Philipp Koellinger

SciWeave: 0% hallucinated citations on ScholarQABench (Asai et al., Nature 2026). GPT-5.2: 59%. Claude Opus 4.6: 62%. 100 queries across biomedicine and neuroscience. The 0% isn't a model trick. SciWeave doesn't ask the LLM to recall papers. It retrieves passages from OpenAlex (~300M scientific works) and synthesizes the answer from what comes back. The architecture rules out fabrication. The benchmark, the scoring script, and the NLI judge are all public. We ran SciWeave against them. Hallucinated citations are already showing up in peer-reviewed bibliographies. The failure rate deserved a number. desci.com/blog/zero-hall…

Replication scripts: github.com/desci-labs/sci…

SciWeave: 0% hallucinated citations on ScholarQABench (Asai et al., Nature 2026). GPT-5.2: 59%. Claude Opus 4.6: 62%. 100 queries across biomedicine and neuroscience. The 0% isn't a model trick. SciWeave doesn't ask the LLM to recall papers. It retrieves passages from OpenAlex (~300M scientific works) and synthesizes the answer from what comes back. The architecture rules out fabrication. The benchmark, the scoring script, and the NLI judge are all public. We ran SciWeave against them. Hallucinated citations are already showing up in peer-reviewed bibliographies. The failure rate deserved a number. desci.com/blog/zero-hall…

@TommiPedruzzi 36

I’ll say it bluntly: AI Publishing is the most reliable business on Earth. If you start today , you can make at least $10,000 per month. Like + comment '36' & I'll DM my new Claude prompts playbook that covers everything for FREE. Must follow me to get DM. ⏳ Taking this down in 24 hours.

@TommiPedruzzi Doc

Busy professionals are quietly adding $10,000+/month using Claude. Without quitting their jobs. I’ve compiled all my Claude prompts and systems into a 53-page guide. Like + comment 'Doc' and I’ll DM you my step-by-step guide for FREE. You must be following me to receive the DM. Taking this down in 24 hours.

@Jason I'm in

We started an AI founder twitter group... reply with "I'm in" if you're a founder and want to be added

Encyclopedias on CD-ROM looked like the right idea. Then the browser showed up. Many researchers are still looking for an "AI research tool": a destination site they open, paste questions into, wait. That category is dissolving. The AI you already use (Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, Codex, Windsurf) can reach into 300M peer-reviewed papers mid-conversation without leaving the chat. The destination is the browser tab you already have open. SciWeave is plumbing. You install it once, into whatever model you work in. Now spinning up 4 parallel sub-agents for platform-native variants. sciweave.com/web/mcp

Free to start. 30-second install. 🔗 mcp.sciweave.com Blog post: 🔗 sciweave.com/blog/sciweave-…

We've just launched an MCP server integration for SciWeave - I'm excited! You've tried doing research tasks with Claude, ChatGPT, CODEX etc. They're amazing tools - but they still hallucinate >50% of academic references. Now you can combine them with the SciWeave MCP and your favorite AI turns into a hyper-productive research companion. For example, you can use this to: - Draft a grant proposal with real citations - Write a syllabus for a course you're teaching - Do a systematic literature review - Brainstorm plausible hypotheses that haven't been tested yet - Build automated research workflows that are grounded in the published literature Try it out and let me know what you think! We'd love to get feedback. Set-up guide: sciweave.com/web/mcp

