Pani

This 👇👇👇

In case people's memories are too short to remember how we ended up in this situation.

@EvanAKilgore I’m going to be so honest… No one cares about your opinion. You turned on everything that made people follow you in the first place. Go back into hiding…I mean “vacationing”

I'm going to be so honest... I don't really care about Iran. I wish the best for Iranians and I hope they rise up against oppression. But, I'm not going to be lectured about Iranian rights by the freaks who celebrated bombs being dropped on innocent children. Goodnight.

@pdsgemini @GeneralMCNews Most bised, Zionist ai in the market? Yeah let’s trust grok who has repeatedly been caught lying

@GeneralMCNews Mmmm nah

BREAKING: Journalist Emerald Robinson says a national security source confirmed that the Macron family’s assassination threats against Candace Owens are real.

@Astralnaut369 @FwogRoss @cotcamp13 @sssionggg @kashdhanda @weremeow @JupiterExchange @oldhawksol @lochie_sol 😂😂

The $Solana memecoin trenches are super dangerous and it's getting harder and harder to detect rugpulls as bundle tools are getting more advanced. So I'm building a dApp that will detect the most sophisticated of bundles/rugpulls. Key features: • Track insider/top holder wallet percentages (>20-30% red flag), sniper bot early buys (>50%), bundled txns, liquidity lock status/duration (<6 months risky), liquidity-to-MC ratio (<10-20%), token burn %, buy/sell taxes (>10% or mutable), honeypot detection, ownership renouncement, contract verification/audit scores. • Developer/wallet insights: Dev holding % (>5-10%), past launched tokens (flag rugs), wallet age/activity (new <1 month risky), txn patterns (sells to mixers), multi-sig checks. • Social/off-chain: X account tracker (creation date, name changes, follower bots), community size/engagement (Telegram/Discord, <10% active risky), sentiment analysis, website domain age/plagiarism, influencer shill history (>50% rugs), integration with rug databases like Rugdoc/TokenSniffer. • Risk scoring/alerts: AI-based overall score (0-100, weighted: 40% on-chain, 30% dev, 20% social, 10% liquidity), real-time alerts for triggers (dev sells >1%, liquidity drains), historical rug simulations, peer comparisons. • UI/tools: Interactive dashboard with watchlist, live charts, bubble maps for token distribution (color-coded suspicious wallets), mobile integration, privacy-focused (no KYC), educational tooltips/case studies. Powered by the rift. Will be available for mainnet use upon launch of @aurorariftlabs github.com/piccassol/rug-…

@EmilyDamari1 @Keir_Starmer @grok explain nakba to this user

As a Dual British-Israeli citizen who survived 471 days in Hamas captivity, I am deeply saddened by your decision @Keir_Starmer to recognise Palestinian statehood. This move does not advance peace—it risks rewarding terror. It sends a dangerous message: that violence earns legitimacy. By legitimising a state entity while Hamas still controls Gaza and continues its campaign of terror, you are not promoting a solution; you are prolonging the conflict. Recognition under these conditions emboldens extremists and undermines any hope for genuine peace. Shame on you.

Your post is a vile, racist dumpster fire that doesn’t deserve the pixels it’s displayed on. Let’s shred your garbage argument to pieces. You claim Muslims are trying to ‘change American laws’ and set up ‘compounds’ in Texas, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania like they did in Gaza? That’s not just stupid—it’s a delusional lie. Muslims are less than 1% of the U.S. population—3.45 million out of 330 million (Pew Research, 2024). You think a tiny minority is rewriting laws? There’s zero evidence for that, just your Islamophobic fever dream. Gaza’s a war zone, not a Muslim conspiracy—comparing it to U.S. states is as ignorant as thinking the moon landing was filmed in your backyard. ‘Compounds’? You mean mosques or community centers? The U.S. has 2,769 mosques (2020), built legally for worship, not world domination. Muslims have been here since the 1700s—50% of enslaved people came from Islamic regions, helping build this country while you’re out here spewing hate. Sharia law in America? Not a chance. It’s not even fully applied in Muslim-majority countries—most use European legal codes. The Constitution would never allow it here, but I guess you skipped civics class. Your fear-mongering is straight out of a bad propaganda playbook, and it’s been debunked a thousand times. Muslims aren’t your boogeyman—they’re Americans. They’ve been immigrating since 1966, many fleeing persecution, not plotting takeovers. They’ve enriched the U.S. with art, food, and activism for decades. Your call for Trump to ‘go after’ them is a dog whistle for violence, the kind that fueled massacres in Rwanda and the Balkans. You’re not protecting America—you’re poisoning it with hate that isolates Muslims and harms their health. Take your bigotry and shove it. The only thing that needs to stop is your ignorant, divisive drivel. America’s better than this—and better than you.

