John Kirton

1.2K posts

John Kirton banner
John Kirton

John Kirton

@PapiJohn55

Not your average Brit living on the continent. Eat food, not too much, mostly plants. Move a lot. Buy quality companies at a discount. Compound your life!

Chalonnes-sur-Loire, France Katılım Ekim 2021
38 Takip Edilen48 Takipçiler
John Kirton
John Kirton@PapiJohn55·
@CapexAndChill I finally got a decent position in $NU yesterday and the day before. $MELI is my biggest holding in a highly concentrated portfolio. My thesis says these two are long term multibaggers.
English
0
0
0
178
CapexAndChill
CapexAndChill@CapexAndChill·
They are both special businesses and their TAMs are becoming more distinct than people may think. $NU is taking the model it nearly perfected in Brazil and planning on expanding it globally outside of LatAm. $MELI is doubling down on LatAm. It has the structural advantage to do so and a team that can navigate it better than anybody else.
Fiscal.ai@fiscal_ai

MercadoPago continues to take share versus NuBank. $NU $MELI

English
4
0
73
12.3K
-destino-
-destino-@degrotepuinhoop·
Na een laatste flush bleek dit het signaal voor $WKL om plotsklaps te gaan stijgen.... 'das gene gewone' zouden we in ons dialect over @JDB_trading zeggen
JDB@JDB_trading

Wat mij nog meer opvalt deze week: 1) #Bitcoin blijft achter in de melt-up zoals ik al vermoedde (dus mijn visie is nog steeds valide) 2) goud/zilver weer zeer zwak zodra beurzen dalen 3) $WKL deze week officieel positieve divergentie met zeer veel negatieve Fintwit vibe.

