
Pam
2.6K posts

Pam retweetledi

Credit where credit is due. This is an important investigate piece by the CBC, and a hard pill to swallow. Timely as I’ll be speaking at the UofC in a few short hours on the very topic of the state of democracy in Canada, and grassroots movements.
Our own military were conducting clandestine psychological operations against us; the very citizens they swore to protect, and they did so without the knowledge or consent of Canadians.
They flew a King Air spy plane over the Freedom Convoy, illegally and unconstitutionally scraping data from cell phones on the ground. Your texts, your emails, and all your photos, your social media all obtained without a warrant. Then they lied to Canadians and told them it was a training mission.
Elected governments
Public health
Judiciary
Subsidized media
RCMP
CSIS
Canadian Armed Forces
What is the state of democracy in a country in which all of the institutions we were raised to believe were in put in place to protect our rights and give us a voice continually, egregiously, sometimes, illegally, violate our trust without accountability or justice?
We’ll discuss this tonight!
cbc.ca/news/politics/…
English
Pam retweetledi

Western and Alberta Independence is a polarizing topic these days. With a referendum on Alberta Independence coming in Alberta this fall, David Parker is going to take us through his story, how and why he became politically involved, how is grassroots movement, Take Back Alberta, removed a sitting premier, and his latest, The Centurion Project; a platform for citizens to put democracy back where it it belongs. In their own hands.
Streaming live at 6pm MT Thursday. Links to follow!
@ChrisBarber1975 @DavidJPba @18houseHouse @tashiapotter @TomMarazzo
English
Pam retweetledi

Anyone else heading to the University of Calgary to hear @LichTamara ?
I'll be there, and I'm bringing petition sheets if anyone hasn't signed yet.
English
Pam retweetledi

Yes, an independent Alberta would continue to be landlocked.
However, it would also be one of the hardest countries on earth for a foreign enemy to reach.
Any international threat would have to cross Canada or the United States first. That is an enormous built-in security advantage.
And unlike today, an independent Alberta would control its own borders and immigration instead of relying on a federal system with no internal provincial border security.
Landlocked is not a weakness when your geography makes you more insulated, more defensible, and harder to reach.

English
Pam retweetledi

If you know NOTHING ELSE about Canadian Politics, know that this alone is why Alberta needs out.
34 out of 37 opted to go blue in the federal election.
By all rights, a mega supermajority.
0% of them have any say, federally- and if they do, the needs of Quebec and Ontario come first.
There is no fair deal we can make with the present framework- where 92% of the will of the province is consistently ignored, while people at the opposite end continue oppressive lawmaking, regulation, culture, and views towards Alberta.

English
Pam retweetledi

Yes, an independent Alberta would need to replace several Canadian services, including postal, police, currency, and passports.
That is true.
But the important point is this: Alberta would also control those services directly, so they would be built to serve Alberta’s needs, Alberta’s values, and Alberta’s security.
On a day-to-day level, life would still feel familiar. Mail would still be delivered. Police would still patrol. Passports would still be issued. Currency would still circulate.
The difference is that Ottawa would no longer be deciding what is best for Alberta while using Alberta’s own money to do it.
Independence is not about losing services. It is about bringing them home.

English

@state74705 @papajeff71 Yes! We are free, sovereign, and untold opportunities for family , faith, and prosperity 🤩⚡️🫶
English
Pam retweetledi

@JonFromAlberta Woooohooo Team Yuma- you made history🫶⚡️Thank you so much🫶
English