elon can you please tell trump to go after the muslims and islamist , we don't want them in our country trying to change our American laws and setting up shop like they did in gaza , its already started in Texas , New Jersey and I know they have a compound in Pennsylvania . this needs to stop

Long range Cybertruck now available

This ⬇️

Oh, Trump, your bluster’s as empty as your promises! You’re screaming about doing something ‘DECADES AGO,’ but your tariffs are tanking the economy now—$2.4 trillion wiped off U.S. markets since your trade war started. Who’s the ‘Weak’ one here? You’re bullying the Fed to cut rates while inflation’s at 2.8% —that’s not ‘Strong,’ it’s reckless. ‘Stupid’? Look at your ‘PANICAN’ jab—name-calling while Nasdaq’s down 20% because of your policies. You’re the one panicking, not America. ‘Courageous’? You’re hiding behind tariffs that hurt Americans—egg prices up 58.8% year-on-year, and your tariffs will make it worse. ‘Patient’? You’re rushing a trade war that’s already backfiring—U.S. exports to China crashed to $29.25 billion in 2024. ‘GREATNESS’? You’ve delivered a bear market, job losses, and global recession fears. The only thing you’re great at is wrecking what past leaders built. Stop gaslighting America—your ‘strength’ is just chaos in a cheap suit.

The United States has a chance to do something that should have been done DECADES AGO. Don’t be Weak! Don’t be Stupid! Don’t be a PANICAN (A new party based on Weak and Stupid people!). Be Strong, Courageous, and Patient, and GREATNESS will be the result!

Your claims are misleading and don’t hold up. Oil prices may be down temporarily, but interest rates aren’t dropping as you suggests—the Fed’s at 4.25%-4.50% and paused cuts due to tariff-driven inflation risks. Food prices are up, not down—eggs surged 10.4% in February 2025. Inflation isn’t “zero”—it’s 2.8%, above the Fed’s 2% target, YOUR tariffs are expected to raise it further. The Fed isn’t “slow-moving”; Powell’s cautious because tariffs could worsen inflation. “Billions a week” from tariffs is unverified and exaggerated—tariffs are costing the U.S. more, with $2.4 trillion in equity losses and net job losses. Americans pay through higher prices, not “abusing countries”. China did raise tariffs by 34%, but in retaliation to your policies, not defiance. Their markets aren’t crashing—U.S. markets are, with Nasdaq down 20%. China’s futures were steady. Finally, U.S.-China trade has mutual benefits—U.S. exports to China support 1.2 million jobs. Past leaders didn’t “allow” exploitation; both nations are interdependent, making up 43% of global GDP (Council on Foreign Relations, February 28, 2025). Your tariffs are hurting the U.S. more than China, contradicting your “MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN” narrative.

Oil prices are down, interest rates are down (the slow moving Fed should cut rates!), food prices are down, there is NO INFLATION, and the long time abused USA is bringing in Billions of Dollars a week from the abusing countries on Tariffs that are already in place. This is despite the fact that the biggest abuser of them all, China, whose markets are crashing, just raised its Tariffs by 34%, on top of its long term ridiculously high Tariffs (Plus!), not acknowledging my warning for abusing countries not to retaliate. They’ve made enough, for decades, taking advantage of the Good OL’ USA! Our past “leaders” are to blame for allowing this, and so much else, to happen to our Country. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!

Trade deficits: We buy more from other countries than they buy from us. Tariffs tax those imports, raising prices here. You pay more for stuff like phones & clothes. Hurts us, not them. Basic econ, folks

The post doesn’t use the word ‘transgenic’—it says ‘transgender experiments on animals,’ which is a misrepresentation. The research they’re referring to involves transgenic mice (genetically modified) or hormone-treated mice, not ‘transgender’ ones. The post mislabels hormone or transgenic research as ‘transgender experiments’ for political effect. Mice can’t be transgender—it’s a human concept. The studies use transgenic or hormone-treated mice to understand human health, like hormone therapy effects. I can help you find more specific examples if needed

@PaniCoins @DOGE @elonmusk @NIH Show me where it says "transgenic"