Nederlands
1
0
4
446
John Kirton
John Kirton@PapiJohn55·
@zniwiarz_fin I had it and did well. But my instincts made me doubt management and I sold. Since then my doubts have been confirmed. DYOR. This needs an activist to kick out management, in my view.
English
0
0
1
123
Finansowy Żniwiarz
Finansowy Żniwiarz@zniwiarz_fin·
Zoetis $ZTS — wracam do tej spółki regularnie i mam dylemat.  Co mnie kusi: - globalny lider animal health z ~18% udziałem rynkowym - ROIC 22% — klasa sama w sobie - dywidenda rosnąca 15-20% rocznie przez dekadę - historycznie najtańsza wycena w historii spółki — 10-11x adj. EPS, yield 2,7% (rekord) - model biznesowy oparty na humanizacji zwierząt — trend Co mnie powstrzymuje: - US companion animal -8% w Q1 2026 — cykliczne czy strukturalne? - rosnąca konkurencja w kluczowych segmentach (Merck Numelvi atakuje Apoquel) - Librela pod presją — sprzedaż i kontrowersje dot. bezpieczeństwa - długoterminowo: mięso syntetyczne i białko alternatywne jako ryzyko dla segmentu livestock Czekać na wyniki w sierpniu (czy US companion animal się ustabilizuje) czy otworzyć pozycję? 🤔 Wy co sądzicie? Ktoś ma ZTS w portfelu? Jak oceniacie ryzyko strukturalne vs przejściowe?
Polski
3
0
7
1.3K
John Kirton
John Kirton@PapiJohn55·
@leepfc76 @pn_neil_allen What are you smoking son? Gary O'Neil has managed two clubs in the Premiership and is now with one of the better French clubs in Ligue 1. No way is he stepping down to a mid table or struggling Championship club.
English
0
0
0
28
Lee
Lee@leepfc76·
@pn_neil_allen Good luck to John but bye 👋 he will be a PL manager if he learns to tactically adapt. Front runners for #Pompey job for me should be Jack Wilshire, Gary O’Neil and Luke Williams.
English
5
0
3
2.4K
Baggr
Baggr@Baggr_fr·
🇬🇧 Terry Smith fait le grand ménage et remonte son niveau de cash… sauf pour un achat : Badger Meter $BMI Une idée partagée sur Baggr dès avril par @0xtechquity 😉Retrouvez son analyse complète de $BMI sur Baggr.fr
Baggr tweet mediaBaggr tweet mediaBaggr tweet media
Français
3
0
13
1.5K
John Kirton
John Kirton@PapiJohn55·
@Baggr_fr @0xtechquity Ce n'est pas absolument correct. Ses investisseurs font le grand ménage et il doit réagir.$BMI était acheté par Smithson. La performance de ce fonds n'est pas bonne.
Français
0
0
0
79
John Kirton
John Kirton@PapiJohn55·
@JKT_Dyke The small reduction in $ZTS indicates that Smith's bullshit meter isn't functioning very well. I sensed it a few years ago.
English
1
0
0
110
Joseph Dyke
Joseph Dyke@JKT_Dyke·
Two interrelated considerations for 13F watchers looking at Terry Smith's 1Q26 filing. (1) $MSCI and all the names below are in the Smithson portfolio, not the Fundsmith Equity fund portfolio. Smithson is run by Simon Barnard, not Terry Smith. (2) Smithson was formerly a listed investment company trading as $SSON.L. Smithson converted to an unlisted open-ended fund (OEIC) in February 2026. As part of this conversion, shareholders were offered the opportunity to exit their investment in cash at NAV. 58.6% of the register elected to take the cash, - this explains the 'reduce ~-60%' in names $MSCI - $HD.
Joseph Dyke tweet media
English
3
0
1
341
John Kirton
John Kirton@PapiJohn55·
@JKT_Dyke Meanwhile they have steadily increased their holdings in $ WKL. Ask AI to calculate the number of shares owned from the monthly updates.
English
1
0
1
23
John Kirton
John Kirton@PapiJohn55·
@JonahLupton @CapexAndChill Because the headline figures of ROIC and margins like poor in relation to a high P/E and near term share price action could be stunted. It is safer for fund managers to follow the crowd. Nothing fundamental if you look closer.
English
0
0
0
104
Jonah Lupton
Jonah Lupton@JonahLupton·
@CapexAndChill Not sure how every large cap fund manager isn’t buying $MELI now, down -40% from the highs and still growing top line at 40-50%
English
9
0
60
