Pedro Fonseca

Pakistan Büyükelçisi, BM genel kurulunda israile haddini bildirerek şöyle söyledi: “israil,mağduriyet numarası yapan, BM kararlarını ihlal eden ve Gazze'de, ve hatta Filistin topraklarında devlet terörü uygulayan bir işgalci ve hayduttur”

Periodista:“ Si tenés que elegir entre no comer o ser explotado 18 horas, probablemente elijas ser explotado antes que morirte de hambre". Javier Milei :“¿Cómo que no? También podés elegir MORIRTE”. Este pedazo de Mierda es el presidente de Argentina..🥴

Ainda sou do tempo em que Orbán tinha, como fiel escudeiro para os assuntos europeus, que o acompanhava a reuniões internacionais, um dedicado cidadão português, a quem chegou a condecorar. O nome escapa-me, mas talvez no PSD alguém ainda se recorde desse seu antigo governante.

Percebo a inocência e o desejo pedagógico de Pacheco Pereira, mas não é possível discutir honestamente com um mentiroso alarve e descarado.

Apple is complicit in Israel’s genocide.

Belçikalı temsilci, Avrupa’daki ikiyüzlülüğü ifşa ediyor! "İran büyükelçisini sınır dışı etmeyi düşünüyorsunuz, ama iki yıl boyunca soykırım yaşanırken hiçbiriniz İsrail büyükelçisini sınır dışı etmeyi talep etmediniz. Bu utanç verici!"

Na SIC Notícias, um reles painel de comentadores, sem contraditório, propagandeiam que o país precisa da reforma laboral do governo Dizem que os mais jovens estão dispostos a uma lei mais flexível e que é preciso o banco de horas. Uma lavagem cerebral revoltante de assistir.

NEW WORLD RECORD: 18-year-old sprint phenom Gout Gout has clocked a stunning 19.67 time in the 200m run, surpassing Usain Bolt’s legendary mark.

Peter Magyar, during his international press conference, confirmed that Szijjarto, Orbán's foreign minister, has barricaded himself with some of his closest colleagues and is destroying and shredding evidence about his treason (documents about the sanctions against russians).

Vox and Chega in Spain and Portugal now forced to join Trump attacking the Vatican. Let’s see how well that does with voters. Trumpism is now a militant anti-Catholic movement. Some would say anti-Christian, of course

Right before the markets open for the week. Like clockwork.

Millions of wrong answers — every single day. trib.al/sF1E57e

2/ Orbán previu desde o início a hipótese de regressar à oposição, apenas deixando o campo ao adversário muito mais armadilhado do que da primeira vez (2002-2010).

3/ Pouca gente sabe que na Hungria existe um Conselho Orçamental de três pessoas, todas nomeadas por Orbán, que podem vetar o orçamento. Quando o fazem, o Parlamento pode ser dissolvido pelo Presidente.

