P James Jenkins

11.6K posts

P James Jenkins

P James Jenkins

@PJamesJenkins

Katılım Ocak 2012
150 Takip Edilen582 Takipçiler
Owen Gregorian
Owen Gregorian@OwenGregorian·
Acting AG Todd Blanche SHUTS DOWN Crying Democrats – Says Even Hunter Biden Can Apply For $1.7B Anti-Weaponization Fund | Jim Hᴏft, The Gateway Pundit The corrupt mainstream media and the unhinged Left are having an absolute, grade-A meltdown. On Monday, the Trump administration dropped a massive truth bomb on Washington by establishing a landmark $1.776 billion Anti-Weaponization Fund. Created as part of a settlement over the deep state’s illegal leaking of President Trump’s tax returns, the fund is a direct weapon against the horrific “lawfare” and weaponized justice that defined the Biden regime. Immediately, Democrats like Representative Jamie Raskin ran to the cameras, hyperventilating and claiming this is a “taxpayer-funded slush fund” exclusively meant to line the pockets of President Trump’s allies and January 6th patriots. “The View” co-host Ana Navarro appeared on CNN Monday night to air her grievances against the new fund, calling it a “slush fund” to pay off his supporters and “J6 insurrectionists.” But during a Capitol Hill appearance, Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche completely dismantled their entire narrative with one hilarious, jaw-dropping truth bomb. Blanche flat-out STUNNED the leftists by pointing out that the fund has zero partisan requirements. In fact, he noted that even Hunter Biden could apply for the money if he wanted to! Todd Blanche: There’s a flaw in the legal system because this legal system was not set up to compensate for what the Democrats, and what Biden, and what Garland did for four years. It doesn’t know how to cope with the fact that hundreds and hundreds of administration officials had their phones taken from them. Members of the Senate had their phone records subpoenaed and weren’t told about it. The system isn’t set up for that. Sen. Moran: In answers to questions previously put before you this morning, I assume—because of what the settlement agreement says—you eliminated certain individuals from being qualified to receive benefits from this fund. What’s the list of those individuals? Todd Blanche: Well, the plaintiffs in the underlying lawsuit have agreed to accept an apology. So that’s President Trump and his sons, I believe. Otherwise, there is no limitation. So whether you’re Hunter Biden or another individual who believed they were a victim of weaponization, they can all apply to this fund. And again, it doesn’t mean the commissioners will agree. It doesn’t mean that they’re getting $10 million, or whatever was just read a few minutes ago. It just means that you can apply. thegatewaypundit.com/2026/05/acting…
English
4
1
11
911
P James Jenkins retweetledi
Mark Penn
Mark Penn@Mark_Penn·
NY Times Does it again In the 1930s, they won a Pulitzer for romanticized reporting of Joseph Stalin that failed to uncover the deliberate starving of millions in the Ukraine. Then the paper won a Pulitzer for reporting that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction when it turned out to be false. And then they won a Pulitzer for their coverage of the non existent Russia Russia hoax on the president that turned out to be an unsubstantiated Clinton oppo research scheme. Recently, they won a Pulitzer for a photo purporting to show a starving child that turned out to be a child with severe prenatal birth defects and a healthy mother and brother (who was cropped out). And now they publish an op ed (and let me tell you they fact check every single word of a moderate op ed for days) from Nicholas Kristof that carries unproven and impossible allegations of trained rape dogs from Hamas-affiliated sources. No award in sight yet but give it time. I don’t know how many more “awards” our country can withstand for this outlet’s nearly hundred year history of the amplification of politicized propaganda.
English
114
875
3.4K
89.2K
P James Jenkins retweetledi
Richard H. Ebright
Richard H. Ebright@R_H_Ebright·
@LeadingReport Good. (It always was unclear to me why May 11 would be a deadline when Fauci perjured himself in Senate testimony at least twice after May 11, 2021.)
English
0
1
13
364
P James Jenkins retweetledi
Love Music
Love Music@khnh80044·
No lyrics needed,absolute masterpiece👏👏💯💯
English
74
456
3K
112.4K
P James Jenkins
P James Jenkins@PJamesJenkins·
@FreemanWSJ @WSJopinion Always enjoy your regular columns featuring different views on the job market and outlook. Keep up the outstanding work Sir….
English
1
0
0
12
End Wokeness
End Wokeness@EndWokeness·
Rep. Justin Pearson in 2016 vs 2026:
English
3.2K
6.3K
31.3K
3M
John Podhoretz
John Podhoretz@jpodhoretz·
Hey aren't you the person who is still wearing a mask after 6 years, claims anyone who isn't masked around her is a potential murderer, and is a deranged, hysterical, and dishonest liar besides?
Taylor Lorenz@TaylorLorenz

Another big study on cell phone bans finds that “average effects on test scores are consistently close to zero.” There is no evidence banning phones had any significant effect on school attendance, classroom attention, or perceived online bullying. marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolu…

English
10
18
224
12.1K
P James Jenkins retweetledi
Richard H. Ebright
Richard H. Ebright@R_H_Ebright·
Richard H. Ebright@R_H_Ebright

@nypost Fauci willfully violated federal policies on gain-of-function and enhanced potential pandemic pathogen research; committed conspiracy to defraud, fraud, perjury, destruction of federal records, and obstruction; and caused a pandemic that killed 20 million and cost $25 trillion.

QME
1
3
14
291
Mark Pulliam
Mark Pulliam@MisruleofLaw·
“Justice Jackson is either a person of extremely limited intelligence or a political operative, rather than a legitimate judge. Her repeated personal attacks on her colleagues are unprecedented.” Alito vs. Jackson | Power Line powerlineblog.com/archives/2026/…
English
1
0
2
49
P James Jenkins
P James Jenkins@PJamesJenkins·
@MisruleofLaw He‘s right behind Fauci. Fauci ~ complicit in millions of deaths, Comey? Talk about a threat to democracy….
English
0
0
1
7
P James Jenkins
P James Jenkins@PJamesJenkins·
@Reptile924150 @rpondiscio With respect, your lead `we are democracy` reveals your lack of understanding. Unique among nations ,we are a constitutional republic. The senate, electoral college & federalism [states rights] guarantees that minorities are respected among these `united states.` Genius really…
English
1
0
0
7
Reptile
Reptile@Reptile924150·
@PJamesJenkins @rpondiscio We are a democracy and no it’s because slave states wanted votes but didn’t want slaves to vote so it wasn’t for minorities being mowed down but because the founders thought the population wasn’t smart enough and slavery
English
1
0
1
14