Patarames

Thanks to everyone who supported the Deep Dive Defense Youtube-Channel Now at 2⃣5⃣.0⃣0⃣0⃣ Subscribers! These milestones motivate me to produce more videos in the future In case you haven't subscribed yet, click below ⬇️ @DeepDiveDefense?sub_confirmation=1&" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">t.co/9FTxFXVGY6

@MisterloseZhang Only ambush systems under current high intensity conditions

@Pataramesh Is Iran only relying on small mobile systems for air defence now? What's your opinion on Iran's area defense systems like s300? Are they already destroyed, hidden away, or do you think they can still play a role in current conflict?

Which surface-to-air missile system did Iran use to target & damage the 🇺🇸 F-35 'Stealth' fighter? Candidates: - 3rd Khordad - Tabas - Raad ➡️ In the next tweets below, I provide my videos detailing each of these systems potentially responsible (Unlikely to be the last...)

@Doubab_electrik Qaem and Qased are basically capable for that mission but no evidence

@Pataramesh hello ddd, i wanted to ask you a serious question. does iran have anti satellite missiles, if yes , do they plane to use against GPS constellation or observation sat? and if shtf, could iran load a BM head with shrapnel and throw it into LO to destroy every satellite there?

@NadoDegen @NickJFuentes Thanks

@Pataramesh @NickJFuentes i forgot to mention keep up the great work and stay safe.

A war take by a key representative of the 🇺🇸 Gen-Z Heavier than 99% of the takes you get on your X feed... @NickJFuentes remains the geo-strategics GOAT of his generation

@NadoDegen @NickJFuentes Well, you should grant him the handicap of being on the side what is fighting with Iran and the sources he has access to But I understand your point

@Pataramesh @NickJFuentes I respectfully disagree.. He completely misjudged the 12 days war aswell and incorrectly said iran lunched fewer misiles towards the end cuz majority of lunchers were destroyed, while in reality interceptors were low and iran didnt need to make big salvos.

@NadoDegen @NickJFuentes Thanks but even that take was right given the information he had at that time. He always stressed the IF

@Pataramesh @NickJFuentes you probably had no internet early on and missed it but x.com/Haqiqatjou/sta… absolutely not goat lol

Bandar Abbas 🇮🇷 has to fight the harshest battle of this War Missile & Air-Defense units positioned there are the most exposed ones, due to its coastal position ➡️ Biggest threat should be 🇺🇸 B-1B performing supersonic pop-ups to reach highest possible altitude and then release larger amounts of penetrating bombs. Like JDAM-ER with BLU-109 This allows them to stay up to 100km away from Iran's air-defenses and still deliver heavy penetrators with many successive hits on the same spot A difficult scenario those units prepared for since decades. The scenario of total war.

@imetatronink Agree, that is certain

@Pataramesh This much is certain: a B-52 or B-1 would be a very fat target for S-300 or Bavar-373. And a B-2 would be an easier target than an F-35.

We don't know the portion of 🇺🇸 airpower-projection into Iran done by: - Stand-off cruise missiles e.g. JASSM - F-35 raids with low-cost JDAMs ➡️ Hence, news about F-35 being hit may become more regular as the cruise-missile stocks deplete. Since F-35 raids may just have begun

@TheIntelFrog @Doha1389960 Landed and "Pilot is in stabile condition" Main damage was at the rear Gives us some ideas about how sever it was

@Pataramesh @Doha1389960 Yet still landed… 🤔

@PascallPatrick "Pilot is in stabile condition" Think a little

This footage is highly questionable from a technical standpoint. Official reports indicate the F-35 landed safely with the pilot unharmed. A direct intercept of this nature—especially within visual range—would likely result in significant structural damage, making a controlled recovery extremely unlikely. The engagement shown appears to imitate a passive electro-optical air defense system. Such systems typically rely on line-of-sight tracking and command guidance, often with slower missile profiles and visible tracking continuity. In this clip, there is no clear evidence of sustained target tracking, mid-course guidance, or terminal correction—elements that are essential for a successful intercept. Additionally, the video is unusually short and omits critical phases of the engagement, particularly post-impact behavior. If an F-35 were actually engaged and hit, it would more plausibly involve a radar-guided or integrated air defense system rather than a purely optical platform. Overall, the inconsistencies in engagement profile, system behavior, and reported outcome strongly suggest this footage is either misattributed or not authentic.

The inevitable happend Such heavy damage on a F-35 unlikely to allow for controlled landing. Hence it was likely near the border regions that its Pilot was not captured... ➡️ Lockheed Martin, Stealth TM

And no: That single engine F-35 fighter has not suddenly become a twin engine F-22... Thats a burning plume due to the damage of the SAM

Watch the video below to understand how Iran targets fighters like the F-35 ⬇️ youtube.com/watch?v=RsQ4bg…

@canadian122333 @RT_com Yes

@RT_com @Pataramesh what is a Nasrallah missile? How is it different from Qadr missile?

IRGC: Israel’s Haifa and Ashdod refineries 'hit by PRECISION MISSILES' Using NEW 'Nasrallah' system — upgraded Qadr ballistic missile — for 1ST TIME VIDEO: Smoke POURS from Haifa oil refinery

@simpatico771 Factually correct 😃

US: "Haha, you had to use IR guidance to bring one down. Stealth remains undefeated."

@Final__battle Its damaged, see the second plume

@Pataramesh اینجا رو ببین. بنظر فرار کرده