@itsolelehmann Cowork

i'm running a live claude cowork workshop for non-technical people on april 22 by the end of the 2 hours, you'll have a fully set up marketing system on your computer that: > produces a full week of content in one sitting, dialed into your voice so it sounds like you on your sharpest day > turns any marketing framework or post into a repeatable skill that claude runs on command for you > builds sales pages in minutes so you stop paying designers and copywriters thousands > schedules tasks to run while you sleep so you wake up to finished drafts, fresh ideas, and updated reports every morning > writes launch emails, newsletters, and sequences using the same frameworks behind my 6-figure product launches all click by click, on your machine, while i do it on mine here's everything that you get: • the full 2-hour live workshop where you build everything in real time • 16 personal skills that i built over 100s of hours for my own business • the complete recording so you can rewatch anytime • a self-paced course version of all the material • access to Claude Marketing OS telegram group this system runs 90% of the marketing behind my 7-figure brand doing 15M+ impressions/month and it's all yours come april 22nd comment "Cowork" and i'll DM you the link

@Simi_2210_ 179

If you solve this, you’re different Can you solve ?

Instead of watching an hour of Netflix, watch this 2-hour Stanford lecture on AI careers. It will teach you more about winning in the AI race than all the AI content you’ve scrolled past this year.

SciWeave is now available for Apple mobile devices! I like using it on the go to quickly check facts based on scientific evidence and for health-related questions. #Science @SciWeave apps.apple.com/eg/app/sciweav…

Empirical evidence from a series of behavioral experiments with students at @Wharton suggest that AI is beginning to influence human thinking and decision making. Many people "surrender" their judgement to AI instead of critically questioning and treating it as a sparing partner. "Surrendering" improves confidence while decreasing cognitive performance. Critical engagement with AI yields much better outcomes. @gidin papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…

If you come across someone asserting there is "no scientific evidence" that social media is causing harm, please send them this link. We lay out seven lines of evidence, including RCTs, natural experiments, and testimony from victims & perpetrators of harm worldhappiness.report/ed/2026/social…

Aysu Okbay and I are hiring a postdoc to study gene–environment interplay in health & social inequalities 🧬 You'll analyze large genomic datasets as part of a 3-node consortium with Uppsala & Oslo. Based at @amsterdamumc 🇳🇱 Apply by May 4 below, please RT for karma points👇🏽

Reviewing yet another academic paper full of hallucinated references, odd citation practices, and improperly attributed material. To all academic colleagues out there, literally ruining our profession: thanks for nothing.

@Aella_Girl @0xAgentOwl The lower median but similar mean for men compared to women in your sample means that the right tail of the male distribution is much longer (i.e. higher bc), which is probably as expected. The higher median for females in your sample could be sampling bias.

@0xAgentOwl yea i'm not totally sure how to interpret the gap, I need to look into it more. but iirc CDC does in person interviews in your house, which i wouldn't be shocked if it meaningfully suppresses sex partner count reporting for women.

In my data, here's the median sexual partners by age and gender:

@causalinf @MarkHahnel had a related blog post with interesting data on this. Developing AIs that check papers, requiring open code at submission, and raising submission fees are all reasonable and doable suggestions to deal with the increasing supply of papers imo openresearch.wtf/have-we-alread…

A modest proposal to editors of Econ journals for how to manage predicted increase in manuscript submissions due to AI agent shocks to the marginal costs of production. causalinf.substack.com/p/claude-code-…

AI won’t replace scientific research anytime soon. But it can accelerate it dramatically. From tens of thousands of research queries on SciWeave, we see three patterns appear repeatedly: 1. Literature review acceleration AI helps researchers quickly map the landscape: what’s been published, which papers matter, where the debates are. 2. Evidence triangulation Scientists compare evidence across multiple papers, datasets, and disciplines. AI can surface the sources — humans judge the evidence. 3. Hypothesis exploration Researchers “jam” with AI to explore possible explanations and overlooked variables. The pattern is clear: AI is becoming research infrastructure, not yet a replacement for expert judgment. The most useful systems are not general purpose LLMs that hallucinate references. The most useful AI's are specialized tools that help researchers: - navigate the literature - connect evidence - separate signal from noise.

It's true, most researchers get "procedural" utility out of their work - they love it, despite all the flaws of academia. And that love for the job gives them a comparitive advantage at it - until a machine comes along that does it all better and faster without love...