Brosef

@thethoroughbred Yes, if they’re not talking about what players get paid! Is it (bench talk) an AFL driven demand for the commentators to try & ‘make’ the teams provide the best quality ‘product’ (ie: best players) at all times, to please the broadcast rights-owners/advertisers?

F..k me. This ridiculous obsession with how long a player is on the bench is giving me the shites. Every game. #aflcatscrows

@radamson15 Crows also played 3 games in 13 days, and travelled to Geelong, playing the Cats who had a 12 day break and played at home.

Lost the game to a goal from a free kick that should’ve been overruled by the ARC and had no Dawson, Tex, Ah Chee, Laird, Keane, Curtin or Hinge. Expect the 7th apology from the VFL in the morning #AFLCatsCrows

@BradKlibansky Yes but consistently being given dodgy free kicks & the resultant one-sided crowd-cheers, all feeds collective Cats confidence, whilst simultaneously deflating the Crows, bullshit free kick by bullshit free kick. Uplifting vs Demoralising. Leading to broader stats wins. Maybe?

The umpiring was horrendous but Geelong deserved to win. They finished the game: +8 scoring shots +22 inside 50 +32 contested possession +33 marks The Cats should have won that game by 30+ points. #AFLCatsCrows

@Brocklesnitch Contender for THE greatest comedy sketch ever written, performed, directed 😘😎🤘

Well

@themongrelpunt Anyone got details of the Crypto deal, to name-brand the goal reviews? Surely the AFL are contracted to provide a certain amount of reviews per game, for Crypto’s money, whether review needed or not. The game’s integrity is apparently for sale.

Wow, that goal umpire may as well retire after calling for that review. #AFLCatsCrows

@NewLeafBrian Anyone got details of the Crypto deal, to name-brand the goal reviews? Surely the AFL are contracted to provide a certain amount of reviews per game, for Crypto’s money, whether review needed or not. The game’s integrity is apparently for sale.

I'm sitting 200km away and I can see that's touched. Fuck off home goal umpire. You've got one job and you're shit at it. #AFLCatsCrows

@Hakz7 Anyone got details of the Crypto deal, to name-brand the goal reviews? Surely the AFL are contracted to provide a certain amount of reviews per game, for Crypto’s money, whether review needed or not. The game’s integrity is apparently for sale.

Might be the worst score review I’ve ever seen #AFLCatsCrows

@SamuelPower68 Anyone got details of the Crypto deal, to name-brand the goal reviews? Surely the AFL are contracted to provide a certain amount of reviews per game, for Crypto’s money, whether review needed or not. The game’s integrity is apparently for sale.

How has the goal umpire reviewed that hahaha clear as anything #AFLCatsCrows

@Chrisdapha Anyone got details of the Crypto deal, to name-brand the goal reviews? Surely the AFL are contracted to provide a certain amount of reviews per game, for Crypto’s money, whether review needed or not. The game’s integrity is apparently for sale.

Goal umpires really need to back themselves Some of these reviews are just not needed #AFLCatsCrows

@FillBrown43 Yep. And… Anyone got details of the Crypto deal, to name-brand the goal reviews? Surely the AFL are contracted to provide a certain amount of reviews per game, whether they’re needed or not. The game’s integrity is apparently for sale.

This is the year the AFL lost the fans. Unwatchable umpiring. #AFLCatsCrows

@Jordan071437680 Anyone got details of the Crypto deal, to name-brand the goal reviews? Surely the AFL are contracted to provide a certain amount of reviews per game, whether they’re needed or not. The game’s integrity is apparently for sale.

Why are we score reviewing that lmao #AFLCatsCrows

@AflGlicko Yep. Also - Anyone got details of the Crypto deal, to name-brand the goal reviews? Surely the AFL are contracted to provide a certain amount of reviews per game, whether they’re needed or not. The game’s integrity is apparently for sale.

The AFL executive is out of touch with the general public.

Anyone got details of the Crypto deal, to name-brand the goal reviews? Surely the AFL are contracted to provide a certain amount of reviews per game, whether they’re needed or not. The game’s integrity is apparently for sale. #AFLCatsCrows

@themongrelpunt I reckon they HAVE to because Crypto went their moneys worth.

@WBulldogs2006 @westernbulldogs Tony Campbell & Alby Smedts

Name a random Footscray / @westernbulldogs’ past player who’s crossed your mind. The other day - don’t ask me why - Brodie Moles came to mind. #Admin 🤔 🤣

@EricMoses_m Bullshit x

Two nights ago, I was at a bar just nursing a drink when I saw this man in his 60s. Total presence full head of white hair, very poised. We happened to be drinking the same brand, so I moved over, exchanged some pleasantries, and just asked him straight up:

@AGissara Unless your allowed to punch him in the face it is

Oh FFS 🤦🏼‍♂️🤦🏼‍♂️🤦🏼‍♂️ That is not fine worthy

@FOXFOOTY How are goal reviews allowed to be sponsored? If a game has no goal reviews, has ‘Crypto’ paid their advertising money for nothing? Are lots of goal reviews called when not needed, to give ‘Crypto’ their monies worth? What ‘integrity of the competition’?

CLOCK BLUNDER CONFIRMED The AFL has revealed 29 seconds were lost from the Saints' thrilling win over GWS and "should have been added back". DETAILS >> bit.ly/4ssbDkn

@tommorris32 How are goal reviews allowed to be sponsored? If a game has no goal reviews, has ‘Crypto’ paid their advertising money for nothing? Are lots of goal reviews called when not needed, to give ‘Crypto’ their monies worth? What ‘integrity of the competition’?

The AFL has conceded that 29 seconds were lost at the end of the second quarter in the GWS v STK game. It was a technical error which the timekeepers didn’t pick up. If they had, a manual backup plan would have been implemented. The AFL is undertaking further testing of the technology ahead of Rd 3. @1116sen @AFLNation

@RileyBev @AFLcomau How are goal reviews allowed to be sponsored? If a game has no goal reviews, has ‘Crypto’ paid their advertising money for nothing? Are lots of goal reviews called when not needed, to give ‘Crypto’ their monies worth? What ‘integrity of the competition’?

The AFL has conceded that a crucial 29 seconds were lost from St Kilda's narrow win over GWS due to a timeclock error. In a statement, the League has said: "Upon a full review, it has been determined that 29 seconds should have been added back onto the timeclock." More @AFLcomau.