Dr. Modales Bechamp

7.2K posts

Dr. Modales Bechamp banner
Dr. Modales Bechamp

Dr. Modales Bechamp

@PETECONTES111

Superviviente en la Gran Pandemia del siglo XXI

Katılım Şubat 2022
1.7K Takip Edilen1.3K Takipçiler
Dr. Modales Bechamp
Dr. Modales Bechamp@PETECONTES111·
Pues se debería estudiar a Flexner en todas las escuelas de "medicadores" jajajajajaja. Shhhhh.... P.d: Su cara dice quién es....
Sama Hoole@SamaHoole

In 1910, an educator named Abraham Flexner, who held a bachelor's degree in classics and had never studied medicine, was sent by the Carnegie Foundation to inspect every medical school in the United States and Canada. He visited 155 of them. His report recommended closing most. What happened next is the foundation of every health system you know today. John D. Rockefeller, the founder of Standard Oil and at the time the richest man on Earth, saw an opening. Standard Oil's refining produced vast quantities of coal-tar and petrochemical byproducts. Those byproducts were, conveniently, the raw material from which most early synthetic pharmaceuticals could be made. Through his General Education Board and the Rockefeller Foundation, Rockefeller directed approximately $50 million, around $10 billion in today's money, into American medical schools. The money came with a condition. The schools had to teach allopathic, drug-based medicine. Anything else was defunded. Within twenty-five years, more than half of America's 155 medical schools had closed. By 1935, only 66 remained. The schools teaching homeopathy, naturopathy, herbalism, eclectic medicine, and what we would now call nutrition and lifestyle medicine were starved out of existence. Five of America's seven Black medical colleges were closed. Most of the women's medical colleges were closed. The surviving schools all taught one paradigm. They still do. The petroleum byproduct became the medicine. The medicine became the curriculum. The curriculum became the doctor. The doctor became the prescription pad. The model that emerged has one structural feature no regulator can legislate away. The pharmaceutical industry earns its revenue when you take a pill. It does not earn revenue when you stop needing the pill. A cure is a one-time transaction. A chronic condition is a subscription. This is not a conspiracy theory. It is on the income statement. From 2017 to 2024, the average net profit margin of pharmaceutical manufacturers was 23.2%, roughly ten times higher than every other sector of the drug supply chain. The system is performing exactly as designed. A century after Flexner, the population of the wealthiest country on Earth is fatter, sicker, and on more medication than at any point in human history. The grass-fed beef, the egg from a hen you can name, the butter, the morning walk, the eight hours of sleep, are all unpatentable. That is why no oil baron funded a hundred medical schools to teach them.

Español
1
0
1
42
Javi
Javi@paciguado·
@PETECONTES111 @Kafiri14 Yo compré unas zapatillas y son una pasada, lo único que no me gustó es que la suela es demasiado fina y si pisas cualquier piedrecita o lo que sea, parece que vayas descalzo y lo notas todo.
Español
1
0
1
24
MatarAlpelicano
MatarAlpelicano@MAlpelicano·
Le doy un consejo de nutrición y me bloquea...en fin.
MatarAlpelicano tweet media
Español
42
19
198
2.8K
Alicia Florrick
Alicia Florrick@aflorrick77·
@PETECONTES111 De dónde ha saludo esta mujer??? Comer 3 ó 5 veces al día, fruta entera, nada de ayuno y carne...🙆‍♀️🙆‍♀️🙆‍♀️
Español
2
0
3
832
Dr. Modales Bechamp
Dr. Modales Bechamp@PETECONTES111·
Alguien puede hacer llegar este post a Llorente, a los pseudo-medicadores y a los Mass-Mierdas?? Porfavor!! 🔽🔽
Zaid K. Dahhaj@zaidkdahhaj

“Tanned skin is a biomarker of damage” Tell me you love to uphold a philosophy that both implicitly and explicitly supports scientific racism and eugenics, while knowing next to nothing about melanin itself Anybody who pushes this myopic philosophy is a clear dilettante because they simply have not studied deeply enough When people are clueless about circadian first principles and rely on conventional dermatologist ideology that is divorced from the circadian lens, they begin to frame an evolutionary adaptation into an injury They fail to realize that melanogenesis is a photoprotective upregulation. UV-B hits keratinocytes, p53 activates, alpha-MSH is released, melanocytes produces melanin, hence melanin caps migrate over nuclei to shield DNA This is a conserved, ancient system working exactly as designed Calling the end result a “damage biomarker” is the same logic as calling muscle hypertrophy a biomarker of damage Technically, there’s cellular disruption upstream, yet the adaptive response is the entire fucking point. It’s going to take these reductionist thinkers another 100 years to realize that biological systems utilize low level damage (with proper recovery) through hormesis for more robust health Bryan’s philosophy, which isn’t even his because he simply parrots the dermatologists, completely ignores the skin’s circadian peripheral clock system Just wait until they learn that the skin barrier full of peripheral circadian clocks which control function, repair, and regeneration of the skin CLOCK/BMAL1 oscillations in keratinocytes and melanocytes control DNA repair timing, keratinocyte proliferation, the cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer repair window Nucleotide excision repair peaks at specific circadian phases. A tan tells you UV hit the skin, yet it tells you nothing about whether the circadian repair mechanisms were active or suppressed at the time of exposure The mainstream dermatology model has no consideration for any of this and more, and yet I’m the one they label as a pseudoscientific quack. No motherfucker, you are, because you worship a Rockefeller model of health that ignores the most foundational aspects of biology and biophysics None of them can compete when scrutinized through the first principles circadian lens That’s why none of them want to debate The cognitive dissonance of realizing they were educated on a grossly bastardized version of the truth is too much for them to handle, and so they resort to staying in their Ivory Tower circle jerk like the intellectual cowards they are