9.2K
CapexAndChill
CapexAndChill@CapexAndChill·
Bill Miller with the $MELI buy cancelled out by the bigger $MSTR buy 🤣
CapexAndChill tweet media
English
8
3
50
32.7K
Rene Sellmann
Rene Sellmann@ReneSellmann·
If you were to build a Nick-Sleep-like portfolio of just 3 super high-quality names that you would not touch for 15 years, which three companies would you choose?
English
54
3
46
22.8K
John Kirton
John Kirton@PapiJohn55·
@Invesquotes Meanwhile Gemini AI tells me of a securities fraud investigation into top management deliberately misleading the market. Peck sold 1.2m shares after her soon to be reversed 'optimistic' February guidance. Other managers were also big sellers. Useless and dodgy? hmmm.
English
0
0
0
248
Leandro
Leandro@Invesquotes·
First insider purchase for Zoetis over the past 5 years $233k $ZTS
Leandro tweet media
English
11
7
178
32.7K
John Kirton
John Kirton@PapiJohn55·
@AparicioCadiz Good business meets poor management team . Mr Market, he no like!
English
0
0
3
245
Antonio Cádiz
Antonio Cádiz@AparicioCadiz·
🦮Zoetis $ZTS a menos de 11 veces beneficios del futuro. No dudo de los problemas que está teniendo en la parte de artrosis, con Librela y Solensia; ni tampoco que ha aparecido mayor competición que tal vez pone en riesgo la política de subida de precios de la empresa si no quieren remitir en volumen y hundir su cuota de mercado. Sin embargo, es la compañía líder en salud animal y tiene mayor capacidad económica para desarrollar una pipeline fructífera.
Antonio Cádiz tweet media
Español
2
4
71
7.1K
Johan Swe 🇸🇪
Johan Swe 🇸🇪@LindenJohan·
Something about the $MELI narrative bugs me. Bulls keep saying margin compression is a choice. "Investing in the future." OK, but if competition wasn't growing, those margins would be expanding. Reframing pressure as strategy is clever, but it's still pressure. I own a small position so I'm not a hater, but my question is simple: what's the competitive moat that makes this temporary? Because without one, "investing in the future" is just a polite way of saying "spending more to hold position." And no, "LATAM e-commerce is growing" doesn't cut it. Growth feeds everyone, including whoever is eating MELI's lunch right now. Honestly, try this filter on any growth stock in your portfolio. Any time you see "cutting margins to invest," ask: would they be doing this without competitive pressure? Interesting exercise.
English
3
0
3
1.5K
John Kirton
John Kirton@PapiJohn55·
@SesaCarlos A moat without decent management erodes. This is primed for an activist. Good business meets bad management.
English
0
0
0
5
PoquitoPower
PoquitoPower@SesaCarlos·
2- El moat de Zoetis parecía casi perfecto. Medicamentos para mascotas. El dueño paga lo que haga falta por su perro. No negocia el precio. Empresa líder con poder de fijación de precios. Eso es oro en inversión.
Español
2
0
0
1.3K
PoquitoPower
PoquitoPower@SesaCarlos·
Esta semana al ver la caída de $ZTS (25% en 5 días) iba a comprar. Pensé que estaba comprando la vieja Zoetis, pero el precio que marcaba la cotización era de la nueva Zoetis. Frené la compra. Te cuento por qué. 🧵
Español
2
2
24
7K
John Kirton
John Kirton@PapiJohn55·
@CapexAndChill I disagree. If you study the charts, history, the numbers that count of $MELI, you'll see another market puke episode. What happened next might just happen again. Especially when the lending growth slows and provisions appear as cash, margins go up etc.
English
0
0
0
86
CapexAndChill
CapexAndChill@CapexAndChill·
Was this guy saying the same thing about $AMZN 3 months ago. What magic does the 5 year chart offer? What about the 6 year chart? Or the 8 year chart? If you make a lot of money in specifically 5 years, no more or and no less are you doing it right. Zero reasoning as why they are down. Are you going to delete now that $SE up on earnings?
Z@ZeeContrarian1

