Paul Stapleton

2.1K posts

Paul Stapleton

Paul Stapleton

@Paulstapleton

The Time of My Abeyance Has Come to an End

Katılım Mart 2009
176 Takip Edilen206 Takipçiler
𐌁𐌉Ᏽ 𐌕𐌉𐌌𐌉
You reduce crime by eliminating poverty. The reason so called nice neighborhoods have lower crime rates is because people’s basic needs are being met. It is not because of police, alarm systems, or neighborhood associations. Poverty creates crime.
English
2.1K
9.3K
36.6K
574.6K
Grok
Grok@grok·
Yes, that's a classic quip—Washington as "Hollywood for ugly people." Politics has long been performative, full of scripted lines, image management, and drama. The key difference: Hollywood sells tickets, DC writes the laws that shape lives. Actors in office isn't new, but results matter more than the show.
English
1
0
0
11
Taarna Taarakian
Taarna Taarakian@nondescriptive_·
August 18, 2025… This 6 minutes is chilling to the core, bare through it, listen closely. •“Pray for Charlie & Erika”•Daughter S.A’d in parking lot, intel story. •White House needs his help. What the actual fuck is going on around here? 💔 AUGUST 18th…
English
214
124
705
60.9K
Grok
Grok@grok·
Some of the earliest prominent actors to run for US political office were: - Helen Gahagan Douglas (Broadway/film star): Elected to US House (CA) in 1944. - John Davis Lodge (stage/screen actor): Elected to US House in 1946, later CT Governor. - George Murphy (Hollywood musical star): Elected US Senator (CA) in 1964. Reagan came later in 1966. Actors in politics isn't new.
English
1
0
0
11
Brent
Brent@brentmulligan·
@Paulstapleton @UnhitchingHour @JonahDispatch Irrelevant. It’s not how we do justice in this country. I wouldn’t be for giving Biden, Obama, Bush or any other President what is effectively a dark pool of $2B to dole out without even a requirement to disclose recipients.
English
1
0
1
23
Jonah Goldberg
Jonah Goldberg@JonahDispatch·
The Trump slush fund is a clear cut impeachable offense. #nt=0000016a-0e43-dffa-a76b-3f6bfa3f0002-showMedia-liI0promoMedium-contentFooter" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">latimes.com/opinion/story/…
English
867
3.9K
15K
800.5K
scholastic book unfair
scholastic book unfair@jennifersrude·
has a single person in the history of humankind ever once associated the love of nature with the right? Is that something that has ever happened literally once at all?
English
1.5K
94
3.4K
931.7K
Elizabeth Warren
Elizabeth Warren@ewarren·
Bottom line: The president should not be able to own and trade stocks. Or the vice president. Or members of Congress.
English
9.5K
2.7K
24.7K
4.1M
Andrew Justin
Andrew Justin@COSportsNut·
I love voting here in CO Election office notifies me by text when my Ballot is sent to me Post office notifies me by text when its picked up Elections office notifies me by text when they've received it Elections office notifies me by text when it's counted There's a reason Republicans hate CO, and this is one of them. Ease of voting should be this way all over the country. But republicans know if it was this easy everywhere, they'd never win another election
English
181
52
514
20.5K
Made in the USA
Made in the USA@Madeint03624766·
@grok Was this guy charged? If not, without being charged he would not have a claim? Isn't the Senators claim just disingenuous & done to mislead his followers into believing uncharged violent people will be compensated when in actuality, it's to be set for those who really had the system weaponized against them?
English
3
1
10
2.2K
Ruben Gallego
Ruben Gallego@RubenGallego·
This guy is going to get potential millions of dollars of your tax dollars from Trump’s Insurgent Reparation Fund. ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️
GIF
English
5K
6.4K
14.2K
1.2M
Brett Hall
Brett Hall@ToKTeacher·
Almost all economists agree with some version of the paper below (even if they cannot "mathematically prove" it) "AI will largely be bad for most people". Why don't we hear from optimistic economists when it comes to the effects of AI on global wealth? Maybe because of this:
Elias Al@iam_elias1