Español
0
1
1
54
Dr. Modales Bechamp
Dr. Modales Bechamp@PETECONTES111·
@Kafiri14 Cierto, la gente con luz aunque físicamente no tenga los "cánones",las veo bellas, es algo curioso que me paso siempre, hombres y mujeres incluidos. Que razón tienes.
Español
1
1
2
57
Kafiri
Kafiri@Kafiri14·
Son todas feas de cojones. Unos adefesios de marca mayor. Es lo que pasa cuando te quedas sin alma (no es una metáfora).
Kafiri tweet media
Español
5
5
38
253
Dr. Modales Bechamp
Dr. Modales Bechamp@PETECONTES111·
Brillante post. --COLESTEROL-- Lo entendería hasta un niño de 5 años....coño, que no es tan difícil!! Pero la colmena solo hace lo que los mass-mierdas le dicen... EL ENGAÑO ES DESCOMUNAL. HDPS.
T𝖚𝖑𝖚𝖒𝖎𝖓⩜⃝𝖙𝖎✨@Tuluminati888

⚠️ The Cholesterol Myth... Someone asked me: “You said high cholesterol can be good. But everything I’m reading says high LDL deposits hard fat inside arteries. How is plaque blocking my heart a good thing?” Fair question. Because on the surface, the mainstream story sounds obvious. High LDL. Plaque. Blocked arteries. Heart attack. Case closed. Except it’s not that clean. Cholesterol became one of the most misunderstood substances in the human body because modern medicine did what it always does. It found something at the scene and blamed it for the crime. Cholesterol is not some useless sludge floating around your blood trying to kill you. It is foundational biology. Your brain depends on it. Your cell membranes depend on it. Your hormones depend on it. Your bile acids depend on it. Your nervous system depends on it. Your endocrine system depends on it. Your body uses cholesterol to build, repair, signal, protect, transport and regulate. So when someone says “cholesterol is bad,” I already know they’re operating from the fairy tail version. The body does not make a substance this important by accident. And it definitely does not keep making it every day because it forgot to read a cardiology pamphlet. The better question is: Why is cholesterol showing up where damage already exists? That’s where the firefighter analogy matters. If you keep seeing firefighters at burning buildings, you don’t conclude firefighters cause fires. You understand they are responding to damage. Same with cholesterol. When arteries are inflamed, oxidized, irritated, glycated, stressed, injured or metabolically compromised, the body sends repair materials. LDL is part of that transport system. It carries cholesterol, fat-soluble nutrients and repair cargo through the bloodstream. That does not mean LDL can never be involved in plaque. It can. But the real issue is not “cholesterol exists.” The real issue is damaged LDL, oxidized LDL, inflamed arterial walls, poor glucose handling, seed oils, smoking, stress chemistry, mineral depletion, high blood pressure, poor thyroid function, liver dysfunction, chronic inflammation and a degraded terrain that turns a repair system into a mess. That is a very different conversation. LDL in a healthy terrain is not the same as LDL in a highly inflamed, oxidized, insulin-resistant, chemically overloaded terrain. Context matters. Oxidation matters. Particle damage matters. Endothelial health matters. Glucose damage matters. Blood pressure matters. Liver function matters. Thyroid status matters. Lifestyle matters. But mainstream medicine flattened it into one easy villain: LDL bad. Lower the number. Take the drug. Move on. That’s why cholesterol became such a perfect pharmaceutical target. Easy to test. Easy to scare people with. Easy to medicate. Easy to turn into lifelong management. And the origin story is shaky too. A lot of the cholesterol panic traces back to early animal experiments where rabbits were fed cholesterol and developed arterial lesions. Rabbits. Herbivores. Animals not designed to eat cholesterol-rich animal foods. Then somehow this helped build the foundation for decades of human cholesterol fear. That alone should make people pause. Imagine feeding a cow steak every day, watching it get sick, then warning lions that meat is dangerous. This is the kind of reductionist nonsense that keeps getting dressed up as settled science. Now, does that mean plaque is fake? No. Does it mean LDL never matters? No. Does it mean someone with sky-high LDL, high triglycerides, poor insulin sensitivity, high blood pressure, high inflammation, belly fat, poor sleep and a junk diet should just ignore it? Absolutely not. That would be stupid. But it does mean cholesterol should not be treated like the root villain in isolation. A blocked artery is not “cholesterol doing cholesterol things.” It is a long-term terrain failure. Damaged arterial lining. Inflammation. Oxidation. Metabolic dysfunction. Glycation. Poor repair signaling. Mineral imbalance. Stress load. Bad fats. Bad light. Bad sleep. Bad food. Bad rhythm. Then cholesterol gets blamed because it was part of the attempted repair. Classic modern medicine. Ignore the fire. Blame the firefighter. And yes, plaque contains cholesterol. Of course it does. Scar tissue contains collagen too. Does that mean collagen caused the injury? No. It means the body used available materials to patch damage. Same principle. The real question is not simply: “How do I lower cholesterol?” The better question is: Why is my vascular system creating the conditions where plaque forms in the first place? That question leads somewhere very different. It leads to blood sugar regulation. It leads to seed oils and oxidized fats. It leads to smoking and pollution. It leads to stress hormones. It leads to poor sleep. It leads to low sunlight. It leads to thyroid function. It leads to liver health. It leads to movement. It leads to minerals. It leads to food quality. It leads to the total terrain. And that’s the conversation the cholesterol industry has spent decades avoiding. Because “your body is responding to vascular damage inside a degraded terrain” is harder to sell than: your LDL is high, take this. I’m not telling people to ignore their labs. I’m telling them to stop worshipping one number like it explains the whole story. LDL is a marker. Not a confession. Cholesterol is a tool. Not a villain. Plaque is the result of a process. Not proof that the body made a mistake by needing cholesterol. The body is usually smarter than the model being used to interpret it. And cholesterol might be one of the clearest examples of that. They convinced millions of people that one of the body’s most essential substances was the enemy. That was never science in its purest form. That was reductionism. And reductionism is very good at creating villains. Especially when those villains can be medicated forever...