If you were even remotely paying attention, you’d pull up the 5-year chart on any of these stocks and realize how terrible the investments have been. You’re talking as if these companies had some massive historic run and are now facing a minor pullback, when in reality all of them have destroyed capital for years.

English
6
0
13
3.8K
John Kirton
John Kirton@PapiJohn55·
@CapexAndChill Institutions sell for many differing reasons. Redemptions, short term outlook, risk management, career motives etc, moving markets. Passive trading adds momentum. MELI's credit ratings are improving and I trust management. Aggressive moves are not without risk, so far, so good.
English
0
0
0
30
CapexAndChill
CapexAndChill@CapexAndChill·
Baillie Gifford likely had many redemptions come its way last quarter with trims across the board including $MELI, $NU, $NVDA and $AMZN But some adds to $SE and $APP. 👌
CapexAndChill tweet media
English
1
0
12
2.2K
John Kirton
John Kirton@PapiJohn55·
Easily the most coherent, destination oriented and best written post that I've seen on this $MELI sell off. This guy gets it!
Dimitry Nakhla | Babylon Capital®@DimitryNakhla

1/2 On MercadoLibre $MELI 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐪𝐮𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐥𝐲 𝐄𝐏𝐒 𝐣𝐮𝐧𝐤𝐢𝐞𝐬 𝐬𝐞𝐞 𝐚 𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐬. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐥𝐨𝐧𝐠-𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐦 𝐢𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐫 𝐬𝐞𝐞𝐬 𝐚 𝐰𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐦𝐨𝐚𝐭. $MELI stock dropped after Q1 2026 earnings. Income from operations fell -20% YoY. Operating margin compressed 600 basis points to 6.91%. EPS missed expectations. From the shareholder letter — in management’s own words: “𝙒𝙚 𝙘𝙝𝙤𝙨𝙚 𝙩𝙤 𝙥𝙧𝙞𝙤𝙧𝙞𝙩𝙞𝙯𝙚 𝙡𝙤𝙣𝙜-𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙢 𝙜𝙧𝙤𝙬𝙩𝙝 𝙞𝙣𝙫𝙚𝙨𝙩𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙨 𝙤𝙫𝙚𝙧 𝙨𝙝𝙤𝙧𝙩-𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙢 𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙛𝙞𝙩𝙖𝙗𝙞𝙡𝙞𝙩𝙮.” “𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙣 𝙮𝙤𝙪𝙧 𝙗𝙪𝙨𝙞𝙣𝙚𝙨𝙨 𝙞𝙨 𝙗𝙚𝙝𝙖𝙫𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙡𝙞𝙠𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙨, 𝙬𝙚 𝙗𝙚𝙡𝙞𝙚𝙫𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙞𝙜𝙝𝙩 𝙧𝙚𝙨𝙥𝙤𝙣𝙨𝙚 𝙞𝙨 𝙣𝙤𝙩 𝙩𝙤 𝙝𝙖𝙧𝙫𝙚𝙨𝙩 — 𝙞𝙩 𝙞𝙨 𝙩𝙤 𝙞𝙣𝙫𝙚𝙨𝙩.” AND “𝙒𝙚 𝙝𝙖𝙫𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙖𝙗𝙞𝙡𝙞𝙩𝙮 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙞𝙖𝙡 𝙢𝙖𝙧𝙜𝙞𝙣𝙨 𝙪𝙥 𝙤𝙧 𝙙𝙤𝙬𝙣 𝙖𝙨 𝙘𝙞𝙧𝙘𝙪𝙢𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙣𝙘𝙚𝙨 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙤𝙥𝙥𝙤𝙧𝙩𝙪𝙣𝙞𝙩𝙞𝙚𝙨 𝙚𝙫𝙤𝙡𝙫𝙚. 𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙖𝙢𝙚 𝙞𝙣𝙫𝙚𝙨𝙩𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙖𝙧𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙥𝙧𝙚𝙨𝙨𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙢𝙖𝙧𝙜𝙞𝙣𝙨 𝙩𝙤𝙙𝙖𝙮 𝙖𝙧𝙚 𝙗𝙪𝙞𝙡𝙙𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙥𝙡𝙖𝙩𝙛𝙤𝙧𝙢, 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙪𝙨𝙚𝙧 𝙗𝙖𝙨𝙚, 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙥𝙚𝙩𝙞𝙩𝙞𝙫𝙚 