Parents United

2.4K posts

Parents United banner
Parents United

Parents United

@ParentsUniteOak

Parents United for Public Schools is an independent, parent-led voice for strong and accountable public schools for all Oakland students.

Oakland, CA Katılım Mayıs 2016
269 Takip Edilen804 Takipçiler
Parents United
Parents United@ParentsUniteOak·
The @OUSDNews CBO says OUSD is solvent with strong cash flow. OUSD just passed a balanced budget. Clearly OUSD is not bankrupt, so why does Dir Hutchinson keep insisting it is? It's irresponsible and untrue and repeating the lie will hurt our kids. ousdparentsunited.com/2025/06/28/new…
English
0
0
0
97
Parents United
Parents United@ParentsUniteOak·
For those who don't know Oakland, the school is in an affluent neighborhood which, like many affluent neighborhoods, had restrictive covenants in deeds which prohibited the sale of property to non-white people through restricted covenants.
Parents United tweet media
English
0
0
1
40
Parents United
Parents United@ParentsUniteOak·
OUSD should not make cuts to schools, nor rush into school mergers, b4 addressing the structural problems with our central spending & the way we budget. The board special meeting is tonight at 6 in person at Met West or on zoom. ousd.zoom.us/j/82677750309 fb.watch/wdQNdAdatC/
English
0
0
0
59
Parents United
Parents United@ParentsUniteOak·
While our union represented employee wage increases have matched that of the Bay area as a whole, confidential employee salaries have risen far faster over time, leading to a wider gap between our highest central admin and other employees.
Parents United tweet media
English
1
0
0
75
Parents United
Parents United@ParentsUniteOak·
The @OUSDNews Board is having a special meeting tonight to discuss up to $175 million in "budget balancing solutions" as part of the plan to close a claimed $95m budget shortfall for next year. We reviewed the 30 options, 85% of which impact school sites. ousd.legistar.com/gateway.aspx?M…
Parents United tweet media
English
1
0
1
95
Parents United
Parents United@ParentsUniteOak·
@joshleecline @OUSDNews Not at all misleading, in fact the OUSD narrative is the one that is misleading bc it fails to include this data. To point to OUSD enrollment decline without also including the fact that OUSD has also closed 26 programs is misleading. Not to include charters is misleading.
English
1
0
0
37
josh cline
josh cline@joshleecline·
@ParentsUniteOak @OUSDNews This post is a bit misleading. OUSD’s recent enrollment decline has little to do with charters. In fact, over the last several years, Oakland charter enrollment is declining faster that OUSD’s.
josh cline tweet media
English
2
0
0
51
Parents United
Parents United@ParentsUniteOak·
The @OUSDNews narrative of sustained declining enrollment must be viewed in the context of the intentional privatization of OUSD. Over the last 20 years, we have lost 10,776 students and have 26 fewer programs while OUSD encouraged charter schools to grow in a zero sum game.
Parents United tweet media
English
1
7
6
725
Parents United
Parents United@ParentsUniteOak·
In other words, it seems they disclosed their campaign spending for Dwayne Aikens in District 3 not to follow the law or to be transparent, but because they got caught violating campaign finance laws. Hold them accountable.
Parents United tweet media
English
0
0
0
63
Parents United
Parents United@ParentsUniteOak·
So why did the PAC file suddenly & belatedly file their 496, 460 AND a new 410 to change the name to "Champions for Quality Education" as on the walk piece beginning 10/30? Our guess is bc they were informed that an ethics complaint was filed 10/25 for campaign finance violations
Parents United tweet media
English
1
0
0
63
Parents United
Parents United@ParentsUniteOak·
The Champions PAC also failed to disclose a $50,000 contribution from another PAC within 24 hours as required.
Parents United tweet media
English
1
0
0
55
Parents United
Parents United@ParentsUniteOak·
Any PAC that spends money supporting a candidate within 90 days of an election must, w/in 24 hours, file a form 496 in the jurisdiction in which the candidate is running. According to a Champions PAC filing 10/31/24, Champions has expenditures on 9/28, but didn't file until 10/30
Parents United tweet media
English
1
0
0
38
Parents United
Parents United@ParentsUniteOak·
Kimi Kean reached out to us on 10/1 about our post re a $1,200 direct contrib by c4 FIA for Justice, which is itself a violation of campaign contrib limits. Ms Kean did not want the public to think FIA was running an IE, but running it herself is just blurring the lines.
Parents United tweet media
English
1
0
0
39
Parents United
Parents United@ParentsUniteOak·
The Champions for Education PAC paid for this ad - maybe they will claim that the inclusion of the endorsement was a mistake, that they meant to include the c4 logo instead. The problem with that explanation: The PAC, the c3 @FIAOakland & c4 were all led by the same person.
Parents United tweet media
English
1
0
0
40