@ParksideHowHow1@007@AmazonMGMStudio Look, as a parting gift, let me introduce you to a Bond series that may be more accommodating to your understanding of the lore...
youtu.be/AoWexi-DWFQ?si…
Stay mad my friend. Stay mad lol
So unless you have some actual evidence to back up your claim, toodles!
Statement from Amazon MGM Studios:
“The search for the next James Bond is underway. While we don’t plan to comment on specific details during the casting process, we’re excited to share more news with 007 fans as soon as the time is right.”
@ParksideHowHow1@007@AmazonMGMStudio Keep going.
Every post you make without providing any evidence is just demonstrating your inability to accept reality.
@LordDSofCanada@007@AmazonMGMStudio AI overviews depend on the prompts you give them. Use critical thinking. You're simply a nerd who raged out when he got hit with the missile.
Underlying characteristics and recurring characters doesn't mean that it's a continuous story.
@Cliffinkent@007@AmazonMGMStudio And I will admit, yes, it's far easier to say no than to make a good pick. It's a very picky thing. There are a lot of intangibles to a good Bond casting that are more than just good acting
Manly, but good looking and smooth, but not too effeminate. Comedic timing. Sly smiles
@Cliffinkent@007@AmazonMGMStudio I think Elba would have been an incredible Bond... And could have broken through a lot of the "Bond isn't black" crowd, but unfortunately the timing just came off poorly. I wish he were at least 10 years younger and could put in a good 4-5 movies
@LordDSofCanada@007@AmazonMGMStudio Resorting to AI overviews and historical quotes are for retarded punk ass bitches who lack intelligence to come up with their own retorts
- Sun Tzu
@LordDSofCanada@007@AmazonMGMStudio We get it. You're a nerd. Don't watch it. Bond is not a dead character. They're not continuous.
By any chance did you notice that from the '60s films to the '10s he didn't age 60 years?
@ParksideHowHow1@007@AmazonMGMStudio It's not nearly as bad as ignoring the facts in the film's proving the continuity of the character.
Like you've decided to do...
@Cliffinkent@007@AmazonMGMStudio Craig retired because of the physical toll it took on his body and he was 53 when No Time To Die was released. It just doesn't make any sense to use an actor who will be 54 by the time shooting starts for a film series that generally has 3+ portrayals
@ParksideHowHow1@007@AmazonMGMStudio I'd be down for an End of career, one last mission type bond. would contrast nicely with the start of career Bond we had
@LordDSofCanada@007@AmazonMGMStudio Not at all.
I know enough to know that there's 0 continuity to the films and most of them work as totally standalone films. Random ass references don't change that. An homage to the Goldfinger Aston Martin doesn't mean it's been 1 big consistent story.
I know enough to know you're wrong and can even site examples. Such as how his wife (Lazenby's) was referenced by Roger Moore. Or how Bronson's in Die Another Day reminisces over the jet pack with Q (who was a mainstay throughout until his death) from Thunderbolt (Connery). Or in Skyfall where we find out that Craig's Bond had the exact same origin as Conery's. You know, with the reveal of the parents and the gravestone that says Bond as his family name, and not a code name.
You new to the series?
@LordDSofCanada@007@AmazonMGMStudio So then you should be well aware of how it's not a steady series and especially between actors any continuity ends and what you wrote was just some dumb corny "well ackshually"
@RealEmirHan I'll die on this hill but Pierce Brosnan was the best and its not even close.
Rupert forgot his name.
Anthony didn't want to be there.
Sam was unsure of himself.
Henry was good but he would be poorly cast.