𝙢𝙤𝙖𝙩𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙬𝙚 𝙗𝙚𝙡𝙞𝙚𝙫𝙚 𝙬𝙞𝙡𝙡 𝙙𝙧𝙞𝙫𝙚 𝙢𝙖𝙧𝙜𝙞𝙣𝙨 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙘𝙖𝙨𝙝 𝙛𝙡𝙤𝙬 𝙨𝙞𝙜𝙣𝙞𝙛𝙞𝙘𝙖𝙣𝙩𝙡𝙮 𝙝𝙞𝙜𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙤𝙫𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙞𝙢𝙚.” Please read that again. Management is telling you explicitly: we could be more profitable today. We are CHOOSING not to be. This is not a business struggling with profitability. This is a business managing its profitability — deliberately suppressing margins to widen the moat while the opportunity window is open. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐮𝐥𝐭𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐜𝐡𝐨𝐢𝐜𝐞 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐯𝐢𝐬𝐢𝐛𝐥𝐞 in the same quarter the market punished: → Revenue grew 49% — the fastest pace in nearly four years → Items sold growth in Brazil doubled from 26% to 56% in nine months → Unique buyer growth in Brazil hit 32% — the fastest in five years → Advertising revenue grew 73% YoY → Credit card portfolio grew 104% YoY → Unit shipping costs in Brazil fell 17% — accelerating from 11% last quarter → Conversion, frequency, retention and NPS in Brazil are all at record highs Quite the result, no? 𝐍𝐢𝐜𝐤 𝐒𝐥𝐞𝐞𝐩 wrote about this exact dynamic twenty years ago when analyzing $COST for his Nomad Partnership. Costco’s net margin was 1.7% — a fraction of Walmart’s 3.6%. Wall Street applied three heuristics: “the company has low margins,” “it’s expensive,” and “Costco has a cost problem.” Sleep saw the opposite. He saw a 𝐛𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐝𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐛𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐥𝐲 𝐝𝐞𝐟𝐞𝐫𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐟𝐢𝐭𝐬 𝐭𝐨 𝐞𝐱𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐥𝐢𝐟𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐬𝐞 — passing scale economics back to customers in the form of lower prices, which deepened loyalty, which drove volume, which funded more price reductions. He called it the robustness ratio: the share of economic benefits going to customers and employees versus shareholders. Costco’s was 5:1. Five dollars reinvested in the competitive position for every one dollar flowing to shareholders. Sleep’s conclusion was simple: the low margin was the moat. The under-earning was the opportunity. And the investors who couldn’t see past the income statement were systematically mispricing one of the greatest compounders of the last 25 years. He wrote that what Wall Street wanted — for Costco to tilt the ratio toward shareholders to satisfy the “quarterly EPS junkies” — would actually weaken the business, not strengthen it. Bezos understood the same thing at Amazon. For over a decade $AMZN reported near-zero net income while reinvesting every dollar into logistics, Prime, and AWS. Wall Street asked the same question every quarter: when will this company become profitable? The answer was always the same: when we CHOOSE to be. The margin was there. The decision was to deploy it into infrastructure that would make the business impossible to compete with.

