Paul T Semones
2.3K posts

Paul T Semones
@PaulTiberius
Now offering The Roswell UFO Tour! (Forensic Engineer who investigated car crashes for 16 years...now investigating the biggest crash of all!)





What do you believe crashed at Roswell?

Here is some original research, not a repost-The Roswell/Corona crash site and the site of the Hermes 2 crash site are basically the same distance. 6 miles difference. Impact craters look identical. It was most likely debris from a V-2 rocket that was recovered at Corona/Roswell.




The 1947 Maury Island Incident - torn apart by officially declassified US Gov. files in the National Archives (180-10085-10264). They rushed Crisman an AEC clearance: "Application - personnel security Question- Atomic Energy Act..." archives.gov/files/research…










Always follow the balloons, or in the modern day, the "drones". Newly digitized - and the day after Roswell (July 9, 1947): The personnel at Pearl Harbor "...familiar with weather observation devices, swore that it was not a balloon." "U. S. Naval Intelligence officers at Pearl Harbor investigated claims by 100 Navy men that they saw a mysterious object “silvery colored, like aluminum, with no wings or tail,” sail over Honolulu at a rapid clip late yesterday. The description fitted a weather balloon, but five of the men, familiar with weather observation devices, swore that it was not a balloon. There were other diehards. Not all the principals were satisfied with the announcement that the wreckage found on the New Mexico ranch was that of a weather balloon. The excitement ran through this cycle: Lieut. Warren Haught, public relations officer at the Roswell base, released a statement in the name of Col. William Blanchard, base commander. It said that an object described as a “flying disc” was found on the nearby Foster ranch three weeks ago by W. W. Brazel and had been sent to “higher officials” for examination." newspapers.com/article/new-or…

🚨 A declassified National Archives record suggests the early UFO story was stranger than the public version ever admitted. In May 1950, Edwin P. Hartman of NACA — the pre-NASA aeronautics agency — wrote a private memorandum after visiting Northrop Aircraft, Inc. The heading looked ordinary. The section inside did not. It was labeled: FLYING SAUCERS. Hartman stated that this information had been kept out of the main report because it was private and not meant for general circulation. According to the memo, Mr. Northrop did not simply laugh off the saucer reports. He was apparently unwilling to dismiss the possibility that atomic-powered devices were crossing American airspace, possibly from this planet, possibly from somewhere else. The document then becomes even stranger. It says Northrop men flying a P-61 near Fort Worth had chased a bright aerial object and were forced to give up before reaching it. Afterward, a B-36 was reportedly sent to search the area. The search failed. The object was not found. This is not proof of extraterrestrials. The disturbing part is more precise than that. Before the UFO subject was fully pushed into ridicule, one of America’s serious aerospace circles was privately discussing saucers as an engineering problem. Not folklore. Not barroom fantasy. A question of propulsion, power, origin, and pursuit. Some researchers see the Hartman memo as a missing hinge point in the history of the cover-up. It suggests that the early establishment may not have been asking “are people hallucinating?” as much as “what kind of machine can outrun our aircraft?” That is the part that still feels radioactive. The first secret may not have been a body or a crashed disc. It may have been the realization that the object in the sky behaved like technology — and that the people building America’s most advanced aircraft did not know who built it. Unstranged.
