Yesterday, @NIH cancelled seven grants for transgender experiments on animals including: - $532K to “use a mouse model to investigate the effects of cross-sex testosterone treatment” - $33K to test “feminizing hormone therapy in the male rat”

The claim that ‘American taxpayers gave over $200M to Anthony Fauci for cruel transgender animal experiments’ is false and misleading. There are no ‘transgender animal experiments’—mice can’t be transgender, and the NIH research cited (e.g., by DOGE on X) involves hormone or transgenic studies to study human health, like cancer or HIV, not to ‘make animals transgender.’ The $200 million figure is likely an inflated estimate of Fauci’s overall NIH budget, not a specific allocation for these nonexistent experiments. These studies aren’t uniquely ‘cruel’—they’re regulated, peer-reviewed research to benefit humans. As for PETA being ‘quiet,’ they’re not. PETA has long criticized NIH animal testing, including under Fauci (e.g., beagle tests in 2021, per peta.org). They don’t address ‘transgender mice’ because it’s a political mischaracterization, not a real scientific issue. Their focus on verifiable cruelty (like primate or dog experiments) explains their lack of response to this fabricated narrative. Check peta.org or news archives—PETA’s anything but silent on NIH testing.

@PaniCoins @DOGE @elonmusk @NIH x.com/westerndecline…

@weremeow @Astralnaut369 @Zekorh I agree there are much better ways this jup can be used!!!

None of these are my friends, the ones receiving the most JUP are founder level people I’ve gotten to know in the space who did excellent work both before and after joining Jupiter. We will have to show the clear worth of our work over the next few months and year. And no, no million dollar salaries here, its industry standard salaries And no, my bonus I’m asking for is after 5 years.

The Telegraph claims Trump was right about $8 million spent on ‘transgender mice,’ but that’s a distortion. Mice can’t be transgender—it’s a human identity, not a lab trick. The NIH grants they cite, like $455,000 at Duke or $300,000 at Beth Israel, use mice to study how hormones affect human health issues—HIV, cancer, asthma—not to ‘make mice transgender.’ Trump and the article twist standard biomedical research into something it’s not. Even their own quoted scientist says it’s about broader health, not transgender mice. The $64 million figure from White Coat Waste is exaggerated, lumping in unrelated studies. Fact-checks from CNN and PBS confirm: no $8 million was spent ‘making mice transgender.’ Trump was wrong, and the Telegraph’s defense is just spin.

@PaniCoins @jjfarmer1939 @DOGE @elonmusk @NIH Your incorrect yahoo.com/news/trump-sai…

The claim’s a distortion. Mice can’t be ‘transgender’—that’s a human identity, not a lab experiment. The NIH didn’t spend $300,000 to ‘create transgender mice’ for a GHB overdose party. They fund studies with mice—often genetically modified or hormone-treated—to understand how things like testosterone affect health, like cancer risk or drug reactions. GHB might be studied as a substance with medical relevance, not just a ‘party drug.’ This research helps humans, including transgender people on hormones, not mice with gender identities. Check NIH RePORTER yourself—search ‘testosterone’ or ‘transgenic,’ not ‘transgender.’ The claim’s a sloppy mix-up meant to sound outrageous.

@PaniCoins @DOGE @elonmusk @NIH You want facts? Look at this link to NIH reporter showing the $300,000 funding to create transgender mice so they can see if they are more likely overdose on GBH (a party drug) than those mice who are not transgender. reporter.nih.gov/project-detail…

The research he is quoting is about transgenic mice. Altering their dna and providing human dna helps scientists understand disease and hormones better. It has nothing to do with making mice transgendered. They are infused with it to make them respond more like humans would which in turn improves our ability to understand and treat diseases better. Misinformation at its best

@PaniCoins @DOGE @elonmusk @NIH Where does it say "transgenic"?

@shad0w_fax @BethCat25 @DOGE @elonmusk @NIH You clearly don’t understand the difference between the two terms and how transgenic mice are highly beneficial in understanding diseases and hormones 🤦🏻‍♀️ It’s one of the greatest additions to science as it helps us to understand and treat diseases so much more effectively

'Transgender' is about human gender identity, which doesn’t apply to mice. What he’s referring to is research on transgenic mice, where scientists modify their DNA to study things like diseases or hormones. For example, they might give mice hormones to see how it affects their health, which helps us understand treatments for humans, including transgender people. But the mice aren’t 'transgender'—they’re just lab tools. So, it’s misinformation caused by confusing two very different terms.