Peter Goodgame

1/ The attached paragraph highlights the origin of a narrative involving all of humanity. This is the story of the Woman and the Bull. From the pre-historic roots of religious belief in Neolithic times, to the myths of Isis/Osiris and Inanna/Dumuzi at the origin of civilization, to the book of Revelation and then down to modern-day testimonies of alleged ET contact experiencers, the theme endures. I believe it is an archetypal interpretive key that can help us find the truth and discover a better way of being human. It is part of the apocalypse, the unveiling, the disclosure, that is currently taking place. @thetlbpod @jason_samosa @UFO_Rabbit_Hole @polarityjosh @AlchemyAmerican

The cat’s out of the bag. Just sat down with Danny Jones alongside Andy Puharich- the son of Dr. Andrija Puharich- to talk about one of the strangest and most overlooked figures of the 20th century. After 10 years of research and exclusive access to private archives, the story behind our film Mind Traveler is finally starting to be discussed publicly. This goes much deeper than most people realize.

In 1888, James "Sligo" Jameson, heir to the Irish Jameson whiskey fortune, committed a horrific act during the Emin Pasha Relief Expedition in the Congo. To witness cannibalism first hand, Jameson "purchased" a 10 year old girl for "six handkerchiefs and handed her over to a local tribe". He watched as she was killed and eaten, documenting the entire process in six watercolor sketches to "study the customs." The incident became a massive scandal in 1890 after expedition leader Henry Morton Stanley leaked the details to the press. Jameson "died of fever" in Africa before he could face the public fallout in Europe. While the whiskey brand has long distanced itself from his actions, the story remains a grim record of colonial depravity. While Jameson is considered a "Catholic" or "Green" whiskey, the founder was actually a Scots Protestant. (So we can blame them)

A healer in the mountains of Lesotho traces his psilocybin recipe back to his grandmother's initiation in 1955. She learned it from her teacher before that. Nobody in the Western psychedelic world had any idea this was happening. A new preprint from researchers at UC Davis, Johns Hopkins, and the University of Exeter now documents what appears to be the first confirmed case of traditional psilocybin use outside of the Americas. The team interviewed 26 Basotho healers and 8 non-healers across Lesotho and South Africa. Fifteen healers independently identified a mushroom called Psilocybe maluti — a species only formally described by science in 2024 — and reported using it for initiation rituals, treating addiction and depression, magical protection against curses, and recreation. None of them appeared to have any awareness of Western psychedelic culture or clinical research. The way they use it looks nothing like anything documented in the Americas. Instead of large ceremonial doses, Basotho healers grind P. maluti into psychoactive brews and snuffs alongside other hallucinogenic plants, primarily in small amounts. They mix it into a foamy preparation called sethoto that initiates consume over multi-day training periods to intensify their dreams and strengthen their connection to ancestral spirits. One healer uses it to treat methamphetamine addiction as a snuff, twice daily for seven days. Another treats what we'd recognize as depression through an infusion taken over a month. Adolescent herd boys snuff it recreationally while grazing cattle in the highlands. They didn't learn any of this from the internet or from outsiders. They learned it from their grandmothers and their spiritual teachers. Two unrelated individuals in their sixties recall recreational use as teenagers in the 1970s. The broader tradition of psychoactive plant use in southern Africa has archaeological evidence stretching back 60,000 years. Psilocybin mushrooms grow on six of seven continents, and new species keep getting described every year. If traditional use was hiding in plain sight in the mountains of Lesotho, where else has it been overlooked?

Prof. Michael Hudson: The #1 US export for 5 months straight is gold. Not AI, not aircraft. Gold to Switzerland, Hong Kong, China. In 1971 Nixon shut the gold window to stop it. Now America can't -- it IS the one selling. The empire is liquidating itself. America's broke.

"In this exchange, Dr. Marandi confronted Piers Morgan with a fact that the Western media refuses to report. Piers kept asking how many protestors the Iranian regime killed. Marandi responded: 'Trump sent weapons to the so-called protestors. If they were spontaneous, why did they need weapons? How did he know who they were? They were organized. 3,117 people were killed, including hundreds of police officers and innocent bystanders-by people your government armed. Your government armed them. Your government murdered them. You want to distract attention away from your own crimes.