English
1
2
12
4.2K
John Kirton
John Kirton@PapiJohn55·
@CapexAndChill FWIW, these guys are amusing. As Buffet says if you can't stomach 50% drops you shouldn't be in the market. $MELI could reach that soon. It's noise. The price will follow the operating income long term and margins will increase.
English
1
0
1
169
CapexAndChill
CapexAndChill@CapexAndChill·
Your average lazy bear analysis that knows nothing about $MELI and just labels it as “broken stock”. Similar to how analysts lower price targets when the stock falls while remaining their buy rating. When the stock goes down, bears get louder. But most bears cannot differentiate a strong business from a crappy one. And there is a good reason MELI is down. They are capturing more of the market than originally seemed possible by expanding their credit offerings. Institutions are selling this down because it creates uncertainty and more risk. But if you actually looking into their lending business nothing changed. They nearly doubled the portfolio while entering riskier cohorts and NPLs are stable. This is a massive land grab. But don’t listen to me. The genius said broken stock. No go up
Arrakis Global@ArrakisGlobal

I see an insane amount of brain damage on my feed regarding $MELI Its hilarious to me, and a complete waste of time. This stock has just consistently failed to properly break new convincing highs since the ecommerce top in ‘21 (same with $CPNG and $SE) people

English
5
0
25
4.5K
John Kirton
John Kirton@PapiJohn55·
@DimitryNakhla Great response! Not exactly 'Scaled economies shared', more like 'Scaled economies, shared and diviersified, no escape now people'.
English
0
0
0
37
Dimitry Nakhla | Babylon Capital®
2/2 $MELI is running the same playbook in Latin America right now — and the shareholder letter makes the parallel explicit. They lowered the free shipping threshold in Brazil. Wall Street sees a margin headwind. $MELI sees what happened when they launched free shipping in 2016: “𝘐𝘵 𝘵𝘰𝘰𝘬 𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘶𝘯𝘪𝘵 𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘰𝘮𝘪𝘤𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘷𝘦 𝘦𝘯𝘰𝘶𝘨𝘩 𝘵𝘰 𝘰𝘧𝘧𝘴𝘦𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘷𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 — 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘢𝘤𝘵 𝘰𝘯 𝘦𝘯𝘨𝘢𝘨𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘴𝘤𝘢𝘭𝘦 𝘷𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘥𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯.” They are repeating a playbook that already worked once, at larger scale, with better data. They are investing aggressively in the credit card — issuing 2.7 million cards in a single quarter, growing the portfolio 104% YoY — because five years of cohort data in Brazil show the payback is predictable, consistent, and attractive. The older cohorts are now mature enough to offset the dilutive impact of new issuance. They are scaling a strategy that is already proven. They are expanding 1P selection — first-party retail that is currently margin-dilutive — because it tripled their cellphone market share in Brazil from 12% to market leader in three years. The earliest categories are already profitable. The rest will likely follow the same curve. ••• 𝐄𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲 𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐬𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐞𝐬 𝐭𝐨𝐝𝐚𝐲’𝐬 𝐦𝐚𝐫𝐠𝐢𝐧. 𝐄𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲 𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐦 𝐰𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐬 𝐭𝐨𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐫𝐨𝐰’𝐬 𝐦𝐨𝐚𝐭. ••• Sleep wrote that the correct way to measure a business like this is not through reported earnings but through the 𝐝𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 — where will the business be in 10 or 15 years if the investments compound as designed? His question about Costco was simple: if the margin is low because the business is passing savings to customers, and those savings deepen loyalty, and that loyalty drives volume, and that volume funds more savings — then isn’t the low margin evidence of strength, not weakness? Applied to $MELI: if the margin is low because the business is investing in free shipping, credit cards, fulfillment, and 1P — and those investments are doubling items sold growth, accelerating buyer acquisition to five-year highs, and pushing NPS to record levels — then the margin compression is not a problem to solve. It is the strategy working exactly as designed. The market is applying Nick Sleep’s Heuristic One — “the company has low margins” — to a business that is deliberately choosing low margins as the mechanism for widening an already strong competitive position. Management said it plainly: “𝘍𝘰𝘳 𝘔𝘦𝘳𝘤𝘢𝘥𝘰 𝘓𝘪𝘣𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘓𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘯 𝘈𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘢, 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘣𝘦𝘴𝘵 𝘪𝘴 𝘺𝘦𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦.”
English
4
1
43
2.8K
Dimitry Nakhla | Babylon Capital®