One of the most encouraging conversations I had in Red Deer was with the Alberta snowbirds from Yuma.
These are Albertans who spend part of the winter in places like Arizona, and instead of checking out politically while they were away, they helped turn Yuma into one of the most unexpectedly inspiring little hubs of the independence movement. In this conversation, they explain that their Yuma team held six pop-up signing events, and at one of the bigger turnouts they saw roughly 350 people show up, with only a handful of canvassers trying to keep up. That is not a gimmick. That is real support showing up in the middle of another country because Albertans abroad still care deeply about what happens back home.
That is why this matters.
A lot of people saw the Yuma story as a funny social media moment. But it is actually much more than that. It is a sign that this movement has reached a level of mainstream visibility where ordinary Albertans are no longer waiting for permission, no longer hiding their support, and no longer treating independence as some fringe theory that only gets discussed in private. They are carrying it with them wherever they go. Arizona, Mexico, Hawaii, even farther afield. That tells you something important: this idea is alive in people now. It travels with them. It is becoming part of their identity.
The Yuma team also makes another point that matters. They were not calling themselves heroes. They said they were just tough Albertans who were not going to put up with any more nonsense. That is exactly the spirit behind a lot of this movement. Not celebrity. Not performance. Not paid activism. Just regular Albertans deciding to do something real because they believe this can actually happen. And in the conversation I say exactly that: the reason so many people are out there, whether in Arizona heat or Alberta wind, is because we genuinely believe this can happen.
That is a big part of why the Yuma story hit so hard online.
It gave people a visible example of momentum. It showed that support is not confined to one town, one rally, or one demographic. It showed that even when Albertans are temporarily outside the province, they are still emotionally and politically invested enough to organize, collect signatures, and encourage others. That kind of behavior only happens when a movement starts to feel real. People do not go to that kind of effort for something they think is doomed.
And yes, a few naysayers tried to mock it or imply there was something improper about collecting signatures outside Canada. But that criticism mostly reveals how weak and short-sighted the opposition is. An Albertan with Alberta identification is still an Albertan wherever he or she happens to be standing. There is nothing absurd about that. In fact, it would be absurd to suggest that Albertans somehow lose their political rights the moment they cross a border for a holiday. The mockery never really landed because it was rooted more in reflexive sneering than in serious thought.
What the Yuma story really symbolizes is critical mass.
When people start setting up pop-up canvassing events not just in Alberta but around the world, it means the movement is no longer surviving on theory alone. It means people feel momentum. It means they want to be part of it. It means they can picture success. And that encouragement matters, because political movements grow when ordinary people start seeing visible signs that victory is possible.
That is why this was such an important little segment.
It was not just about Yuma. It was about proof that Alberta independence is spreading, normalizing, and becoming something more and more people believe can actually be done.
English
Pam retweetledi

Pam retweetledi

HANNAFORD: Ex-Alberta emergency chief says Ottawa destroying national se... youtu.be/MYjqYV0j138?si… via @YouTube

YouTube
English
Pam retweetledi
Pam retweetledi
Pam retweetledi

A veteran of the Canadian Armed Forces stopped me in Red Deer and shared a perspective that I think a lot of people need to hear in full, not reduced to a slogan.
He told me his father fought in World War II. He told me his sons served in Afghanistan. This is not somebody speaking casually about loyalty, sacrifice, or duty. This is somebody from a family that has given real service across generations.
And his message was blunt: in his view, Canada is no longer being loyal to people like him, and nothing meaningful is going to change in Ottawa. That is why he believes Alberta independence is now the only way forward.
Whether someone agrees with that conclusion or not, people should at least understand the depth behind it.
For many soldiers, veterans, and military families, loyalty is not an abstract idea. It is tied to duty, sacrifice, service, loss, and trust. The basic belief is that if you give yourself to a country, that country should still reflect the values you served to protect. When people who spent their lives serving begin to feel alienated from the direction of the country, that is not a small thing.
I think the concern here is bigger than party politics. It is about the feeling that the institutions of Canada are no longer listening, no longer correcting course, and no longer representing the people who built, defended, and sustained this country. For some veterans, the frustration is not just with one bad policy or one bad government. It is the belief that the system itself is no longer responsive.
That is the nuance people miss.
When a veteran says Alberta independence is the only way forward, he is not necessarily saying he stopped caring about the country overnight. He may be saying the opposite. He may be saying he cared so much, for so long, that it means something when he finally concludes the relationship is broken beyond repair.
A lot of soldiers and veterans may have concerns about even entertaining that idea. They may value unity, continuity, tradition, and the memory of what they served under. They may worry that supporting Alberta independence feels like turning their back on their service, their oath, or the people they served beside. That is a real emotional and moral tension.
But the other side of that tension is this: what if loyalty is not supposed to be one-way? What if there comes a point where citizens, including veterans, have the right to say that the political system has become unworthy of their continued trust? What if defending freedom sometimes means being honest about when a government or a national project has drifted too far from the people it claims to represent?
That is why this moment mattered.
This was not just a random political opinion shouted from the roadside. It was a serious statement from someone whose family has lived service, sacrifice, and national duty. And when people like that start saying Ottawa will not change, others should pay attention.
You do not have to agree with him to recognize the weight of what he is saying.
Watch this and listen to his words for yourself.
English
Pam retweetledi

I wasn’t planning to set up today, since it was Easter Sunday, but I decided to go for it anyway.
I’m so glad I did.
It turned into an incredible day.
Dozens of cars drove by waving and honking, and quite a few people pulled over, rolled down their windows, and personally thanked me for the work I’m doing.
Once again, I had a lot of young parents sign the petition. But what really blew me away was the number of younger single people, 20 to 30 years old, who stopped to sign.
Many of them told me that while most of their friends might not have signed yet, they’ll definitely be voting for #AlbertaIndependence.
Alberta is frickin’ fabulous.


English
Pam retweetledi

@treadheavynow @JonFromAlberta And his words are meaningless and fall on deaf ears - he’s inconsequential
English