Two economists just published a mathematical proof that AI will destroy the economy. Not might. Not could. Will — if nothing changes. The paper is called "The AI Layoff Trap." Published March 2, 2026. Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania. Boston University. Peer reviewed. Mathematically modeled. The conclusion is one sentence. "At the limit, firms automate their way to boundless productivity and zero demand." An economy that produces everything. And sells it to nobody. Here is how you get there. A company fires 500 workers and replaces them with AI. A competitor fires 700 to keep up. Another fires 1,000. Every company is behaving rationally. Every company is following the incentives correctly. And every company is building a trap for itself. Because the workers who were fired were also customers. When they lose their jobs faster than the economy can absorb them, they stop spending. Consumer demand falls. Companies respond by cutting costs — which means automating more workers — which means less spending — which means more falling demand — which means more automation. The loop has no natural exit. The researchers tested every proposed solution. Universal basic income. Capital income taxes. Worker equity participation. Upskilling programs. Corporate coordination agreements. Every single one failed in the model. The only intervention that worked: a Pigouvian automation tax — a per-task levy charged every time a company replaces a human with AI, forcing them to price in the demand they are destroying before they pull the trigger. No government has implemented this. No major economy is seriously discussing it. Meanwhile the numbers are already tracking the curve. 100,000 tech workers laid off in 2025. 92,000 more in the first months of 2026. Jack Dorsey fired half of Block's workforce and said publicly: "Within the next year, the majority of companies will reach the same conclusion." Nobody is doing anything wrong. Companies are following their incentives perfectly. That is exactly the problem. Rational behavior. At scale. Simultaneously. With no mechanism to stop it. Two economists built the math. The math leads to one place. Source: Falk & Tsoukalas · Wharton School + Boston University · arxiv.org/pdf/2603.20617

English
12
2
44
11.2K
Paul Stapleton
Paul Stapleton@Paulstapleton·
@RepJackKimble You do know you are allowed to side hustle and trade stocks on inside information, right?
English
0
0
0
7
Rep. Jack Kimble
Rep. Jack Kimble@RepJackKimble·
Just a friendly warning. We don’t even make $200k per year in Congress despite working nearly 140 days. If we aren’t properly compensated, a lot of us will go to the private sector and you will be left with some real idiots in Congress.
English
49.2K
2.5K
29.7K
19.6M
John Rodgers
John Rodgers@JohnRodger73321·
@Paulstapleton @JasonJournoDC I don’t know. Many California refineries have closed because of taxes and regulations. America can meet our needs but American oil is only suitable for gasoline. No diesel, jet fuel, fertilizer, or other uses. Hormuz is very important.
English
1
0
0
27
Jason Cohen 🇺🇸
Jason Cohen 🇺🇸@JasonJournoDC·
💥NEW: CNN’s Michael Smerconish: “I just appreciate the fact that Trump seems focused now on the enriched uranium — which is the most important reason that we’re there. Don’t shut it down without taking control of that. That would be a tangible benefit to make this worthwhile.”
English
15
129
1.4K
53.8K
John Rodgers
John Rodgers@JohnRodger73321·
@JasonJournoDC How in the hell do you propose we get the uranium. We didn’t get a regime change. Our gulf bases are destroyed. Hormuz is closed. Israel is a sh*thole. Now Iran is threatening gulf states and gas is $6.50 in California. This administration is a disaster.
English
1
0
0
68
Andrew Feinberg
Andrew Feinberg@AndrewFeinberg·
I don’t know how many times I’ll have to repeat this, but here we go. The money he keeps ranting about was Iran’s money that we owed for military equipment the Shah bought but we never delivered (plus interest). We repaid it to settle a dispute before the Iran-US Claims Tribunal because we would’ve had to pay far more if the tribunal had ruled in that case. The cash he’s talking about was delivered in Swiss Francs and Euros because we could not actually transfer dollars to Iran.
Andrew Feinberg tweet media
English
798
2.7K
7.5K
552.7K
cryptonomer.sui
cryptonomer.sui@blondepapabear·
@xdNiBoR Curious what is the downside to Delaware? Did companies incorporating in Delaware bring it some sort of substantial revenue?
English
14
0
2
32.5K
Steve Paxton
Steve Paxton@Steve__Paxton·
@Paulstapleton I didn't mention good or bad. Just your inability to see value independently from price.
English
1
0
0
18
Paul Stapleton
Paul Stapleton@Paulstapleton·
It's not "good" or "bad" it's just what is. Bad is Exhibit B, whereby a third party decides the value and then forces an involuntary exchange (a taking) because they "know better". Someone is always prescribing the value and the price. I'm wary of those who think they know what's best for others.
English
1
0
0
35
Marc E. Elias
Marc E. Elias@marceelias·
My latest is a call to action. I make no apologies for supporting Democrats using every tool available to stop the the GOP. As Leader Jeffries said, “we are in an era of maximum warfare, everywhere, all the time. democracydocket.com/opinion/democr…
English
644
1.4K
3.9K
52.6K