1/2 On MercadoLibre $MELI 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐪𝐮𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐥𝐲 𝐄𝐏𝐒 𝐣𝐮𝐧𝐤𝐢𝐞𝐬 𝐬𝐞𝐞 𝐚 𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐬. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐥𝐨𝐧𝐠-𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐦 𝐢𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐫 𝐬𝐞𝐞𝐬 𝐚 𝐰𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐦𝐨𝐚𝐭. $MELI stock dropped after Q1 2026 earnings. Income from operations fell -20% YoY. Operating margin compressed 600 basis points to 6.91%. EPS missed expectations. From the shareholder letter — in management’s own words: “𝙒𝙚 𝙘𝙝𝙤𝙨𝙚 𝙩𝙤 𝙥𝙧𝙞𝙤𝙧𝙞𝙩𝙞𝙯𝙚 𝙡𝙤𝙣𝙜-𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙢 𝙜𝙧𝙤𝙬𝙩𝙝 𝙞𝙣𝙫𝙚𝙨𝙩𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙨 𝙤𝙫𝙚𝙧 𝙨𝙝𝙤𝙧𝙩-𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙢 𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙛𝙞𝙩𝙖𝙗𝙞𝙡𝙞𝙩𝙮.” “𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙣 𝙮𝙤𝙪𝙧 𝙗𝙪𝙨𝙞𝙣𝙚𝙨𝙨 𝙞𝙨 𝙗𝙚𝙝𝙖𝙫𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙡𝙞𝙠𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙨, 𝙬𝙚 𝙗𝙚𝙡𝙞𝙚𝙫𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙞𝙜𝙝𝙩 𝙧𝙚𝙨𝙥𝙤𝙣𝙨𝙚 𝙞𝙨 𝙣𝙤𝙩 𝙩𝙤 𝙝𝙖𝙧𝙫𝙚𝙨𝙩 — 𝙞𝙩 𝙞𝙨 𝙩𝙤 𝙞𝙣𝙫𝙚𝙨𝙩.” AND “𝙒𝙚 𝙝𝙖𝙫𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙖𝙗𝙞𝙡𝙞𝙩𝙮 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙞𝙖𝙡 𝙢𝙖𝙧𝙜𝙞𝙣𝙨 𝙪𝙥 𝙤𝙧 𝙙𝙤𝙬𝙣 𝙖𝙨 𝙘𝙞𝙧𝙘𝙪𝙢𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙣𝙘𝙚𝙨 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙤𝙥𝙥𝙤𝙧𝙩𝙪𝙣𝙞𝙩𝙞𝙚𝙨 𝙚𝙫𝙤𝙡𝙫𝙚. 𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙖𝙢𝙚 𝙞𝙣𝙫𝙚𝙨𝙩𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙖𝙧𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙥𝙧𝙚𝙨𝙨𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙢𝙖𝙧𝙜𝙞𝙣𝙨 𝙩𝙤𝙙𝙖𝙮 𝙖𝙧𝙚 𝙗𝙪𝙞𝙡𝙙𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙥𝙡𝙖𝙩𝙛𝙤𝙧𝙢, 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙪𝙨𝙚𝙧 𝙗𝙖𝙨𝙚, 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙥𝙚𝙩𝙞𝙩𝙞𝙫𝙚 𝙢𝙤𝙖𝙩𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙬𝙚 𝙗𝙚𝙡𝙞𝙚𝙫𝙚 𝙬𝙞𝙡𝙡 𝙙𝙧𝙞𝙫𝙚 𝙢𝙖𝙧𝙜𝙞𝙣𝙨 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙘𝙖𝙨𝙝 𝙛𝙡𝙤𝙬 𝙨𝙞𝙜𝙣𝙞𝙛𝙞𝙘𝙖𝙣𝙩𝙡𝙮 𝙝𝙞𝙜𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙤𝙫𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙞𝙢𝙚.” Please read that again. Management is telling you explicitly: we could be more profitable today. We are CHOOSING not to be. This is not a business struggling with profitability. This is a business managing its profitability — deliberately suppressing margins to widen the moat while the opportunity window is open. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐮𝐥𝐭𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐜𝐡𝐨𝐢𝐜𝐞 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐯𝐢𝐬𝐢𝐛𝐥𝐞 in the same quarter the market punished: → Revenue grew 49% — the fastest pace in nearly four years → Items sold growth in Brazil doubled from 26% to 56% in nine months → Unique buyer growth in Brazil hit 32% — the fastest in five years → Advertising revenue grew 73% YoY → Credit card portfolio grew 104% YoY → Unit shipping costs in Brazil fell 17% — accelerating from 11% last quarter → Conversion, frequency, retention and NPS in Brazil are all at record highs Quite the result, no? 𝐍𝐢𝐜𝐤 𝐒𝐥𝐞𝐞𝐩 wrote about this exact dynamic twenty years ago when analyzing $COST for his Nomad Partnership. Costco’s net margin was 1.7% — a fraction of Walmart’s 3.6%. Wall Street applied three heuristics: “the company has low margins,” “it’s expensive,” and “Costco has a cost problem.” Sleep saw the opposite. He saw a 𝐛𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐝𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐛𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐥𝐲 𝐝𝐞𝐟𝐞𝐫𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐟𝐢𝐭𝐬 𝐭𝐨 𝐞𝐱𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐥𝐢𝐟𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐬𝐞 — passing scale economics back to customers in the form of lower prices, which deepened loyalty, which drove volume, which funded more price reductions. He called it the robustness ratio: the share of economic benefits going to customers and employees versus shareholders. Costco’s was 5:1. Five dollars reinvested in the competitive position for every one dollar flowing to shareholders. Sleep’s conclusion was simple: the low margin was the moat. The under-earning was the opportunity. And the investors who couldn’t see past the income statement were systematically mispricing one of the greatest compounders of the last 25 years. He wrote that what Wall Street wanted — for Costco to tilt the ratio toward shareholders to satisfy the “quarterly EPS junkies” — would actually weaken the business, not strengthen it. Bezos understood the same thing at Amazon. For over a decade $AMZN reported near-zero net income while reinvesting every dollar into logistics, Prime, and AWS. Wall Street asked the same question every quarter: when will this company become profitable? The answer was always the same: when we CHOOSE to be. The margin was there. The decision was to deploy it into infrastructure that would make the business impossible to compete with.
English
18
19
198
32.1K
John Kirton
John Kirton@PapiJohn55·
@evfcfaddict @Invesquotes just reposted his observations from last year. I sold a couple of years ago at a decent profit. I came to the conclusion that the CEO wasn't very good. I was very surprised to see @FundsmithLLP reinvesting. Recent news confirms what he said about idiots and companies
English
0
0
5
712
Andy
Andy@evfcfaddict·
It’s interesting that nearly no one talked about the management team while the stock was expensive and now everyone seems to know how horrible they are. No position, just an observation. $ZTS
English
7
2
91
15.3K