Zelensky’s favorite oligarch, Rinat Akhmetov, known for having bought himself a yacht for 500 million dollars, has carried out another interesting act and set a new record. He bought an apartment in Monaco for 550 million euros. I would like to remind you what exactly oligarch Akhmetov earns his money from. He earns money from electricity in Ukraine. This is the sector to which Brussels sends our European taxes. This is the sector that, almost every month, receives tens and hundreds of millions of euros “to support Ukraine’s energy system.” Just think about it — during a war, earning from an industry that we support with our taxes, a person buys a yacht for 500 million, and then an apartment for 550 million. This is a challenge, this is mockery, this is simply a spit in everyone’s face.

Powerful

Every time the West calls an African country "unstable" they mean the resources stopped flowing. I made a glossary of 100 diplomatic words they use and what they actually mean. orange-anselma-35.tiiny.site Bookmark this before your next history book. 🧵

This is pretty incredible (Dounana by Siba)

It is so bizarre to watch this and to know this is how the world operates in the dark while we sleep. Inquisitive billionaires funding private research on anti gravity & advanced technologies most likely derived from UFO systems. Amy Eskridge lays it out.

My full documentary exploring the many connections between modern UFOlogy and Angels. 0:00 - Intro 2:09 - Tucker Carlson 4:58 - Garry Nolan - Aliens are Avatars 9:04 - Jaques Vallee & Fallen Angels 13:36 - History of Rosicrucianism 14:40 - What are Angels? 16:10 - Michaelic Beings 16:55 - Luciferic Beings 17:54 - Satanic Beings 19:41 - How they interact with Humans 21:00 - 3 Body Problem 23:17 - Carl Jung & Dreams

We'll see...

Some key points from Dr. James Lacatski’s new interview today on Weaponized. Like Dr. Lacatski says, disclosure is within those books, and you need to read between the lines, and then some: 1. The 4 books are guidebooks 2. We cannot provide final conclusions. That’s up to the reader. 3. We need to move beyond collecting data on lights in the sky 4. Whatever happened to plans for a UFO university program? 5. His wife is also a nuclear physicist. 6. No one person knows about the phenomenon, its origins and intentions. 7. Yes he’s been to Pax River. It was just being built, but can’t say what was going to go in there. Could have held largest aircraft. 8. Human levitation happened at the ranch 9. A list of recovered materials disappeared. 10. Don’t dismiss deception on the part of the NHIs. 11. Implies: tic tac is not ours 12. There are other locations just as substantial as Skinwalker ranch or even more so. 13. Doesn’t believe there is a control system, like Vallée says. Implies this. 14. People have lied, under oath, during UFO hearings. 15. Dylan Borland and George Knapp did not lie under oath. 16. Won’t testify under oath since false info that is out there cannot be taken back, undone. 17. Congress and POTUS are being led down the wrong path as it pertains to disclosure. 18. There are two forces out there: those that want us to know the truth, and those that don’t. And there’s a religious component to these. 19. Third attempt for that fabled UFO materials transfer; he knew it was gonna fail, but was surprised the most on what they were focused on about the potential transfer - it was not the transfer of the recovered tech. 20. Some of the material we acquired tells us that this is far beyond just non-human craft. 21. It all comes down to physics. It is technology. youtu.be/rW02-PuPMJ8?si…

What an American thinks about Iran

It doesn't matter who we elect, the warmongers always win.

You won't hear a better 55-second description of MAGA and Trump than this: in terms of the perspective of any minimally honest MAGA supporter:

#C4News "The strait of Hormuz is actually open if you're not part of the war" "The Spanish, Portuguese, Japanese, Chinese, have got ships through" "The idea that the strait of Hormuz is not open is not true" "It is closed if you are supporting the illegal war" "They have hit 30 universities" "They have hit 600 schools" "These are war crimes" "66% of the Iranian diaspora in the USA are against this war" "Iran a couple of 93 million people now has people suffering from toxins because petrochemical plants have been bombed, it is egregious to suggest that people want to be bombed" Well said @sanambna

