thank you @Failed_Kings could not have said it better myself

@NSecondarius @KronosTrigger @Failed_Kings they are attracted to child's physique, because otherwise they would not target children and would be an regular rapists or sadists

@PAVELKUS1 @KronosTrigger @Failed_Kings The source is the DSM-5 itself lmao. It specifically states attraction children or prepube children 13 or younger (notice how it says age?), it doesn't specify or state attraction to appearance, behaviour, traits, etc.

@Failed_Kings @Cthulhu_OwO said the retard who cannot make basic assumptions that manga that sexualises children is an pedophilic one

@PAVELKUS1 @Cthulhu_OwO You're calling people pedophiles because you made a retarded assumption. Amazing.

If you can show me where fictional characters are used as part of the diagnostic criteria for pedophilia, I'll delete my account.

@NSecondarius @KronosTrigger @Failed_Kings petite woman dont look like that, midgets dont look like that, children look like that

@PAVELKUS1 @KronosTrigger @Failed_Kings You didn't even try to guess and a tip, they aren't 100+. It can't be that difficult bro. Also looking like a child is not bad and by trying ti say it is, you are bodyshaming women.

@BenisKen @Cthulhu_OwO fucking goal posting again IM NOT DEFENDING CRIMINALS

@PAVELKUS1 @Cthulhu_OwO Look man, I am TRYING to communicate on your level and you’re making this difficult. I can’t help you if you act like “touching kids” isn’t an evil that deserves jail time at worst, the wood chipper at best.

Ok, so your argument is that if I DON'T want to be called a pedophile over the fictional characters I like, I shouldn't talk about the fictional characters I like on social media. Right. Cool, do me a favor. Take three steps back, real quick. And fuck your own face.

@KronosTrigger @NSecondarius @Failed_Kings 28 years, and acts like she only left an kindergarten

@PAVELKUS1 @NSecondarius @Failed_Kings Still waiting on your answer

@NSecondarius @KronosTrigger @Failed_Kings Where your source on that? or you just came up with it?

@PAVELKUS1 @KronosTrigger @Failed_Kings And simple counter there, pedophilia is not sexual attraction to appearance. Its being inherently attracted to children or prepube children because they are children, they are underage and can't consent. Also look like doesn't mean they are.

@NSecondarius @KronosTrigger @Failed_Kings "She's 100000 year dragon so its fine, never mind she looks like a child"

@KronosTrigger @PAVELKUS1 @Failed_Kings And try to guess the age of these 2 next.

@Failed_Kings @Cthulhu_OwO Yes

@PAVELKUS1 @Cthulhu_OwO So your entire framework is based on the assumption that it includes fiction.

@KronosTrigger @NSecondarius @Failed_Kings And one never acts like an adult. Is it another one "she's 1000 years old" argument?

@PAVELKUS1 @NSecondarius @Failed_Kings Tatsumaki and Rebecca are both lolis Guess their ages

@KronosTrigger @Failed_Kings @NSecondarius you fucking goalposting, im not saying lolicon is pedophilia in criminal sense, im saying lolicon is an pedophilia in psychologial sense is it soo hard to understand?

@PAVELKUS1 @Failed_Kings @NSecondarius Then lolicon isn't pedophilic

@NSecondarius @Failed_Kings @KronosTrigger IM NOT SAYING ITS CSAM im saying its an pedophilic material, made for people with pedophilic disorder

@PAVELKUS1 @Failed_Kings @KronosTrigger Yet here you are trying to use lolicon (A FICTIONAL GENRE) to say its CSAM. Its almost like your entire argument is oxymoronic in and of itself and its causing your brain to short-circuit.

@NSecondarius @KronosTrigger @Failed_Kings Its a fucking legal definition of a child. Were talking about an factual definition

@PAVELKUS1 @KronosTrigger @Failed_Kings Literally says time of birth until he or she is born. Fictional characters are not "born", they are literally made up. A child is concieved, grows in the womb before eventually being birthed, a fictional character literally just pops into existence.

@Failed_Kings @NSecondarius @KronosTrigger CSAM ITS AN REAL CHILD ABUSE MATERIAL YOU MORON

@PAVELKUS1 @NSecondarius @KronosTrigger Again, you're not very smart, are you? If it's pedophilic, that makes loli henti CSAM. That makes it illegal. That means you: -Seeked -Possessed -Distributed CSAM to people you think are pedophiles. These are felonies and that last bit is a cherry on top.

@NSecondarius @KronosTrigger @Failed_Kings No fucking idea but they do not look like fucking prebuscent children

@PAVELKUS1 @KronosTrigger @Failed_Kings Nigga those 2 are 3 and 8 years old lmao. Why wouldn't they count for children and thus pedophilia? That is unless you don't actually know what you are talking about.

@NSecondarius @KronosTrigger @Failed_Kings It itsnt a depiction of a specific child, its an depiction of a child, idea of child, what makes a fucking child

@PAVELKUS1 @KronosTrigger @Failed_Kings Yet it doesn't have to be always sexual lmao. Also lolicon depicts lolis, for it to be a depiction of an actual child, an actual child must have been used in its creation. A fictional character depicts themselves.

@NSecondarius @Failed_Kings @KronosTrigger Counter: Where is here a fucking mention that a child should be real? WHERE ITS FUCKING WRITTEN? IN A FUCKING LAW DOCUMENT?

@PAVELKUS1 @Failed_Kings @KronosTrigger Light, Light, Medium, Special attack into lvl 3 super.

@NSecondarius @KronosTrigger @Failed_Kings dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/eng…

@NSecondarius @KronosTrigger @Failed_Kings No word about being alive or dead or non existant

@NSecondarius @KronosTrigger @Failed_Kings You just conviniently picked teens, who are not even naked nad not from porn... GREAT FUCKING EXAMPLE

@PAVELKUS1 @KronosTrigger @Failed_Kings These characters are "children" yet i don't see you bitching about them. Also a child cannot be fictional, thats an oxymoron. A character is just that, a character.