Español
0
1
2
47
Dr. Modales Bechamp
Dr. Modales Bechamp@PETECONTES111·
@Wirkal No sé si conoces la historia....pero es un señor digno de admiración...de verdad lo digo. Espakistan fue tomada hace mucho tiempo...y nos guío a muchos, sin el saberlo... Eso!!
Español
1
0
0
13
Hector Wirkal
Hector Wirkal@Wirkal·
@PETECONTES111 Exacto, son dos cosas de gravedad, diferentes, pero graves, la pedo filia en si, y el uso que le dan los satanistas a esa gente degenerada para colocarlas en puestos claves de los gobiernos en todo el mundo.
Español
1
0
1
25
Dr. Modales Bechamp
Dr. Modales Bechamp@PETECONTES111·
Este tipo es un valiente... Con sus cosas como todos. Pero un ejemplo para todos...con dos cojones se ha enfrentado a las cloacas del estado. Pero vivimos en el mundo del mal. Al Universo pido que se le haga el bien. Todos deberíamos ser técnico preocupado! Te admiro!!!!♥️♥️
UTP Ramón Valero@tecn_preocupado

6 personas seremos juzgadas del 21 al 30 de septiembre del 2026 a las 9h en el juzgado n3 de lo penal, Bulevar Blasco Ibáñez en Castellón de la Plana por la difusión del caso bar España. La petición de pena para mí es de 40 años. Ninguno de ellos es Las Cloacas del sistema.

Español
2
3
32
498
Dr. Modales Bechamp
Dr. Modales Bechamp@PETECONTES111·
@Mar_122122 Diría que vital para nosotros. Añade el libro " el arcoiris invisible" cuando esté en casa te paso el link cuando esté en casa...
Español
0
0
1
9
Dr. Modales Bechamp
Dr. Modales Bechamp@PETECONTES111·
Consulta a la IA: ¿las antenas de telefonía son perjudiciales para la salud? avaate.org/?Consulta-a-la… Cosas de conspiranoicos..... Es triste, pero la única solución es salir de las jaulas de ratones donde hemos sido encerrados= ciudades. En fin
Español
1
2
21
357
Dr. Modales Bechamp
Dr. Modales Bechamp@PETECONTES111·
Yo apagaría el router antes de acostarme, lo ideal sería tener todos los aparatos cableados pero... Es de vital importancia para tu salud,es más,creo que por las noches los usan para radiarnos,es solo una creencia. PROTEGETE a ti y a los tuyos.
Español
8
1
27
920