@ParaN_rmal Yes, read The Stargate Conspiracy

Bledsoe changed his date based on information given to him from someone associated with Edgar Cayce's ARE. So many of the themes in Bledsoe's story mirror themes in the Edgar Cayce lore.. why is that? under the sphinx - hall of records - a new age - prophecy - miraculous healing etc etc

You said Hồ Chí Minh "chose war." Let me reconstruct the timeline so we're working from actual events rather than impressions. 1858: France begins military conquest of Vietnam. 1887: France formally establishes French Indochina. 1945: Hồ Chí Minh declares Vietnamese independence after Japanese occupation ends. 1945: France announces its intention to recolonize Vietnam. 1946: Hồ Chí Minh negotiates in Paris. Signs preliminary agreements. 1946: France shells Haiphong. Kills six thousand civilians. Occupies Hanoi. 1954: Vietnam defeats France at Điện Biên Phủ. Geneva Accords mandate national elections. 1956: United States prevents the elections because Hồ Chí Minh would win 80 percent. 1965: United States begins massive military escalation. 1975: Vietnam wins. At which moment in that sequence did Hồ Chí Minh "choose war" in the sense that implies a peaceful alternative was available and he rejected it? The French chose war in 1946 when they shelled Haiphong. The Americans chose war in 1956 when they cancelled the election. The Americans chose war again in 1964 with the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution. The attack that justified it was fabricated. They knew. They escalated anyway. Hồ Chí Minh responded to wars that were brought to his country. For over a century, from 1858 to the end of the American war in 1975, Vietnam was a country being fought over by foreign powers. The question is not why Hồ Chí Minh chose war. The question is why you describe as a choice something that was, for the Vietnamese people, simply the condition of existence under colonialism.

JUST IN: You do not fire your Army Chief of Staff in the middle of a war for no reason. You fire him because of what comes next. Pete Hegseth called General Randy George on April 2 and told him to retire immediately. The Pentagon confirmed it within hours. No reason was given. Not publicly. Not privately. A senior Army official told Fox News that Hegseth offered George nothing: no misconduct, no operational failure, no policy disagreement on the record. Just a phone call and a career ending in the middle of the most significant American combat operation in two decades. George is the 24th general or admiral Hegseth has removed. But he is not the 24th. He is the one that matters. The Army Chief of Staff. The man whose signature sits between a president’s intent and the order that sends soldiers across a beach or into a tunnel complex. The 82nd Airborne is deploying right now. Marines from the 31st MEU are staged on the USS Tripoli. JSOC operators are at forward bases in Israel, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE. Kharg Island, 90 percent of Iranian oil exports, sits 16 kilometres off a coast that someone will have to decide whether to approach. And the four-star general whose job it was to advise whether that approach should happen was removed 48 hours after Trump told the nation the war would continue for two to three more weeks. The replacement is Vice Chief General Christopher LaNeve. He was Hegseth’s senior military aide before this appointment. The man who carried the Secretary’s briefcase now commands the Army the Secretary is reshaping. The chain of command did not break. It shortened. The distance between a television studio and a combat order just collapsed to zero intermediaries who were not personally selected by the man giving the order. No reason was given. That is the tell. When someone is removed without explanation during a crisis, the explanation is the crisis itself. George either objected to something or was about to. The ground option. The power plant strikes. The Kharg raid. The escalation that turned a highway bridge in Karaj into rubble on the same day he was told to leave. Something in the next two weeks requires a chief who will not push back, and the Pentagon solved that problem by installing one trained as Hegseth’s aide. A former Fox News weekend host just fired a four-star general with combat tours in Iraq and Afghanistan, replaced him with his own former assistant, and did it during a live war in which the next decision could put American soldiers on Iranian soil for the first time in history. No hearing was held. No misconduct cited. The Army woke up on April 3 with a new chief it did not choose, in a war it did not start, preparing for a phase the previous chief apparently could not be trusted to execute. The question is not why George was fired. Every general in the building knows why. The question is what order is coming in the next fourteen days that required removing the one man in the chain of command who might have said no. The war has no perimeter. The chain of command has no objectors. And the next phase has no one left to stop it. open.substack.com/pub/shanakaans…