Patrick Heizer

31.6K posts

Patrick Heizer banner
Patrick Heizer

Patrick Heizer

@PatrickHeizer

Biomedical engineer, permaculture farmer, Camus scholar, Maryland supremacy, husband, and father.

Frederick, MD Katılım Aralık 2009
1.2K Takip Edilen12.7K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Patrick Heizer
Patrick Heizer@PatrickHeizer·
Otto von Bismarck is one of the most impactful people to have shaped the modern world, yet few know anything about him. I genuinely believe he is one of the most important figures for our age. Why? Because of artificial intelligence. Link below:
Patrick Heizer tweet media
English
6
4
32
20K
Drake
Drake@silvopasturist·
@PatrickHeizer It grows so fast this time of year. I need 6 beeves behind my sheep right now.
English
1
0
4
86
Patrick Heizer
Patrick Heizer@PatrickHeizer·
Growing some major grass here. These three are doing their best to keep up with it. Think I'll definitely get four, maybe even five, in the next cohort.
Patrick Heizer tweet media
English
4
0
15
539
Patrick Heizer
Patrick Heizer@PatrickHeizer·
@awarenesss Will book a day sometime fall '27. Just needs to be before the grass stops growing (i.e. I'm not feeding another winter). No date yet, but stopped into the slaughterhouse just the other day and got the date that they'll open the scheduling books for when I'll need.
English
0
0
2
26
Ioan Mitrea
Ioan Mitrea@awarenesss·
@PatrickHeizer How long are you keeping them for ? Have you already scheduled a butcher date ?
English
1
0
0
50
daeveningglow
daeveningglow@InlandCaGuy·
The neighborhood I'm biking in. People want you to believe CA is negligent because it doesn't remove 800 vertical feet of brush above every house like this once a year. Idk how else you protect a house like this if a fire starts during a 70 mph wind event (which do happen here)
daeveningglow tweet media
English
8
4
91
4.8K
Patrick Heizer
Patrick Heizer@PatrickHeizer·
@MichaelSLinden I think there is an important difference between eagerness for tax cuts and supporting an actual tax increase!
English
0
0
0
16
Michael Linden
Michael Linden@MichaelSLinden·
@PatrickHeizer Their passing is evidence for the political power of rich people (and their defenders). The fact that the public rejected those bills suggests they are not so eager for tax cuts, especially those that skew overwhelmingly to the top.
English
1
0
0
43
Michael Linden
Michael Linden@MichaelSLinden·
While I agree people’s feelings about taxes are complicated, it’s crazy to say “we’re living through a tax revolt” when the current president’s two most significant laws were giant tax cuts that resulted in negative political benefit.
Patrick Heizer@PatrickHeizer

You are wearing historical blinders and not assessing the board as it is. We are living through a tax revolt, with nearly every cohort pushing back on **current taxes.** We aren't increasing the payroll tax and then getting additional trillions. That is delusional.

English
3
0
12
2.3K
Patrick Heizer
Patrick Heizer@PatrickHeizer·
@MVHarper Yes, several aren't technically Boomers. It's used loosely to communicate a broad point.
English
0
0
0
228
Mitch Harper
Mitch Harper@MVHarper·
@PatrickHeizer President Pro Tempore Chuck Grassley is not a Boomer. He is 13 years older than the first Boomer. His favorite appliance, Beth, is a Millennial. He sort of missed the whole Boomer generation.
English
2
0
7
338
Patrick Heizer
Patrick Heizer@PatrickHeizer·
McConnell and Graham are the canaries in the coal mine. The next ten years will be when the Boomer deaths really start accelerating. Trump, Biden, GWB, both Clintons, Grassley, Pelosi, Alito, Thomas, Romney, etc. will all be dead by 2036. Internationally, Xi, Putin, Modi, etc.
English
9
6
100
4.2K
Patrick Heizer
Patrick Heizer@PatrickHeizer·
You are wearing historical blinders and not assessing the board as it is. We are living through a tax revolt, with nearly every cohort pushing back on **current taxes.** We aren't increasing the payroll tax and then getting additional trillions. That is delusional.
Michael Linden@MichaelSLinden

This is totally wrong. Eliminating the cap would raise $2.5-$3 trillion over 10 years. That’s less than 1% of GDP. We are, today, 3% below pre-Bush tax cut levels.

English
0
0
8
3.2K
Patrick Heizer
Patrick Heizer@PatrickHeizer·
@MichaelSLinden You are wearing historical blinders and not assessing the board as it is. We are living through a tax revolt, with nearly every cohort pushing back on current taxes. We aren't increasing the payroll tax and then getting additional trillions. That is delusional.
English
4
0
6
280
Michael Linden
Michael Linden@MichaelSLinden·
This is totally wrong. Eliminating the cap would raise $2.5-$3 trillion over 10 years. That’s less than 1% of GDP. We are, today, 3% below pre-Bush tax cut levels.
Patrick Heizer@PatrickHeizer

No, for all intents and purposes, an additional 6.2%/12.4% tax on high earners would pretty much exhaust our ability to raise additional revenue. Every other policy objective that would require additional revenue would have to be placed on the back burner.

English
13
5
29
4.9K
Patrick Heizer
Patrick Heizer@PatrickHeizer·
No, for all intents and purposes, an additional 6.2%/12.4% tax on high earners would pretty much exhaust our ability to raise additional revenue. Every other policy objective that would require additional revenue would have to be placed on the back burner.
Michael Linden@MichaelSLinden

@PatrickHeizer If you’re worried about rich people not contributing appropriately, I agree! Better to actually tax rich people than cut Social Security. And raising the payroll max in no way exhausts our ability to raise revenue.

English
3
0
35
6.8K
Patrick Heizer
Patrick Heizer@PatrickHeizer·
@MichaelSLinden No, for all intents and purposes, an additional 6.2%/12.4% tax on high earners would pretty much exhaust our ability to raise additional revenue. Every other policy objective that would require additional revenue would have to go on the back burner.
English
0
0
8
188
Michael Linden
Michael Linden@MichaelSLinden·
@PatrickHeizer If you’re worried about rich people not contributing appropriately, I agree! Better to actually tax rich people than cut Social Security. And raising the payroll max in no way exhausts our ability to raise revenue.
English
2
1
5
2.9K
Patrick Heizer
Patrick Heizer@PatrickHeizer·
"Man tries to actualize all his potentialities; and his potentialities are inexhaustible." - Paul Tillich
Patrick Heizer tweet media
English
0
0
1
271
Patrick Heizer
Patrick Heizer@PatrickHeizer·
@Ed_of_O Aside from the specifics of that particular chart, do you disagree with the general trend that veteran disability is consuming an increasing amount of our financial resources?
English
4
0
3
162
daeveningglow
daeveningglow@InlandCaGuy·
@PatrickHeizer To be fair to my wife and her stopping my spendthrift ways, we still never have bought a new car in the 15 years since I agreed to stop driving total junk heaps.
English
1
1
1
14
Patrick Heizer
Patrick Heizer@PatrickHeizer·
@MakeUSAVAT The longer we refuse to cut benefits, the more future generations get stuck with the eventual bill.
English
0
0
0
17
privatize social security
@PatrickHeizer that's fair and I'm not inherently against raising the retirement age but it's a bit misleading to characterize it as generational warfare
English
1
0
0
46