France is on the eve of voting one of the most shameful laws in its history: it would effectively outlaw criticism of Israel and criminalize any speech seen as even remotely sympathetic to whoever the French government chooses to designate a "terrorist group." In effect this law would turn France's foreign policy into unchallengeable dogma backed by prison time. You could literally be sent for 5 years in prison if you, for instance, call what France says are "terrorists" a "resistance group." Think for instance Nelson Mandela during the apartheid (the ANC was on every Western terrorist list) or, heck, France's own Résistance against Nazi Germany - designated as "terrorists" by the Vichy regime and the Nazi occupation. It's frankly absolutely insane. The new law is called "loi Yadan" after its author Caroline Yadan, a MP who represents French expatriates living in Israel. The U.S. has congressmen paid by AIPAC: France has cut out the middleman entirely, we have MPs whose constituency is literally in Israel. The law has already passed committee and heads to a full parliamentary vote on April 16th - 3 days from now - under a very unusual fast-track procedure. Seven of eleven parliamentary groups have said they'll vote yes and the law is expected to pass. What does the law say? Let me quote from it directly (full text here: assemblee-nationale.fr/dyn/17/textes/…): 1) Article 1 introduces the concept of "implicit" provocation to terrorism and punishes it with five years imprisonment and a fine of €75,000 That's the one I was speaking about. Under this provision, describing anyone France designates as terrorist as a "resistance movement" - the way France describes its own Résistance against Nazi occupation - could effectively become a crime. The key concept is what does "implicit provocation to terrorism" mean? Nobody knows. And that's the point. It means whatever a prosecutor wants it to mean: a perfectly good case could be made that, for instance, quoting international law on the right of occupied peoples to resist with respect to Hamas is, in fact, "implicit provocation to terrorism." France's most famous anti-terrorism judge, Marc Trévidic, says he has never seen anything like it in his entire career (x.com/CharliesIngall…): "Implicit provocation to terrorism: do you realize what that means? Becoming a censor of other people's thoughts, trying to guess what a person really meant." 2) The same article also expands the terrorism apology offense to include "minimizing or trivializing acts of terrorism in an outrageous manner." This is even crazier: until now, "apology of terrorism" meant actually expressing a favorable judgment of "terrorist acts" (which is already insane because, as we all know, one person's terrorist is another's freedom fighter). Well, under this new provision, a judge could decide that providing context, explaining root causes, or insufficiently condemning an act amounts to "trivializing" terrorism - and that would now be punishable with 5 years in prison. So, for instance, a history teacher explaining the origins of Hamas or Hezbollah is providing context - but a prosecutor could argue that contextualization is trivialization. The same reasoning could apply to a journalist, a researcher, or anyone on social media who says "yes, it was terrible, but here's why it happened." The "but" becomes a crime, as it is trivialization. 3) Article 4 expands Holocaust denial law Under current French law, denying the Holocaust is already a crime. This provision extends that crime by specifying that contestation of crimes against humanity now includes, "whatever its formulation, a negation, minimization, or outrageous trivialization" of those crimes. Again with "outrageous trivialization"! In this instance the very authors of the text - Caroline Yadan and her colleagues - explain their reasoning explicitly in the law's preamble (assemblee-nationale.fr/dyn/17/textes/…): "Comparing the State of Israel to the Nazi regime would thereby be punishable as an outrageous trivialization of the Shoah." So while the provision is written in general terms, its architects are openly saying what it's for: making it a crime to draw any parallel between Israel's actions and those of the Nazis. 4) Article 2 creates a brand new crime: calling for the destruction of a state. The law adds to an existing 1881 press law a provision punishing anyone who "publicly, in disregard of the right of peoples to self-determination and the purposes and principles of the UN Charter, calls for the destruction of a state recognized by the French Republic." Five years imprisonment, €75,000 fine. The qualifiers about self-determination and the UN Charter are meant to sound reassuring. But what does "destruction" mean? In practice, if you advocate for a one-state solution where Israelis and Palestinians live as equals, you are de-facto calling for the "destruction" of the state of Israel. Well, that would now be punishable by 5 years in prison 🤷 There you go. Absolutely insane: if this new law passes, and it unfortunately very much looks like it will, France - the country that gave the world the Declaration of the Rights of Man, the country whose national identity is built on the Résistance - will have made it illegal to use the word 'resistance' about anyone the government doesn't like. Jean Moulin would be prosecuted. De Gaulle would be prosecuted. The only people who wouldn't be prosecuted are those who stay silent. Which, of course, is the whole point.

@ruirochaliberal Pede pra cagar e sai.

Se a corrupção e a manipulação do Estado de Direito forem o critério, é provável que sejas o próximo.

Google is now also erasing the villages and settlements of Lebanon, presumably to make space for the Israeli names of settlements to come. Google is now being evil.

Apple removes all village names in southern Lebanon from its Maps app. What is the justification for this? What is the reason?

Echaron a Trump de un restaurante y le dijeron que no aceptan ped0filos jajajaj se ve que le va a ir bien en las elecciones por suerte

With Analisa.pt, you can follow public contracts at municipality level, see where the money is flowing, and explore the network behind it through connected entities and contracts. It's a simpler way to understand who is contracting with whom, where public money is going, and how local spending moves across the network.