Palatin Zsombor

@ShaqAram Lehet, hogy részben közpénzből épült a cég, de azért, mert olcsóbban és jobban csinálják, mint bárki más, ezért ezzel szerintem semmi gond nincsen. (Most a másik felére reagáltam csak, nyilván az vita tárgya lehet, hogy nekünk volt-e erre szükségünk)

Ezért lehet kapok anyázást, de amíg elismerem Kapu Tibor fizikai és szellemi képességeit, és hogy nagyon menő űrhajósnak lenni, nem értem miért kéne nemzeti mérföldkőnek lennie annak hogy vettünk egy széket Elon Musk amerikai közpénzekből épített cégének az űrhajóján

Our track record speaks for itself. From today, Hungary is led by a liberal government. Let us hope they do not squander what our patriotic forces have built over the past 16 years. 🇭🇺

@aakashgupta That's why I don't buy apple products. I want usable stuff.

Let me explain exactly why Apple ships the Magic Mouse charging port on the bottom, because no one seems to get it. This is not an oversight. Apple has shipped this exact design since 2015. They updated the mouse in October 2024 to USB-C and kept the port on the bottom anyway. They actively block the mouse from working when it receives power, which kills every third-party case that tries to move the port to the side. Apple watcher John Gruber has said Apple designers tried front-port versions and rejected all of them because every one looked worse. Ten years of memes. A decade of competitor mockery. An entire cottage industry of accessory makers trying to fix this. Apple held the line on every single attempt. The reason is the entire Apple thesis. Every other hardware company asks "is it usable?" Apple asks "is anything visible that I wouldn't put on a museum shelf?" When usability and visibility collide, they hide the usability. iMac power button on the back since 1998. Headphone jack deleted in 2016. Every port stripped from the MacBook Pro for five years before they admitted defeat. Touch Bar replaced function keys for a cleaner look and died after five years. The Magic Mouse is the purest version of the discipline. The cost is a few minutes of charging downtime every couple of months. The benefit is the mouse looks beautiful 100% of the time it is in your hand. Apple ran that trade in 2015 and has refused every chance to renegotiate it. Run the math on what this aesthetic discipline buys them. Apple sells a $99 mouse that has to be flipped on its back to charge. Logitech sells better mice for $40 with the port in the right place. Apple is worth $4.3 trillion. Logitech is worth $15 billion. A 280x gap on the same category of product. The trade was never even close.

@peldothu @magyarpeterMP @GiorgiaMeloni He said that will be first after elected to prime minister, that will happen on the 9th of May.

@magyarpeterMP @GiorgiaMeloni Why you ditched Poland?

I will meet Italian Prime Minister @GiorgiaMeloni in Rome on Thursday morning.

@Matt_Pinner @grok is wrong about this being the Goa beach incident in India, this one below is that one. You can clearly see, that even the color of the chute is different and the height too. x.com/nextminutenews…

I'm sure they are fine... right?! 😨

@escapefrommelos Why is it somewhat the opposite in the Americas?

>there isn’t a single good argument against eating with your hands the humble Diarrheal Diseases Death Rate Map:

@Kekius_Sage I think the answer is yes, but there could be cheats that lets us go further in a period of time compared to light. Like wormholes and other exotic stuff.

Are we 100% sure nothing can surpass light speed?

@EmbyFlame @Yatoplayz I respect your decision, but I disagree, that someone hitting red is neccecarily a bad person (bad people will hit red though). There are numerous reason to either hit red or blue and it also depends on lots of personal circumstances (family, ideology, logical/emotional thinking)

@PalatinZ @Yatoplayz Absolutely. I'd press it till it was a lose-lose either way (85+%). And at that point it's not a difficult question anyway, though even at 70 you're gonna see a lot more hitting red.

I know if blue won but the winning results and peoples votes were not made public that everyone who voted red would say they chose blue if asked

@EmbyFlame @Yatoplayz Some red pressers might be, but as I wrote if my vote was worth 1 million votes, I'd press blue. Would you still press blue if the requirement was 70%?

@PalatinZ @Yatoplayz My vote doesn't matter, you're correct, but I'm not gonna forsake the lives of millions just to save myself. Again, that's not a world I'd wanna live in. You red pressers are fueled by rage and copium.

@EmbyFlame @Yatoplayz If only my vote was worth 1 million votes (still ~0.012% of all votes) I'd pick blue.

@EmbyFlame @Yatoplayz Btw at an 8 billion people scale your vote doesn't even matter if it can't influence anyone, so the real question is: Would you live in a world where many people will die potentially?

@elenadesaa1999 It's simple, you're not watching your phone, but your screen, that shows something else, completly detached from the hardware itself.

¿Cómo es que ya estamos en 2026 y nadie ha encontrado una explicación convincente de por qué los celulares nunca aparecen en nuestros sueños si los usamos varias horas al día?

@q_slavic Unless you were already a killer

If you kill a killer, the number of killers in the world remains the same.

@worldwide_yuya Hungary

こんばんは世界。 この投稿がみえてる世界中の人たち いまどこから見ていますか？

This GPT Image 2 prompt is going insanely viral right now. “Redraw the attached image in the most clumsy, scribbly, and utterly pathetic way possible. Use a white background, and make it look like it was drawn in MS Paint with a mouse. It should be vaguely similar but also not really, kind of matching but also off in a confusing, awkward way, with that low-quality pixel-by-pixel feel that really emphasizes how ridiculously bad it is. Actually, you know what, whatever, just draw it however you want.”

@MrBeast For those who figured out, that their vote doesn't matter at an 8 billion people scale, the only question remains is if they would/could live in a world, where lot's of people might die around them.

Everyone on earth takes a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press? BE HONEST.

@mysteriouskat I dont believe 50% would press blue, so I'm definetly pushing red.

I guess the question is really about whether we believe that most of us would press the blue button. No reason to press red unless you believe that at lease 50%+ of your fellow humans will press red. Unless you're outright evil.

@currydtx Choosing a big gamble over some minor casualities is not the logical decision. Also if you predict, that there is no way to reach 50%, why would you pick blue?

Blue is 100% the right choice. There is no reality where all 8 billion people pick red so you have to pick blue to prevent millions from dying.

@EmbyFlame @Yatoplayz You are potentially killing a person by picking blue. If you think 50% won't be reached this brings the bigger threat to kill someone, not red.

@PalatinZ @Yatoplayz Of course most of us would. The crux of the argument is "we pick blue cause we didn't wanna kill anyone" you moron. It's not about *us* living, it's about*everyone* living. Even the selfish pricks who voted red.

@adrusi I'm pushing red, because I think blue will be less than 50% in a real life scenario. That is one life saved and if it was someone random's life I would still pick red to save them.

you know that all these attempts to do a "realistic" button game dont actually succeed at realism because you find zero coordinated efforts to punish red-pushers when blue predictably wins